Old 11-05-08, 07:59 AM
  #14  
dclaryjr
Gray Haired Commuter
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Corpus Christi, Tx
Posts: 333
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DScott
It's worth double fredelicious points for eventually spending as much, or more, than a good purpose-built light system would have cost in the first place!

I didn't reply to the original bait because it's the OPs opinion, and I quit caring about what other people think about what I wear or attach to my bike a long time ago. But your statement can be evaluated with some objectivity so I'm curious to see some examples of what you're talking about. I have $30 invested in a flashlight-based system that is rated at 215 lumens using two AA batteries (the actual output is probably less but still a valid number for comparison). What off the shelf lighting system can come close to that for $30? And if I would have spent $55 instead on a P7 based system, I'd have a light that rivals some HID stuff for a fraction of the cost.

I guess I should add the cost of a charger and batteries for my $30 system and bump that up $45-$50. But I already own a bunch of devices that run on AAs (two-way radios, remotes, etc) so I didn't have to spend on that separately. That's probably the case for a lot of other folks.

I have a Nashbar catalog in front of me. Here's a few examples of output in lumens vs. price (and these are on sale).

85 $119
120 $79
400 $349
85 $149
150 $199

So where are the systems that can touch a flashlight-based system on a cost basis?

Last edited by dclaryjr; 11-05-08 at 08:01 AM. Reason: typo
dclaryjr is offline