View Single Post
Old 10-04-04, 04:32 PM
  #22  
Seanholio
Senior Member
 
Seanholio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 566

Bikes: Vision R40 - recumbent, Gunnar Crosshairs

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by operator
Wrong, even though you give both of them 40 hours (I like that idea instead of fine by the way...).

The rich guy can afford to not work and do these hours. I doubt a guy living on paycheck to paycheck and working weekends to make ends meet will be hurting less than the rich guy.

Again, disporportionate.
Oh really? The government considers me to be one of the rich, even though I make just enough to get by in a high-cost-of-living area. I could ill-afford to spend 40 hours doing community service. Likewise, most others who are considered to be rich have little time to sweep up trash because they broke the law. The picture you paint above is of some ultra-rich guy who doesn't work for his money, and a poor laborer who must work every day to put food on the table. These are ridiculous extremes.

Time is a precious commodity of which no one has excess.
Seanholio is offline