Originally Posted by
markhr
In London, especially with untrained and inexperienced cyclists, practical training makes a huge difference. Even the video instruction has some positive impact but not nearly as much as practical training.
However, some experienced cyclists (most likely a minority chosen for their controversial views) are quite often filmed saying they will continue to break the rules of the road because they either think it makes them safer or need to get somewhere without being slowed.
Uh huh. And what are your references for this claim of "huge difference" and/or "positive impact" of bicycling training?
Huge difference in what metric?
BTW who is doing all the "filming" of experienced cyclists with controversial views? And for what purpose?