Old 08-27-08, 02:31 PM
  #23  
merlinextraligh
pan y agua
 
merlinextraligh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,302

Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike

Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1447 Post(s)
Liked 724 Times in 371 Posts
Originally Posted by Onegun
Lastly, if it is mostly aerodynamics, does anyone know exactly what percent of the bike/rider combination this wind-cheating technology actually represents?

The rider is far and away the largest component of aerodynamic drag. You can argue whether aerodynamic wheels, or helmets make the next biggest difference, but both are an order of magnitude below rider position in importance.

This link is a little dated, but gives some perspective http://www.sheldonbrown.com/rinard/a...rodynamics.htm

Aero wheels in that data were worth 18 seconds over a 40k TT compared to conventional 32 spoke wheels. Some modern very aero wheels, such as Zipp 808's might push that out to as much as a minute.

Whereas rider position can make as much as 5 minutes difference over just 10k.
http://www.analyticcycling.com/RiderAeroStudy.html

So we're talking pretty small time differences in time amongst difference wheels that are only relevent if your time trialing, and then only if your fast enough to be competitive.
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.

Last edited by merlinextraligh; 08-27-08 at 02:36 PM.
merlinextraligh is offline