Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 19 of 19
  1. #1
    Walmart bike rider gpsblake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    1,681
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Finally, a motorist charged with murder

    I understand accidents happen but I am sick and tired of motorist getting charged with no more than manslaughter or less when a bicyclist gets killed while they are driving impaired. About time a murder charged got filed.

    http://www.courier-journal.com/apps/...EWS01/50707009

    A 25-year-old Louisville woman has been charged with murder and DUI after the car she was driving allegedly struck and killed a 22-year-old bicyclist on Bardstown Road Wednesday night, according to police.

    Officer Dwight Mitchell, a spokesman for Louisville Metro Police, said Heather L. McCorty was driving southbound in the 4400 block of Bardstown Road near Buechel when she struck the bicyclist, Charles Barfield, who was also traveling south.

    Barfield, of the 4500 block of Beech Brook Drive, was taken to University Hospital, where he died at 12:22 a.m. from multiple blunt force injuries, according to Jefferson County deputy coroner Jack Arnold.

    In addition to the murder and DUI charges, McCorty was charged with possession of marijuana and possession of drug paraphernalia.

  2. #2
    But Getting Smaller Bigmark's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Boardman Ohio
    My Bikes
    05 Gary Fisher Tiburon S
    Posts
    235
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    understand accidents happen
    It is not an accident!

    When you drink you are knowingly impairing your ability for rational judgment, and willingly decreasing your ability to drive a vehicle. It is not an accident. This is the problem with America. Driving while drunk is such a common placed thing that it is considered an accident when someone decides to drink and drive, and they wreck into someone or something.

    This dumb ### not only was drunk, but had dope in the car.
    Was that an accident? No she planed to get screwed up, and while screwed up she killed someone. It was her choice.

    Pre meditated murder should be her sentencing.

    Letís get with it. When people decide to have that first drink they are knowingly saying I am going to be impaired. Isnít that premeditated? It is the same as saying I am going to kill someone, then put a bullett into the chamber, and fire it into a croud.

    No different, and as soon as society realizes this the better.
    ~~"Get on your bikes and ride!"~~
    Working to be JustMark

  3. #3
    Cheesmonger Extraordinair natelutkjohn's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    417
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Bigmark
    Letís get with it. When people decide to have that first drink they are knowingly saying I am going to be impaired. Isnít that premeditated? It is the same as saying I am going to kill someone, then put a bullett into the chamber, and fire it into a croud.

    No different, and as soon as society realizes this the better.
    I have to disagree with that one, I personaly don't even have a car, so I don't drink and drive and am very against it as I don't want to be hit by a drunk driver, but I would imagine that well over 90% of the time, impared drivers get home fine (considering that a LARGE amount of people who drink also drive impared from time to time) with no accidents and no premeditation to get into one, however firing a *** into a crowd? Uh, that would lead to at least an injury well over 99.9% of the time and can be considered pre-meditated in that you are obviously planning to injure someone, or you are mentaly impared and should'nt own a *** in the first place.
    Of course, I have no problem with murder charges if you kill someone, or even assult charges or attempted murder if you injure someone while drinking and driving, but pre-meditated? No, I don't see that at all.

  4. #4
    But Getting Smaller Bigmark's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Boardman Ohio
    My Bikes
    05 Gary Fisher Tiburon S
    Posts
    235
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have no problem with murder charges if you kill someone, or even assult charges or attempted murder if you injure someone while drinking and driving, but pre-meditated? No, I don't see that at all.
    With everything that has flooded the media concerning driving under the influence, and how it impairs your judgment as well as reactions, and full knowing that it is illegal to do so, then isnít doing it premeditated? You donít accidentally put a drink to your mouth and take a drink do you? No, you full well know that you are going to take a drink, and you full well know that it is against the law to do so and get behind the wheel, but you decide to disregard the law and do it anyhow. Yes, or No.

    Your answer must be yes, you know you are going to take a drink, and you know the consequences, so there is nothing in the equation that is not premeditated.

    Drinking and driving is wrong, and if you think differently you can tell the mother of the 3 girls that lived up the street from me who were killed by a drunk driver at 3:30 in the afternoon. Two of the girls had seatbelts on, and the third was in a car seat. They were hit so hard from behind that it killed them. Tell the girlís mother that he almost got home, but he killed them instead. He got home ok the other times when he was drunk, but this time the three girls were killed because they were just unlucky. Yea, right.

    So its OK if you drink and get home, but its not if you drink and kill someone. A casual drinker has the same chance in killing someone than an alcoholic does. When you are impaired you are impaired. You know you are going to do it before you are impaired. So it is BS to say
    but I would imagine that well over 90% of the time, impaired drivers get home fine (considering that a LARGE amount of people who drink also drive impaired from time to time) with no accidents and no premeditation to get into one,ÖĒ
    If you take that first drink you are premeditating to impair yourself thus impairing the ability to safely control your vehicle.
    ~~"Get on your bikes and ride!"~~
    Working to be JustMark

  5. #5
    Senior Member filtersweep's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    2,615
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    There is a big difference between being charged and being convicted.

  6. #6
    Badger Biker ctyler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Beloit, Wisconsin
    My Bikes
    Cannondale Saeco CAD-3, Surly Cross Check
    Posts
    974
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Bigmark
    It is not an accident!

    When you drink you are knowingly impairing your ability for rational judgment, and willingly decreasing your ability to drive a vehicle. It is not an accident. This is the problem with America. Driving while drunk is such a common placed thing that it is considered an accident when someone decides to drink and drive, and they wreck into someone or something.

    This dumb ### not only was drunk, but had dope in the car.
    Was that an accident? No she planed to get screwed up, and while screwed up she killed someone. It was her choice.

    Pre meditated murder should be her sentencing.

    Letís get with it. When people decide to have that first drink they are knowingly saying I am going to be impaired. Isnít that premeditated? It is the same as saying I am going to kill someone, then put a bullett into the chamber, and fire it into a croud.

    No different, and as soon as society realizes this the better.
    You are absolutely correct. It was not an accident. If you cchoose to drink/take drugs and drive and kill someone, it's premeditated murder.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    240
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Does anyone notice that the only people charged or convicted for killing cyclists are the ones who happen to be drunk at the time? The sober road-ragers and other assorted non-drinking murderers always seem to walk without so much as a police report.
    Remember: 98% of Drivers rate themselves as at least "Above Average".

  8. #8
    Cheesmonger Extraordinair natelutkjohn's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    417
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by ctyler
    You are absolutely correct. It was not an accident. If you cchoose to drink/take drugs and drive and kill someone, it's premeditated murder.
    Exactly, if you choose to kill someone, just drinking and driving is not deciding to go out and kill someone, It's against the law and should be severly punished, but in no way is that alone the same as saying "I think I will get drunk tonight, then drive wildly and intend to kill someone" That may endup up being the result depending on the driver, but not usualy the pre-meditation. I know this can be debated left and right, but that's my stance. Saying it's pre-meditated murder is just silly in my opinion, maybe pre-meditated getting drunk and DUI, but that's about it.

  9. #9
    All Bikes All The Time Sawtooth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Boise, ID
    My Bikes
    Giant TCR 0, Lemond Zurich, Giant NRS 1, Jamis Explorer Beater/Commuter, Peugeot converted single speed
    Posts
    2,345
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I bet it gets plea bargained down to manslaughter, which is really what it is. To recklessly endanger someone knowingly resulting in death is manslaughter, not murder, as I understand the law. Doesn't make it right.

  10. #10
    Compulsive Upgrader cyclingshane73's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Toronto, Ontario
    My Bikes
    2002 Kona Deluxe (road), 2001 Cove Stiffee (mtb)
    Posts
    603
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    We have a legal system. Not a justice system.

    Murder is the willful intention to kill someone. Whether it is thought out or impulsive.

    DUI and killing some one is not premeditated or impulsive. It is stupid, selfish, and neglectfully wanton act that may or may not result injury or loss of life or destruction of property. While there is no premeditated thought to intentionally harm anyone, the enormous possibility is still there.

    I agree though that it should be severely punished.
    "No drug, not even alcohol, causes the fundamental ills of society. If we're looking for the source of our troubles, we shouldn't test people for drugs. We should test them for stupidity, ignorance, greed, and love of power." -P.J. O'Rourke

  11. #11
    Senior Member Seanholio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    San Jose, CA
    My Bikes
    Vision R40 - recumbent, Gunnar Crosshairs
    Posts
    566
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I think that reckless homicide would be appropriate:

    from Findlaw
    QUESTION:
    Is a conviction for Driving Under the Influence of Alcohol (DUI) a felony?

    ANSWER:
    A first-time DUI, (or, in some states, "DWI" -- short for "driving while intoxicated") is normally charged as a misdemeanor, not a felony. But if someone was injured as a result of the drunken driving, some states (including your home state of Illinois) will raise the charge to a felony. (And if the victim dies, Illinois may charge the driver with reckless homicide.) Also, in a number of states, a DUI will be raised to a felony if it is the driver's second, third, or even fourth DUI offense. Your state, Illinois, falls right in the middle -- Illinois will charge a third DUI as a felony.

    "Misdemeanor" and "felony" are emotionally charged words, but what do they really mean? Whether a conviction ends up as a misdemeanor or a felony depends on the type and length of the punishment for the crime. Misdemeanors carry the possibility of incarceration in the county or local jail for one year or less; felonies usually result in a state prison term of more than a year.
    Emphasis added
    If you ride, ride with RoadID.
    2005 Gunnar Crosshairs My new ride

  12. #12
    CRIKEY!!!!!!! Cyclaholic's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    My Bikes
    several
    Posts
    4,270
    Mentioned
    26 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Bigmark
    It is not an accident!

    When you drink you are knowingly impairing your ability for rational judgment, and willingly decreasing your ability to drive a vehicle. It is not an accident. This is the problem with America. Driving while drunk is such a common placed thing that it is considered an accident when someone decides to drink and drive, and they wreck into someone or something.

    This dumb ### not only was drunk, but had dope in the car.
    Was that an accident? No she planed to get screwed up, and while screwed up she killed someone. It was her choice.

    Pre meditated murder should be her sentencing.

    Let’s get with it. When people decide to have that first drink they are knowingly saying I am going to be impaired. Isn’t that premeditated? It is the same as saying I am going to kill someone, then put a bullett into the chamber, and fire it into a croud.

    No different, and as soon as society realizes this the better.
    Finally, the voice of reason. I couldn't agree with you more.

    I want to say it again - Driving while intoxicated is NOT AN ACCIDENT!

  13. #13
    genec genec's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    san diego
    My Bikes
    custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
    Posts
    23,050
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. Miskatonic
    Does anyone notice that the only people charged or convicted for killing cyclists are the ones who happen to be drunk at the time? The sober road-ragers and other assorted non-drinking murderers always seem to walk without so much as a police report.
    Yeah this is the issue that gets me... Going after a cyclist is about as premeditated as it gets. But how many of these ragers have killed cyclists? And don't they usually come back with "I just didn't see the cyclist." The ultimate excuse.

  14. #14
    Giant-Riding Ogre Don Gwinn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Virden, IL
    My Bikes
    2005 Giant OCR2
    Posts
    469
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have to disagree with that one, I personaly don't even have a car, so I don't drink and drive and am very against it as I don't want to be hit by a drunk driver, but I would imagine that well over 90% of the time, impared drivers get home fine (considering that a LARGE amount of people who drink also drive impared from time to time) with no accidents and no premeditation to get into one, however firing a *** into a crowd? Uh, that would lead to at least an injury well over 99.9% of the time and can be considered pre-meditated in that you are obviously planning to injure someone, or you are mentaly impared and should'nt own a *** in the first place.
    Of course, I have no problem with murder charges if you kill someone, or even assult charges or attempted murder if you injure someone while drinking and driving, but pre-meditated? No, I don't see that at all.
    Believe it or not, shooting someone with a ******* has a very low rate of mortality, too. It's not an excuse to do it and then claim you weren't trying to kill anyone.
    If you don't like your own example of intentionally firing the *** into the crowd, how about this one?

    You take out the *** to show people. You point it toward the crowd (to look gangsta.) You put your finger on the trigger (hey, the safety's on!) You didn't check the chamber to be sure it was empty (not necessary, since you unloaded it last night before you cleaned it and you are a very safe and conscientious shooter.)

    Now, at this point you've broken all the known rules of safe *** handling, no matter what your intent was. If something startles you and you pull that trigger, do you get charged with an accidental death, or do you get murder? Manslaughter is likely if you can show that there was no intent beyond stupidity, but is it appropriate? That's what drunk driving looks like to me.
    _________________________________________________

    Created by MyFitnessPal.com - Free Calorie Counter

  15. #15
    Cheesmonger Extraordinair natelutkjohn's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    417
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Don Gwinn
    Believe it or not, shooting someone with a ******* has a very low rate of mortality, too. It's not an excuse to do it and then claim you weren't trying to kill anyone.
    If you don't like your own example of intentionally firing the *** into the crowd, how about this one?

    You take out the *** to show people. You point it toward the crowd (to look gangsta.) You put your finger on the trigger (hey, the safety's on!) You didn't check the chamber to be sure it was empty (not necessary, since you unloaded it last night before you cleaned it and you are a very safe and conscientious shooter.)

    Now, at this point you've broken all the known rules of safe *** handling, no matter what your intent was. If something startles you and you pull that trigger, do you get charged with an accidental death, or do you get murder? Manslaughter is likely if you can show that there was no intent beyond stupidity, but is it appropriate? That's what drunk driving looks like to me.
    Sounds very reasonable, a lot more so then the pre-meditated murder charges flying around.

  16. #16
    Walmart bike rider gpsblake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    1,681
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I actually meant there are accidents and then there are cases like this one. In a case of an accident where alcohol or drugs isn't involved, I understand charges not being filed unless it is total incompetence. I believe when a bicyclist, pedestrian, or even another motorist gets killed by a drunk or impaired driver, it should be murder. I believe driving under the influence is pre-meditation for murder. Everyone knows the dangers of it and everyone who drives impaired has the power not to drive.

  17. #17
    Senior Member Dchiefransom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Newark, CA. San Francisco Bay Area
    Posts
    6,191
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Driving impaired should also include prescription medications. I wonder how many in this country that rant against drinking and driving take meds that have warnings, and then drive??????? The punishment for accidents while under the influence of those should be the same as alcohol.

  18. #18
    Walmart bike rider gpsblake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    1,681
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Dchief, The majority of americans take some sort of prescription medication. It's not the same as an illegal drug or alcohol. Taking an illegal drug and/or alcohol then driving is willful intent in my opinion.

    If you would include legal prescriptions, you would dilute and kill any chance for stronger laws.

  19. #19
    Senior Member Dchiefransom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Newark, CA. San Francisco Bay Area
    Posts
    6,191
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by gpsblake
    Dchief, The majority of americans take some sort of prescription medication. It's not the same as an illegal drug or alcohol. Taking an illegal drug and/or alcohol then driving is willful intent in my opinion.

    If you would include legal prescriptions, you would dilute and kill any chance for stronger laws.
    I'm talking about the medications that have impairment warnings. Nobody should be on the road driving while they are taking those. If we accept that, then why don't we accept alcohol? The answer, because it would affect a lot of people, no matter how dangerous it is.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •