View Single Post
Old 03-17-09, 09:42 AM
  #14  
Road Fan
Senior Member
 
Road Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,874

Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8

Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1856 Post(s)
Liked 664 Times in 506 Posts
Two major issues. The first is cadence and beocming winded; the approach here is to improve conditioning and to reduce the gear ratios. Bigger cogs with smaller chainwheels, as has been noted.

Second one is front-rear weight distrubution. The classic frame design guides (at least Talbot, Oliver, and CONI) plus the modern Arnie Baker say there should be 40 to 45% of the bike+rider weight on the front wheel. Saddle fore/aft positioning affects this, as do chainstry length, and front-center. I've found it's a lot more comfortable for me to get this on my Woodrup with a 44 cm chainstay and 60 cm front-center, than on my Mondonico with 41 cm chainstays.

Obviously leaning forward accomplishes something similar, but it's a lot more tiring. My HR soars faster if I stand.

I can't say this will work for you, but it should get the bike more working for you. It argues in favor of a sport-tour geometry rather than a modern road race geometry.
Road Fan is offline