Old 03-27-08, 03:46 PM
  #22  
-=(8)=-
♋ ☮♂ ☭ ☯
 
-=(8)=-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 40205 'ViLLeBiLLie
Posts: 7,902

Bikes: Sngl Spd's, 70's- 80's vintage, D-tube Folder

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by EmptyCup
First of all, the narcissistic cycling community is showing its true colors again. Not satisfied that a law firm took this case for free, when no others would, they complain about the outcome, rather than being appreciative of what has been achieved. Moreover, I question why the law firm took the case in the first place, when the bulk of the South Florida cycling community acts like irrational children on the road and doesn't deserve what they have been given!
Are there specific areas you base this on, EmptyCup ?
My cycling is utilitarian and is limited to Tequesta into West Palm
and I havent seen anything that could remotely be called a 'community'
or irrational behavior from the 5 or 6 other commuters that I see, daily.
I see the usual Carbon - Lycriod Roadie set on A1A but they seem happy
to stay in the lanes or on the sidewalks. There are lots of crackheads
cycling in Riviera Beach but I dont think the stuff being discussed here
applies to them. I believe me and like minded people do deserve lanes
unless the police are going to protect us and that just isnt going to happen.
I dont think anyone needs to be harmed because a spoilt West Palm yup
needs to get to the Gardens in time for Happy Hour. Whatever the solution
might be, people in a society should not have to suffer because the lowest
element thinks they are an inconvenience.
__________________
-ADVOCACY-☜ Radical VC = Car people on bikes. Just say "NO"

Last edited by -=(8)=-; 03-27-08 at 03:52 PM.
-=(8)=- is offline