Hold the presses -- study says streetcar tracks cause bike accidents
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,716
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5787 Post(s)
Liked 2,580 Times
in
1,430 Posts
Well ------Duh!!!!!!
They had to study it because a generation or two went by, and in the intervening years without tracks people forgot about the problem.
They had to study it because a generation or two went by, and in the intervening years without tracks people forgot about the problem.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,716
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5787 Post(s)
Liked 2,580 Times
in
1,430 Posts
Then, how could they need a new study to "prove" the obvious?
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#6
Me duelen las nalgas
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 13,513
Bikes: Centurion Ironman, Trek 5900, Univega Via Carisma, Globe Carmel
Mentioned: 199 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4560 Post(s)
Liked 2,802 Times
in
1,800 Posts
Lots of railroad tracks on my riding routes, including those mini tracks for kids and families in the park. Gotta be careful. But we can cross most of those perpendicularly or at least at a safe angle.
If I had to routinely ride parallel to tracks I'd seriously consider a fat bike. Or avoid the entire area.
If I had to routinely ride parallel to tracks I'd seriously consider a fat bike. Or avoid the entire area.
#7
Senior Member
Looking at the article, the authors hope that by putting actual number to the cause (about 1/3 of the serious accidents) they can focus solutions where needed. Otherwise you might as well use the A&S forum to determine the causes, with the inevitable claims of your making that up and calls for sources. In other word its a good idea to have some facts when trying to determine the ordering of causations.
#8
Cycle Year Round
according to Ross Lyle, head mechanic at Toronto's Bikes on Wheels. "People think a big fat tire is going to be okay. A streetcar track is way wider than you think and it'll accept anything," he told CBC's Ali Chiasson. "So there's really no bike that's better for it."
__________________
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
#9
Cycle Year Round
#10
Senior Member
A while ago we had a thread here: https://www.bikeforums.net/advocacy-s...-disaster.html
#12
Cycle Year Round
You mean the researchers and you with no practical experience riding on roads let alone roads with rails?
The bike shop mechanic has more actual experience dealing with the situation. My own experience with such wheel traps leads me to believe that thinner tires are more often safer. The fat tire drops in and gets hard stuck there. A thinner tire drops in, has some room on the sides and an experienced rider can lift it back out (I have done that) .
Bet the researchers did not even research the impact of tire size, they just did like you so often do, pull it out of their ass and call it common sense.
The bike shop mechanic has more actual experience dealing with the situation. My own experience with such wheel traps leads me to believe that thinner tires are more often safer. The fat tire drops in and gets hard stuck there. A thinner tire drops in, has some room on the sides and an experienced rider can lift it back out (I have done that) .
Bet the researchers did not even research the impact of tire size, they just did like you so often do, pull it out of their ass and call it common sense.
__________________
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Posts: 7,048
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 509 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times
in
8 Posts
You mean the researchers and you with no practical experience riding on roads let alone roads with rails?
The bike shop mechanic has more actual experience dealing with the situation. My own experience with such wheel traps leads me to believe that thinner tires are more often safer. The fat tire drops in and gets hard stuck there. A thinner tire drops in, has some room on the sides and an experienced rider can lift it back out (I have done that) .
Bet the researchers did not even research the impact of tire size, they just did like you so often do, pull it out of their ass and call it common sense.
The bike shop mechanic has more actual experience dealing with the situation. My own experience with such wheel traps leads me to believe that thinner tires are more often safer. The fat tire drops in and gets hard stuck there. A thinner tire drops in, has some room on the sides and an experienced rider can lift it back out (I have done that) .
Bet the researchers did not even research the impact of tire size, they just did like you so often do, pull it out of their ass and call it common sense.
Last edited by B. Carfree; 07-28-16 at 11:21 AM.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,905
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4806 Post(s)
Liked 3,928 Times
in
2,553 Posts
For a while Portland, OR had a designated bike lane running along the new trolley tracks on Lovejoy in the Pearl district. That winter, an organized ride ran down that bike lane. I had no idea the bike lane was there as I never rode it, always using the street a block over (because that street had RR tracks, duh!). The ride took place in February and, surprise!, the road was wet. A bunch of riders crashed trying to adhere to the bike lane.
The next town west has designated bike lanes on a road that crossed three sets of severely angled tracks. (5th Street near the 217 underpass.) The sign warns you that they are angled but not that there are multiple sets and that they cannot be done at any kind of speed unless you plan to use the full car lane. Now both directions have options, wide pavement to the right on one side and access to the pedestrian sidewalk on the other but still no warning that a routine angled track crossing will crash you or that other options exist. I have talked to a lot of riders who have crashed there and it isn't ever a very heavily traveled bike route.
Ben
The next town west has designated bike lanes on a road that crossed three sets of severely angled tracks. (5th Street near the 217 underpass.) The sign warns you that they are angled but not that there are multiple sets and that they cannot be done at any kind of speed unless you plan to use the full car lane. Now both directions have options, wide pavement to the right on one side and access to the pedestrian sidewalk on the other but still no warning that a routine angled track crossing will crash you or that other options exist. I have talked to a lot of riders who have crashed there and it isn't ever a very heavily traveled bike route.
Ben
#15
Full Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 398
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 214 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
You mean the researchers and you with no practical experience riding on roads let alone roads with rails?
The bike shop mechanic has more actual experience dealing with the situation. My own experience with such wheel traps leads me to believe that thinner tires are more often safer. The fat tire drops in and gets hard stuck there. A thinner tire drops in, has some room on the sides and an experienced rider can lift it back out (I have done that) .
Bet the researchers did not even research the impact of tire size, they just did like you so often do, pull it out of their ass and call it common sense.
The bike shop mechanic has more actual experience dealing with the situation. My own experience with such wheel traps leads me to believe that thinner tires are more often safer. The fat tire drops in and gets hard stuck there. A thinner tire drops in, has some room on the sides and an experienced rider can lift it back out (I have done that) .
Bet the researchers did not even research the impact of tire size, they just did like you so often do, pull it out of their ass and call it common sense.
Don't try to pass off your opinion as fact. If you can't handle others having a different opinion then yours without cursing and swearing like a madman then maybe you shouldn't be on the forum until you learn to deal with your anger issues. It's not good for your health!
Everyone has different opinions and experiences on the issue and you're not the center of the universe, sorry to break it to you. Who do you think you are? You think yours is the last and only word on every thread and no one is allowed to say differently? You really do need to pull that stick out your rear end and a get a life. Either that or get a more comfortable bicycle seat, maybe you wouldn't be so bitter and enraged all the time.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,530
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2112 Post(s)
Liked 663 Times
in
443 Posts
You mean the researchers and you with no practical experience riding on roads let alone roads with rails?
The bike shop mechanic has more actual experience dealing with the situation. My own experience with such wheel traps leads me to believe that thinner tires are more often safer. The fat tire drops in and gets hard stuck there. A thinner tire drops in, has some room on the sides and an experienced rider can lift it back out (I have done that) .
Bet the researchers did not even research the impact of tire size, they just did like you so often do, pull it out of their ass and call it common sense.
The bike shop mechanic has more actual experience dealing with the situation. My own experience with such wheel traps leads me to believe that thinner tires are more often safer. The fat tire drops in and gets hard stuck there. A thinner tire drops in, has some room on the sides and an experienced rider can lift it back out (I have done that) .
Bet the researchers did not even research the impact of tire size, they just did like you so often do, pull it out of their ass and call it common sense.
This is Meghan. That is one of her bikes. Any questions?
-mr. bill
Last edited by mr_bill; 07-28-16 at 07:29 AM.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,530
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2112 Post(s)
Liked 663 Times
in
443 Posts
You mean the researchers and you with no practical experience riding on roads let alone roads with rails?
The bike shop mechanic has more actual experience dealing with the situation. My own experience with such wheel traps leads me to believe that thinner tires are more often safer. The fat tire drops in and gets hard stuck there. A thinner tire drops in, has some room on the sides and an experienced rider can lift it back out (I have done that) .
Bet the researchers did not even research the impact of tire size, they just did like you so often do, pull it out of their ass and call it common sense.
The bike shop mechanic has more actual experience dealing with the situation. My own experience with such wheel traps leads me to believe that thinner tires are more often safer. The fat tire drops in and gets hard stuck there. A thinner tire drops in, has some room on the sides and an experienced rider can lift it back out (I have done that) .
Bet the researchers did not even research the impact of tire size, they just did like you so often do, pull it out of their ass and call it common sense.
-mr. bill
Last edited by mr_bill; 07-28-16 at 07:32 AM.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Groningen
Posts: 1,308
Bikes: Gazelle rod brakes, Batavus compact, Peugeot hybrid
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5998 Post(s)
Liked 956 Times
in
730 Posts
Interesting, I always thought that not crossing them at a wide enough angle was the cause of getting stuck in it, which doesn't have to qualify as an accident btw.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,530
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2112 Post(s)
Liked 663 Times
in
443 Posts
That is *NOT* at all like what we have in most of North America, *especially* on turning sections of track in intersections. Our flange-ways are, uh, jaw opening.
-mr. bill
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Groningen
Posts: 1,308
Bikes: Gazelle rod brakes, Batavus compact, Peugeot hybrid
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5998 Post(s)
Liked 956 Times
in
730 Posts
Don't even think that North American trolley tracks are anything like Dutch/German trolley tracks (light rail, tram, strassenbahn, stadtbahn). Your rails are designed with flange-ways large enough for light rail but small enough so that they generally present minimal hazard to other road users.
That is *NOT* at all like what we have in most of North America, *especially* on turning sections of track in intersections. Our flange-ways are, uh, jaw opening.
-mr. bill
That is *NOT* at all like what we have in most of North America, *especially* on turning sections of track in intersections. Our flange-ways are, uh, jaw opening.
-mr. bill
They're dangerous, stay between them or cross them at a large angle, mind the rear wheel follows on a different angle, and if there are a lot of rails crossing, navigate carefully and slowly.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,530
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2112 Post(s)
Liked 663 Times
in
443 Posts
But you are quite wrong - those rails can absolutely capture either the front or rear wheel.
Again, compare and contrast.
Toronto - Tee-rail, concrete flange-way of varying width.
Frankfurt - Groved-rails with gaskets.
Bottom line.
Better engineering makes a HUGE difference.
Education makes a difference.
But until you get to a fat bike, tire width doesn't make much of a difference.
-mr. bill
#22
Banned
"His safety advice? "It's really just about paying attention."
This is a key piece of advice when I go on my urban commutes, with some cyclists being geared up for the higher concentration intensity level and some are not.
I liken my the urban commute situation to the one segment of TV program where a business man recently acquired a pilot's license, then goes out and buys a vintage WWII fighter plane, in the thinking that he can go and fly and relax, leaving the daily work grind behind. The business man quickly learned on his maiden voyage with the plane, that with the plane's much higher speed requirements, along with more "seat of the pants" flying, that his concentration level was far greater than anything he experienced at work, along with maneuvering plans having to be made much, much farther in advance.
This is a key piece of advice when I go on my urban commutes, with some cyclists being geared up for the higher concentration intensity level and some are not.
I liken my the urban commute situation to the one segment of TV program where a business man recently acquired a pilot's license, then goes out and buys a vintage WWII fighter plane, in the thinking that he can go and fly and relax, leaving the daily work grind behind. The business man quickly learned on his maiden voyage with the plane, that with the plane's much higher speed requirements, along with more "seat of the pants" flying, that his concentration level was far greater than anything he experienced at work, along with maneuvering plans having to be made much, much farther in advance.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Groningen
Posts: 1,308
Bikes: Gazelle rod brakes, Batavus compact, Peugeot hybrid
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5998 Post(s)
Liked 956 Times
in
730 Posts
The picture used in the article is from a year old crash with a car - nothing at all to do with the article or tracks - other than the bicycle and its front wheel happened to land between tracks after the crash.
But you are quite wrong - those rails can absolutely capture either the front or rear wheel.
Again, compare and contrast.
Toronto - Tee-rail, concrete flange-way of varying width.
Frankfurt - Groved-rails with gaskets.
Bottom line.
Better engineering makes a HUGE difference.
But you are quite wrong - those rails can absolutely capture either the front or rear wheel.
Again, compare and contrast.
Toronto - Tee-rail, concrete flange-way of varying width.
Frankfurt - Groved-rails with gaskets.
Bottom line.
Better engineering makes a HUGE difference.
It might help cyclists with fat tyres, it's not foolproof.
Education makes a difference.
#24
20+mph Commuter
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Greenville. SC USA
Posts: 7,517
Bikes: Surly LHT, Surly Lowside, a folding bike, and a beater.
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1434 Post(s)
Liked 331 Times
in
219 Posts
Streetcar tracks in New Orleans around Lee Circle (traffic circle) were designed by an evil genius. First place I ever got tracked back in the early '70s. Remember it like yesterday. A merging car forced me into trouble, I crashed, my riding buddy caught up with the car and kicked a big dent in the driver's door. Ahh...to be young again!
Had to stand on my steel rear wheel to make it round enough to get to a bike shop about 7 miles away. Dude sold me a wheel, moved the freewheel over for me all for $20, which is all I had on me. Will never forget that guy either.
Happened right here: MAP LINK
================
An aside:
I used to ride with a club back in the late '80s, early '90s (before I became a crotchety old man who pretty much hates everybody). One particular ride called the "Double Ferry Ride" went past a bunch of shipyards and other industry along the Mississippi River. Before the ride began the ride leader would give a quick overview of the route, caution everyone about the multiple train tracks crossing the road on about a 5* angle, and then point to me and another friend of mine to let everyone know that after the tracks my friend and I would become the ride leaders for the remainder of the route. Why you ask? Because the ride leader would have to drive his car, not his bike, so he could take one or two cyclists to the E.R. every freaking time! It never failed - like moths to a flame. If you refused to dismount and portage over some of these tracks, God help you. Or George help you (the ride leader in the follow car).
Had to stand on my steel rear wheel to make it round enough to get to a bike shop about 7 miles away. Dude sold me a wheel, moved the freewheel over for me all for $20, which is all I had on me. Will never forget that guy either.
Happened right here: MAP LINK
================
An aside:
I used to ride with a club back in the late '80s, early '90s (before I became a crotchety old man who pretty much hates everybody). One particular ride called the "Double Ferry Ride" went past a bunch of shipyards and other industry along the Mississippi River. Before the ride began the ride leader would give a quick overview of the route, caution everyone about the multiple train tracks crossing the road on about a 5* angle, and then point to me and another friend of mine to let everyone know that after the tracks my friend and I would become the ride leaders for the remainder of the route. Why you ask? Because the ride leader would have to drive his car, not his bike, so he could take one or two cyclists to the E.R. every freaking time! It never failed - like moths to a flame. If you refused to dismount and portage over some of these tracks, God help you. Or George help you (the ride leader in the follow car).
Last edited by JoeyBike; 07-28-16 at 11:24 AM.
#25
Full Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 398
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 214 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
So much for the previous ass-umptions.
Why would someone from Hawaii be so up in arms about streetcars anyway,
when they don't have any? I guess some people just like to hear themselves talking.