View Single Post
Old 11-25-08, 08:40 AM
  #15  
JRA
Senior Member
 
JRA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 945
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by resipsa
It's not unreasonable to expect cyclists to put their feet down at a stop. It's the law (most everywhere), and following the law is per se reasonable, i.e. there's a reason to stop: the law.

I agree with the OP, though: cyclists should indeed be allowed to treat stops as yields. Until that law passes, though, we're either going to have to stop or we can treat them as yields and put up with the potential legal, medical, and financial consequences. I know that I waiver between the two, depending largely on the amount of vehicular traffic.
In what state is it the law that bicyclists must put their foot down at a stop sign? That seems more like something a cop might say (make up) than an actual law.

It's not unreasonable to expect bicyclists to stop at a stop sign but it does seem a little unneccesary to require them to put a foot down.
JRA is offline