Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

View Poll Results: How much control do you believe a cyclist has in determining his safety in traffic?

Voters
145. You may not vote on this poll
  • 0% - The cyclist is a sitting duck, subject to being wiped out by 4,000 lbs. of steel at any time, and there is nothing he can do about it.

    1 0.69%
  • 10% - Cyclist has very little control, basically a sitting duck whose fate is mostly determined by the competence of drivers around him.

    5 3.45%
  • 25% - Cyclist has some significant influence, but not as much as drivers around him have.

    13 8.97%
  • 50% - It's 50/50. Even the perfect cyclist who makes no mistakes reduces his chances of crashing by only half over a careless cyclist.

    17 11.72%
  • 75% - The cyclist has a lot of control, but drivers around him still make it all too likely that he will get hit when there is nothing he can do about it.

    38 26.21%
  • 90% - A cyclist's safety is mostly in his control, but there is still a decent chance that a crash he cannot avoid might happen.

    54 37.24%
  • 95-99% - Almost all crashes are the cyclist's fault, or could have been avoided by the cyclist.

    9 6.21%
  • 99.00001-99.9999% - Except for the most blatant of errors, like a drunk driver careening across the road, a cyclist is in complete control of his fate.

    6 4.14%
  • 100% - If a cyclist is hit, he didn't do something he should have in order to have avoided it, period.

    0 0%
  • Other (specify in post)

    2 1.38%
Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 85
  1. #1
    Banned. Helmet Head's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    13,075
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    How much control does a cyclist have?

    How much control do you believe a cyclist has in determining his own safety when cycling in traffic?

  2. #2
    I drink your MILKSHAKE Raiyn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    St. Petersburg, FL
    My Bikes
    2003 Specialized Rockhopper FSR Comp, 1999 Specialized Hardrock Comp FS, 1971 Schwinn Varsity
    Posts
    15,071
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    In terms of percentage? Perhaps 75%. The bulk of one's personal safety is based on two things: precautions taken and the environmental / outside forces. You can't stop a car from hitting you, but you can make every effort to make yourself visible and ride in a vehicular fashion.

  3. #3
    Banned. Helmet Head's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    13,075
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    15 views, and only 1 vote???
    Why is no one voting?

  4. #4
    People Before Profit Mehow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Vancouver, B.C.
    Posts
    497
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Helmet Head
    15 views, and only 1 vote???
    Why is no one voting?
    There are so many variables envolved in VC safety, plus maybe some of us don't want to think about the chances of something going wrong.

    I'd say it's 50/50 . . .with the key to safety being that both cyclist and car-driver are visable and predictable to one another.

  5. #5
    Senior Member KeithA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    688
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I voted 90% because I try to anticipate anything that might happen as best I can. Still...

  6. #6
    Senior Member Metieval's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Ohio
    My Bikes
    Giant Cypress SX, C'Dale caad8 R1000
    Posts
    461
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Raiyn
    In terms of percentage? Perhaps 75%. The bulk of one's personal safety is based on two things: precautions taken and the environmental / outside forces. You can't stop a car from hitting you, but you can make every effort to make yourself visible and ride in a vehicular fashion.
    That is what I thought, and then somedays it seems no matter what you do to become visable. Some drivers are just jerks or don't care.

    I suppose with a mirror a cyclist could keep from getting clipped, but at what expense? hitting a road sign? hitting a mailbox? riding into a ditch? It is still an accident although you had taken the precaution of using a mirror.

  7. #7
    Senior Member royalflash's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Munich
    My Bikes
    Lemond Alpe d´Huez, Scott Sub 10, homemade mtb, Radlbauer adler (old city bike), Dahon impulse (folder with 20 inch wheels), haibike eq xduro
    Posts
    1,372
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I voted for 90%- this seems like the most realistic option- cyclist behaviour is the most important factor of course in determining safety- you could for example just use your bike to go round your garden in which case your chance of an accident in traffic would be very low.

    In real life however most of us choose to get out there and take some risks to get stuff done.
    only the dead have seen the end of mass motorized stupidity

    Plato

    (well if he was alive today he would have written it)

  8. #8
    mac
    mac is offline
    They see me rollin' mac's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Los Angeles
    My Bikes
    2005 Cannondale T2000
    Posts
    785
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I voted for only 25% in traffic. No matter how many lights, reflectors, vests, hand signals, cycling dogma (vehicular, invisible, hybrid), etc. you have, you're still at an incredible disadvantage in traffic and at the mercy of cars, trucks, and SUVs. Don't fall into the false sense of security that your particular cyclist kit & style will make you in control. The soccer mom on the phone stuffing her face and yelling at her kids and the irate businessman corporate-drone pounding down his 4th cup of coffee control 75% of your security. Why? Size matters - a 6,400# Hummer H2 SUV driven even slightly recklessly vs. a 200# bicycle + rider will control the bicycle each and every time. You can't avoid vehicles. They zoom past you at 50+ mph, barely giving you enough room. And if you "take the lane" and if they see you, they will still zoom past you unaware of the width of their monster trucks. I know, I've done it - taken a lane & taken the gutter - and still get buzzed either way.

    There are a lot of unskilled and malicious drivers out there. Most of the accidents they get into are little fender-benders like a small bump here or a tap there. In vehicle vs. vehicle, it's nothing - sometimes not even enough to report to the DMV. But in vehicle vs. bicycle, even those littlest of taps is enough to injure, possibly seriously, a bicyclist.

    And you can also ask this question to motorcyclists. We can wear reflective body armor, very secure helmets, be very well lit up, ride the speed limit (i.e. flow with traffic), and still get hit by left-turners or red-light runners or no-look lane-changers. Now imagine a bicyclist who can't even keep up with the flow of traffic. Sorry, but the majority of our safety in traffic is in the hands of the 16 y.o. kid in his ricer and fart-can and his two aforementioned parents.

    Oh, and I forgot about the people who actively seek out cyclists to mess with them. The ones with the air-horns, paintballs, beer cans, profanities, etc. You may be doing everything safely, but that still offers zero security against these kinds of people. Even carrying a weapon won't stop them at first since they don't know you are armed.

  9. #9
    EARTH IS FULL. GO HOME. heckflosse's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    ENGLAND
    My Bikes
    Jeep Cherokee-se, Euro Eco-bike
    Posts
    292
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'ld like to think I have 75% whilst cycling. Observation and antisipation can go along way to preventing an accident on a bike, as it can with a car.
    However I do think their should be some kind of 'test' on a bicycle before being allowed on the road and I think the car driving test could be alot better. Can't comment on the US but my driving test here in the UK only lasted around 20 minutes and I can't see how anyones driving skills can be judged in that short a time. Despite touching the pavement on the 'turn in the road' I still managed to pass first time
    I've since passed my Advanced Driving Test and Police Class 2 (no I'm not a copper) but still don't class myself as an excellent driver, a safer one maybe but I've still got room for improvement.

  10. #10
    I drink your MILKSHAKE Raiyn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    St. Petersburg, FL
    My Bikes
    2003 Specialized Rockhopper FSR Comp, 1999 Specialized Hardrock Comp FS, 1971 Schwinn Varsity
    Posts
    15,071
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Helmet Head
    15 views, and only 1 vote???
    Why is no one voting?
    Simple. There wasn't a poll when I posted

  11. #11
    genec genec's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    san diego
    My Bikes
    custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
    Posts
    22,534
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Its 50-50 but not for the reasons you stated:

    Quote Originally Posted by helmet head
    50% - It's 50/50. Even the perfect cyclist who makes no mistakes reduces his chances of crashing by only half over a careless cyclist.
    The perfect cyclists has a far greater chance of daily survival over a careless cyclist... but in an auto accident situation, the blame or causation is not shared between a perfect cyclist and a careless cyclist, the blame is shared between a motorist and a cyclist.

    Become a better cyclist and you reduce your chances of being hit, get better motorists on the road and all users of the roads benefit.

    Traffic is predictable; however, individual motorists are not.

  12. #12
    34x25 FTW! oboeguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    NYC
    My Bikes
    Scott CR1 '07, Dahon SpeedPro '06
    Posts
    6,002
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    This one's easy. Figure the number of crashes you've avoided with your mad skillz versus the number you've been in that you couldn't avoid. I put in "90%" even though I think maybe it's closer to 95% or better. Yes, for every 10-20 incidents I avoid I'd say at most one happens.
    Quote Originally Posted by Blue Order
    Quote Originally Posted by sknhgy
    I do not want to be associated with the kind of riders that come through my neck of the woods on weekends, dressed in superhero costumes
    Do they wear capes?
    ---

    http://www.cycopaths.net/

  13. #13
    Enthusiasm on Wheels As You Like It's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Kansas City, MO
    My Bikes
    1953 Schwinn Debutante, 1971 Hercules 3-speed, 1973 Schwinn Suburban, 1990 Huffy White River, 1990-something Bianchi Advantage, 1996 Trek 800
    Posts
    725
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I voted 75%. Basically, I think being alert, riding sensibly, and doing your best to be visible and make your intentions known goes a LONG way toward saving your hide, but there are always going to be lousy drivers out there. Kids who just got their licenses who don't know what they're doing, distracted drivers eating their lunch, conducting phone business, handling their children, etc, elderly drivers who can't see well and have slower reaction times, drunk drivers, and other nuts who can't be categorized. For all of the drivers who are alert, who drive defensively, who take care, there's always going to be the guy who hasn't had his coffee and runs a red light 'cause he's still half asleep, or the out-of-towner who is trying to read a map and drive at the same time.

    We cyclists can and should watch out for ourselves, and keep an eye out for erratic drivers, people coming off side streets, and pretty much everyone and everything else, but you know, some day, something could be out of your control. I do my best to ensure that I won't end up a street pizza, but I know that is a possibility that is always out there.
    Wheeeee!

  14. #14
    Gravel for Breakfast
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Inside my scabs
    My Bikes
    Jake
    Posts
    1,486
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    84.7%

    I thought everybody knew that.
    Sin after sin I have endured, but the wounds I bear are the wounds of love.

  15. #15
    Videre non videri
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Gothenburg, Sweden
    My Bikes
    1 road bike (simple, light), 1 TT bike (could be more aero, could be lighter), 1 all-weather commuter and winter bike, 1 Monark 828E ergometer indoor bike
    Posts
    3,202
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Almost went with 0%, but figured there are some things a bicyclist can do, as a last-minute avoidance measure, so I decided to vote 10%.
    We're really all sitting ducks out there. I just try my hardest to ignore that fact while I'm riding.

  16. #16
    Dominatrikes sbhikes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Still in Santa Barbara
    My Bikes
    Catrike Pocket, Lightning Thunderbold recumbent, Trek 3000 MTB.
    Posts
    4,920
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    This is a hard question to answer.

    The factor in safety is not being involved in an accident. But accidents by their very definition include such terms as unavoidable, unintentional, unexpected, and chance. You cannot control that which is unavoidable, unintentional, unexpected or by chance. You can try to expect the unexpected, but there are unknowns and then there are unknown unknowns, to loosely quote Rumsfeld.

    So, the control you seek is control over that which hasn't happened yet.

    I have never been in an accident involving a motor vehicle while riding my bicycle (I did have a reflector jam in my spokes once which caused me to crash). Does this mean I've got the ability to exert near perfect control? Does that even make me above average in skill? I really don't think so. And if my DMV record over my lifetime, and the scores I got on my drivers exam when I was 16 are any indication, I'm not particularly skilled in the operation of vehicles on streets where there are other vehicles. Add my new clipless pedals to the mix and I'm an accident waiting to happen.

    Then there is the question of what exactly are you in control of. As an individual I'm pretty much in control only of myself. I can't control all those other people out there. As a citizen, however, I do have some control through laws and such over the behavior of others. But it seems there's been a breakdown over the past few decades in the behavior of other citizens and in the community's willingness or ability or financial capability to enforce laws.

    So, focusing only on the control I have over myself, the only thing I can do is make choices. Do I make good ones? Not always.

    I do not choose the carless routes every time I can. So right there I've decreased the control I have over becoming a car accident statistic. Were I to choose the MUP over the street I might increase becoming a bike/ped or bike/bike accident statistic instead, which probably wouldn't hurt as much. Either way, I put myself at risk of what others might do to me that I am unable to avoid, unable to expect, that is unintended or happens by chance.

    I also don't choose the safest routes I can. I guess I like the expediency of my routes even though I'm at risk of being run over by a confused tourist. I do my best to anticipate what they will do, but they frequently surprise me.

    I find myself to be inattentive sometimes. My choice to cycle is partially a reaction to that. Better to turn off my brain with some vigorous exercise than drive home like that trying to solve problems I can't seem to leave behind at work.

    I do choose my reactions to car drivers who are demonstrably aggressive or blatantly inattentive toward me as a cyclist. I think I'm ok in that department. I try not to provoke the situation even if that means yielding, pulling over or stopping. Any attempts at assertiveness, I have learned, only worsen the situation. It's not worth it to be dead right, me in my geeky, ***** bike vs. some testosterone mullet-head in a bloated tank.

    So how do I vote in your poll? I really don't know. I can't put a number on the amount of control I have over something I personally can't control: the unintended, unexpected, unavoidable, by chance mishap that might happen in the future.

    I'd probably choose the 90% option, but not for the 90% figure. I think the statement you list next to it is accurate, but I can't put a number on how much control that statement represents. I could be 99.999999% in control but it would only take one mishap to end my life.
    ~Diane
    Recumbents: Lightning Thunderbolt, '06 Catrike Pocket. Upright: Trek Mountain Bike.
    8.5 mile commute. I like bike lanes.

  17. #17
    Banned Bikepacker67's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Ogopogo's shoreline
    My Bikes
    LHT, Kona Smoke
    Posts
    4,063
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I think cyclists can avoid a lot of accidents just by choosing quieter routes, and best times of day.

    I know that this isn't practical for many urban and commuter types, but whenever I read of a local biker getting clipped, it's always either at night, during rush hour, or on a 4 lane race track.

  18. #18
    cab horn
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Toronto
    My Bikes
    1987 Bianchi Campione
    Posts
    28,292
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I don't understand the point of this poll.

  19. #19
    Videre non videri
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Gothenburg, Sweden
    My Bikes
    1 road bike (simple, light), 1 TT bike (could be more aero, could be lighter), 1 all-weather commuter and winter bike, 1 Monark 828E ergometer indoor bike
    Posts
    3,202
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Ok, of course I could always choose a car-free area to ride around in, but that isn't practical.

    The question isn't worded that way, but the intent surely was to decide what level of control the rider has, while doing what he/she is normally doing!?
    And in that case, it's close to zero.

  20. #20
    Been Around Awhile I-Like-To-Bike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Burlington Iowa
    My Bikes
    Vaterland and Ragazzi
    Posts
    19,544
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by operator
    I don't understand the point of this poll.
    Sure you do; the same as all the other polls from this pollster; more grist for the SergeHead-Brand of Advocacy Mill. Anyone who doesn't provide a brilliant (i.e. the expected and pre-approved) response is subject to an internet interrogation until "understanding" the error of his/her previous response.

  21. #21
    Senior Member JavaMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Southern California
    My Bikes
    2011 Madone 5.2, 64 cm, 180 mm cranks
    Posts
    1,067
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    When you write your book, are you going to reimburse us for providing your research data?
    JavaMan!
    Faster than a speeding moped!
    More powerful than the Santa Ana winds!
    Able to bunny-hop railroad tracks in a single bound!

  22. #22
    Been Around Awhile I-Like-To-Bike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Burlington Iowa
    My Bikes
    Vaterland and Ragazzi
    Posts
    19,544
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by JavaMan
    When you write your book, are you going to reimburse us for providing your research data?
    Java, You better provide only EC™ approved data if you expect it to be used in any EC™ tome. Otherwise it will be tossed in the rubbish bin as a superstition.

  23. #23
    Sophomoric Member Roody's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Dancing in Lansing
    Posts
    20,380
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I chose 90 %.

    I believe half the unavoidable risk is from Non-traffic sources (e.g., road surface, debris, wet or icy conditions, etc.), so maybe I should have put 95 %.

  24. #24
    Senior Member Dchiefransom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Newark, CA. San Francisco Bay Area
    Posts
    6,190
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I voted 25%. Unlike others, I don't believe drivers have the good intentions that others here seem to believe. If we anal-yze every accident and show that the cyclist could have always done something to avoid it, then why should the drivers ever be listed as "at fault"?

  25. #25
    mac
    mac is offline
    They see me rollin' mac's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Los Angeles
    My Bikes
    2005 Cannondale T2000
    Posts
    785
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Bikepacker67
    I think cyclists can avoid a lot of accidents just by choosing quieter routes, and best times of dayp.
    No offense, but I don't think you and a few others understand this poll. The question is:

    How much control do you believe a cyclist has in determining his own safety when cycling in traffic?

    I put 25% when in traffic. However, I try my best to avoid traffic, take side streets, etc. But I think the OP's question was very specific to traffic, esp since he's a VC.

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •