View Poll Results: Should cyclists face the same consequences as drivers?
Yes
25
89.29%
No
3
10.71%
Voters: 28. You may not vote on this poll
Do the same rules apply
07-12-02, 03:09 PM
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Concord, MA
Posts: 84
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Do the same rules apply
I am curious by the Death in Cambridge thread so I figured I would ask this question. Especially to those who want the driver to serve a jail term (or to be lynched--which was as offensive as the idea that Hitler anywhere or on anything is a good thing), do you feel that if a cyclist causes a death or severe bodily harm they should also be prosecuted and serve a jail term? I mean we have all seen cyclists who take corners too quickly or seen cyclists serve into traffic.
Examples, a cyclist comes around a blind corner while descending at 30-35 mph and runs into someone. The other person falls and hits their head on the pavement and sustains brain injury. Or if a driver swerves to avoid a cyclist who is making a u-turn and hits a telephone pole and dies. (p.s. to the person who had the u-turn accident I hope you and the bike are feeling better.) Should the cyclists be held to the same standards as a driver for negligence, inattention, and poor/dangerous riding?
Examples, a cyclist comes around a blind corner while descending at 30-35 mph and runs into someone. The other person falls and hits their head on the pavement and sustains brain injury. Or if a driver swerves to avoid a cyclist who is making a u-turn and hits a telephone pole and dies. (p.s. to the person who had the u-turn accident I hope you and the bike are feeling better.) Should the cyclists be held to the same standards as a driver for negligence, inattention, and poor/dangerous riding?
Last edited by presfoxm; 07-12-02 at 03:12 PM.
07-12-02, 03:23 PM
#2
Every lane is a bike lane
The answer is that yes, of course they should. If you negilgently break the law and kill another person doing so, a jail term should result irrespective of the vehicle you are using at the time.
__________________
I am clinically insane. I am proud of it.
That is all.
I am clinically insane. I am proud of it.
That is all.
07-12-02, 03:29 PM
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Concord, MA
Posts: 84
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Are there any circumstances under which a vehicle (no matter the kind) kills someone that they should not be prosecuted?
07-12-02, 03:37 PM
#4
Every lane is a bike lane
Originally posted by presfoxm
Are there any circumstances under which a vehicle (no matter the kind) kills someone that they should not be prosecuted?
Are there any circumstances under which a vehicle (no matter the kind) kills someone that they should not be prosecuted?
However, if they are acting in a law abiding and predictable manner, it then becomes the responsibility of the larger vehicle not to run them down. Funnily enough, they seem to be parts of the world that have fewer problems with 'road rage' and generally fewer traffic fatalities. I wonder if there is a link?
__________________
I am clinically insane. I am proud of it.
That is all.
I am clinically insane. I am proud of it.
That is all.
07-12-02, 05:31 PM
#5
Sumanitu taka owaci
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 8,945
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Pedestrians have rights, too. But one of them is not crossing a busy street away from an intersection, or against the lights. This deals with the culpability question.
The moral question is quite different.
The moral question is quite different.
__________________
No worries
No worries
07-12-02, 06:27 PM
#6
feros ferio
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
Posts: 21,796
Bikes: 1959 Capo Modell Campagnolo; 1960 Capo Sieger (2); 1962 Carlton Franco Suisse; 1970 Peugeot UO-8; 1982 Bianchi Campione d'Italia; 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10;
Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1392 Post(s)
Liked 1,324 Times
in
836 Posts
What we really need is individual accountability for our actions.
__________________
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
07-13-02, 07:19 AM
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 701
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Just curious ... what should be the punishment for a drunk bicyclist? Can't take his license away. If the drunk swerves into traffic and gets killed, does the car driver get prosecuted?
07-13-02, 10:12 AM
#8
Wood Licker
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Whistler,BC
Posts: 16,966
Bikes: Trek Fuel EX 8 27.5 +, 2002 Transition Dirtbag, Kona Roast 2002
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 23 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Stor Mand,
Take his car liscence away, suspend him and in lueu of that possibly charge with a criminal offence if no liscence exists.
Take his car liscence away, suspend him and in lueu of that possibly charge with a criminal offence if no liscence exists.
07-13-02, 11:45 AM
#9
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sharon Hill, PA
Posts: 20
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
A cyclist who is operating his bike with intoxicated could/would be cited for public drunkeness. A summary offense.
07-13-02, 05:23 PM
#10
feros ferio
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
Posts: 21,796
Bikes: 1959 Capo Modell Campagnolo; 1960 Capo Sieger (2); 1962 Carlton Franco Suisse; 1970 Peugeot UO-8; 1982 Bianchi Campione d'Italia; 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10;
Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1392 Post(s)
Liked 1,324 Times
in
836 Posts
Originally posted by grego262
A cyclist who is operating his bike with intoxicated could/would be cited for public drunkeness. A summary offense.
A cyclist who is operating his bike with intoxicated could/would be cited for public drunkeness. A summary offense.
__________________
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
07-13-02, 06:39 PM
#11
Every lane is a bike lane
Originally posted by Stor Mand
Just curious ... what should be the punishment for a drunk bicyclist? Can't take his license away.
Just curious ... what should be the punishment for a drunk bicyclist? Can't take his license away.
__________________
I am clinically insane. I am proud of it.
That is all.
I am clinically insane. I am proud of it.
That is all.
07-13-02, 07:08 PM
#12
SLJ 6/8/65-5/2/07
Here in Fla. they have gone after a drunk cyclist's drivers license. I have mixed feelings. The guy was drunk but made a, I believe, good decision to attempt to get home by bike rather than the car he drove to the party. Public drunkeness would seem to be appropriate.
The issue in the other thread is negligence leading to another person's death. Of course, the vehicle is irrelevant. Are there circumstances of truly accidntal deaths. Of course. Blow outs leading to loss of control are not the driver's fault. Weather conditions can lead to accidents. True accidents even tragic ones can and do happen. My position in calling for jailtime is not b/c a cyclist was killed by a car driver but b/c a lady was killed by an action that was negligent.
The issue in the other thread is negligence leading to another person's death. Of course, the vehicle is irrelevant. Are there circumstances of truly accidntal deaths. Of course. Blow outs leading to loss of control are not the driver's fault. Weather conditions can lead to accidents. True accidents even tragic ones can and do happen. My position in calling for jailtime is not b/c a cyclist was killed by a car driver but b/c a lady was killed by an action that was negligent.
__________________
Life is not one damned thing after another. Life is one damned thing over and over.
Edna St. Vincent Millay
Life is not one damned thing after another. Life is one damned thing over and over.
Edna St. Vincent Millay
07-14-02, 09:36 AM
#13
To infinity and beyond
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Posts: 425
Bikes: Cannondale M600, Crescent 92318, Bianchi Lo Spillone (tandem)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally posted by presfoxm
Are there any circumstances under which a vehicle (no matter the kind) kills someone that they should not be prosecuted?
Are there any circumstances under which a vehicle (no matter the kind) kills someone that they should not be prosecuted?
Anders K
07-14-02, 11:48 PM
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 6,956
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
5 Posts
I live in the United States, and here's the State of Washington's answer to the drunk-cyclist question, from the Revised Code of Washington 46.61.790:
As for the original question, the person would be subject to the same obligations whether driving a bicycle or an automobile, in the State of Washington at least, as per RCW 46.61.755.
Intoxicated bicyclists.
(1) A law enforcement officer may offer to transport a bicycle rider who appears to be under the influence of alcohol or any drug and who is walking or moving along or within the right of way of a public roadway, unless the bicycle rider is to be taken into protective custody under RCW 70.96A.120. The law enforcement officer offering to transport an intoxicated bicycle rider under this section shall:
(a) Transport the intoxicated bicycle rider to a safe place; or
(b) Release the intoxicated bicycle rider to a competent person.
(2) The law enforcement officer shall not provide the assistance offered if the bicycle rider refuses to accept it. No suit or action may be commenced or prosecuted against the law enforcement officer, law enforcement agency, the state of Washington, or any political subdivision of the state for any act resulting from the refusal of the bicycle rider to accept this assistance.
(3) The law enforcement officer may impound the bicycle operated by an intoxicated bicycle rider if the officer determines that impoundment is necessary to reduce a threat to public safety, and there are no reasonable alternatives to impoundment. The bicyclist will be given a written notice of when and where the impounded bicycle may be reclaimed. The bicycle may be reclaimed by the bicycle rider when the bicycle rider no longer appears to be intoxicated, or by an individual who can establish ownership of the bicycle. The bicycle must be returned without payment of a fee. If the bicycle is not reclaimed within thirty days, it will be subject to sale or disposal consistent with agency procedures.
(1) A law enforcement officer may offer to transport a bicycle rider who appears to be under the influence of alcohol or any drug and who is walking or moving along or within the right of way of a public roadway, unless the bicycle rider is to be taken into protective custody under RCW 70.96A.120. The law enforcement officer offering to transport an intoxicated bicycle rider under this section shall:
(a) Transport the intoxicated bicycle rider to a safe place; or
(b) Release the intoxicated bicycle rider to a competent person.
(2) The law enforcement officer shall not provide the assistance offered if the bicycle rider refuses to accept it. No suit or action may be commenced or prosecuted against the law enforcement officer, law enforcement agency, the state of Washington, or any political subdivision of the state for any act resulting from the refusal of the bicycle rider to accept this assistance.
(3) The law enforcement officer may impound the bicycle operated by an intoxicated bicycle rider if the officer determines that impoundment is necessary to reduce a threat to public safety, and there are no reasonable alternatives to impoundment. The bicyclist will be given a written notice of when and where the impounded bicycle may be reclaimed. The bicycle may be reclaimed by the bicycle rider when the bicycle rider no longer appears to be intoxicated, or by an individual who can establish ownership of the bicycle. The bicycle must be returned without payment of a fee. If the bicycle is not reclaimed within thirty days, it will be subject to sale or disposal consistent with agency procedures.
07-15-02, 02:54 AM
#15
Donating member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Faversham, Kent, UK
Posts: 1,852
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally posted by Chris L
The answer is that yes, of course they should. If you negilgently break the law and kill another person doing so, a jail term should result irrespective of the vehicle you are using at the time.
The answer is that yes, of course they should. If you negilgently break the law and kill another person doing so, a jail term should result irrespective of the vehicle you are using at the time.
__________________
Currently riding an MTB with a split personality - commuting, touring, riding for the sake of riding, on or off road :)
Currently riding an MTB with a split personality - commuting, touring, riding for the sake of riding, on or off road :)
07-15-02, 06:35 AM
#16
The Flying Scot
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: North Queensferry Scotland and London (and France)
Posts: 1,904
Bikes: Custom (Colin Laing) 531c fast tourer/audax, 1964 Flying Scot Continental, 1995 Cinelli Supercorsa, Holdsworth Mistral single speed, Dahon Speed 6 (folder), Micmo Sirocco and a few more
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally posted by Stor Mand
Just curious ... what should be the punishment for a drunk bicyclist? Can't take his license away. If the drunk swerves into traffic and gets killed, does the car driver get prosecuted?
Just curious ... what should be the punishment for a drunk bicyclist? Can't take his license away. If the drunk swerves into traffic and gets killed, does the car driver get prosecuted?
__________________
plus je vois les hommes, plus j'admire les chiens
1985 Sandy Gilchrist-Colin Laing built 531c Audax/fast tourer.
1964 Flying Scot Continental (531)
1995 Cinelli Supercorsa (Columbus SLX)
1980s Holdsworth Mistral fixed (531)
2005 Dahon Speed 6 (folder)
(YES I LIKE STEEL)
2008 Viking Saratoga tandem
2008 Micmo Sirocco Hybrid (aluminium!)
2012 BTwin Rockrider 8.1
plus je vois les hommes, plus j'admire les chiens
1985 Sandy Gilchrist-Colin Laing built 531c Audax/fast tourer.
1964 Flying Scot Continental (531)
1995 Cinelli Supercorsa (Columbus SLX)
1980s Holdsworth Mistral fixed (531)
2005 Dahon Speed 6 (folder)
(YES I LIKE STEEL)
2008 Viking Saratoga tandem
2008 Micmo Sirocco Hybrid (aluminium!)
2012 BTwin Rockrider 8.1
07-16-02, 06:26 AM
#17
Bike Happy
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Detroit, MI USA
Posts: 695
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I voted yes.
The issue is really recklessness or negligence. It doesn't make much practical difference if you kill someone with a bicycle, or use an automobile. They are just as dead in either case.
The issue is really recklessness or negligence. It doesn't make much practical difference if you kill someone with a bicycle, or use an automobile. They are just as dead in either case.
07-16-02, 06:42 AM
#18
cycle-powered
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Munich Germany (formerly Portland OR, Texas)
Posts: 1,848
Bikes: '02 Specialized FSR, '03 RM Slayer, '99 Raleigh R700, '97 Norco hartail, '89 Stumpjumper
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
yes. in general people should be held accountable for their actions.
there are still some differences between bikes and cars and so in certain cases, bicycle cases may be handled differently, but more due to individual circumstances - for exmaple, cases where say a cyclist is on a bike path and someone with a dog has the leash across the path (it's happened to me, not the death part, just the accident) and then doesn't see the thin leash line, so crashes and then out of control strikes and kills someone - obviously this is different than if a car were being operated on a bike path...
but a precedent has already been set in this direction with the decision i think in 2000 that a skier in Colorado who lost control, struck and killed a woman was found guilty (of negligent homicide or something) and i think sentenced to 2 years - not so sure of the details. This is even more significant b/c it occurred not on public roadways but on a ski slope.
there are still some differences between bikes and cars and so in certain cases, bicycle cases may be handled differently, but more due to individual circumstances - for exmaple, cases where say a cyclist is on a bike path and someone with a dog has the leash across the path (it's happened to me, not the death part, just the accident) and then doesn't see the thin leash line, so crashes and then out of control strikes and kills someone - obviously this is different than if a car were being operated on a bike path...
but a precedent has already been set in this direction with the decision i think in 2000 that a skier in Colorado who lost control, struck and killed a woman was found guilty (of negligent homicide or something) and i think sentenced to 2 years - not so sure of the details. This is even more significant b/c it occurred not on public roadways but on a ski slope.
07-16-02, 09:57 AM
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: New Castle, IN
Posts: 126
Bikes: Cannondale R600, Huffy 10-speed, and a Mongoose
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
If everyone above is stating that if the death or injury was a result of a bicyclist breaking the law, then I agree.
However, I do have a problem with the "the responsibility of the larger vehicle not to run them down" comment. Do you mean if both are law abiding? I was once riding on a flat area just after coming down a hill. I had taken one of the two lanes and was doing ~32MPH when a person stepped off of a curb right in front of me. Lucky for both me and him, he looked up just in time to step back. If I had hit him, would the responsibility for the incident lay on me or him?
btw, there was an injury as a result of the above incident. I got out of the aero bars so fast and hit the brakes so hard I sprained my right hand and wrist for a few days.
However, I do have a problem with the "the responsibility of the larger vehicle not to run them down" comment. Do you mean if both are law abiding? I was once riding on a flat area just after coming down a hill. I had taken one of the two lanes and was doing ~32MPH when a person stepped off of a curb right in front of me. Lucky for both me and him, he looked up just in time to step back. If I had hit him, would the responsibility for the incident lay on me or him?
btw, there was an injury as a result of the above incident. I got out of the aero bars so fast and hit the brakes so hard I sprained my right hand and wrist for a few days.
07-16-02, 09:57 AM
#20
山馬鹿
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 1,407
Bikes: Nakagawa
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I voted yes, but I would like to make clear that the cyclist would have to be found negligent in order to recieve repurcusions. The number of cyclists who are cyclist along and not really paying attention is really not that high.
__________________
Become King of the Square! https://kingofthesquares.com
Plan or Find your next ride on Sporra!
Become King of the Square! https://kingofthesquares.com
Plan or Find your next ride on Sporra!
