Old 04-15-09, 05:00 PM
  #19  
njkayaker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,273
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4257 Post(s)
Liked 1,358 Times in 942 Posts
Originally Posted by bgn6h
[Aurora versus LHT]
I've managed to have seen and touched both! The Aurora is nice and with a nice price. I think it would be a good choice. The frame on the LHT is cleaner (weld wise) but the Aurora is fine. People say good things here about the Aurora (and nothing bad).

Originally Posted by cyccommute
The Aurora has short chainstays and a short wheel base which put it near the bottom of the heap, in my opinion, for loaded touring.
Yes, the wheelbase is shorter by 25mm or so than a more standard loaded tourer. But many people have toured on similar bikes. It might depend on how much crap you plan to carry.
http://www.jamisbikes.com/usa/thebik...urora_geo.html

Last edited by njkayaker; 04-15-09 at 05:10 PM.
njkayaker is online now