Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Advocacy & Safety
Reload this Page >

Not voting for the Governator next time

Search
Notices
Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

Not voting for the Governator next time

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-05-05, 11:01 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
7rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Mountain View, CA
Posts: 925

Bikes: 1999 Seven Sola, 2004 Bianchi Axis, 2005 Trek Madone 5.2 SL, 2006 Merlin Works CR 3/2.5, 2009 Kona Ute, Spot Acme, 2017 Raleigh Roker Comp, 2016 Specialized Camber Expert 29

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I voted for Arnold in the recall election although I'm a registered Democrat (Gray seemed so weak - especially with his proposal just before he left office to provide driver's licenses to illegal immigrants, and Arnold seemed like he would stir up things), but after his veto of AB 748, no more support for Arnie:

Governor vetoes bike bills!

Arnie, if you leave office soon, there still may be time to make True Lies 2.
7rider is offline  
Old 10-05-05, 11:09 AM
  #2  
Bent_Rider
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: SF Bay area
Posts: 1,248

Bikes: Bacchetta Aero, BikeE, Bruce Gordon Rock n Road

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Yup, he sucks. The Hummer man. He is not a friend of cyclists, the enviroment, workers, consumers.
scarry is offline  
Old 10-05-05, 11:38 AM
  #3  
Banned.
 
Helmet Head's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 13,075
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
"It is clear from his message that the veto was based on the issue of state .vs. local control, and not on support for tolling cyclists and pedestrians."

I think you're overreacting. It's the right call. We've got too many decisions moving up the political food chain -- to Sacramento and Washington D.C. Keep it local. That's what this veto is about, not tolling cyclist on bridges.
Helmet Head is offline  
Old 10-05-05, 11:45 AM
  #4  
Rides again
 
HiYoSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: SW. Sacramento Region, aka, down river
Posts: 3,282

Bikes: Giant OCR T, Trek SC

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Amen helmet head. If not careful, the moving from Local Control ->State Control -> Federal Control will add a final --> International Control.

A better question might be what are they doing with the toll money. I thought the bridge was paid for long long ago.
HiYoSilver is offline  
Old 10-05-05, 11:48 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
7rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Mountain View, CA
Posts: 925

Bikes: 1999 Seven Sola, 2004 Bianchi Axis, 2005 Trek Madone 5.2 SL, 2006 Merlin Works CR 3/2.5, 2009 Kona Ute, Spot Acme, 2017 Raleigh Roker Comp, 2016 Specialized Camber Expert 29

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
A better question might be what are they doing with the toll money. I thought the bridge was paid for long long ago.
Bridge maintenance costs a lot. Ah, I did overreact after reading Arnie's reasons. I guess we have to appeal to the local organization that would decide on a toll. I'd still like to see a True Lies 2 - with a grown up Eliza Dushku working as an undercover agent in a gentlemen's club - hey, one can dream.
7rider is offline  
Old 10-05-05, 11:54 AM
  #6  
Rides again
 
HiYoSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: SW. Sacramento Region, aka, down river
Posts: 3,282

Bikes: Giant OCR T, Trek SC

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Dream on. No dreams you're dead.

I thought a study of the tools showed the majority of funds were not being used for the bridge.

Another of the wonderful reasons why I moved away from the bay area.
HiYoSilver is offline  
Old 10-05-05, 11:54 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Keith99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,866
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Wasn't just this week, last week if not, that people were complaining that one of the New York bridges was closed for cycleists and peds most of the night? Speculation on that one was that part of the reason was that they didn't pay tolls!

Making laws like the one vetoed limit options. Now the tolls for bikes option may never be used, but it would sure suck if there was some great project for bikes that didn't get done for lack of funds (worst case lack of a trivial amount of funds that would get a huge amount of matching funds) when a bike toll could raise those funds.
Keith99 is offline  
Old 10-05-05, 12:13 PM
  #8  
Bent_Rider
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: SF Bay area
Posts: 1,248

Bikes: Bacchetta Aero, BikeE, Bruce Gordon Rock n Road

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 7rider
Bridge maintenance costs a lot. Ah, I did overreact after reading Arnie's reasons. I guess we have to appeal to the local organization that would decide on a toll. I'd still like to see a True Lies 2 - with a grown up Eliza Dushku working as an undercover agent in a gentlemen's club - hey, one can dream.
Bridge maintenance does cost a lot. Maybe we should charge according to impact each user has on the bridge's upkeep.

Let's say hypothetically...$1 per thousand pounds. 5,000 lbs vehicle is $5, the current toll.

So a 150lbs rider plus his bike, call it 200lbs. or 1/5 of $1 or $0.20. Not worth the overhead for the collection. This is the reason this toll has been shot down repeatedly.
scarry is offline  
Old 10-05-05, 12:41 PM
  #9  
1.9lb/in
 
pseudobrit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Susquehanna shoreline
Posts: 1,360

Bikes: LeMond, CAAD9/1

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Do state or federal taxes pay for upkeep?
pseudobrit is offline  
Old 10-05-05, 12:47 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Keith99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,866
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by scarry
Bridge maintenance does cost a lot. Maybe we should charge according to impact each user has on the bridge's upkeep.

Let's say hypothetically...$1 per thousand pounds. 5,000 lbs vehicle is $5, the current toll.

So a 150lbs rider plus his bike, call it 200lbs. or 1/5 of $1 or $0.20. Not worth the overhead for the collection. This is the reason this toll has been shot down repeatedly.
At least when we are talking about a bridge over salt water a big part of upkeep has nothing to do with the wear by man, but rather the wear by nature and for that part it would be fair to treat everyone more equally.

One other toll might be off hours tolls. If the bridge would otherwise be closed from let us say 9:00 pm to 6:00 am having a toll during those hours or even part of those hours to keep it open could be a good thing for cyclists.
Keith99 is offline  
Old 10-05-05, 01:51 PM
  #11  
Ride the Road
 
Daily Commute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 4,059

Bikes: Surly Cross-Check; hard tail MTB

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 3 Posts
One dollar seems like a small price to pay for the right to use a very convenient bridge.
Daily Commute is offline  
Old 10-05-05, 01:53 PM
  #12  
The Improbable Bulk
 
Little Darwin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Wilkes-Barre, PA
Posts: 8,379

Bikes: Many

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by pseudobrit
Do state or federal taxes pay for upkeep?
I am not sure if any tax money is used, but I do know that in California, the tolls are used for bridge maintenance, and also to subsidize mass transit.

When I lived in the bay area it did bother me that part of the payment I made to cross the bridge was to subsidize mass transit that I could have taken to work... but would have been incredibly painful.

I would have had to take a bus to BART for a buck or two (about 3 miles), take BART to the farthest point for $9 + and taken another bus (and perhaps a transfer) for the 18 miles between the bart station and work. Or I could just drive the 18 miles to work in about 1/4 the time and less cost (even with being robbed at the toll booth)
__________________
Slow Ride Cyclists of NEPA

People do not seem to realize that their opinion of the world is also a confession of character.
- Ralph Waldo Emerson
Little Darwin is offline  
Old 10-08-05, 09:25 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
smurfy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 1,258

Bikes: Classic lugged-steel road, touring, shopping, semi-recumbent, gravel

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 46 Post(s)
Liked 81 Times in 32 Posts
Originally Posted by Daily Commute
One dollar seems like a small price to pay for the right to use a very convenient bridge.
Let the cagers pay the toll. The state should be paying CYCLISTS for saving gas and the enviroment. They should be pulling out all the stops - doing all they can to encourage bicycle and alternative transport, not single-occupancy car driving.

Yes, a dollar's not much but it's the idea of even charging cyclists that sucks.
smurfy is offline  
Old 10-08-05, 01:39 PM
  #14  
Ride the Road
 
Daily Commute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 4,059

Bikes: Surly Cross-Check; hard tail MTB

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by smurfy
Let the cagers pay the toll. The state should be paying CYCLISTS for saving gas and the enviroment. They should be pulling out all the stops - doing all they can to encourage bicycle and alternative transport, not single-occupancy car driving.

Yes, a dollar's not much but it's the idea of even charging cyclists that sucks.
It sucks to pay out money, but it certainly legitimizes cyclists as bridge users. It also means cyclists have a clear right to demand appropriate and safe facilities.

And don't cars have to pay a lot more?
Daily Commute is offline  
Old 10-08-05, 05:20 PM
  #15  
RacingBear
 
UmneyDurak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: NorCal
Posts: 9,053
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 280 Post(s)
Liked 68 Times in 36 Posts
Well I dislike our Governator for different reasons, for the BS he pulled with school/university system funding. Anyway did anyone here actually finished reading the article? What troubles me more is that he also vetoed AB 523, the state Bicycle Transportation Account (BTA). Now the funding will be decreased by over two milion.
UmneyDurak is offline  
Old 10-08-05, 05:36 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: San Gabriel Mountains
Posts: 465

Bikes: Vortex, Proteus,Tuscany, Victoire

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I think Arnold deserves a break. California is near bankruptcy after years of mismanagement. Arnold is just trying to spend less. If he could, I am sure he would spend billions on bike lanes and every other sports activity you can think of.
trayer350 is offline  
Old 10-08-05, 07:05 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
Dchiefransom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Newark, CA. San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 6,251
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 31 Post(s)
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
The tolls on the Bay bridges pay for all the work they do on them. The tolls have been increased to pay for other projects, also.
Dchiefransom is offline  
Old 10-08-05, 09:28 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
Placid Casual's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 942
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 7rider
I voted for Arnold in the recall election
Ha ha ha ha ha. That's me laughing at you for voting for him in the first place.

Hey, but never fear, dude. I heard that the little yellow fuzzy guy from the Homestar Runner cartoons is going to run next year. Yeah, he's really going to clean up Sacramento and take the government back from all those special interests and political insiders. And he's a celebrity, so why would he lie?
Placid Casual is offline  
Old 10-10-05, 09:37 PM
  #19  
High Desert of California
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: In a cycling unfriendly area
Posts: 125
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
[QUOTE=7rider]I voted for Arnold in the recall election although I'm a registered Democrat (Gray seemed so weak - especially with his proposal just before he left office to provide driver's licenses to illegal immigrants, and Arnold seemed like he would stir up things), but after his veto of AB 748, no more support for Arnie:

I wonder what happened to Arnold's idea of getting accountants to go through Sacramento and find all the waste. I guess it was just easier to blame teachers and the unions. I have been a Republican all my life but after Bush and Arnold I doubt I ever vote for a Republican again. The unfortunate thing is that the Democratic Party is so full of wacko's I can't vote for the either. Oh well, guess I will exercise my right to not vote as my new party.
Bike nut is offline  
Old 10-10-05, 10:04 PM
  #20  
.
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: .
Posts: 3,094

Bikes: .

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I forcast the dems will die out like the whigs did, the repubs will become what the dems were, and a new Right/Populist party will arise. And get my vote and the votes of the majority.
lilHinault is offline  
Old 10-10-05, 10:09 PM
  #21  
.
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: .
Posts: 3,094

Bikes: .

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Oh yeah and if Arnold is smart he'll align himself with this new party.
lilHinault is offline  
Old 10-11-05, 02:54 AM
  #22  
Ride the Road
 
Daily Commute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 4,059

Bikes: Surly Cross-Check; hard tail MTB

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 3 Posts
Can we pull this thread back to cycling? Criticize or support his policies regarding cyclists, but too much general pro- or anti-Arnold talk will get the thread closed or moved to P&R.
Daily Commute is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.