Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

View Poll Results: What would you do?

Voters
43. You may not vote on this poll
  • Take the Detours on the "safer" routes

    22 51.16%
  • Take the lane in all three examples

    3 6.98%
  • Take the lane in 1, but not 2 or 3

    0 0%
  • Take the lane in 2, but not 1 or 3

    0 0%
  • Take the lane in 3, but not 1 or 2

    9 20.93%
  • Take the lane in 1 and 2, but not 3

    3 6.98%
  • Take the lane in 1 and 3, but not 2

    1 2.33%
  • Take the lane in 2 and 3, but not 1

    2 4.65%
  • Other

    3 6.98%
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 34
  1. #1
    genec genec's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    san diego
    My Bikes
    custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
    Posts
    22,571
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Poll: Where would you ride... what choice would you make?

    What choice would you make?

    Given in the following examples that every main road is a 50MPH road. In every case, to take the main route given you will have to take and hold the lane for the half mile to mile it takes to get to “the other side.”

    What would you do?

    The first example is a construction zone… it is uphill on a major arterial, there is only one narrow lane going each way. The traffic tends to be heavy. Your cycling speed uphill would be about 10MPH. The edge of the road is a K rail concrete barrier… there is no shoulder, nor bike lane. The city has offered an alternative for cyclists… rather than take the 50MPH arterial, you can ride a “safer” detour. The speed limit on the detour is 35MPH with a 4 foot shoulder or a bike lane. But the detour takes you a mile out of your way.

    The second example is a 50 MPH slight uphill arterial, 3 lanes either way. The traffic tends to be heavy. Your cycling speed up this hill would be about 15MPH. There is no shoulder… you will have to take one of the lanes. The road passes a wide sweeping freeway on ramp and an off ramp, both of which you will have to cross. Traffic typically moves at freeway speeds on the on and off ramps while merging with traffic on the arterial. The sight lines are short… maybe 200 feet where the curving ramps meet the arterial.

    The city has offered a detour. Your destination at the decision point is about a ½ mile away and just visible on the straight arterial… past the on and off ramps. The detour will take you about a ½ mile out of your way… and then you cut back on a perpendicular road… for a total “safe” route of about ¾ of a mile. The detour is a 35MPH road with a wide shoulder.

    The third example. 50MPH country freeway, one lane either way. No shoulders. Your cycling speed would be about 20+MPH. The traffic tends to be heavy. The city has offered an alternative route. A narrow 8 foot wide sidepath has been given that is separated from the main road by K rail barriers. You will have to slow down to about 10 MPH to use the sidepath… and cross the hiway at either end of the sidepath at a light controlled intersection. There are no intersections on the sidepath… but there may be pedestrians on it.

  2. #2
    totally louche Bekologist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    A land that time forgot
    My Bikes
    the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes
    Posts
    18,026
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    can i take helemt heads RV?

    what's wrong with a half mile or mile detour if it keeps a bicyclist safer? i ride those types of conditions without possible detours every time i ride across the Hood Canal Bridge. why do i have to ride the mup at 10? will my bike fall apart if i ride it doing 17? do you worry the third scenario will lead to bikes being 'banned' on that road? all that talk is pretty empty.

    taking the lane in front of traffic doing 50 for any length of time requires steely headed bicycling skills AND a thick skin. sure, the cars slow, then move around and pass you, some closer than others, and it is an exercise in cool headed determination. sure it is legal and possible; smart, not necessarily. expically if there is a readily available and safer, calmer alternative.

    that is NOT where i want the majority of bicyclists riding; just the ballsy ones.

    getting rid of the safer detour routes, or failing to improve the roadways in question with wide shoulders or bike lanes is NOT the awnser.
    "Evidence, anecdote and methodology all support planning for roadway bike traffic."

  3. #3
    Dominatrikes sbhikes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Still in Santa Barbara
    My Bikes
    Catrike Pocket, Lightning Thunderbold recumbent, Trek 3000 MTB.
    Posts
    4,920
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Just as it isn't worth it for motorists to threaten a bicyclist's life just to save a couple of seconds of time, it isn't worth it for me to put my own life in danger just to save a couple of minutes of time. I'll take the detour.
    ~Diane
    Recumbents: Lightning Thunderbolt, '06 Catrike Pocket. Upright: Trek Mountain Bike.
    8.5 mile commute. I like bike lanes.

  4. #4
    your nightmare gal chipcom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    The Cracker Factory
    Posts
    24,353
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'd take the detours in 1 and 2, but stick to the road in 3, which is pretty typical of many of the roads I ride.
    "Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws" - Edward Abbey

  5. #5
    The Dude abides
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Florifornia
    Posts
    104
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I would take the detours. In fact, I had to do a combo of 1 and 3 last night.

  6. #6
    Senior Member cooperwx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Asheville, NC
    My Bikes
    Trek 7.5 FX
    Posts
    389
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm with the majority. You are reducing motorists' speed quite a bit for quite a while. I would feel "in the way" and wouldn't risk drawing someone's ire/bumper.

    (Still working to comprehend the "The city has offered an alternative for cyclists" statements. Amazing/great!)
    06 Trek 7.5 FX

  7. #7
    Crankenstein bmclaughlin807's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Spokane
    My Bikes
    Novara Randonee (TankerBelle)
    Posts
    4,038
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I will not use a path that restricts me to 10 mph. I can barely handle the Platte river trail, which has a speed limit of 15 mph, and a 'we will ticket' speed of 20 mph. I usually ride it at 17-19 mph, and slow for the problem areas.

    I choose not to interfere with the motorists, if possible, but if there is no reasonable alternative, I'll take a lane, and they can go around. If I can choose an alternate route that doesn't take me 5 miles out of the way, and has less traffic, or a wider route, I'll choose the alternate route.
    "There is no greater wonder than the way the face and character of a woman fit so perfectly in a man's mind, and stay there, and he could never tell you why. It just seems it was the thing he most wanted." Robert Louis Stevenson

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Alexandria, VA (formerly Amherst, MA)
    My Bikes
    Miyata touring bike, Xtracycle, Montague DX
    Posts
    280
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I answered, "Take the lane in 2 and 3, but not 1". I'd much rather ride the high-traffic road for a half a mile then have to exit and re-enter such a road. That is more difficult and more dangerous. I would detour around a construction area though. They can really slow you down and you have to sit there breathing in fumes. And given that it's on an uphill too, you might have do a lot of uphill stopping and starting, A total pain.

  9. #9
    Fast and Danger Ill Mitch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    My Bikes
    A bunch
    Posts
    1,057
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'd take the detours on 1 and 2, and I'd stick with the road in 3.

  10. #10
    Banned. Helmet Head's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    13,075
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by genec
    Given in the following examples that every main road is a 50MPH road. In every case, to take the main route given you will have to take and hold the lane for the half mile to mile it takes to get to “the other side.”
    I can't imagine a 50+mph road where there is no way for motorists to pass cyclists.

    Even in a 9 foot wide lane with k-rails on both sides, drivers of standard width vehicles (cars) can slow down to within 10 mph or so of the cyclist's speed, and pass a cooperative cyclist safely.

  11. #11
    feros ferio John E's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Location
    www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
    My Bikes
    1959 Capo; 1980 Peugeot PKN-10; 1981 Bianchi; 1988 Schwinn KOM-10;
    Posts
    14,838
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Helmet Head
    ... Even in a 9 foot wide lane with k-rails on both sides, drivers of standard width vehicles (cars) can slow down to within 10 mph or so of the cyclist's speed, and pass a cooperative cyclist safely.
    You certainly won't have 3 feet of clearance. ...
    "Early to bed, early to rise. Work like hell, and advertise." -- George Stahlman
    Capo [dschaw'-poe]: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger, S/N 42624
    Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
    Bianchi: 1981 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
    Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069

  12. #12
    feros ferio John E's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Location
    www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
    My Bikes
    1959 Capo; 1980 Peugeot PKN-10; 1981 Bianchi; 1988 Schwinn KOM-10;
    Posts
    14,838
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Gene, I screwed up and voted for "take the lane in 1 and 2, not 3." I meant to vote "take the lane in 3, not 1 and 2." Sorry about that ...
    "Early to bed, early to rise. Work like hell, and advertise." -- George Stahlman
    Capo [dschaw'-poe]: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger, S/N 42624
    Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
    Bianchi: 1981 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
    Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069

  13. #13
    Banned. Helmet Head's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    13,075
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by John E
    You certainly won't have 3 feet of clearance. ...
    Right, which is why you control the lane until they're moving about your speed, and then move aside.

    I'm comfortable passing or being passed with less than 3' of clearance if the relative speeds are under 10 mph and the absolute speeds are not much higher.

  14. #14
    Banned. galen_52657's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Towson, MD
    My Bikes
    2001 Look KG 241, 1989 Specialized Stump Jumper Comp, 1986 Gatane Performanc
    Posts
    4,020
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    As a general rule, I stick with the cars and don't use 'special' accomodations.

    I would ride the road in all three instances. In example one, if there is a construction zone and heavy traffic, speeds are usually lower than posted with lots of stop and go which I don't find threatening. If it's bumper-to-bumper, once you get the first car behind you slowed, the rest have to slow.

    In the second example, with three same-direction lanes again, there is plenty of opportunity for cars to merge over and pass.

    In example 3 I don't use paths....

  15. #15
    Senior Member Brian Ratliff's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Near Portland, OR
    My Bikes
    Three road bikes. Two track bikes.
    Posts
    9,501
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Why in the world would I make a decision based on how I ride when sitting in my office chair staring at a computer screen? I am an experienced cyclist, and I trust that experience when I am riding. However, I can talk myself and others in circles from my comfortable office chair. Frequently, situations which look scary when they are thought about are not all that interesting from the saddle of a bike. Other times, bravado when sitting in the office chair turns to annoyance at the difficulty of the situation when you are in the saddle, tired and hungry at the end of a day's work.

    So: I guess it depends on subtle indicators which I cannot name, only know from experience, and my mood at the time to dictate how I would choose a route. Say it is morning on a Monday, I am feeling peppy, and feel I can hold 20 mph on your uphill option for the half mile. Perhaps I won't trouble myself with the detour, prefering the more direct route. Perhaps it is Friday afternoon, I just want to get home and cars are doing the typical Friday crazy stuff; maybe I don't want to bother and will take the detour. I've even been known to purposefully take a path.

    One of the things that experience has taught me in recent years is to not be so rigid with my cycling choices. The combination of relatively fast, personal transportation and flexibility exceeding even that of a car, are the reasons why cycling is fun. The dangers so frequently cited here are only theoretical. To take a sidepath merely means that you need to go slow. To take a detour taking you a mile out of your way might be a way of finding a new commute route which might be faster or involve less hassle and stress. The detour might actually make your route shorter; I had this experience where I was commuting down the main road for a while, then found that a quiet detour into an out of the way commercial area with a two lane road not only was far more pleasant, but also cut a mile or so out of my commute.

    I have the confindence I need to ride in any situation. But I don't use that confidence to decrease my options to only those involving heavily traveled arterials; I use that confidence to do away with the "as a general rule..." statements I use to make a few years ago. I can ride anywhere; so I ride where I choose at the moment.
    Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
    "If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter

  16. #16
    Senior Member Brian Ratliff's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Near Portland, OR
    My Bikes
    Three road bikes. Two track bikes.
    Posts
    9,501
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    For what it's worth, I have no difficulty riding such roads in such situations. I am merely saying that my choice will depend on my thinking from behind the bars in the moment; it would have very little relevence to me to make the choice sitting in front of the desk.
    Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
    "If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter

  17. #17
    Banned. Helmet Head's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    13,075
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by genec
    The third example. 50MPH country freeway, one lane either way. No shoulders.
    What is a "country freeway"? A freeway out in the country?

    What freeway has only one lane either way?

    What freeway is posted at only 50 MPH?

    On what freeway without shoulders is a cyclist ever allowed?

    Did you mean highway?

  18. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Toronto
    My Bikes
    Miyata 600, Marin Larkspur, Marin Muirwoods, GT tequesta, Fuji Ace
    Posts
    970
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Too long! Break it down into three polls or so. My head hurts :0

  19. #19
    -=Barry=- The Human Car's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Baltimore, MD +/- ~100 miles
    Posts
    4,077
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    FWIW Often for my ride home in the evening I’ll take longer more relaxed routes home so really my answer would be split 50/50 between the safe routes and just taking the lane in 3.
    Cycling Advocate
    http://BaltimoreSpokes.org
    . . . o
    . . /L
    =()>()

  20. #20
    totally louche Bekologist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    A land that time forgot
    My Bikes
    the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes
    Posts
    18,026
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Helmet Head
    What is a "country freeway"? A freeway out in the country?

    Did you mean highway?
    maybe they mean 'ruralish' four lane roads with highway speeds. or maybe they meant rural logging roads with 60MPH speed limits and 12 foot shoulders....

    or, maybe, there's actually a gorilla playing basketball in the travel lanes and this is a trick poll.....
    "Evidence, anecdote and methodology all support planning for roadway bike traffic."

  21. #21
    Sophomoric Member Roody's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Dancing in Lansing
    Posts
    20,463
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Assuming the detours (1 and 2) really are safer, I would most often take them. The time loss would be only a matter of moments. (If the detours were much further off-course, I would go ahead and take the lanes.)

    On number 3, it seems that you would lose a lot of time if you took the side path, and I don't think it sounds much (if any) safer than the street described. I'd take the lane there.


    "Think Outside the Cage"

  22. #22
    Senior Member wheel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Crystal MN
    Posts
    2,147
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Yep 40 mile is your 85 percent death card. After that kiss your ass good bye.

    I would detour, but only if getting too and ridding on was safer in my opinion.
    No sense dying trying to get to a safer route. Which I deal with.
    My Youtube Cycling Videos Here

  23. #23
    Conservative Hippie
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Wakulla Co. FL
    Posts
    4,271
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I went with "Other", it just depends on what I wanted to do. If I were in a hurry, I would take the lane in all 3 examples. On the other hand, a mile or less on a bike is nothing. I would take the detour on days I wanted to ride slower. If these were regular commutes of mine, some days I would take the lane, some days I would take the detour and some days I would take the car.

  24. #24
    Ride the Road Daily Commute's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Columbus, Ohio
    My Bikes
    Surly Cross-Check; hard tail MTB
    Posts
    4,059
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Brian Ratliff
    For what it's worth, I have no difficulty riding such roads in such situations. I am merely saying that my choice will depend on my thinking from behind the bars in the moment; it would have very little relevence to me to make the choice sitting in front of the desk.
    I agree with Brian on this. But it's still an interesting hypo, so, making generalizations, I would probably take the road on 2 & 3 (cars can easily move over to get around me on 2, and 3 is just a standard country highway). The first one is a closer call. It would depend in part on how long I would be in the chute you described, road conditions, my schedule, etc.

    Edit: For my daily commute, I have the choice of a 5 1/2 mile route that takes me down a three-lane (no BL), one-way 35 mph street (where cars sometimes go 40-45)* road, and a 7 1/2 mile route that's a darned good MUP along a river (and one that's usually nearly empty during morning commuting hours). I take the road more frequently because I just want to get to work, plus, the road is in mostly good condition and the slight downhill makes decent speed possible.

    *I used to think that the ruthlessly timed lights kept cars at 35 mph, but that's frequently not the case.
    Last edited by Daily Commute; 10-08-06 at 09:07 AM.

  25. #25
    genec genec's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    san diego
    My Bikes
    custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
    Posts
    22,571
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Bekologist
    maybe they mean 'ruralish' four lane roads with highway speeds. or maybe they meant rural logging roads with 60MPH speed limits and 12 foot shoulders....

    or, maybe, there's actually a gorilla playing basketball in the travel lanes and this is a trick poll.....
    A four lane road offers you lots of options... and I think many of us would easily ride in the far right lane while motorists go around us.

    No, by "county hiway" I mean a narrow somewhat irregular road, with no shoulders or shoulders that vary from inches wide to maybe a foot wide. With only a double yellow stripe at the center... no barrier or island divider. These are usually given farm hiway or state hiway numbers... These occur quite often in California, especially along the coast and in and around farm country area.

    Even the fog line may not be in great shape, and the road surface may be irregular rather than nice a smooth and flat.

    Here is a an example of one. This is at the narrow extreme.

    http://www.madisoncounty.org/hiway/Fairvi2.jpg

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •