LAB courses.
#26
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
Originally Posted by N_C
I do. Correct me if I'm wrong but you're saying if a LCI does not train enough students for what ever reason, lack of interest, etc, he may forget what to teach unless he take refresher courses. Also you're saying there is a lot of cyclists & not enough of an interest amongst those cyclists to take the LAB courses. I do not know how many I expdct to train each year, yet. I have to get my training under my belt first. Then I'll go from there. What I do know is myself & others who will become LCI's with me have a 3 state area to cover, maybe 4. I will offer the courses I am able to teach for those that want to take it.
The other thing I am saying is that due to the method of training... Trained cyclists will never be in the majority... so expecting a "critical mass" of cyclists to "lead" motorists et. al. into a "more co-operative road sharing world" just is not going to happen.
I am not saying the training shouldn't be done... but it should be done on a far grander scale... and as ILTB points out... there sure hasn't been much progress with LAB type education over the last 20 years. Even Forester (through a different message board) has admitted that.
I also find Forester rather tedious and poor reading... which may be part of the slow uptake for his stuff. Hurst reads far easier, and therefore is more likely to be comprehended.
Get your LCI training... offer the classes... but understand that you are barely scratching the surface of all cyclists in the people you reach. And sadly, those that need training the most, are the least likely to be aware that such training even exists.
#27
♋ ☮♂ ☭ ☯
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 40205 'ViLLeBiLLie
Posts: 7,902
Bikes: Sngl Spd's, 70's- 80's vintage, D-tube Folder
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Hey...Whatever makes you happy I am all for !
To each his own...If you want to ride a tricycle you
should do it without worrying what anyone thinks.
That being said.....I would never take any class on bicycling.
I wouldnt take one on tying my shoelaces either.
But if someone else does, great !
I am aware of cycling 'experts' both internet and IRL and believe the
'expertise'/overcomplication they assault one with to be turnoff to a
lot of cyclists.
To each his own...If you want to ride a tricycle you
should do it without worrying what anyone thinks.
That being said.....I would never take any class on bicycling.
I wouldnt take one on tying my shoelaces either.
But if someone else does, great !
I am aware of cycling 'experts' both internet and IRL and believe the
'expertise'/overcomplication they assault one with to be turnoff to a
lot of cyclists.
__________________
☞-ADVOCACY-☜ Radical VC = Car people on bikes. Just say "NO"
☞-ADVOCACY-☜ Radical VC = Car people on bikes. Just say "NO"
#28
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
Originally Posted by Helmet Head
N_C, I know what Gene is trying to say since he's said it many times before, but I can see why you're having trouble discerning it from what he has posted here.
Gene's basic point about LAB training ineffectivity is not a criticism of the training itself, but it's inabiility (for whatever reason) to reach very many cyclists.
What he's saying is we need to get it into the schools, and/or make it part of driver training, etc. I think we can all agree that that would be nice. The political realitics, however, make it challenging. It's a chicken-egg problem. I think we need the culture to accept the value of cyclist training first. And I think the only way to reach the necessary threshold of acceptance required to support broader programs like those we can only dream about for now, is to continue with the grass roots program. I know in San Diego, for example, we're looking at another relatively big year of training next year. I also know of efforts to get into training law enforcements, and efforts to get into the schools. But it's difficult and challenging. Gene, get your LCI and help us out!
Gene's basic point about LAB training ineffectivity is not a criticism of the training itself, but it's inabiility (for whatever reason) to reach very many cyclists.
What he's saying is we need to get it into the schools, and/or make it part of driver training, etc. I think we can all agree that that would be nice. The political realitics, however, make it challenging. It's a chicken-egg problem. I think we need the culture to accept the value of cyclist training first. And I think the only way to reach the necessary threshold of acceptance required to support broader programs like those we can only dream about for now, is to continue with the grass roots program. I know in San Diego, for example, we're looking at another relatively big year of training next year. I also know of efforts to get into training law enforcements, and efforts to get into the schools. But it's difficult and challenging. Gene, get your LCI and help us out!
As far as me getting an LCI... not likely. My weekends are already pretty unavailable. I race sailboats on weekends... It was hard enough timewise just taking the LAB classes.
I'll do my bit for advocacy by showing up at the town council meetings....
#29
Dog is my copilot.
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 802
Bikes: Lemond Maillot Jaune, Specialized Stumpjumper, Kona Jake the Snake, Single-Speed Rigid Rocky Mtn Equipe, Soon-to-be fixed Bianchi Brava
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
What determines that the instructor of these courses is competent to teach them? Just because you take a bunch of these courses in a row? Obviously for people new to cycling on the road these courses may offer a good starting point, but for someone like myself who has been riding on heavily trafficked (sp?) roads for close to 17 years, I don't see much value in them.
I also suspect these courses will be heavy on the liability avoidance side, i.e. teaching one to obey all the rules of the road, regardless of whether the law was contrived with motorists in mind, which in my experience is bunk. They wouldn't be able to teach skills which might contravene laws because of a threat of a lawsuit.
All that being said, if it makes you feel better on the bike, or if it gets more people riding then its a good thing.
BTW - I have never been hit or hit anything on my bicycle and the reason is because I use common sense, observation and have a healthy survival instinct.
I also suspect these courses will be heavy on the liability avoidance side, i.e. teaching one to obey all the rules of the road, regardless of whether the law was contrived with motorists in mind, which in my experience is bunk. They wouldn't be able to teach skills which might contravene laws because of a threat of a lawsuit.
All that being said, if it makes you feel better on the bike, or if it gets more people riding then its a good thing.
BTW - I have never been hit or hit anything on my bicycle and the reason is because I use common sense, observation and have a healthy survival instinct.
#30
Banned.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Bannation, forever.
Posts: 2,887
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike
I am posting about results and lack of same from the LAB promoters. I don't need to take a course to ask "What Results?" What can the students or sponsors of such a program expect from taking the course? What has happened for the last 20 years? Why should the public be interested in LAB courses?
Opinions and concepts are NOT results. The Forester clan promoting Forester derived LAB classes with fabricated claims of risk reduction results for their trained students are NOT results but rather a line of B.S.
Opinions and concepts are NOT results. The Forester clan promoting Forester derived LAB classes with fabricated claims of risk reduction results for their trained students are NOT results but rather a line of B.S.
Opinions & concepts may not be YOUR idea of a result. But if someone came up to me & siad they took the Road I course. They recommend I join the LAB & take the course myself. I would consider that opinion from that person a successful result that the course is a good thing to take & the LAB is a good organization to join. And that the person got very good results from the course. and I would join the LAB & take the course myself.
Results by word of mouth opinion or not are the best form of advertisment & promotion & are very valuable. Soem of us do not need hard core facts to believe something, or believe in something,. It is called faith. If we find out faith is unfounded then so be it, let that be out mistake. But let us figure it out with out trying to cram your opinions down our throats by telling us we are wrong because we believe in what John Forrester teaches &/or promotes.
Please do not assume your ideas of a result are the same as others, they're not, they won't be. Get used to it &/or get over it.
#31
Banned.
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 13,075
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by GGDub
What determines that the instructor of these courses is competent to teach them?
Proven and time-tested instructor certification programs.
The EC-based systems, including CANBIKE, have been around for a few decades. It's all we've got. That, and our own judgment when we take the courses.
Finally, this stuff is not rocket science. But some of it is contrary to many "common sense" notions about how cycling should done in traffic in our culture.
#32
Banned.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Bannation, forever.
Posts: 2,887
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Helmet Head
N_C, I know what Gene is trying to say since he's said it many times before, but I can see why you're having trouble discerning it from what he has posted here.
Gene's basic point about LAB training ineffectivity is not a criticism of the training itself, but it's inabiility (for whatever reason) to reach very many cyclists.
What he's saying is we need to get it into the schools, and/or make it part of driver training, etc. I think we can all agree that that would be nice. The political realitics, however, make it challenging. It's a chicken-egg problem. I think we need the culture to accept the value of cyclist training first. And I think the only way to reach the necessary threshold of acceptance required to support broader programs like those we can only dream about for now, is to continue with the grass roots program. I know in San Diego, for example, we're looking at another relatively big year of training next year. I also know of efforts to get into training law enforcements, and efforts to get into the schools. But it's difficult and challenging. Gene, get your LCI and help us out!
<sarcasm on>
By the way, where are the studies that show SCUBA TRAINING is effective? I am posting about results and lack of same from the SCUBA TRAINING promoters. I don't need to take a course to ask "What Results?" What can the students or sponsors of such a program expect from taking the course? What has happened for the last 20 years? Why should the public be interested in SCUBA TRAINING courses? It's not like strapping on a mask and an air tank and swimming and BREATHING is rocket science.
Opinions and concepts are NOT results. The clan promoting SCUBA TRAINING classes with fabricated claims of risk reduction results for their trained students are NOT results but rather a line of B.S.
<sarcasm off>
Gene's basic point about LAB training ineffectivity is not a criticism of the training itself, but it's inabiility (for whatever reason) to reach very many cyclists.
What he's saying is we need to get it into the schools, and/or make it part of driver training, etc. I think we can all agree that that would be nice. The political realitics, however, make it challenging. It's a chicken-egg problem. I think we need the culture to accept the value of cyclist training first. And I think the only way to reach the necessary threshold of acceptance required to support broader programs like those we can only dream about for now, is to continue with the grass roots program. I know in San Diego, for example, we're looking at another relatively big year of training next year. I also know of efforts to get into training law enforcements, and efforts to get into the schools. But it's difficult and challenging. Gene, get your LCI and help us out!
<sarcasm on>
By the way, where are the studies that show SCUBA TRAINING is effective? I am posting about results and lack of same from the SCUBA TRAINING promoters. I don't need to take a course to ask "What Results?" What can the students or sponsors of such a program expect from taking the course? What has happened for the last 20 years? Why should the public be interested in SCUBA TRAINING courses? It's not like strapping on a mask and an air tank and swimming and BREATHING is rocket science.
Opinions and concepts are NOT results. The clan promoting SCUBA TRAINING classes with fabricated claims of risk reduction results for their trained students are NOT results but rather a line of B.S.
<sarcasm off>
#33
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
Originally Posted by GGDub
What determines that the instructor of these courses is competent to teach them? Just because you take a bunch of these courses in a row? Obviously for people new to cycling on the road these courses may offer a good starting point, but for someone like myself who has been riding on heavily trafficked (sp?) roads for close to 17 years, I don't see much value in them.
I also suspect these courses will be heavy on the liability avoidance side, i.e. teaching one to obey all the rules of the road, regardless of whether the law was contrived with motorists in mind, which in my experience is bunk. They wouldn't be able to teach skills which might contravene laws because of a threat of a lawsuit.
All that being said, if it makes you feel better on the bike, or if it gets more people riding then its a good thing.
BTW - I have never been hit or hit anything on my bicycle and the reason is because I use common sense, observation and have a healthy survival instinct.
I also suspect these courses will be heavy on the liability avoidance side, i.e. teaching one to obey all the rules of the road, regardless of whether the law was contrived with motorists in mind, which in my experience is bunk. They wouldn't be able to teach skills which might contravene laws because of a threat of a lawsuit.
All that being said, if it makes you feel better on the bike, or if it gets more people riding then its a good thing.
BTW - I have never been hit or hit anything on my bicycle and the reason is because I use common sense, observation and have a healthy survival instinct.
I know in the SCUBA community the final test was evaluation by other instructors who used the standard "could I trust this potential instructor to teach a loved one." Some instructors failed... and this was a costly program. You don't just buy your way in.
As far as what is taught... it is really quite common sense... not liability motivated. There is a subtle lesson that prevails that encourages you as a cyclist to realize you have rights to the road... that you are not just some second class "bastard step child."
The class focuses on improving rider ability and confidence... using discussion and on road riding with other cyclists as examples. Cyclists are pushed a bit to do things they might have otherwise have shyed away from... such as merging with traffic... makeing proper left turns and how to avoid conflicts.
It is about legal cycling... it is NOT about "taking the lane" or being militant in any way. But the course does teach "fast turns" and emergency braking... It also teaches flat fixing, and other simple mechanical things that frankly bike shops do not bother with.
I was lucky that when I decided to really persue cycling beyond high school, I fell in with a crowd that was willing to teach me some of these things... the rest I learned the hard way.
In taking a class (out of a desire to improve and couriosity) I saw folks that really knew very little of the basics... had a difficult time changing gears, did not know how to fix flats. Tended to avoid all traffic situations and did not know if what they were doing was right or wrong (including how to wear a helmet).
A lot of folks here on BF are experienced cyclists... so it may be difficult to imagine that there are folks out there that do not have basic cycling skills or understand their rights to the road.
The classes did not "dismiss" bike lanes, nor did it focus on "VC correctness." This was straight forward, common sense, smart cycling. But compressed... so several years of "learning by the school of hard knocks" is compressed to 4 weeks. It gets folks off on the right foot.
As far as "dealing with laws contrived with motorists in mind..." well, "red light running" was not taught... If that is what you mean.
Last edited by genec; 09-15-06 at 02:10 PM.
#34
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
Originally Posted by Helmet Head
What determines a SCUBA, driver, or parenting instructor is competent?
If you don't win the confidence of the evaluation team, you don't teach.
#35
Banned.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Bannation, forever.
Posts: 2,887
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
One thing I have not pointed out is another reason for LCI's. One of the things that helps a community obtain the very important status of being a Bicycle Friendly Community by the LAB is if there is an LCI or those educated in the Road I in the community. Or someone who is a bicycle safety advocate or coordinator. They prefere an LCI, but will accept an advocate/coordinator.
The city of South Sioux City recently was awarded the Bronze Level by the LAB as a Bicycle Friendly Community. Part of the reason is because I am the bicycle safety coordinator for that community. In part because I agreed to do that they were awarded the bronze level as a BFC. Had I been an LCI they may have been awarded a higher level, I don't know. Part of doing this does serve an ulterior &/or an alternative motive. I have no problem with that. Plus it will help the other communities in this area become BFC's as well. I am proud to be a part of & help with that. I love helping my community in this manner.
The city of South Sioux City recently was awarded the Bronze Level by the LAB as a Bicycle Friendly Community. Part of the reason is because I am the bicycle safety coordinator for that community. In part because I agreed to do that they were awarded the bronze level as a BFC. Had I been an LCI they may have been awarded a higher level, I don't know. Part of doing this does serve an ulterior &/or an alternative motive. I have no problem with that. Plus it will help the other communities in this area become BFC's as well. I am proud to be a part of & help with that. I love helping my community in this manner.
#36
Dagger Boy
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Southern California
Posts: 3,247
Bikes: 1999 GT 5.0i mountain, 2004 Basso Reef road
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Genec, if all that you can contribute to bicyclists rights and safety is going to city council meetings, then I say THANK YOU! We need you there because some of us would rather be working with the people that do not know how to deal with traffic while riding. We all have our own parts to play.
Most of what you described about the LAB classes are correct and even during the LCI class, people were discussing methods to get proper bicycle training into schools and driver's education programs to make everyone play nice out there.
One path to increasing the visibility of these instructional programs was missed in the discussion above. The charity bike rides. In three months I was able to be in front of over 100 cyclists to teach them some additional cycling skills. Over the next few years, the MS Society is looking to institute a nationwide safety training program to try and reduce the number of incidences during the events. While this is not a complete Road 1 class (3 hours, not 20 hours), we are able to inform people about the laws governing their travel, some general guidelines on handling yourself on a bike, and other basic information that some of the students did not know about.
And to every experienced cyclist that says 'I don't need to take that class, I already know this stuff' really needs to have their head examined. They might not learn as much as a newbie, but the classes are not geared towards morons and I'll bet that everyone learns at least one thing during the day. Yes, even people that have been riding for 30 years with no problems.
**edit** I cannot believe that people passed up the perfect opportunity to pick on HH and N_C. They get enough grief in every other thread that I assumed that people would be lining up to write post #22!
Most of what you described about the LAB classes are correct and even during the LCI class, people were discussing methods to get proper bicycle training into schools and driver's education programs to make everyone play nice out there.
One path to increasing the visibility of these instructional programs was missed in the discussion above. The charity bike rides. In three months I was able to be in front of over 100 cyclists to teach them some additional cycling skills. Over the next few years, the MS Society is looking to institute a nationwide safety training program to try and reduce the number of incidences during the events. While this is not a complete Road 1 class (3 hours, not 20 hours), we are able to inform people about the laws governing their travel, some general guidelines on handling yourself on a bike, and other basic information that some of the students did not know about.
And to every experienced cyclist that says 'I don't need to take that class, I already know this stuff' really needs to have their head examined. They might not learn as much as a newbie, but the classes are not geared towards morons and I'll bet that everyone learns at least one thing during the day. Yes, even people that have been riding for 30 years with no problems.
**edit** I cannot believe that people passed up the perfect opportunity to pick on HH and N_C. They get enough grief in every other thread that I assumed that people would be lining up to write post #22!
__________________
Women think they're so clever because they can fake an orgasm for the sake of a relationship, but men can fake a whole relationship for the sake of an orgasm.
Women think they're so clever because they can fake an orgasm for the sake of a relationship, but men can fake a whole relationship for the sake of an orgasm.
#37
Commuter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Southern Maine
Posts: 2,568
Bikes: 2006 Giant Cypress EX (7-speed internal hub)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
My understanding is that the LAB has advanced courses that are required to be a certified LCI, so you have to take a course and pass the test.
-=£em in Pa=-, if you had to tie your shoelaces in the middle of an intersection, would you consider a course on it then? (Probably not, huh...)
I think the LAB courses are useful. I took Road I in June. In my case, I have to admit I didn't find it all that useful in the area of safety, but only because I already knew most of it from these forums! Had I not known any of that, it would have been extremely useful. Even so, I picked up a few less major things that I hadn't known before, like the names of all the parts of the bike, and the idea to train your kids to not just shoot out of the driveway by actually putting a small stop sign at the end of it.
-=£em in Pa=-, if you had to tie your shoelaces in the middle of an intersection, would you consider a course on it then? (Probably not, huh...)
I think the LAB courses are useful. I took Road I in June. In my case, I have to admit I didn't find it all that useful in the area of safety, but only because I already knew most of it from these forums! Had I not known any of that, it would have been extremely useful. Even so, I picked up a few less major things that I hadn't known before, like the names of all the parts of the bike, and the idea to train your kids to not just shoot out of the driveway by actually putting a small stop sign at the end of it.
#38
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
Originally Posted by Extort
Genec, if all that you can contribute to bicyclists rights and safety is going to city council meetings, then I say THANK YOU! We need you there because some of us would rather be working with the people that do not know how to deal with traffic while riding. We all have our own parts to play.
Originally Posted by Extort
And to every experienced cyclist that says 'I don't need to take that class, I already know this stuff' really needs to have their head examined. They might not learn as much as a newbie, but the classes are not geared towards morons and I'll bet that everyone learns at least one thing during the day. Yes, even people that have been riding for 30 years with no problems.
Actually some of the more advanced mechanical stuff was pretty good. And honestly, I still have a hard time with high speed turns.
#39
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 658
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
From Extort: **edit** I cannot believe that people passed up the perfect opportunity to pick on HH and N_C. They get enough grief in every other thread that I assumed that people would be lining up to write post #22!
For me, it's because they try to hammer their views (the same ones over and over and over) into every single thread, and I just don't see the point in arguing with them. I barely read anything they write anymore.
For me, it's because they try to hammer their views (the same ones over and over and over) into every single thread, and I just don't see the point in arguing with them. I barely read anything they write anymore.
#40
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,951
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,517 Times
in
1,031 Posts
Originally Posted by tomcryar
For me, it's because they try to hammer their views (the same ones over and over and over) into every single thread, and I just don't see the point in arguing with them. I barely read anything they write anymore.
#41
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
Originally Posted by tomcryar
From Extort: **edit** I cannot believe that people passed up the perfect opportunity to pick on HH and N_C. They get enough grief in every other thread that I assumed that people would be lining up to write post #22!
#42
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tempe, AZ
Posts: 2,968
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Hay-zoos! riding ain't rocket science. some people act like you shouldn't even be on the road unless you've been branded/certified/brainwashed by your local LAB/VC nazi. I had to tell a guy the other day that he didn't need to buy the jersey, the shorts, the special shoes, and the other crap just to ride his bike. people think it's complicated, it's not. in fact, many VC/LAB/bike nazi folks are creating obstacles to the very thing they *say* they desire, getting more butts on bikes on the road, by making it seem like a daunting task fraught with certification, rules and theories, not to mention the special "gear" and he "right" bike. you guys are your own worst enemas.
__________________
"Think of bicycles as rideable art that can just about save the world". ~Grant Petersen
Cyclists fare best when they recognize that there are times when acting vehicularly is not the best practice, and are flexible enough to do what is necessary as the situation warrants.--Me
"Think of bicycles as rideable art that can just about save the world". ~Grant Petersen
Cyclists fare best when they recognize that there are times when acting vehicularly is not the best practice, and are flexible enough to do what is necessary as the situation warrants.--Me
#43
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
Originally Posted by rando
Hay-zoos! riding ain't rocket science. some people act like you shouldn't even be on the road unless you've been branded/certified/brainwashed by your local LAB/VC nazi. I had to tell a guy the other day that he didn't need to buy the jersey, the shorts, the special shoes, and the other crap just to ride his bike. people think it's complicated, it's not. in fact, many VC/LAB/bike nazi folks are creating obstacles to the very thing they *say* they desire, getting more butts on bikes on the road, by making it seem like a daunting task fraught with certification, rules and theories, not to mention the special "gear" and he "right" bike. you guys are your own worst enemas.
Special gear... a helmet was the only required gear... oh and a bike. Hardly "special."
Sorry folks, but someone is painting a pretty polluted picture that just ain't right.
You're right, it's not rocket science... It's pretty common sense stuff... but if nobody showes it to you, then I guess it's not all that common, eh?
Where did you learn how to fix a flat?
#44
Banned.
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 13,075
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by rando
Hay-zoos! riding ain't rocket science. some people act like you shouldn't even be on the road unless you've been branded/certified/brainwashed by your local LAB/VC nazi. I had to tell a guy the other day that he didn't need to buy the jersey, the shorts, the special shoes, and the other crap just to ride his bike. people think it's complicated, it's not. in fact, many VC/LAB/bike nazi folks are creating obstacles to the very thing they *say* they desire, getting more butts on bikes on the road, by making it seem like a daunting task fraught with certification, rules and theories, not to mention the special "gear" and he "right" bike. you guys are your own worst enemas.
What Gene said.
#45
Dagger Boy
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Southern California
Posts: 3,247
Bikes: 1999 GT 5.0i mountain, 2004 Basso Reef road
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Personally, I found it amazing that after moving to SoCal from Colorado (where I grew up) I found that many people have never even been on a bicycle. They have no idea how to balance on two wheels, so the finer points of cycling like 'How to cross railroad tracks and not fall on your face' were completely lost on them.
Back to the original question..... I saw elitism, an deficient method for obtaining large number of students, and cost as being the issues that people are bringing to the table.
Any other issues with LAB/VC/HH ? (I know that it is a loaded question, but I believe that N_C's intent was to learn from this thread)
Back to the original question..... I saw elitism, an deficient method for obtaining large number of students, and cost as being the issues that people are bringing to the table.
Any other issues with LAB/VC/HH ? (I know that it is a loaded question, but I believe that N_C's intent was to learn from this thread)
__________________
Women think they're so clever because they can fake an orgasm for the sake of a relationship, but men can fake a whole relationship for the sake of an orgasm.
Women think they're so clever because they can fake an orgasm for the sake of a relationship, but men can fake a whole relationship for the sake of an orgasm.
#46
Me fail English?
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 135
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Helmet Head
If you think that's what LAB courses are about, you have no idea what you're talking about.
I don't have a problem with the classes, if you think you need them, great. I've never seen any information about these classes, are they teaching how to actually ride the bike, or ideas on how to do it safely? If they are just learning how to ride, they should find a parking lot and just learn to use the bike, instead of riding on the roads with their new "training". Most of the stuff that is apparently being taught does seem like common sense, maybe the riders just don't have it.
Maybe it should be more about how to think on your feet too, it isn't worth being "right" when you're smashed under a car. I understand the things in the class are meant to keep you alive and safe, but things change quick on the street, or trail, that you have to react to without time to think about what to do.
While I agree that a long time rider shouldn't act like they know everything, though something kept them alive all of this time besides just luck, a new rider can't think that the best training can make up for lack of real world experience.
#47
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tempe, AZ
Posts: 2,968
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by genec
Special gear? Right bike? Gee, I took my two road classes using my two old bikes. I wore a jersey in the first class and got called on it by everybody including the instructor. In Road 2, the Bikes were all old and worn... Although I was the only one still using friction shifters.
Special gear... a helmet was the only required gear... oh and a bike. Hardly "special."
Sorry folks, but someone is painting a pretty polluted picture that just ain't right.
You're right, it's not rocket science... It's pretty common sense stuff... but if nobody showes it to you, then I guess it's not all that common, eh?
Where did you learn how to fix a flat?
Special gear... a helmet was the only required gear... oh and a bike. Hardly "special."
Sorry folks, but someone is painting a pretty polluted picture that just ain't right.
You're right, it's not rocket science... It's pretty common sense stuff... but if nobody showes it to you, then I guess it's not all that common, eh?
Where did you learn how to fix a flat?
__________________
"Think of bicycles as rideable art that can just about save the world". ~Grant Petersen
Cyclists fare best when they recognize that there are times when acting vehicularly is not the best practice, and are flexible enough to do what is necessary as the situation warrants.--Me
"Think of bicycles as rideable art that can just about save the world". ~Grant Petersen
Cyclists fare best when they recognize that there are times when acting vehicularly is not the best practice, and are flexible enough to do what is necessary as the situation warrants.--Me
Last edited by rando; 09-15-06 at 09:30 PM.
#48
Banned.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Bannation, forever.
Posts: 2,887
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike
But wouldn't you just love to pay $50 or $60 to sit in a classroom for hours listening to certified smart guys just like 'em jabber about the only right way to ride a bicycle?
I doubt the instruction in the Road I course says their way is the ONLY right way to ride a bicycle. Besides how would you know if you've never taken the course?
#49
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
Originally Posted by Extort
Personally, I found it amazing that after moving to SoCal from Colorado (where I grew up) I found that many people have never even been on a bicycle. They have no idea how to balance on two wheels, so the finer points of cycling like 'How to cross railroad tracks and not fall on your face' were completely lost on them.
Back to the original question..... I saw elitism, an deficient method for obtaining large number of students, and cost as being the issues that people are bringing to the table.
Any other issues with LAB/VC/HH ? (I know that it is a loaded question, but I believe that N_C's intent was to learn from this thread)
Back to the original question..... I saw elitism, an deficient method for obtaining large number of students, and cost as being the issues that people are bringing to the table.
Any other issues with LAB/VC/HH ? (I know that it is a loaded question, but I believe that N_C's intent was to learn from this thread)
So while HH does recommend the LAB courses, what the LAB offers is hardly what HH "preaches."
For example, I on the other hand like bike lanes, but then I know how to use them and how to judge when their use may not suit me.
I know other folks in the area that are even more "preachy" than HH... They get downright militant at the discussion of "bike lanes" and "cyclist's rights." (I try not to discuss it with them... )
Anyway... The LAB classes do have merit, and are not some VC indoctrination ritual or anything like that. So folks that dismiss the LAB classes based on what they feel they know, due to their conversations with HH, are off base.
#50
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
Originally Posted by N_C
I doubt the instruction in the Road I course says their way is the ONLY right way to ride a bicycle. Besides how would you know if you've never taken the course?
N_C, have you taken a course? That really is one of the requirements for LCI... plus you never know what you might learn.