Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 17 of 17
  1. #1
    Senior Member kf5nd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Houston, TX 77095
    My Bikes
    Specialized Sequoia Elite, Schwinn Frontier FS MTB, Centurion LeMans (1986)
    Posts
    1,470
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    What is the most common outcome of a hazardous situation?

    What is the most common outcome of a hazardous situation? For example, not being trained in how to undertake a complex and potentially injurious actvity... not having the proper safety equipment... not paying attention... not being sober while doing the activity... etc.

    The most common outcome is: NOTHING. Absolutely nothing.

    Which lulls people into a sense of complacency. If the activity were so risky that huge percentages of people died doing something, not many would do that activity. But most people act unsafely in some area of their lives, and routinely get away with it.

    Until someday, all of the tumblers of the cosmic lock align, and *bang*, they get bit by probability and they fall victim to the risk factors.

    This is why it is so hard to talk to people about safety. They just don't get it. They don't see the big picture, they can't reason using statistics, most of what influences their behavior is via direct experience, word of mouth, peer group pressure, or media influence, and they just go along with all of those.
    Peter Wang, LCI
    Houston, TX USA

  2. #2
    Gone, but not forgotten Shiznaz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Toronto
    My Bikes
    spicer fixie, Haro BMX, cyclops track, Soma Double Cross, KHS Flite 100
    Posts
    4,509
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The most common outcome of a hazardous situation is us complaining about it on here.

  3. #3
    Striving for Fredness deputyjones's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    West Michigan
    My Bikes
    Old Giant Rincon
    Posts
    1,191
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Sure, everything we do in life is a gamble. A plane could crash into my house right now and kill me, but I haven't built a plane-proof bunker yet to house my family.

    I agree that talking to people about safety is very difficult. People worry about all the wrong things that they get from the media, friends, etc. Although to a certain extent you have to trust your own anecdotal, empirical evidence to define the risk in your environment. If someone did a study on bicycle accident rates at a specific intersection that I cross everyday I would be more inclined to change the way I ride based on those statistics then I would for a survey conducted on one in LA or NYC.
    Monsignor: We must always fear evil men. But there is another kind of evil that we must fear the most, and that is the indifference of good men.
    Connor: I do believe the monsignor's finally got the point.
    Murphy: Aye.

    OttawaCountyDSA.com

  4. #4
    pj7
    pj7 is offline
    On Sabbatical
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    1,543
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by kf5nd
    What is the most common outcome of a hazardous situation? For example, not being trained in how to undertake a complex and potentially injurious actvity... not having the proper safety equipment... not paying attention... not being sober while doing the activity... etc.
    The most common outcome is: NOTHING. Absolutely nothing.
    Asked and answered in the same post
    But how do you come up with "nothing" as being your answer?
    Let's take one of your examples and look into it a little more, "not being sober".
    Say I drive drunk for 5 miles. Using your approach of listening to statistics in this situation, we can assume that I would be safe, statistically speaking of course, and so would others on the road. Since it can be shown that more drunk drivers make it from point A to boint B without incident. I guess I can conclude that drunk driving is safe.
    See how listening to statistics can get you into trouble when trying to prove a point?

    Quote Originally Posted by kf5nd
    Which lulls people into a sense of complacency. If the activity were so risky that huge percentages of people died doing something, not many would do that activity. But most people act unsafely in some area of their lives, and routinely get away with it.
    Try telling this to people who have signed up for the America armed forces in the last 3.5 years.

    Quote Originally Posted by kf5nd
    Until someday, all of the tumblers of the cosmic lock align, and *bang*, they get bit by probability and they fall victim to the risk factors.
    At which point statistics would mean nothing right? Since we are talking about fate here. No matter how much safety you use to your advantage, if one believes in fate, then they would not live a minute longer. If of course you subscribe to the theory that "the great ones" wrote the story of your life long ago.

    Quote Originally Posted by kf5nd
    This is why it is so hard to talk to people about safety. They just don't get it. They don't see the big picture, they can't reason using statistics, most of what influences their behavior is via direct experience, word of mouth, peer group pressure, or media influence, and they just go along with all of those.
    I don't see how what you mentioned earlier concludes to this.
    But I do agree, people don't see the big picture alot. Maybe, the big picture doesn't relate to them. For instance, statistics on getting killed by an aligator mean nothing to me since where I live aligators only live in the zoo.
    What does my example have to do with cycling? Well, we are talking about the BIG PICTURE here, and some cyclists do have to give them some though. You can use my example and fold it over a few times and look at it like this.
    There is a cyclist on here who lives in Costa Rica, in the non-turist area, where there are not many, if any at all, paved roads and no such thing as traffic. So do you think he really cares about VC, DLLP, and avoiding busses?
    I am a sig Virus. Please put me in your sig so that I can continue to replicate.

  5. #5
    Infamous Member chipcom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Ohio
    My Bikes
    Surly Big Dummy, Fuji World, 80ish Bianchi
    Posts
    24,373
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I don't care about statistics and I don't get complacent. Statistics scare you into not living life to its fullest, complacency gets you killed.
    "Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws" - Edward Abbey

  6. #6
    Al noisebeam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    AZ
    My Bikes
    Cannondale SuperSix, Lemond Poprad. Retired: Jamis Sputnik, Centurion LeMans Fixed, Diamond Back ascent ex
    Posts
    13,974
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I see the point.

    A good example is drivers who roll thru right turns on red, with hardly a glance to left (let alone to their right) to see if a vehicle is coming or a ped is in x-walk. People get away with it accident free many times a day, day in day out. Maybe after 3-10yrs of doing this they pull right in front of a cyclist or into a ped using the x-walk. Many more collisions are prevented as motorist slams on brakes just before hitting someone.

    A similar/related bad driver behavior is not stopping fully at stop line (before x-walk marked or not) Most often there is not a ped who is using x-walk who is hidden behind the stopped vehicle to the left of driver who doesn't stop before stop line. But sometimes a ped is moving along in x-walk and the driver who doesn't stop where they should hits them.

    There are many other bad driver behaviors that folks get away with, but these two are observable in so many drivers it seems its almost become the norm.

    Al

  7. #7
    Banned. Helmet Head's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    13,075
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by kf5nd
    What is the most common outcome of a hazardous situation? For example, not being trained in how to undertake a complex and potentially injurious actvity... not having the proper safety equipment... not paying attention... not being sober while doing the activity... etc.

    The most common outcome is: NOTHING. Absolutely nothing.

    Which lulls people into a sense of complacency. If the activity were so risky that huge percentages of people died doing something, not many would do that activity. But most people act unsafely in some area of their lives, and routinely get away with it.

    Until someday, all of the tumblers of the cosmic lock align, and *bang*, they get bit by probability and they fall victim to the risk factors.

    This is why it is so hard to talk to people about safety. They just don't get it. They don't see the big picture, they can't reason using statistics, most of what influences their behavior is via direct experience, word of mouth, peer group pressure, or media influence, and they just go along with all of those.
    That's a really good point. It's the same one I have been trying to make in the Riding safely with children thread.

  8. #8
    Dominatrikes sbhikes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Still in Santa Barbara
    My Bikes
    Catrike Pocket, Lightning Thunderbold recumbent, Trek 3000 MTB.
    Posts
    4,920
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I thought the most common outcome was explosion. Maybe I watch too much TV.
    ~Diane
    Recumbents: Lightning Thunderbolt, '06 Catrike Pocket. Upright: Trek Mountain Bike.
    8.5 mile commute. I like bike lanes.

  9. #9
    Senior Member Brian Ratliff's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Near Portland, OR
    My Bikes
    Three road bikes. Two track bikes.
    Posts
    9,759
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by kf5nd
    What is the most common outcome of a hazardous situation? For example, not being trained in how to undertake a complex and potentially injurious actvity... not having the proper safety equipment... not paying attention... not being sober while doing the activity... etc.

    The most common outcome is: NOTHING. Absolutely nothing.

    Which lulls people into a sense of complacency. If the activity were so risky that huge percentages of people died doing something, not many would do that activity. But most people act unsafely in some area of their lives, and routinely get away with it.

    Until someday, all of the tumblers of the cosmic lock align, and *bang*, they get bit by probability and they fall victim to the risk factors.

    This is why it is so hard to talk to people about safety. They just don't get it. They don't see the big picture, they can't reason using statistics, most of what influences their behavior is via direct experience, word of mouth, peer group pressure, or media influence, and they just go along with all of those.
    Interesting. But what is this "safety" you talk about? It seems to me that if something were done routinely without incident, then this is the very definition of safety.

    Safety measures such as tip guards on chainsaws and helmets on bicycles are not "safety" measures, but rather "mitigation" measures. A tip guard does not prevent the operator from putting the tip of the saw against the ground; it just mitigates the consequence of that incident. Helmets don't make a cyclist less likely to fall down, it just mitigates the consequences of falling.

    And statistics have a nasty way of being misused. The most common is using the average rate of some occurance as the probability that this occurance will happen to a single, distinct person. For instance, the statistic of, say, cyclists fall an average of once every 1000 miles (I'm making this up), does not mean that your chances of falling at any certain time is 1/1000. Or that if 1 in 4 children have ADD, that the probabliliy of your child having ADD is 25%.

    The thing is, research and book learning needs to be tempered by experience and pushing the limits. It goes the inverse too. Too many times, research and researchers are too uninformed by the "real world" for their research to be of huge value.
    Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
    "If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter

  10. #10
    pj7
    pj7 is offline
    On Sabbatical
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    1,543
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Helmet Head
    That's a really good point. It's the same one I have been trying to make in the Riding safely with children thread.
    Well, instead of "trying", how about actually making the point, and make it clear, without bogging it down with anything useless.
    Please, do tell, what IS the point. What point were you "trying" to make in that thread that you were unable to make and how does it pertain to this thread?
    And what is the point of this thread? How can the most common outcome of a hazardous situation be nothing Helmet Head?
    I am a sig Virus. Please put me in your sig so that I can continue to replicate.

  11. #11
    don't be so angry clancy98's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    617
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    gee OP, its hard to argue with raw facts and scientific data like that...
    Irregardless is not a word, and you do not sound more intelligent using it.

  12. #12
    eternalvoyage
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    2,437
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Probability. Introduction to Finite Mathematics, by John Kemeny, covers a lot of fundamentals. Most people just don't think this way.

    It can be very useful, though. The commercial aviation industry has used this sort of thinking extensively to increase their safety records. They have a handle on it; they think this way, and do something useful with it. I wish someone would bring more of these sorts of insights into the field of bicycle safety. (Maybe someone can start here?)

    In commercial aviation they have applied their intelligence to these issues in rigorous ways, and it has worked. There is no reason some of their approaches can't be transferred to bicycle safety.

  13. #13
    Faster but still slow slowandsteady's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Jersey
    My Bikes
    Trek 830 circa 1993 and a Fuji WSD Finest 1.0 2006
    Posts
    5,979
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by sbhikes
    I thought the most common outcome was explosion. Maybe I watch too much TV.

    You're close. I watch 24, and the most common outcome is a nuclear attack on Los Angeles sponsored by several countries, some rogue terrorists, and supported by a corrupted mole inside CTU. Don't forget the routine assasination of all of the African-American presidents that compound the situation.
    "Ride lots." -- Eddy Merckx

  14. #14
    The Site Administrator: Currently at home recovering from a couple of strokes,please contact my assistnt admins for forum issues Tom Stormcrowe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    South Florida
    My Bikes
    Techna Wheelchair and a Sun EZ 3 Recumbent Trike
    Posts
    16,159
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    4 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by deputyjones
    Sure, everything we do in life is a gamble. A plane could crash into my house right now and kill me, but I haven't built a plane-proof bunker yet to house my family.
    Negligence of your family's safety? I'm shocked, shocked, I say!
    on light duty due to illness; please contact my assistants for forum issues. They are Siu Blue Wind, or CbadRider or the other 3 star folk. I am currently at home recovering from a couple of strokes. I am making good progress, happily.


    . “He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you.”- Fredrick Nietzsche

    "We can judge the heart of a man by his treatment of animals." - Immanuel Kant

  15. #15
    Former Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    dropmachine.com
    Posts
    4,061
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Shiznaz
    The most common outcome of a hazardous situation is us complaining about it on here.
    +1

  16. #16
    Senior Member The other Inane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Brisvegas
    My Bikes
    Fixed Gear and Cannondaler R4000
    Posts
    67
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Control what you can control, ignore the rest and have fun.
    Fight Club - "On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero."

  17. #17
    pj7
    pj7 is offline
    On Sabbatical
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    1,543
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by The other Inane
    Control what you can control, ignore the rest and have fun.
    yup
    as someone on here once said
    "There is a difference between living life, and avoiding death."
    I am a sig Virus. Please put me in your sig so that I can continue to replicate.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •