Old 05-03-08, 07:35 AM
  #7  
ericthered
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Knoxville TN
Posts: 138

Bikes: Surley Crosscheck, 1988 Rockhopper Commuter

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rideorglide
I have shorter legs in relation to my torso. My change was for comfort and fit, with no real care about being possibly slower. I figured I would spin faster to compensate, if anything.

I experimented by shifting to 165mm cranks from 170/175 to try a different fit for my legs. The change revolved around comfort. It also allows me to lower the saddle a few millimeters (an insignificant amount for most, but a little more comfortable for me.).

I'm happy with the new bike and cranks and don't have any complaints, but I realize I may have sacrificed some speed/leverage. Knees haven't been complaining, but are they any better, I can't really say.

I think you have to be prepared to lose peed if you go shorter, and maybe have a compelling fit/comfort reason to make the shift.
Wouldn't you need to raise the saddle by 5mm/10mm to keep the same pedal to seat distance? I guess you could slide the seat back a little as well.
Eric
ericthered is offline