Policy article-increasing bicycle safety
10-19-05, 09:51 AM
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Tacoma, WA
Posts: 4
Bikes: Kona Dew Deluxe
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Policy article-increasing bicycle safety
I found this article in the October issue of Governing magazine- good to see it in a policy magazine. Interesting point about helmets...
https://www.governing.com/articles/10trans.htm
https://www.governing.com/articles/10trans.htm
10-19-05, 10:15 AM
#2
Senior Member
This is a good article. Particularly how the author addresses helmets and how it is foolish to have the only bicycling policy be a helmet promotion policy. Aside from all the discussions here about vehicular cycling, critical mass, bike lanes, and the general direction of advocacy here in the United States, it really is "safety in numbers" which reduces the threat to any one cyclist.
It would be interesting to see how a law dictating that the car is automatically at fault for any car/bicycle accident would work here in the US. We already have some blanket laws like that, such as automatic pedestrian right of way, and rear-end accidents. I wonder if drivers would take bicycles more seriously if the legal responsibility were placed squarly on them for avoiding an accident.
Before we get into another flame war about the responsibility of cyclists (or helmets), remember that I am talking about official policy toward cars -- how the laws are enforced with respect to cars, not how cyclists should behave or how the laws should be enforced against cyclists. Even with an automatic pedestrian right of way, the pedestrian can still be cited for jay walking. The same principle can easily apply for cyclists as well. After all, there is still the concept of dead right.
It would be interesting to see how a law dictating that the car is automatically at fault for any car/bicycle accident would work here in the US. We already have some blanket laws like that, such as automatic pedestrian right of way, and rear-end accidents. I wonder if drivers would take bicycles more seriously if the legal responsibility were placed squarly on them for avoiding an accident.
Before we get into another flame war about the responsibility of cyclists (or helmets), remember that I am talking about official policy toward cars -- how the laws are enforced with respect to cars, not how cyclists should behave or how the laws should be enforced against cyclists. Even with an automatic pedestrian right of way, the pedestrian can still be cited for jay walking. The same principle can easily apply for cyclists as well. After all, there is still the concept of dead right.
__________________
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
10-19-05, 11:27 AM
#4
Senior Member
It's interesting that you found this while a thread on obeying traffic laws is near the top of the subject list. Members of this forum that have been to Holland report that cyclists there obey all the traffic laws, thus, they can hold drivers responsible in an accident.
10-19-05, 07:22 PM
#5
Fattest Thin Man
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Directly above the center of the earth
Posts: 2,648
Bikes: Miyata 610, Vinco V, Rocky Mountain Element
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by Brian Ratliff
We already have some blanket laws like that, such as automatic pedestrian right of way,
Check your vehicle code.
Az
10-19-05, 08:25 PM
#6
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
Originally Posted by Az B
Just a minor nit pick. This is not true, pedestrians only have the right of way while in a crosswalk. This is apparently a common misconception, I remember being taught that in driver's ed back in the 70s. But it wasn't true then and it's not true now.
Check your vehicle code.
Az
Check your vehicle code.
Az
10-19-05, 08:27 PM
#7
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
I don't know how true this statement is... but it sure sounds good to me.
"In Amsterdam and many cities where cycling is common, drivers are taught that a cyclist comes first, both practically and legally. In Holland and most Scandinavian countries, if a driver hits a cyclist, the driver is at fault. Period. The European Union is now working to make this a standard policy in its member countries."
Now obviously, like the pedestrian law that was just discussed, there are exceptions and responsibilities on the part of all parties involved.
"In Amsterdam and many cities where cycling is common, drivers are taught that a cyclist comes first, both practically and legally. In Holland and most Scandinavian countries, if a driver hits a cyclist, the driver is at fault. Period. The European Union is now working to make this a standard policy in its member countries."
Now obviously, like the pedestrian law that was just discussed, there are exceptions and responsibilities on the part of all parties involved.
10-19-05, 09:27 PM
#8
Fattest Thin Man
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Directly above the center of the earth
Posts: 2,648
Bikes: Miyata 610, Vinco V, Rocky Mountain Element
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
1 Post
In several countries (Japan, Sweden, etc) if you ever hit a ped or a bicyclist you will probably lose your license forever.
Unfortunately, a car is part of being an American so the right is rarely revoked. It's too bad, but it's the way it is.
Az
Unfortunately, a car is part of being an American so the right is rarely revoked. It's too bad, but it's the way it is.
Az
10-20-05, 09:41 AM
#9
Senior Member
Originally Posted by Az B
Just a minor nit pick. This is not true, pedestrians only have the right of way while in a crosswalk. This is apparently a common misconception, I remember being taught that in driver's ed back in the 70s. But it wasn't true then and it's not true now.
Check your vehicle code.
Az
Check your vehicle code.
Az
__________________
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
