Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    132
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Test Your Cycling legal Know-How Here! (#2)

    Wallace, driving a dump truck, runs a stop sign, heading north.
    Larry, riding a bicycle, also runs a stop sign at the same time, heading east. he hits the side of Wallace's truck, scratching it, falls under the rear wheels, and is critically injured.
    Wallace sues Larry for the damage to his truck.

    In a pure contributory negligence state, Wallace (will / will not) be able to recover any money.

  2. #2
    I need more cowbell. Digital Gee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Reno, Nevada
    My Bikes
    2012 Masi Evoluzione, 2009 Specialized Globe Vienna 2
    Posts
    7,899
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    True
    Visit my blog! The Leadership Almanac
    2012 Masi Evoluzione
    2009 Specialized Globe Vienna 2

    Proud member of the original Club Tombay

  3. #3
    Calamari to go cc_rider's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Falls Church, VA
    My Bikes
    Trek 750
    Posts
    3,103
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    If they both ran stop signs at the same time, then Larry should have yielded to Wallace, since Wallace was on the right. Under Virginia law at least.

    Wallace could sue, Larry could counter-sue. Both are partially at fault. IMO both suits should be thrown out.

    If I was a juror in this case, I would probably be more sympathetic to Larry, since he sustained the greater loss. His running the stop sign might negate my finding for him.

    Not a lawyer. Never touch the stuff.

  4. #4
    genec genec's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    san diego
    My Bikes
    custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
    Posts
    22,379
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    In a pure contributory negligence state, Wallace will be able to recover money.

    As the driver on the right has right of way in any "tie" situation at stop signs.

  5. #5
    Calamari to go cc_rider's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Falls Church, VA
    My Bikes
    Trek 750
    Posts
    3,103
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I don't know the details of "contributory negligence." As a juror I might find for Wallace and award him one dollar.

  6. #6
    You need a new bike supcom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    5,434
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    In some states, each would probably be judged to be responsible for 50% of the losses. Since Larry obviously has greater losses than Wallace, Larry would collect on the net.

  7. #7
    Senior Member Rex G's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Bellaire TX USA
    My Bikes
    Bianchi Alloro, Veloce, San Remo, Pista; Rivendell Canti Rom; Zinn custom
    Posts
    808
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I am much more familiar with the criminal/traffic law side, but it is true that, all else being equal, the vehicle to the right has the right-of-way. Both are guilty of running a stop sign, but the truck failed to yield R-O-W to the vehicle on the right. If I were making the accident report, Wallace would have two factors against him, the cyclist one.

  8. #8
    Calamari to go cc_rider's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Falls Church, VA
    My Bikes
    Trek 750
    Posts
    3,103
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Rex G
    I am much more familiar with the criminal/traffic law side, but it is true that, all else being equal, the vehicle to the right has the right-of-way. Both are guilty of running a stop sign, but the truck failed to yield R-O-W to the vehicle on the right. If I were making the accident report, Wallace would have two factors against him, the cyclist one.
    The truck was going north, the bike was going east. That puts the truck to the right of the bike.

  9. #9
    High Desert of California
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    In a cycling unfriendly area
    Posts
    125
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Wallace gets to collect the money. Larry was riding a bike AND he was on a street. As I have read in several threads here, most non cyclists say that bikes don't belong on the streets. Wallace gets 1.2 million for psychological trauma, lifetime medical, and any of Larry's still functioning body parts. Wallace also gets a child of his choice from Larry's family. He also gets a new truck because Larry has scratched the old one. The jury is made up from that idiot on NPR radio, the guy from the "Have at it boys" thread (the one who suggested cyclists be ran over) and the guy from the Pittsburg Gazette.

    Am I close to being right??
    " People don't go to church because, they say, Churchs are full of hypocrites. No they're not, there's room for plenty more!!"
    My Pastor

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •