If your perspective on cycling is based on VC, then your response to a lane positioning, road design, or facilties question will be based on that background. So yes, I am suggesting that it is not possible to discuss many A&S subjects without bringing up VC concepts.Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian
This subforum will work as long as all discussion of VC ideas, pro and con, get moved as well (like praise for bike lanes on 25 mph downtown streets, advocating for regularly filtering forward at red lights, or any position on "Complete Streets"). You really can't move only half of an argument.
As I said before, the real problem was the refusal of a few (mainly anti-VC people) to follow forum guidelines on respect and harassment. I hope you don't give them a heckler's veto.
Edit: my post below illustrates the real problem. If it's OK to make posts like that, please let us know. And if it remains, I guess we'll know it's an acceptable A&S argument technique.
Edited for content, 11:15 a.m., 3/18/07.