View Single Post
Old 08-17-09, 02:49 PM
  #46  
LandKurt
Senior Member
 
LandKurt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Beltsville, Maryland
Posts: 81

Bikes: Jamis Commuter 3 and Novara Randonee

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Barrettscv
Check your math, the change in resistance is not linier. 20% is not correct, even if it was, it would be significant.

Michael
OK then, lets walk through the math. I'm sure it will be riveting.

0.080 / 0.055 = 1.4545 i.e. a 45% difference in density.

square root of 1.4545 = 1.2060

You got me, I should have rounded that to a 21% increase in terminal velocity given a non linear squared drag function. Why did you think I was talking linear? A 20% increase is the difference between 40 and 48 MPH, that sounds significant.

Do you have a different answer for the increase in terminal velocity based on the density changes you mentioned? You seem certain 20% is wrong. I'm not trying to be argumentative, nor am I in a huff at having my math skills questioned (well, maybe a little), just wondering.
LandKurt is offline