View Single Post
Old 09-27-09, 10:58 AM
  #15  
joejack951
Senior Member
 
joejack951's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 12,100

Bikes: 2016 Hong Fu FM-079-F, 1984 Trek 660, 2005 Iron Horse Warrior Expert, 2009 Pedal Force CX1, 2016 Islabikes Beinn 20 (son's)

Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1242 Post(s)
Liked 94 Times in 65 Posts
Originally Posted by ak08820
Exactly, and I was pointing out that the LBS bikes, too have integrated steel rings, just like (or worse than) the DS (Dept Store) bikes, instead of the expected better quality interchangeable rings.
"Better quality" depends on who you ask. Those stamped steel rings are cheaper to replace (yes, you replace the whole crankset but it can be had for less than the cost of a single aluminum ring) and last longer than aluminum rings. I've also found that they shift just fine considering the bikes they come on. The only thing left is weight. The average consumer wouldn't know the difference between steel and aluminum anyway so it's a non-issue to them. Your expectation for replaceable chainrings on the lowest end of bike store bikes is not realistic.
joejack951 is offline