I think a lot of bandwidth is wasted here with assertions about the way I present vehicular cycling as being biased, or incorrect, or twisted, etc. Lately, these have mostly come from Chipcom, Bekologist and Brian Ratliff.
For the record, I'm the originator and the major editor of the vehicular cycling entry in Wikipedia (see my signature). Others have edited and contributed.
If there is some other definition of vc, please present it here, or provide a pointer to it. Or at least state clearly what specifically is different about the vc presented by me in these posts, or that presented in the Wiki article, with "the real vc", or whatever you want to call it. Also, please cite my actual words, not an interpretation of my words.
Otherwise, let's put these nonsense assertions to rest and stop wasting so much time and bytes on it.