Old 04-26-09, 07:59 PM
  #11  
cerewa
put our Heads Together
 
cerewa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: southeast pennsylvania
Posts: 3,155

Bikes: a mountain bike with a cargo box on the back and aero bars on the front. an old well-worn dahon folding bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I guess the human body is much more efficient than any battery/motor.
The issue is really that if you're using a motor to capture energy that comes from human leg-power, you are ADDING the energy-losses of the motor+battery to the energy losses that were already there. If you just don't use a motor, you don't lose any energy in the motor.

Apparently humans can convert food energy into motion energy at about 20% efficiency.

If you consider losses along the system of fuel => powerplant => electric wires => charger => battery => motor controller => motor, the over-all efficiency is much lower than 20%.

If you then consider the fossil fuel energy that goes in to creating the average USA person's diet, the efficiency for the human is also far worse.
cerewa is offline