Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Advocacy & Safety
Reload this Page >

Something I have been saying for years...

Search
Notices
Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

Something I have been saying for years...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-13-16, 08:02 AM
  #1  
genec
Thread Starter
 
genec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079

Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2

Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times in 3,158 Posts
Something I have been saying for years...

Motor vehicle crashes left 35,398 people dead. This figure represents a decline of 22 per cent from a decade ago and down steeply from a record high of more than 53,000 in 1980.

Ken Kolosh, statistics manager at the NSC, said, “Far fewer teenagers and young adults are dying on the roads than they were in 1981 … Distraction related crashes are very under-reported. It’s very difficult for police officers at the time of a crash investigation to get accurate information about the level of distraction at the time of the crash.”
Accidental deaths in the United States reach record high in 2014 | NH Voice

Flat out, this is why no one can specifically cite whether a collision is due to cell phone use or not, in spite of the fact that multiple studies cite cell phone use while driving as very distracting...

Be careful out there my friends.
genec is offline  
Old 06-13-16, 08:08 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
andr0id's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,522
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1422 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 5 Posts
Austin passed a no hand held devices while driving law.

So now, people hide their phones in their laps and drive down the road with their heads down. I'm not sure that's an improvement over holding them at the top of the steering wheel and at least having some peripheral vision.
andr0id is offline  
Old 06-13-16, 08:26 AM
  #3  
Banned
 
dynodonn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: U.S. of A.
Posts: 7,466
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1268 Post(s)
Liked 78 Times in 67 Posts
The vehicle death rate decrease over the years is mainly due to the increased safety features in US motor vehicles, as time goes on, the older vehicles are scrapped and replaced with the newer vehicles that have the added safety features.
Recently, one local motorist died instantly when their early 80's vehicle hit head on with another motorist's newer vehicle, and with the motorist of the newer vehicle basically walking away from the collision with minor injuries.
dynodonn is offline  
Old 06-13-16, 08:31 AM
  #4  
Me duelen las nalgas
 
canklecat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 13,513

Bikes: Centurion Ironman, Trek 5900, Univega Via Carisma, Globe Carmel

Mentioned: 199 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4560 Post(s)
Liked 2,802 Times in 1,800 Posts
Yeah, I've ridden with people who mount their smart phones on their dash, but still look at it constantly rather than the road. Even when they use voice navigation they still fiddle with their phones.

I don't get it. They're defeating the purpose of a smart phone. Heck, more than 10 years ago my cheapest Virgin Mobile cell phone had hands-free voice activation so I didn't need to touch the phone to make or accept calls. It was a big help when I had to drive up to 100 miles a day while looking after my grandmother during her hospitalization, tending to her distant rural home, and staying in touch with many family members. I usually avoided taking or making calls while driving around the city, but routinely did that stuff away from town on the long rural highway stretches.

I do see some cyclists and joggers on the MUP using Bluetooth devices for hands-free operation of their smart phones, which they mount on the bike or wear on their shoulders or waists. It seems safer, but they also seem distracted, so it's hard to say whether hands-free operation is safe for everyone.
canklecat is offline  
Old 06-13-16, 08:34 AM
  #5  
Me duelen las nalgas
 
canklecat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 13,513

Bikes: Centurion Ironman, Trek 5900, Univega Via Carisma, Globe Carmel

Mentioned: 199 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4560 Post(s)
Liked 2,802 Times in 1,800 Posts
Originally Posted by dynodonn
The vehicle death rate decrease over the years is mainly due to the increased safety features in US motor vehicles, as time goes on, the older vehicles are scrapped and replaced with the newer vehicles that have the added safety features.
Recently, one local motorist died instantly when their early 80's vehicle hit head on with another motorist's newer vehicle, and with the motorist of the newer vehicle basically walking away from the collision with minor injuries.
Yup, I'm betting the well designed crumple zones of my compact Sunfire saved my life, and my grandkids, when an SUV driver ran a light and t-boned us at 50 mph. I was astonished by how the little car crumpled like an accordion while protecting the passenger compartment. The engine was almost in my lap, but my knees were only bruised. Biggest injuries I experienced were several cracked vertebrae from the whiplash impact, including a permanently splintered C2. But it could have been far worse in an older model vehicle.
canklecat is offline  
Old 06-13-16, 09:02 AM
  #6  
20+mph Commuter
 
JoeyBike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Greenville. SC USA
Posts: 7,517

Bikes: Surly LHT, Surly Lowside, a folding bike, and a beater.

Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1434 Post(s)
Liked 331 Times in 219 Posts
Originally Posted by genec
Be careful out there my friends.
Duly noted and done. Now I spend a lot less time "out there" due to phone use behind the wheel.

Originally Posted by andr0id
Austin passed a no hand held devices while driving law.

So now, people hide their phones in their laps and drive down the road with their heads down. I'm not sure that's an improvement over holding them at the top of the steering wheel and at least having some peripheral vision.
Yep. As much as I hate cell phone use behind the wheel, I have always been AGAINST laws that try to stop it. Think of those phone users as heroin addicts. What does the law do for heroin users? It drives them into the shadows and helps prevent them from getting any help. Laws DO NOT prevent people from using heroin.

Cell phone abuse is an addiction plain and simple. You can find a thousand sources online to back this up. Lets keep the danged phones on top of the steering wheel so the driver has a freaking CHANCE of seeing me. If someone gets in an accident while on the phone - and there are ways to track this - they should get a DUI plain and simple.
JoeyBike is offline  
Old 06-14-16, 08:46 AM
  #7  
Banned
 
dynodonn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: U.S. of A.
Posts: 7,466
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1268 Post(s)
Liked 78 Times in 67 Posts
Originally Posted by canklecat
Yup, I'm betting the well designed crumple zones of my compact Sunfire saved my life, and my grandkids, when an SUV driver ran a light and t-boned us at 50 mph. I was astonished by how the little car crumpled like an accordion while protecting the passenger compartment. The engine was almost in my lap, but my knees were only bruised. Biggest injuries I experienced were several cracked vertebrae from the whiplash impact, including a permanently splintered C2. But it could have been far worse in an older model vehicle.

Though I've posted this video a couple of times already, it's still a great example of why the death rate in US motor vehicle collisions has decreased for motorists and their passengers, even with many more miles driven.


dynodonn is offline  
Old 06-14-16, 09:52 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
CliffordK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,547
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18376 Post(s)
Liked 4,511 Times in 3,353 Posts
There is some correlation between accident rates and fuel prices.

With rapidly dropping fuel prices, the accident rates go up.
CliffordK is offline  
Old 06-14-16, 10:39 AM
  #9  
Unlisted member
 
no motor?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 6,192

Bikes: Specialized Hardrock

Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1376 Post(s)
Liked 432 Times in 297 Posts
Originally Posted by dynodonn
Though I've posted this video a couple of times already, it's still a great example of why the death rate in US motor vehicle collisions has decreased for motorists and their passengers, even with many more miles driven.
I was just thinking of this video, thanks for posting it.
no motor? is offline  
Old 06-14-16, 11:38 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
italktocats's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 885
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 150 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by JoeyBike
You can find a thousand sources online to back this up. Lets keep the danged phones on top of the steering wheel so the driver has a freaking CHANCE of seeing me. If someone gets in an accident while on the phone - and there are ways to track this - they should get a DUI plain and simple.
you can find 'research' for and against anything nowawday
italktocats is offline  
Old 06-14-16, 11:40 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
italktocats's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 885
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 150 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dynodonn
Though I've posted this video a couple of times already, it's still a great example of why the death rate in US motor vehicle collisions has decreased for motorists and their passengers, even with many more miles driven.


chevvy just sucks

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6prtCtxk1ho

italktocats is offline  
Old 06-14-16, 01:36 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Posts: 7,048
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 509 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times in 8 Posts
Originally Posted by dynodonn
The vehicle death rate decrease over the years is mainly due to the increased safety features in US motor vehicles, as time goes on, the older vehicles are scrapped and replaced with the newer vehicles that have the added safety features.
Recently, one local motorist died instantly when their early 80's vehicle hit head on with another motorist's newer vehicle, and with the motorist of the newer vehicle basically walking away from the collision with minor injuries.

However, since 2015 saw a large increase in roadway deaths, to over 38,000, and 2016 is on its way to surpass 40,000 roadway deaths, we may have reached the end of the road for the ability of air bags, crumple zones, mandatory seat belts and such to reduce the CARnage. The past two years have seen increases in roadway deaths of 14% and then over 20% in my state.

I suspect we won't see another significant decrease in roadway deaths until and unless autonomous driving cars get on the road in substantial numbers. Even a couple per cent of these would calm traffic and save lives.
B. Carfree is offline  
Old 06-14-16, 02:15 PM
  #13  
genec
Thread Starter
 
genec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079

Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2

Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times in 3,158 Posts
Originally Posted by JoeyBike
Duly noted and done. Now I spend a lot less time "out there" due to phone use behind the wheel.



Yep. As much as I hate cell phone use behind the wheel, I have always been AGAINST laws that try to stop it. Think of those phone users as heroin addicts. What does the law do for heroin users? It drives them into the shadows and helps prevent them from getting any help. Laws DO NOT prevent people from using heroin.

Cell phone abuse is an addiction plain and simple. You can find a thousand sources online to back this up. Lets keep the danged phones on top of the steering wheel so the driver has a freaking CHANCE of seeing me. If someone gets in an accident while on the phone - and there are ways to track this - they should get a DUI plain and simple.
Nah, they won't look at you... they WILL however see you as you pass over the hood.

What we really have to do is make cell phone use while driving an incredibly painful experience... most likely in a monetary way... such that cities see a chance for huge revenue streams if they enforce the laws...

Or we have to make phones smart enough to know when someone is driving and have that individual phone become inactive... in such a way as to not impinge on the use of phones by others in the vehicle.
genec is offline  
Old 06-14-16, 02:24 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
ypsetihw's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 1,109

Bikes: s-1

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 221 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
smart phones all have GPS or at least cell tower tracking these days. why not create a feature that locks the phone when it senses that you are moving over say 15mph or something? it would be super easy, and it is obvious nobody cares about the law or safety, so I don't see drivers putting down their phones unless they are forced to do so.
ypsetihw is offline  
Old 06-14-16, 02:26 PM
  #15  
genec
Thread Starter
 
genec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079

Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2

Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times in 3,158 Posts
Originally Posted by ypsetihw
smart phones all have GPS or at least cell tower tracking these days. why not create a feature that locks the phone when it senses that you are moving over say 15mph or something? it would be super easy, and it is obvious nobody cares about the law or safety, so I don't see drivers putting down their phones unless they are forced to do so.
That would disable any phone in any moving location, such as a train or bus or even the passenger seat of a car... no, the "feature" has to be smarter than that.
genec is offline  
Old 06-15-16, 07:11 AM
  #16  
For The Fun of It
 
Paul Barnard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Louisissippi Coast
Posts: 5,852

Bikes: Lynskey GR300, Lynskey Backroad, Litespeed T6, Lynskey MT29, Burley Duet

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2135 Post(s)
Liked 1,647 Times in 829 Posts
Originally Posted by ypsetihw
smart phones all have GPS or at least cell tower tracking these days. why not create a feature that locks the phone when it senses that you are moving over say 15mph or something? it would be super easy, and it is obvious nobody cares about the law or safety, so I don't see drivers putting down their phones unless they are forced to do so.
This really needs to be done. At least disable the text and surfing functions after a certain speed. While talking hands free is a distractor it's much more manageable than texting and surfing. The argument that people on buses or trains or passengers can't use them is a weak argument relative to the gains implementing such regulation would achieve. If you simply must communicate while moving, call. If you must work while moving, get a laptop or notebook.
Paul Barnard is offline  
Old 06-15-16, 07:37 AM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Madison, AL
Posts: 693

Bikes: 2010 Felt DA, 2012/6 Felt F5, 2015 Felt AR FRD

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 27 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Paul Barnard
This really needs to be done. At least disable the text and surfing functions after a certain speed. While talking hands free is a distractor it's much more manageable than texting and surfing. The argument that people on buses or trains or passengers can't use them is a weak argument relative to the gains implementing such regulation would achieve. If you simply must communicate while moving, call. If you must work while moving, get a laptop or notebook.
There are probably more people that commute by public transport, per day, in NYC, than drive in the state of Alabama. How do you propose selling your idea to all those people?
KBentley57 is offline  
Old 06-15-16, 07:42 AM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
italktocats's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 885
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 150 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Paul Barnard
This really needs to be done. At least disable the text and surfing functions after a certain speed. While talking hands free is a distractor it's much more manageable than texting and surfing. The argument that people on buses or trains or passengers can't use them is a weak argument relative to the gains implementing such regulation would achieve. If you simply must communicate while moving, call. If you must work while moving, get a laptop or notebook.
well lets ban phones then, i mean, if freedom and personal choice are already out the window, why do you need to be mobile
italktocats is offline  
Old 06-15-16, 07:57 AM
  #19  
For The Fun of It
 
Paul Barnard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Louisissippi Coast
Posts: 5,852

Bikes: Lynskey GR300, Lynskey Backroad, Litespeed T6, Lynskey MT29, Burley Duet

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2135 Post(s)
Liked 1,647 Times in 829 Posts
Originally Posted by KBentley57
There are probably more people that commute by public transport, per day, in NYC, than drive in the state of Alabama. How do you propose selling your idea to all those people?
What is it that they need to do that they couldn't do if smart phones couldn't text or surf the net while moving?
Paul Barnard is offline  
Old 06-15-16, 07:59 AM
  #20  
For The Fun of It
 
Paul Barnard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Louisissippi Coast
Posts: 5,852

Bikes: Lynskey GR300, Lynskey Backroad, Litespeed T6, Lynskey MT29, Burley Duet

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2135 Post(s)
Liked 1,647 Times in 829 Posts
Originally Posted by italktocats
well lets ban phones then, i mean, if freedom and personal choice are already out the window, why do you need to be mobile
That seems a little extreme to me. I am all for freedom and personal choice until your freedom and personal choices creates a substantial danger to me.
Paul Barnard is offline  
Old 06-15-16, 08:02 AM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Madison, AL
Posts: 693

Bikes: 2010 Felt DA, 2012/6 Felt F5, 2015 Felt AR FRD

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 27 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
It's not for you or anyone else that decides what another person "needs" to do, I can appreciate the urge for more safety, but not at the expense of the invasion into personal choice.
KBentley57 is offline  
Old 06-15-16, 08:18 AM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,716

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5786 Post(s)
Liked 2,579 Times in 1,430 Posts
It's hard to tease many meaningful conclusions out of the data. Some like the increase in drug overdoses may be closely related to increases in drug use, but for most of the other data, there are too many factors at play.

As noted by others here, the decline in auto related deaths can be attributed to improvements in auto safety systems, changes in the fleet mix, decline in driving miles due to fuel costs, and in the other direction (maybe) to increases in distracted driving. In short there are too many variables. In short, there are too many variables, and not enough controls to be sure of anything.

Another factor may be demographics and an aging of the US population. That means fewer drivers in the peak auto accident ages, and more in the accidental fall age brackets.

So, we can debate the issue of cell phone use until the cows come home, but the numbers don't prove anything there either way.

However, that doesn't mean bicyclists can relax. Whether it's cell phones, kids in the car, a crying baby in the back seat, worrying about work or finances, lost and trying to figure out where they are, etc., there have always been and always will be distracted drivers, so we need to be aware of what's going on around us.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is offline  
Old 06-15-16, 08:53 AM
  #23  
20+mph Commuter
 
JoeyBike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Greenville. SC USA
Posts: 7,517

Bikes: Surly LHT, Surly Lowside, a folding bike, and a beater.

Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1434 Post(s)
Liked 331 Times in 219 Posts
Originally Posted by genec
Nah, they won't look at you... they WILL however see you as you pass over the hood.
I am running a 300+lumen Dinotte rear flashing light and a 500+ flashing front light BY DAY. They can see me from the space station. Trust me that motorists with their phones on top of the steering wheel WILL see me and ARE seeing me. I keep an eye on my mirror when cars are approaching and I can actually SEE the instant they "wake up" and pull left. It happens roughly 100ft back minimum.

It's hard to win an argument with someone who has actual EXPERIENCE.
JoeyBike is offline  
Old 06-15-16, 10:50 AM
  #24  
genec
Thread Starter
 
genec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079

Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2

Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times in 3,158 Posts
Originally Posted by JoeyBike
I am running a 300+lumen Dinotte rear flashing light and a 500+ flashing front light BY DAY. They can see me from the space station. Trust me that motorists with their phones on top of the steering wheel WILL see me and ARE seeing me. I keep an eye on my mirror when cars are approaching and I can actually SEE the instant they "wake up" and pull left. It happens roughly 100ft back minimum.

It's hard to win an argument with someone who has actual EXPERIENCE.
My experience is that people holding phones right to their ears (not hidden) can run right off the road... They can be blind to even the most obvious things
genec is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bakerjw
Advocacy & Safety
25
07-26-19 02:46 AM
rydabent
Advocacy & Safety
19
08-06-15 02:21 PM
Sydney Cyclist
Advocacy & Safety
12
08-21-14 05:30 PM
rydabent
Advocacy & Safety
77
10-18-12 03:39 PM
christ0ph
Advocacy & Safety
26
02-28-12 07:40 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.