Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-17-05, 07:33 PM   #1
Blue Order
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 7,282
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Note to Drivers: Lose the Cellphone, and the Lipstick

The New York Times

October 1, 2005

Note to Drivers: Lose the Phone (and Lipstick)

By DAMIEN CAVE

GREENWICH, Conn., Sept. 29 - When a new state driving law goes into effect here on Saturday, Will Suarez will have to put down his Treo 650 cellphone and stop digging into his briefcase while cruising Connecticut's streets and highways in his Audi sedan.

The new law, one of the toughest in the nation, goes beyond just prohibiting drivers from using hand-held cellphones while behind the wheel. Those pulled over for speeding or other moving violations can be fined $100 for any behavior that distracts them from driving - glancing at a newspaper, typing on a BlackBerry, applying lipstick while looking in the rearview mirror or turning to yell at the kids in the back seat.

It is a prospect that Mr. Suarez, 42, like many drivers across Connecticut, can hardly believe is possible.

"I'm in sales, so I work out of my car a lot," he said Thursday, after driving into a parking lot here with his phone pressed against his ear. "It's an infringement of my personal freedoms."

Drivers nonetheless will have to get used to it. Four years after New York passed the nation's first cellphone ban, 22 states and Washington have limited cellphone use while driving. And in the last year, many of those states have gone beyond merely regulating cellphone use among drivers, cracking down on distractions inside cars.

Tennessee and Virginia, going further than most, have passed laws prohibiting the display of pornographic videos in vehicles. In Nevada, lawmakers recently increased penalties for drivers who kill someone while eating, putting on makeup or using a cellphone. In Washington, district lawmakers have banned driving while "reading, writing, performing personal grooming, interacting with pets or unsecured cargo" or while playing video games. At least a half-dozen other states, including Alaska, Louisiana, Delaware and Wisconsin, are considering bans on activities that pull drivers' attention away from the road.

"This is a trend that we're seeing in a lot of places," said Matt Sundeen, a transportation specialist at the National Conference of State Legislatures. "Since the introduction of the cellphone in cars, there has been enormous growing interest in distractions and now they are looking at all aspects of the issue."

Studies have shown for years that holding a cellphone to your ear while maneuvering a vehicle can be dangerous. One 2002 Harvard study estimated that drivers using cellphones may cause about 2,600 deaths a year nationwide and 330,000 injuries.

Hand-held cellphones are not the only problem either. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration estimates that distractions are a factor in up to 80 percent of all traffic accidents reported to the police. Even the use of a headset or other hands-free cellphone device can reduce a driver's concentration enough to pose a hazard, the agency found.

"It's the cognitive distraction of the conversation that causes problems," said Rae Tyson, a spokesman for the traffic safety agency.

Banning the use of hand-held cellphones will nonetheless make highways safer by reminding drivers to pay better attention, said Connecticut State Representative Richard Roy, Democrat of Milford, who had been pushing for a law against driving distractions since 1998.

"There's nothing worse than seeing someone driving down the road, on the phone or shaving or putting on make-up, and there's a child in the back seat," he said. "They'll say over and over that they love that child but they're putting the child in danger."

Mr. Roy said the law included a provision that allows the police to record which distractions are occurring most often. The Connecticut law includes a ban on cellphone use, even with a hands-free device, for drivers with a learning permit. Mr. Sundeen said that 10 states had recently passed laws limiting the use of electronics by teenage drivers.

In addition to Connecticut, only New York, New Jersey and a few cities, including Washington and Chicago, have outright bans on the use of hand-held cellphones by drivers.

In New York, the police can pull over and ticket a motorist just for using a hand-held cellphone.

In New Jersey, drivers spotted using a hand-held phone can be ticketed only if they are pulled over for a moving violation. But on Wednesday, the state's acting governor, Richard J. Codey, called for a law allowing the police to cite motorists solely for talking on a hand-held phone.

"Strengthening the ban will help us live better with technology," Mr. Codey said.

Connecticut's law follows the trend: drivers can be fined $100 simply for holding a cellphone "in the immediate proximity" of their ear. To be ticketed for other distractions, a motorist must first be pulled over for a moving violation.

Not that all drivers here are comforted by the distinction. Throughout Connecticut on Thursday, motorists said they supported outlawing hand-held cellphones, but had reservations about the law's language banning "any activity not related to the actual operation of a motor vehicle in a manner that interferes with the safe operation of such vehicle."

Mr. Suarez in Greenwich, who said that he also opposed mandatory seat-belt laws, called the new prohibition "way over the top."

Nancy Neumann, 40, who was shopping on Thursday for a hands-free device at a Verizon store in Trumbull, said the police should not have the right to penalize drivers for eating, drinking or talking to people in the back seat.

"You can grab a soda without even looking and you can swat your kids in the backseat without even looking," said Ms. Neumann, a mother of three.

Kelli Bussan, 36, a stay-at-home mom in New Canaan, said some distractions were impossible to avoid.

"My kids are always dropping their cups," she said, while rearranging toys in her parked gold 2004 Lincoln Navigator. "I have to turn around and get it unless I want them screaming the whole way home."

And what about, some people asked, more personal vehicular occurrences, like kissing or drumming on the dashboard to Bruce Springsteen's "Born to Run." Leigh Owen, standing near a Starbucks in Greenwich, said she wondered how the police would handle her own recent embarrassing car crisis: a giant spider camped out just above her head.

"I was screaming 'Oh my God, Oh my God, I'm going to die,' " she said. "I had to jerk the wheel to pull over. Would I get a ticket for a spider?"

Mr. Roy, the representative, said the police will have a lot of discretion in enforcing the law. Several officers in Bridgeport emphasized on Thursday that the law will not be used as an excuse for intrusion.

Kim Nikola, 39, an officer with the Bridgeport police, said that the no-cellphone law will be "just one more thing to keep in our minds."

And for some drivers, the law's extension beyond just talking was a welcome reminder that sharing the road requires concentration. Efrain Rosario, 22, an account manager for a Verizon Wireless store in Trumbull, said that on Aug. 10 he drove his 2005 Scion tC into the back of a Honda while reading a text message from a friend. If the law had been in place, he said, maybe he would have thought twice about looking down to read "What's up?"

"That 25-cent text message cost me a thousand dollars in damage," Rosario said, "and it ruined my night."
Blue Order is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-05, 07:34 PM   #2
Blue Order
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 7,282
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I didn't notice this posted before, but if it was, my apologies for posting it again.
Blue Order is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-05, 07:42 PM   #3
EricDJ
Airborne Titanium
 
EricDJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Los Angeles, California
Bikes: Airborne Ti Upright, Raleigh M-20 beater, Peugeot Folding
Posts: 952
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Someone around LA has their license plate as "hang up", they went further and made the top of the trim cover say "shut up" and the bottom says "and drive". Very cool when read together
EricDJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-05, 08:18 PM   #4
michaelnel
Macaws Rock!
 
michaelnel's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: San Francisco, CA
Bikes: 2005 Soma Doublecross
Posts: 1,513
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I wish they had a law like that in Kalifornia. But if they did, they wouldn't enforce it.
__________________
---

San Francisco, California
michaelnel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-05, 10:45 PM   #5
Bikepacker67
Banned
 
Bikepacker67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ogopogo's shoreline
Bikes: LHT, Kona Smoke
Posts: 4,086
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
"I'm in sales, so I work out of my car a lot," he said Thursday, after driving into a parking lot here with his phone pressed against his ear. "It's an infringement of my personal freedoms."
Do these folks even realize how self absorbed they sound?
Bikepacker67 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-05, 10:48 PM   #6
Blue Order
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 7,282
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
That was the quote that grabbed me too. "It's an infringement of my personal freedoms." Boo ****ing hoo. Self-centered a-hole.
Blue Order is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-05, 11:06 PM   #7
khuon
DEADBEEF
 
khuon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Catching his breath alongside a road near Seattle, WA USA
Bikes: 1999 K2 OzM, 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte
Posts: 12,242
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
The problem with these types of laws is that it's like the anti-bacterial soap problem. The laws attempt to eliminate distraction through legislation instead of dealing with the root cause of the problem. That is that the average motorist is ill-equipped/ill-trained to deal with a driving environment that is full of both intentional and unintentional distractions. Vehicular operations require task management and prioritisation. Simply saying that by enacting a law, we can eliminate distraction-induced accidents is nothing short of white-washing the issue. I would like to see more effort be placed on more thorough driver education/training and rigorous testing. If this means that more people have to actually spend more time increasing their driving skills through training and education, the better off the roads will be. If this means that those who simply cannot pass muster and no longer fit the requirements of "you must be this tall to ride this ride" and end up losing their driving priviledges then so be it. Would it not be better to raise the bar rather than continuing to admit those who cannot exhibit proper decision-making processes like knowing when to use a mobile phone or take a sip from their coffee? Playing whack-a-mole with driving distractions simply is not a scalable nor complete solution.
__________________
1999 K2 OzM 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte
"Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send." -- Jon Postel, RFC1122
khuon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-05, 11:19 PM   #8
Blue Order
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 7,282
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I'm not at all clear on how training would equip someone to drive better if they're being distracted while driving. Now, if you mean that drivers should be trained to recognize distracting activities as distracting activities, and thus, avoid distracting activities while they're driving, I see no harm in that. I also see no harm in making drivers pay the price for their inattention.
Blue Order is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-05, 12:47 PM   #9
khuon
DEADBEEF
 
khuon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Catching his breath alongside a road near Seattle, WA USA
Bikes: 1999 K2 OzM, 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte
Posts: 12,242
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue Order
I'm not at all clear on how training would equip someone to drive better if they're being distracted while driving. Now, if you mean that drivers should be trained to recognize distracting activities as distracting activities, and thus, avoid distracting activities while they're driving, I see no harm in that. I also see no harm in making drivers pay the price for their inattention.
If you have ever seen how operators of other vehicles are trained... especially those of commercial vehicles, you'll see that such training includes things like how to properly use navigation and communications equipment, how to avoid distractions and prioritise their tasks, how to handle emergency situations. Some operators must also undergo phsychological testing. The standards are far too low today for allowing an individual to get behind a device capable of imparting more kenetic energy damage than a round from an M-16.
__________________
1999 K2 OzM 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte
"Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send." -- Jon Postel, RFC1122
khuon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-05, 12:56 PM   #10
o-dog
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: College Park, MD
Bikes:
Posts: 535
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
"It's an infringement of my personal freedoms."

what about the personal freedom of others not to be killed or injured by distracted drivers?
o-dog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-05, 01:18 PM   #11
ChroMo2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Bikes: 1997 Schwinn Moab2 cross-country racing, highly modified, rebuilt many, many times. very fast!
Posts: 256
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
try driving a 5-speed and drinking coffee. that's legal! it doesn't matter if someone doesn't have the common sense not to drive and talk on a cellphone, because there's always the alcohol impaired operator or the druggie or the mental incapacitant. it's a shame no one has the right of way anymore. no wonder so many deaths and injuries occur on our nations roadways. i'm glad i'm a biker. it's nice to travel where motorized vehicles can't!
ChroMo2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-05, 02:38 PM   #12
Slow Train
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Bikes: 2006 Specialized S-Works Tricross
Posts: 462
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
>>
Kelli Bussan, 36, a stay-at-home mom in New Canaan, said some distractions were impossible to avoid.

"My kids are always dropping their cups," she said, while rearranging toys in her parked gold 2004 Lincoln Navigator. "I have to turn around and get it unless I want them screaming the whole way home."
<<

This is exactly the type of driver that caused me, years ago, to radically alter my commuting route. I came across way to many SUV's driven by distracted parents swatting at their kids. One time I even had to dive off the road as the vehicle coming at me was zig zaging from left to right.
Slow Train is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-05, 03:01 PM   #13
trackhub
Senior Member
 
trackhub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Watching all of you on O.B.I.T.
Bikes: Gunnar Street Dog
Posts: 2,040
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Quote:
"It's an infringement of my personal freedoms."
Well, I don't know about the rest of you folks, but I am damn tired of these morons using that argument.
trackhub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-05, 03:10 PM   #14
peregrine
commuter all star
 
peregrine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Seattle, WA
Bikes: '05 Fuji Cross, '04 Cannondale R1000
Posts: 806
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
*sigh* I know. Why can't some people understand the damage distractions while driving can cause and the seriousness of it?! It's frustrating!
peregrine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-05, 04:13 PM   #15
khuon
DEADBEEF
 
khuon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Catching his breath alongside a road near Seattle, WA USA
Bikes: 1999 K2 OzM, 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte
Posts: 12,242
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slow Train
>>
Kelli Bussan, 36, a stay-at-home mom in New Canaan, said some distractions were impossible to avoid.

"My kids are always dropping their cups," she said, while rearranging toys in her parked gold 2004 Lincoln Navigator. "I have to turn around and get it unless I want them screaming the whole way home."
<<

This is exactly the type of driver that caused me, years ago, to radically alter my commuting route. I came across way to many SUV's driven by distracted parents swatting at their kids. One time I even had to dive off the road as the vehicle coming at me was zig zaging from left to right.
I had a similar thing happen to me...

Do motorists like bike lanes?
__________________
1999 K2 OzM 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte
"Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send." -- Jon Postel, RFC1122
khuon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-05, 04:53 PM   #16
UmneyDurak
RacingBear
 
UmneyDurak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: NorCal
Bikes:
Posts: 8,602
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 39 Post(s)
Her reply also shows another problem, kids are too damn spoiled. Parents are letting them get away with too much crap.
UmneyDurak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-05, 05:05 PM   #17
sbhikes
Dominatrikes
 
sbhikes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Still in Santa Barbara
Bikes: Catrike Pocket, Lightning Thunderbold recumbent, Trek 3000 MTB.
Posts: 4,920
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by khuon
The laws attempt to eliminate distraction through legislation instead of dealing with the root cause of the problem. That is that the average motorist is ill-equipped/ill-trained to deal with a driving environment that is full of both intentional and unintentional distractions. Vehicular operations require task management and prioritisation. Simply saying that by enacting a law, we can eliminate distraction-induced accidents is nothing short of white-washing the issue.
I think enacting the law is step one in educating motorists of the seriousness of distracted driving. And if any of them actually obey the law, maybe the driving environment will be quiet enough for them to recall the driver training they actually did have all those long years ago.

As for these "I work out of my car I have to talk on the phone" people, maybe they should go work out of an Internet cafe instead.

And that parent--oh boo hoo your kids will scream all the way home. Let them. Maybe it'll teach them to stop spilling stuff. Oh, and maybe if you didn't give them drinks in the car there wouldn't be this problem to begin with. Sheesh!
sbhikes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-05, 05:46 PM   #18
Sasquatchula
Flowbie
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: NorCal
Bikes:
Posts: 318
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
[QUOTE=Slow Train]>>
Kelli Bussan, 36, a stay-at-home mom in New Canaan, said some distractions were impossible to avoid.

"My kids are always dropping their cups," she said, while rearranging toys in her parked gold 2004 Lincoln Navigator. "I have to turn around and get it unless I want them screaming the whole way home."

Hmm, no toys or food allowed in your death-trap? Hey, two problems solved! Personal responsibility, learn to live with it.
Sasquatchula is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-05, 06:21 PM   #19
michaelnel
Macaws Rock!
 
michaelnel's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: San Francisco, CA
Bikes: 2005 Soma Doublecross
Posts: 1,513
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by UmneyDurak
Her reply also shows another problem, kids are too damn spoiled. Parents are letting them get away with too much crap.
Agreed. I think the baby boomer and later generations are the worst parents the world has seen yet.
__________________
---

San Francisco, California
michaelnel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-05, 10:05 AM   #20
oboeguy
34x25 FTW!
 
oboeguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NYC
Bikes: Kona Jake, Scott CR1, Dahon SpeedPro
Posts: 6,013
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Wow, every single quote from a driver is negative and pathetically self-centered. It's too bad, though, that these laws won't make a bit of difference. Here in NY where it all started, NOBODY ever gets a ticket for it.
oboeguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-05, 10:46 AM   #21
Crazy Cyclist
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Winnipeg, Canada
Bikes:
Posts: 841
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slow Train
>>
Kelli Bussan, 36, a stay-at-home mom in New Canaan, said some distractions were impossible to avoid.

"My kids are always dropping their cups," she said, while rearranging toys in her parked gold 2004 Lincoln Navigator. "I have to turn around and get it unless I want them screaming the whole way home."
<<

This is exactly the type of driver that caused me, years ago, to radically alter my commuting route. I came across way to many SUV's driven by distracted parents swatting at their kids. One time I even had to dive off the road as the vehicle coming at me was zig zaging from left to right.
Thank god she is a stay at home mother, I wouldn't want her out on the streets around me.
Crazy Cyclist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-05, 12:24 PM   #22
noisebeam
Al
 
noisebeam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: AZ
Bikes: Cannondale SuperSix, Lemond Poprad. Retired: Jamis Sputnik, Centurion LeMans Fixed, Diamond Back ascent ex
Posts: 14,112
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 385 Post(s)
Drivers should at least put down the cell phone if taking a drag while running a red light:


See more red light runnng photos here:
http://www.kpho.com/Global/link.asp?L=86906

Al
noisebeam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-05, 12:47 PM   #23
lsits
Desert tortise
 
lsits's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Riverside, California
Bikes: Ibex Corrida LT 4.4 (2003), 2006 Bianchi Vigorelli (Red)
Posts: 884
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Tennessee and Virginia, going further than most, have passed laws prohibiting the display of pornographic videos in vehicles.
__________________
Wish I didn't know now what I didn't know then. - Bob Seger
lsits is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-05, 01:30 PM   #24
UmneyDurak
RacingBear
 
UmneyDurak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: NorCal
Bikes:
Posts: 8,602
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 39 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by noisebeam
Drivers should at least put down the cell phone if taking a drag while running a red light:


See more red light runnng photos here:
http://www.kpho.com/Global/link.asp?L=86906

Al
This is just scary.
UmneyDurak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-05, 05:44 PM   #25
Slow Train
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Bikes: 2006 Specialized S-Works Tricross
Posts: 462
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by noisebeam
Drivers should at least put down the cell phone if taking a drag while running a red light:
See more red light runnng photos here:
http://www.kpho.com/Global/link.asp?L=86906

Al
That's funny! No hands on the wheel while running the red light. This girl should be the poster girl for why we need distracted driver laws
Slow Train is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:37 PM.