Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Advocacy & Safety
Reload this Page >

Hard takedown of rude 14-year-old for helmet & sidewalk riding violations

Notices
Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

Hard takedown of rude 14-year-old for helmet & sidewalk riding violations

Old 02-02-16, 08:52 AM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
mconlonx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 7,558
Mentioned: 47 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7148 Post(s)
Liked 134 Times in 92 Posts
Contempt of cop is a serious offense that can result in an immediate ass-kicking or getting yourself shot.
mconlonx is offline  
Old 02-02-16, 05:28 PM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
Digital_Cowboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Tampa/St. Pete, Florida
Posts: 9,352

Bikes: Specialized Hardrock Mountain (Stolen); Giant Seek 2 (Stolen); Diamondback Ascent mid 1980 - 1997

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 62 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by koolerb
OK,,, so a take-down in the middle of the street seems bad enough for riding on the sidewalk with no helmet. But why was the cop just sitting on the kid?
Agreed, and a good question, maybe to make sure that the kid in question didn’t try and run. Who knows, and sadly, somehow I don’t think that we’ll ever get the whole truth.

Originally Posted by asmac
And the injury would be blamed on not wearing a helmet. In fairness, if that’s possible, I expect the violence was because the kid was rude, insolent and disobedient and not because of the actual violations. Lucky he wasn’t shot.
Again, agreed and probably true. But does that really justify an officer of the law to sit on top of a minor?

Originally Posted by FBinNY
We need to keep in mind that the “takedown” wasn’t because of the violations, but because of what happened after the stop. An officer issuing a citation for an infraction is within his rights in insisting of your name and other identifying info. Refusal to provide that makes you liable to arrest.
Agreed, what do we know? Only what was shown in the civilian video(s). Do the RCMP wear bodycams? If so where is that footage and what does it show IF it exists?

Originally Posted by FBinNY
This isn’t to defend the cop, who clearly needs to learn about proportional response, and how to manage situations so they don’t get out of hand. Rather than engage the youth in a physical attack, he might have called for backup, or at least called a supervisor for advice.
Again agreed, aren’t they supposed to be train in how to deescalate a situation NOT to escalate it?

Originally Posted by FBinNY
Sometimes cops need to be more creative when minor nonsense looks like it might spin out of control. In his shoes, I might have told the offender that is was no problem, I didn’t need his name right now and he was free to go ----- without his bike, and he could reclaim his bike by coming to the station with his parents.
While I agree that that is one way of handling the situation, and judging by the on the scene outcries from those watching from the sidelines. That might have opened them up to even more backlash. I think that suggestion to call a supervisor is the beset one.

Originally Posted by FBinNY
Years ago park police had a problem with mtn bikers riding in restricted areas and damaging trails in a large park. Citations didn’t help, nor did frank conversations about erosion and the like and pleas to be cooperative and stick to the open trails. Eventually they came up with something that did work. The officers patrolled with enduro motorcycles and would stop offenders, and give them a choice of a big dollar fine or their front wheel, which was easy enough for them to carry back to the station, with a shoulder harness they had for the job.

It could be a long 2-5 mile hike, carrying your bike, to reclaim your wheel, which was cheerfully returned -- no citation -- and eventually the problem was solved.
Now that is a creative way of dealing with a serious problem. And I am sure that word also spread that if you ride in area outside of the designated riding area you’re going to loose your front wheel and have “nice” hike in front of you also got around rather quickly, which I am sure also helped with the situation.

Originally Posted by squirtdad
Not saying police are always right, but they are also not always wrong as it seems the sentiment is way too often here.

As usual we don’t have the whole story and are still making rash judgments

Without the context of what happened before there is no way any rational judgment can me made. Did the kid swing at the mountie or otherwise provoke escalation?

How edited is the video? again we don’t know, it could very well be edited to show a specific viewpoint.
That’s why it’d be nice to know if there’s any bodycam footage of what happened before the “concerned” citizens became involved in the situation.
Digital_Cowboy is offline  
Old 02-02-16, 05:40 PM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
Digital_Cowboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Tampa/St. Pete, Florida
Posts: 9,352

Bikes: Specialized Hardrock Mountain (Stolen); Giant Seek 2 (Stolen); Diamondback Ascent mid 1980 - 1997

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 62 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by mrodgers
This. Once again we have for the public a clip of part of the video that starts with the “perp” already on the ground with the cop attempting to restrain. We have no idea what led to the start of this clip that was cut out and shown. Sure gets all the uninformed in an uproar though.
Exactly, which is why bodycam footage would be nice to have, if it exists.

Originally Posted by FBinNY
It doesn’t matter. There has to be a sense of proportionality to the underlying offense. Like you, I can’t comment on the specific action because I don’t know what happened immediately before. But even the official version says it started with a simple traffic stop over riding on the sidewalk without a helmet. Moreover the officer had to know it was a juvenile, so it’s up to the police to explain how it got from A to B.

Just as we wouldn’t condone a high speed car chase through downtown over a purse snatching, we need to be very wary of a traffic citation that ends up in a street brawl. Doesn’t mean the kid is without blame, just that the officer has failed to manage a situation, which is part of his job description.
Exactly, such as a case that has happened down here in Fl and I don’t know if it has fully gone through the court system yet or not. There was a retired police captain/swat officer, and a few other specialties IF I’m remembering correctly. Who while at a movie theater and who himself had just been texting his son. Got upset with another movie patron who was also texting, BEFORE the start of the movie. Well the second texting patron ends up throwing popcorn into the face of the retired cops face. The retired cop resorts to shooting the popcorn thrower, killing him. Now yes, Fl is a “stand your ground” state, but come on having popcorn thrown at one does NOT rise to level of using deadly force. Especially with all of the various training that the retired cop had. He more than anyone should have been able to deescalate the situation NOT escalate it to a deadly force situation.

Originally Posted by dksix
I don’t know what happened before the video was started but from what I could tell in the video it looked like he was just restraining the kid, not excessive force in my opinion.
Without bodycam footage I don’t think that any of us ever will. Unless the RCMP is able to subpoena ALL of the cell phones and get the “raw” footage and are willing to share it.

Originally Posted by Chris0516
I don’t disagree about what caused the RCMP officer’s response. But to use an utterly strange analogy. In the movie ‘Christine’(Keith Gordon, Harry Dean Stanton, Alexandra Paul). The car gets’ revenge on anyone that has teased Keith Gordon’s character. It seemed like, the RCMP officer was thinking, ‘This kid is on bike. I can take him down. If he were in a car, I wouldn’t have to’.

Even though the teen was insolent and rude to the officer. The officer still went over the top. I have had to live with a brain injury all my life. But I wouldn’t wish one on my worst enemy.
Good movie, I’ve enjoyed it every time I’ve watched it.

Without bodycam footage IF it even exists we’ll never really know what precipitated the incident. And I think that most here agree that pretty much no matter what lead up to the “take down” it was out of proportion to the triggering event. And that it could have been handled in a much better manner.
Digital_Cowboy is offline  
Old 02-02-16, 05:42 PM
  #29  
Senior Member
 
Digital_Cowboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Tampa/St. Pete, Florida
Posts: 9,352

Bikes: Specialized Hardrock Mountain (Stolen); Giant Seek 2 (Stolen); Diamondback Ascent mid 1980 - 1997

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 62 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by FBinNY
We're not in a position to do anything except voice an opinion. Nothing I say will affect the officer's job reviews, a possible civil award, or anything at all. Plus the officer and/or the PD can always provide their version of events and maybe provide the needed context or clarity.

OTOH - if nobody comments or raises questions, then there's no need for the PD to respond and provide the clarity the public is entitled to. So far we have the video shouting the outcome, and we base opinions on that. If/when more information comes out then we can adjust our opinions accordingly.

In all of this is the unstated preface --- Based on the facts as presented so far, I think.......
+100

As I've said, hopefully bodycam footage does exist and will be made public at some later point in time.
Digital_Cowboy is offline  
Old 02-02-16, 05:50 PM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
Digital_Cowboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Tampa/St. Pete, Florida
Posts: 9,352

Bikes: Specialized Hardrock Mountain (Stolen); Giant Seek 2 (Stolen); Diamondback Ascent mid 1980 - 1997

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 62 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by gregf83
+1. There may be some other videos showing something else but all I saw was a calm officer sitting on a kid who allegedly wouldn’t give his name and instead was verbally abusive.

If you don’t want officers to sit on you, just give them your name when asked.
About the only complaint that I have is if the allegation of the officer somehow choking the minor is accurate that shouldn’t have been done. But yeah, for the most part most of what is shown in the video doesn’t really show the use of excessive force.

Originally Posted by kickstart
From what I’ve seen so far, any opinion of mine would be solely based on speculation, and my personal biases. I guess I rather look (and see whats really there) before I leap.

Personally, I’ve used more force to restrain a friend from getting into a bar fight, and the video looks like a mild event, but I’m seeing this from a ex-military and blue collar point of view.
I agree, that in the overall scheme of things that the events in the video (at least what has been made public) appears to be somewhat mild, and as I said about the only real problem is that the cop in question used some sort of choke hold on a minor.

Originally Posted by Moe Zhoost
This is a reasonable stance, but reason is never a significant factor in the court of social media fueled public opinion. Objectivity has given way to trendy outrage.
Was it ever?

Originally Posted by jon c.
Given way? Was there ever a time that public opinion was formed through thorough and well informed analysis? Objectively, I don’t think much has changed. We just hear more voices.
Agreed, opinions are like arseholes everyone has one.
Digital_Cowboy is offline  
Old 02-02-16, 06:48 PM
  #31  
Senior Member
 
wphamilton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280

Bikes: Nashbar Road

Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times in 228 Posts
Originally Posted by Digital_Cowboy
...

Agreed, opinions are like arseholes everyone has one.
Mine is that there is no justification for any violent take-down unless the citizen is resisting arrest or getting physical.

So all that I have to know about this incident is, was the kid under arrest? Did the kid get physical with the LEO?
wphamilton is offline  
Old 02-02-16, 08:30 PM
  #32  
Senior Member
 
kickstart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Kent Wa.
Posts: 5,332

Bikes: 2005 Gazelle Golfo, 1935 Raleigh Sport, 1970 Robin Hood sport, 1974 Schwinn Continental, 1984 Ross MTB/porteur, 2013 Flying Piegon path racer, 2014 Gazelle Toer Populair T8

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 396 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by Digital_Cowboy
as I said about the only real problem is that the cop in question used some sort of choke hold on a minor.
Its a good idea to keep in mind there are plenty of "minors" out there committing murder, ****, torture, assault, armed robbery, arson, and a host of other adult crimes. While obviously the infractions that instigated the incident were trivial, they don't define what type of person the "minor" in question is.
kickstart is offline  
Old 02-02-16, 08:55 PM
  #33  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 9,201
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1186 Post(s)
Liked 289 Times in 177 Posts
Originally Posted by wphamilton
Mine is that there is no justification for any violent take-down unless the citizen is resisting arrest or getting physical.

So all that I have to know about this incident is, was the kid under arrest? Did the kid get physical with the LEO?
I believe in Canada if the officer believes you've committed an offence and you refuse to provide ID the officer can arrest you. Not enough evidence on video to determine if the kid resisted but I think it's unlikely the officer just threw him down on the ground without giving him a chance to cooperate.
gregf83 is offline  
Old 02-02-16, 10:49 PM
  #34  
Junior Member
 
wrldtraveller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 118

Bikes: 1999 Raleigh 24 spd Mtn bike, 2019 Trek ALR Checkpoint touring bike, 2012 Scott Speedster S30

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times in 3 Posts
hmm. As I've noticed, a lot of the good folks commented are from USA. Its not very often that an incident would happen in Canada that warrant this type of response. The mounties take their jobs seriously, and they are out to protect the safety of everyone. I don't know the full story, but the kid did not do what the mountie asked, and that warranted a response from the mountie, which involved arresting him after attempting to subdue him. Possibly because the kid was belligerent or something. like I mentioned, I don't know the full story.

As to a cyclist travelling across Canada, Don't worry about the Mounties. They are a wonderful police service across the country. As for Toronto, They have all three branches (Municipal Police, Provincial police, and RCMP) However, the RCMP is more geared to Serious crime that involved Government, or espionage, or Terrorism. Inside the RCMP, there is another branch called CIS which is Canadian Intelligence Service which is responsible for Terrorism and Espionage.

I rarely have any problems with the Mounties and found them to be quite friendly and cordial.

W
wrldtraveller is offline  
Old 02-03-16, 08:22 AM
  #35  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
asmac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,261

Bikes: Salsa Vaya

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 172 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by wrldtraveller
As for Toronto, They have all three branches (Municipal Police, Provincial police, and RCMP) However, the RCMP is more geared to Serious crime that involved Government, or espionage, or Terrorism. Inside the RCMP, there is another branch called CIS which is Canadian Intelligence Service which is responsible for Terrorism and Espionage.
I rarely have any problems with the Mounties and found them to be quite friendly and cordial.
W
Most police everywhere are friendly. Except when they're not. American police seem to expect that everyone is armed and respond accordingly. We don't have such a big problem in that regard so there tends to be a more relaxed attitude.
You should really get up to date on things. The RCMP role in national security -- also unfortunately called the Security Service or SS -- ended in 1984 with the formation of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS). The OPP and RCMP have very little to do with policing in Toronto. In many other provinces and cities the RCMP is contracted as a local police force. Anyhow, I realize that none of this holds much interest for BF readers.
I agree that the boy was probably responsible for creating a situation which led to over-reaction but it does appear -- unless he physically attacked the officer -- that it was a considerable over-reaction and looks very bad. In fairness, the officer does seem to have kept his cool throughout.
asmac is offline  
Old 02-03-16, 09:13 AM
  #36  
Banned
 
dynodonn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: U.S. of A.
Posts: 7,466
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1268 Post(s)
Liked 78 Times in 67 Posts
In looking at some of our local mugshots, plus watching the video in the OP, IMO, this arrest does not qualify as a hard takedown in our area, since neither the officer or teen had to report to the hospital afterwards.
dynodonn is offline  
Old 02-03-16, 01:24 PM
  #37  
Senior Member
 
Digital_Cowboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Tampa/St. Pete, Florida
Posts: 9,352

Bikes: Specialized Hardrock Mountain (Stolen); Giant Seek 2 (Stolen); Diamondback Ascent mid 1980 - 1997

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 62 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by wphamilton
Mine is that there is no justification for any violent take-down unless the citizen is resisting arrest or getting physical.

So all that I have to know about this incident is, was the kid under arrest? Did the kid get physical with the LEO?
Yes, and no. If the suspect makes threats of violence and is visibly armed that would also be legitimate grounds for a "violent" take-down. But if the suspect is just verbally resisting arrest/being uncooperative then no that isn't grounds for a "violent" take-down.

Which is where bodycams on all LEOs would be a good idea. Yes, I know that it's been argued that even they don't show the "whole" story. But in today's world where just about everyone walking down the street has a cell phone on their person and most if not all cell phones have the ability to record video the bodycams in conjunction with cell phone footage would certainly show most if not all of what happened.

Originally Posted by kickstart
Its a good idea to keep in mind there are plenty of "minors" out there committing murder, ****, torture, assault, armed robbery, arson, and a host of other adult crimes. While obviously the infractions that instigated the incident were trivial, they don't define what type of person the "minor" in question is.
I'm not arguing against that. But in the linked to incident I think that it is clear that that was not the case.
Digital_Cowboy is offline  
Old 02-03-16, 01:33 PM
  #38  
Senior Member
 
Digital_Cowboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Tampa/St. Pete, Florida
Posts: 9,352

Bikes: Specialized Hardrock Mountain (Stolen); Giant Seek 2 (Stolen); Diamondback Ascent mid 1980 - 1997

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 62 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by gregf83
I believe in Canada if the officer believes you've committed an offence and you refuse to provide ID the officer can arrest you. Not enough evidence on video to determine if the kid resisted but I think it's unlikely the officer just threw him down on the ground without giving him a chance to cooperate.
For better or worse that is true. As has been pointed out we do not know the whole story nor have we seen all of the footage that was shot that day.

Originally Posted by asmac
Most police everywhere are friendly. Except when they're not. American police seem to expect that everyone is armed and respond accordingly. We don't have such a big problem in that regard so there tends to be a more relaxed attitude.
You should really get up to date on things. The RCMP role in national security -- also unfortunately called the Security Service or SS -- ended in 1984 with the formation of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS). The OPP and RCMP have very little to do with policing in Toronto. In many other provinces and cities the RCMP is contracted as a local police force. Anyhow, I realize that none of this holds much interest for BF readers.
I agree that the boy was probably responsible for creating a situation which led to over-reaction but it does appear -- unless he physically attacked the officer -- that it was a considerable over-reaction and looks very bad. In fairness, the officer does seem to have kept his cool throughout.
Agreed, generally speaking they are, and they are doing a very tough and largely thankless job.

Originally Posted by dynodonn
In looking at some of our local mugshots, plus watching the video in the OP, IMO, this arrest does not qualify as a hard takedown in our area, since neither the officer or teen had to report to the hospital afterwards.
I almost hate to ask what does?
Digital_Cowboy is offline  
Old 02-03-16, 02:53 PM
  #39  
Senior Member
 
kickstart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Kent Wa.
Posts: 5,332

Bikes: 2005 Gazelle Golfo, 1935 Raleigh Sport, 1970 Robin Hood sport, 1974 Schwinn Continental, 1984 Ross MTB/porteur, 2013 Flying Piegon path racer, 2014 Gazelle Toer Populair T8

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 396 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by Digital_Cowboy



I'm not arguing against that. But in the linked to incident I think that it is clear that that was not the case.
Is it clear? Did I miss something? All I've seen is that the person in question is male, and 14, nothing more.
kickstart is offline  
Old 02-03-16, 04:10 PM
  #40  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Bozeman
Posts: 4,094

Bikes: 199? Landshark Roadshark, 198? Mondonico Diamond, 1987 Panasonic DX-5000, 1987 Bianchi Limited, Univega... Chrome..., 1989 Schwinn Woodlands, Motobecane USA Record, Raleigh Tokul 2

Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1131 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
From the way the kid was acting, I wouldn't be surprised if he had done something to provoke the mountie. Pure speculation of course. As for "choking," well, the kid could talk so I'm going to say the mountie was not choking him.

I don't know why people have a problem with police. It's almost like kids rebelling against their parents. People don't like other people to have power over them. I've never personally had a problem with any police. I'm always polite and if I did something wrong (speeding) then I'll accept the consequences of my actions. Being a police officer must be a hard job. Could YOU imagine walking up to a lifted truck in Texas and asking for license and registration? How would you feel if you knew the person was A. probably pissed off, B. probably armed, C. may or may not have previous offenses. Would you have the balls to give someone like that a ticket?
corrado33 is offline  
Old 02-04-16, 10:44 AM
  #41  
Buddy
 
Ratzinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Toronto
Posts: 684

Bikes: 80s Gardin. Green fixed-gear. POS mountain bike.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by koolerb
I have a trip to Toronto planned for the family and I in two weeks. Good thing it's the middle of winter,,, no one will be tempted to ride any bikes.
Yesterday was over 15 degrees Celcius here! And there is no snow on the ground! And you don't have to wear a helmet! And apparently you can also ride illegally on the side walks without consequence!!
Ratzinger is offline  
Old 02-04-16, 12:04 PM
  #42  
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 26
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Wilfred Laurier
RCMP do not have a presence in TO, and it is the RCMP who are the worst thugs in Canadian law enforcement, historically. RCMP are only around federal sites (like House of Commons in Ottawa) and in provinces where there is no provincial police force, and Ontario has the OPP.
Sort of like the Mexican Federales, huh?
Old Crab is offline  
Old 02-04-16, 12:13 PM
  #43  
Señor Member
 
Wilfred Laurier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 5,066
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 649 Post(s)
Liked 292 Times in 215 Posts
Originally Posted by Ratzinger
And apparently you can also ride illegally on the side walks without consequence!!
When I lived in Toronto, whenever I saw a someone riding on the sidewalk I would do my best to block, or at least inconvenience, them. My favourite times were when walking my dog and I would detect someone riding up behind us on the sidewalk and I would let the leash out as far as it would go, and my dog seemed to know why and would walk on the opposite side of the sidewalk so getting past was impossible. If the person said anything or rang their bell I would ignore them except for slowing down significantly.
Wilfred Laurier is offline  
Old 02-04-16, 12:14 PM
  #44  
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 26
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
That link didn't work for me, but I found it on You Tube. There is also another link about cops screwing up in training. So check this one out. This one should make a lot of you feel better.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G55bnP5sDjI
Old Crab is offline  
Old 02-04-16, 01:54 PM
  #45  
For The Fun of It
 
Paul Barnard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Louisissippi Coast
Posts: 5,845

Bikes: Lynskey GR300, Lynskey Backroad, Litespeed T6, Lynskey MT29, Burley Duet

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2134 Post(s)
Liked 1,643 Times in 825 Posts
I saw an officer using low level force on a non-compliant subject.
Paul Barnard is offline  
Old 02-04-16, 02:39 PM
  #46  
Senior Member
 
CrankyOne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,403
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 358 Post(s)
Liked 48 Times in 35 Posts
Originally Posted by kickstart
How can one form an opinion without the context of what prompted the use of force?
This.
CrankyOne is offline  
Old 02-04-16, 03:04 PM
  #47  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 51
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by corrado33
From the way the kid was acting, I wouldn't be surprised if he had done something to provoke the mountie. Pure speculation of course. As for "choking," well, the kid could talk so I'm going to say the mountie was not choking him.

I don't know why people have a problem with police. It's almost like kids rebelling against their parents. People don't like other people to have power over them. I've never personally had a problem with any police. I'm always polite and if I did something wrong (speeding) then I'll accept the consequences of my actions. Being a police officer must be a hard job. Could YOU imagine walking up to a lifted truck in Texas and asking for license and registration? How would you feel if you knew the person was A. probably pissed off, B. probably armed, C. may or may not have previous offenses. Would you have the balls to give someone like that a ticket?
Good point.

Also, riding on the sidewalk is a "minor offense" until the cyclist runs over a pedestrian and seriously injures them. Riding a bike on the sidewalk is dangerous for all parties.
vanguardx3 is offline  
Old 02-04-16, 03:28 PM
  #48  
Senior Member
 
Digital_Cowboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Tampa/St. Pete, Florida
Posts: 9,352

Bikes: Specialized Hardrock Mountain (Stolen); Giant Seek 2 (Stolen); Diamondback Ascent mid 1980 - 1997

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 62 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by corrado33
From the way the kid was acting, I wouldn't be surprised if he had done something to provoke the mountie. Pure speculation of course. As for "choking," well, the kid could talk so I'm going to say the mountie was not choking him.

I don't know why people have a problem with police. It's almost like kids rebelling against their parents. People don't like other people to have power over them. I've never personally had a problem with any police. I'm always polite and if I did something wrong (speeding) then I'll accept the consequences of my actions. Being a police officer must be a hard job. Could YOU imagine walking up to a lifted truck in Texas and asking for license and registration? How would you feel if you knew the person was A. probably pissed off, B. probably armed, C. may or may not have previous offenses. Would you have the balls to give someone like that a ticket?
A) and B) the officer has no real control over as for C) isn't that why they're suppose to call in the license plate BEFORE they approach the suspect vehicle? And as for your last statement, uh, isn't that their job?!?!
Digital_Cowboy is offline  
Old 02-04-16, 03:57 PM
  #49  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,624

Bikes: iele Latina, Miele Suprema, Miele Uno LS, Miele Miele Beta, MMTB, Bianchi Model Unknown, Fiori Venezia, Fiori Napoli, VeloSport Adamas AX

Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1324 Post(s)
Liked 927 Times in 640 Posts
Originally Posted by vanguardx3
Good point.

Also, riding on the sidewalk is a "minor offense" until the cyclist runs over a pedestrian and seriously injures them. Riding a bike on the sidewalk is dangerous for all parties.
Far too many times I see bicyclists riding recklessly on sidewalks in the business section of towns. bicycle/pedestrian collisions can be very serious. There have been a number of pedestrians (on sidewalks) who have been struck and killed by bicyclist riding bicycles on the sidewalk.

Cheers
Miele Man is offline  
Old 02-04-16, 04:05 PM
  #50  
Senior Member
 
texaspandj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Heart Of Texas
Posts: 4,238

Bikes: '85, '86 , '87 , '88 , '89 Centurion Dave Scott Ironman.

Mentioned: 99 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1605 Post(s)
Liked 582 Times in 379 Posts
What a smart mouthed teenager? That's expected.
A police officer using excessive force? No surprise.
Not a black person? Whaaaaat?
Well the kid can't call it racism.
At least the officer is not discriminating. Good for him?
texaspandj is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.