Old 05-07-09, 09:04 AM
  #18  
umd
Banned
 
umd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 28,387

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by MDcatV
sure, the PM is the gold standard for this type of workout, but it can be done by just riding hard, harder, harder, etc. HR *should* respond similarly each effort, and based on one's knowledge of their own body, they *should* be able to conclude when they're going backward (although that's the trickiest part of doing a workout such as the pacing workout on PE or with LTHR as the guide). BUT, that doesnt mean that one couldnt benefit from it - maybe not so much the pacing benefit, but the time working at or near ftp/lthr.
Fair enough... I would agree that you would still get a good threshold workout you would just not get the pacing benefit from it.

Here is mine from a few days ago. Because the HR starts lower for each interval and drifts up as it goes, if you tried to hold a steady HR you would probably go to hard at the start and fade near the end.

umd is offline