Originally Posted by
ChipSeal
I wish they would enforce the laws about sidewalk and wrong way cyclists, but they seem ignorant or apathetic to actually be citing safety violations. But they are zealous about traffic "flow" disruptions, even to the point of enforcing imaginary laws.
"To serve and protect" must mean to serve the motorists and to protect the streets from non-motorized travelers .
Hey wasn't you that in another thread just the other day stated, among other things:
Originally Posted by
ChipSeal
The law we have now is known. 
Apparently, not known well enough, eh?