Insurance
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Insurance
I started thinking. Unless your auto insurance covers you on a bike. For those like myself that either, don't drive, or no longer drive. What is the point of having insurance for, when on a bike. Because of the propensity of law enforcement to cite the cyclist. Regardless of who's fault it is, in an accident.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,696
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5774 Post(s)
Liked 2,572 Times
in
1,424 Posts
Insurance for what?
You already carry medical insurance which pays the doctors and hospital. Granted that the auto policy might have smaller co-pays, but the overall reality is that it's more about accounting, ie. who pays your medical or the auto insurer.
Then there's the liability side, in case you get sued for damage the other guy claims you caused. Insurance might be nice, but how much damage can a bicycle cause? And regardless of the police report, it's rare for a driver to sue a bicyclist over a collision.
Now we have the last part, which is about compensating you for your pain, suffering and/or long term damage. The protection your own auto policy might provide is fairly limited unless you pay for added protection. You can also buy a stand alone or wrap around disability policy.
But in a serious accident with serious consequences, the police report is only a tiny piece of the puzzle, It's not binding on anybody, and when the stakes are high litigators have a dcent track record getting compensation for their clients regardless of what a police report may say.
Lastly, as I say here all to often, it shouldn't be about fault finding or insurance. Focus on assurance, meaning avoiding the kinds of things you insure against entirely.
You already carry medical insurance which pays the doctors and hospital. Granted that the auto policy might have smaller co-pays, but the overall reality is that it's more about accounting, ie. who pays your medical or the auto insurer.
Then there's the liability side, in case you get sued for damage the other guy claims you caused. Insurance might be nice, but how much damage can a bicycle cause? And regardless of the police report, it's rare for a driver to sue a bicyclist over a collision.
Now we have the last part, which is about compensating you for your pain, suffering and/or long term damage. The protection your own auto policy might provide is fairly limited unless you pay for added protection. You can also buy a stand alone or wrap around disability policy.
But in a serious accident with serious consequences, the police report is only a tiny piece of the puzzle, It's not binding on anybody, and when the stakes are high litigators have a dcent track record getting compensation for their clients regardless of what a police report may say.
Lastly, as I say here all to often, it shouldn't be about fault finding or insurance. Focus on assurance, meaning avoiding the kinds of things you insure against entirely.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#3
staring at the mountains
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Castle Pines, CO
Posts: 4,560
Bikes: Obed GVR, Fairdale Goodship, Salsa Timberjack 29
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 394 Post(s)
Liked 197 Times
in
112 Posts
auto insurance covers autos. not bikes. I'd talk to your agent regarding uninsured motorist coverage and/or what your homeowner's policy covers...
#4
Me duelen las nalgas
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 13,513
Bikes: Centurion Ironman, Trek 5900, Univega Via Carisma, Globe Carmel
Mentioned: 199 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4559 Post(s)
Liked 2,802 Times
in
1,800 Posts
Insurance is intended to protect the insured against loss, primarily the property of the insured, or to protect the assets of the insured against loss due to liability -- the latter of which is generally determined by the courts.
What's the risk of loss when you're riding a bicycle? Determine that and you'll know which insurance to get.
The problem occurs when the government complicates and obfuscates the concept by making insurance mandatory. Arguably, mandatory insurance is no longer insurance. It's a bond, surety, hidden tax or something else, but it isn't insurance.
Texas acknowledges this verbal mendacity by technically referring to mandatory vehicle "insurance" as "proof of financial responsibility" and accepts a surety bond in lieu of "insurance". Arguably this is a good thing, as it establishes a precedent for creative and legal surety bonds in situations where genuine insurance isn't readily available.
So don't mistake mandatory minimum "insurance" for the type of real insurance intended to protect your assets -- your health, property, and valuables against liability. Mandatory minimum "insurance" is for serfs like me who have poor health, no assets and little or nothing to lose other than the prospect of imprisonment for failure to pay hidden taxes, surcharges, fees (as in fealty), pre-paid penalties and various forms of sanctioned bribes for engaging in activities that are lawful for free people but which the government would prefer we not do, as such activities do not directly benefit the feudal lords.
What's the risk of loss when you're riding a bicycle? Determine that and you'll know which insurance to get.
- If your primary risk is to your health -- usually loss of income due to injury/illness -- insure for that.
- If your risk includes loss of personal property in excess of easy replacement value -- such as a multi-thousand dollar bicycle -- insure for that.
- And if you have sufficient assets that #1 and #2 are significant concerns, you may also be at risk of liability and may need insurance to protect your assets against lawsuits from folks who hit you with their vehicle and then sue you for denting their fender and causing them pain and suffering in the form of feeling somewhat miffed, peevish and semi-guilty for having struck you.
The problem occurs when the government complicates and obfuscates the concept by making insurance mandatory. Arguably, mandatory insurance is no longer insurance. It's a bond, surety, hidden tax or something else, but it isn't insurance.
Texas acknowledges this verbal mendacity by technically referring to mandatory vehicle "insurance" as "proof of financial responsibility" and accepts a surety bond in lieu of "insurance". Arguably this is a good thing, as it establishes a precedent for creative and legal surety bonds in situations where genuine insurance isn't readily available.
So don't mistake mandatory minimum "insurance" for the type of real insurance intended to protect your assets -- your health, property, and valuables against liability. Mandatory minimum "insurance" is for serfs like me who have poor health, no assets and little or nothing to lose other than the prospect of imprisonment for failure to pay hidden taxes, surcharges, fees (as in fealty), pre-paid penalties and various forms of sanctioned bribes for engaging in activities that are lawful for free people but which the government would prefer we not do, as such activities do not directly benefit the feudal lords.
Last edited by canklecat; 01-28-16 at 11:36 PM.
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
All of that is correct from the usual perspective. But I am referring to the hostility of law enforcement towards bikers/cyclists' being on the road. Automatically(or almost automatically) finding fault with the biker/cyclist. Even if the motorist was really at fault. Resulting in an increase in the insurance rate for the personal policy.
#6
Yeah, you betcha!
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 171
Bikes: 2014 Cannondale EVO 5, 2006 Trek 1000, and early 70's Manufrance Hirondelle
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
6 Posts
Well, consider this, from a bike injury lawyer in southern California;
https://pvcycling.wordpress.com/2015...se-get-r-done/
https://pvcycling.wordpress.com/2015...-thyself-more/
https://pvcycling.wordpress.com/2015...se-get-r-done/
https://pvcycling.wordpress.com/2015...-thyself-more/
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,696
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5774 Post(s)
Liked 2,572 Times
in
1,424 Posts
All of that is correct from the usual perspective. But I am referring to the hostility of law enforcement towards bikers/cyclists' being on the road. Automatically(or almost automatically) finding fault with the biker/cyclist. Even if the motorist was really at fault. Resulting in an increase in the insurance rate for the personal policy.
First of all, the police report isn't binding on anybody as it's based on nothing but what was reported to the officer who wrote it. About the only useful info would be the names and addresses of the involved parties and hopefully any eyewitnesses. Rarely, it might include some verifiable factual data, such as skid marks, or an accurate(?) physical description of the damage and reported injuries. So, given that it's mostly hearsay, the courts tend to give it minimal weight.
As for the assumptions that bicycle events drive up the cost of non-auto policies, consider that the totality of bike accidents isn't enough in the scheme of things to affect anything.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 161
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
My auto policy covers my bike even in the case of me screwing up and solo crashing. The deductible is about 50% of replacement cost, but better than nothing.
#9
Yeah, you betcha!
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 171
Bikes: 2014 Cannondale EVO 5, 2006 Trek 1000, and early 70's Manufrance Hirondelle
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
6 Posts
#10
staring at the mountains
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Castle Pines, CO
Posts: 4,560
Bikes: Obed GVR, Fairdale Goodship, Salsa Timberjack 29
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 394 Post(s)
Liked 197 Times
in
112 Posts
Not exactly. Your bike is one thing. If your bike is damaged in an accident, you likely are "damaged" too. And your auto insurance can help. Really, do read this; https://pvcycling.wordpress.com/2015...se-get-r-done/. The guy might be a lawyer, but he's also an accomplished amateur racer, the blog post is short, easy to read and understand, and funny too (a bonus)!
Originally Posted by my insurance agent
Your health insurance would be your primary coverage for your injuries while riding. However, if you were struck by a vehicle, your automobile medical payment of xxx would be applicable, and also uninsured motorist(assuming the vehicle is under insured).
Property damage or bodily injury caused by you, is covered under your personal liability + umbrella policy. Damage to the bike would fall under contents coverage, homeowners.
Property damage or bodily injury caused by you, is covered under your personal liability + umbrella policy. Damage to the bike would fall under contents coverage, homeowners.
#11
Senior Member
For me, it works like this, if I get in an accident involving a motorist, with me riding a bike:
I get damaged. Health insurance covers, maybe auto insurance as well, both will subrogate payment and go after motorists insurance co. or motorist for reimbursement.
Bike gets damaged. Home/Apt content insurance covers, subrogates as above.
And if a claim is filed on your auto insurace? I'd rather they use their legal resources to fight such a claim than have to fight an insurance company on my own...
#12
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Well, consider this, from a bike injury lawyer in southern California;
https://pvcycling.wordpress.com/2015...se-get-r-done/
https://pvcycling.wordpress.com/2015...-thyself-more/
https://pvcycling.wordpress.com/2015...se-get-r-done/
https://pvcycling.wordpress.com/2015...-thyself-more/
You base your assumptions on unproven and inaccurate facts.
First of all, the police report isn't binding on anybody as it's based on nothing but what was reported to the officer who wrote it. About the only useful info would be the names and addresses of the involved parties and hopefully any eyewitnesses. Rarely, it might include some verifiable factual data, such as skid marks, or an accurate(?) physical description of the damage and reported injuries. So, given that it's mostly hearsay, the courts tend to give it minimal weight.
As for the assumptions that bicycle events drive up the cost of non-auto policies, consider that the totality of bike accidents isn't enough in the scheme of things to affect anything.
First of all, the police report isn't binding on anybody as it's based on nothing but what was reported to the officer who wrote it. About the only useful info would be the names and addresses of the involved parties and hopefully any eyewitnesses. Rarely, it might include some verifiable factual data, such as skid marks, or an accurate(?) physical description of the damage and reported injuries. So, given that it's mostly hearsay, the courts tend to give it minimal weight.
As for the assumptions that bicycle events drive up the cost of non-auto policies, consider that the totality of bike accidents isn't enough in the scheme of things to affect anything.
Here are a number of examples of what I am getting at:
https://isolatecyclist.bostonbiker.or...ming-cyclists/
San Francisco Police, Bicyclists Clash Over Fatal Collisions | News Fix | KQED News
Chicago jury finds for injured bicyclist ticketed by police | Bike Law
It isn't only in the U.S.
Traffic police given target to fine 10 cyclists a month | The Times
https://www.raisethehammer.org/article/1801/
Police repression of cyclists in Montreal | John S. Allen's Bicycle Blog
I don't get it: you "either don't drive or no longer drive," but you still have auto insurance?
For me, it works like this, if I get in an accident involving a motorist, with me riding a bike:
I get damaged. Health insurance covers, maybe auto insurance as well, both will subrogate payment and go after motorists insurance co. or motorist for reimbursement.
Bike gets damaged. Home/Apt content insurance covers, subrogates as above.
And if a claim is filed on your auto insurace? I'd rather they use their legal resources to fight such a claim than have to fight an insurance company on my own...
For me, it works like this, if I get in an accident involving a motorist, with me riding a bike:
I get damaged. Health insurance covers, maybe auto insurance as well, both will subrogate payment and go after motorists insurance co. or motorist for reimbursement.
Bike gets damaged. Home/Apt content insurance covers, subrogates as above.
And if a claim is filed on your auto insurace? I'd rather they use their legal resources to fight such a claim than have to fight an insurance company on my own...
But The rest of your answer was needed information on the insurance end, as to coverage. But it still doesn't address the law enforcement pre-determined response of finding the cyclist at fault. Instead of doing a complete investigation for any traffic violations.
Which affect a person's insurance rate.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Jose (Willow Glen) Ca
Posts: 9,842
Bikes: Kirk Custom JK Special, '84 Team Miyata,(dura ace old school) 80?? SR Semi-Pro 600 Arabesque
Mentioned: 106 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2337 Post(s)
Liked 2,821 Times
in
1,540 Posts
All of that is correct from the usual perspective. But I am referring to the hostility of law enforcement towards bikers/cyclists' being on the road. Automatically(or almost automatically) finding fault with the biker/cyclist. Even if the motorist was really at fault. Resulting in an increase in the insurance rate for the personal policy.
__________________
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can
(looking for Torpado Super light frame/fork or for Raleigh International frame fork 58cm)
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can
(looking for Torpado Super light frame/fork or for Raleigh International frame fork 58cm)
#14
Senior Member
Thread Starter
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,696
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5774 Post(s)
Liked 2,572 Times
in
1,424 Posts
...
At first, that is true, about the police report. But the way you describe it. A police report is never 'entered in evidence' in court and what a police officer has to say, is just hearsay. No wonder officers' need body cameras'. Not only to catch 'dirty' beat cops. But to also backup 'clean' beat cops..
At first, that is true, about the police report. But the way you describe it. A police report is never 'entered in evidence' in court and what a police officer has to say, is just hearsay. No wonder officers' need body cameras'. Not only to catch 'dirty' beat cops. But to also backup 'clean' beat cops..
Other than that, he can only relate what the various participants told him at then scene, and while that might be used to impeach someone, it's not material as direct testimony which can more properly be received in court directly from the people involved.
Body cameras wouldn't help or hurt since they, like the officer, were not likely to record the event in question.
So, I'm not saying cops are liars, only that they can't testify to things they don't know first hand.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Jose (Willow Glen) Ca
Posts: 9,842
Bikes: Kirk Custom JK Special, '84 Team Miyata,(dura ace old school) 80?? SR Semi-Pro 600 Arabesque
Mentioned: 106 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2337 Post(s)
Liked 2,821 Times
in
1,540 Posts
All of that is correct from the usual perspective. But I am referring to the hostility of law enforcement towards bikers/cyclists' being on the road. Automatically(or almost automatically) finding fault with the biker/cyclist. Even if the motorist was really at fault. Resulting in an increase in the insurance rate for the personal policy.
As to hostility by LEO... I think if varies and it also varies by what the general public is asking of the police. I know in San Francisco the police have been called to be stricter in enforcement due to public demand because of stop sign and red light running by cyclists (2 pedestrian fatalities by red light running cyclist in the last 3-5 years)
__________________
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can
(looking for Torpado Super light frame/fork or for Raleigh International frame fork 58cm)
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can
(looking for Torpado Super light frame/fork or for Raleigh International frame fork 58cm)
#17
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,971
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,534 Times
in
1,044 Posts
As in what kind of insurance "goes up" for a bicyclist, no matter what the bicyclist does on a bicycle? Sounds like someone is fretting about a non existent problem.
#18
Yeah, you betcha!
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 171
Bikes: 2014 Cannondale EVO 5, 2006 Trek 1000, and early 70's Manufrance Hirondelle
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
6 Posts
Absolutely agree about the treatment of law enforcement. I'm addressing the concerns of the OP about the point of insurance and what it can do for a cyclist.
#19
Yeah, you betcha!
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 171
Bikes: 2014 Cannondale EVO 5, 2006 Trek 1000, and early 70's Manufrance Hirondelle
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
6 Posts
That sux for two reasons, first, why have you been paying health insurance premiums if your provider covers it's payouts by taking your injury settlement? Second, be aware that most drivers carry minimal bodily injury coverage. You could receive a $10-15k settlement from the drivers insurance company and that is ALL! In the meantime you are incurring all kinds of costs and your health insurance company is taking the only settlement available for your injury.
Just check out your UM/UIM insurance. That's all. It's probably the cheapest thing on your auto insurance policy and it can pay enormous benefits if hit by a negligent driver.
#20
Senior Member
Thread Starter
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Kent Wa.
Posts: 5,332
Bikes: 2005 Gazelle Golfo, 1935 Raleigh Sport, 1970 Robin Hood sport, 1974 Schwinn Continental, 1984 Ross MTB/porteur, 2013 Flying Piegon path racer, 2014 Gazelle Toer Populair T8
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 396 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
7 Posts
Perhaps counseling would be more productive than insurance.
#23
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Clever, not.
I marginally found what I was looking for
How Police Car Accident Reports Affect Insurance Claims
[h=2]The Police Report and Your Injury Claim[/h]A few days after the accident, once a claim has been filed with the insurance company, a claims adjuster will begin collecting statements from you, their insured, the passengers, and any witnesses. Even though the police report may clearly show their insured was at fault, the adjuster still has to investigate the claim.
Police officers aren't infallible. A thorough investigation by a claims adjuster may uncover something the responding officer missed. But in most cases, the police accident report is the deciding document for determining fault. It's usually accepted by the adjuster as the most accurate assessment of the accident.
Police reports are very persuasive in personal injury claims. Unlike the adjuster, the police officer was actually at the scene of the accident. Their training enabled them to properly evaluate the accident and its causes, especially each driver's fault.
Claims adjusters can disagree with police officers, but they usually don't. If the adjuster disagrees with the officer's assessment, and the case ends up in court, there's a 90 percent chance the jury will rely on the officer's opinion. A police officer's testimony has automatic credibility with a jury.
This is from a major American city on the West Coast: Victims Share Tales of SFPD Anti-Bike Bias and Hostility at City Hall | Streetsblog San Francisco
This guy lives near me, and knows first-hand about police hostility: Driver assaults bicyclist, police ticket bicyclist: The video - Greater Greater Washington
I marginally found what I was looking for
How Police Car Accident Reports Affect Insurance Claims
[h=2]The Police Report and Your Injury Claim[/h]A few days after the accident, once a claim has been filed with the insurance company, a claims adjuster will begin collecting statements from you, their insured, the passengers, and any witnesses. Even though the police report may clearly show their insured was at fault, the adjuster still has to investigate the claim.
Police officers aren't infallible. A thorough investigation by a claims adjuster may uncover something the responding officer missed. But in most cases, the police accident report is the deciding document for determining fault. It's usually accepted by the adjuster as the most accurate assessment of the accident.
Police reports are very persuasive in personal injury claims. Unlike the adjuster, the police officer was actually at the scene of the accident. Their training enabled them to properly evaluate the accident and its causes, especially each driver's fault.
Claims adjusters can disagree with police officers, but they usually don't. If the adjuster disagrees with the officer's assessment, and the case ends up in court, there's a 90 percent chance the jury will rely on the officer's opinion. A police officer's testimony has automatic credibility with a jury.
This is from a major American city on the West Coast: Victims Share Tales of SFPD Anti-Bike Bias and Hostility at City Hall | Streetsblog San Francisco
This guy lives near me, and knows first-hand about police hostility: Driver assaults bicyclist, police ticket bicyclist: The video - Greater Greater Washington
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,232
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18409 Post(s)
Liked 15,527 Times
in
7,325 Posts
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Kent Wa.
Posts: 5,332
Bikes: 2005 Gazelle Golfo, 1935 Raleigh Sport, 1970 Robin Hood sport, 1974 Schwinn Continental, 1984 Ross MTB/porteur, 2013 Flying Piegon path racer, 2014 Gazelle Toer Populair T8
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 396 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
7 Posts