Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-30-07, 04:10 PM   #1
powerhouse
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Portland, Maine USA
Bikes: Trek 850 Antelope
Posts: 778
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Riding Single File Or Two Abreast?

In the United States, bicyclists are regulated to ride single file in some states. In others, bicyclists are allowed to ride two abreast. I've traveled in many states, not knowing how it applied in some of them.

For those of you who ACTUALLY know the laws applying to this, I ask this:

Which specific states regulate bicyclists to ride single file?

Which states allow bicyclists to ride two abreast?



MODERATORS: If this belongs in the Vehicular Cycling forum, put it there.

Last edited by powerhouse; 03-30-07 at 05:28 PM.
powerhouse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-07, 07:26 PM   #2
zeytoun
Non-Custom Member
 
zeytoun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Portland, Oregon
Bikes: 1975-1980 SR road bike
Posts: 1,613
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Number of Riders Abreast
There is no need to prohibit riding abreast since the rules on passing require cyclists to move right to permit overtaking and the slow-moving vehicle rule requires cyclists to keep to the right if going slower than other traffic. Eight states have no rule concerning the number of riders abreast. Fifteen other states prohibit bicycling more than two abreast, but permit riding two abreast. Twenty states permit riding two abreast unless traffic is impeded. New York permits riding two abreast except when a cyclist is being overtaken. The remaining six states require cyclists to ride single file, with the exceptions shown in Table 6.
Table 6. Exceptions to Single File Requirement
State
Exceptions
Colorado
when no traffic is impeded or on bike paths or lanes
Hawaii
when on bike lanes and where traffic is unimpeded
Massachusetts
when passing
Montana
when passing, on bike lanes, paved shoulder or parking lane, or on a multilane road when not impeding traffic
Nebraska
when on bike lanes or paths
Virginia
none
from:
http://www.bicycledriving.com/trafficlaw.htm
zeytoun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-07, 12:19 AM   #3
MrCjolsen
Senior Member
 
MrCjolsen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Davis CA
Bikes: Surly Cross-Check, '85 Giant road bike (unrecogizable fixed-gear conversion
Posts: 3,957
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
I have no problem with requiring single file as long as an exeption is allowed for passing.

I'm not a big fan of riding two abreast. I don't like doing it. On my commute I often come up behind other commuters who are two abreast, and passing them can often be a pain.
MrCjolsen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-07, 07:04 AM   #4
Da Tinker
Can't ride enough!
 
Da Tinker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: south Louisiana
Bikes: IFab Crown Jewel, Giant Defy, Hardtail MTB, Fuji finest, Bianchi FG conversion
Posts: 1,235
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Two abreast riding can be useful at times. When riding with a group (>3 riders), riding abreast in a narrow lane will serve to give the riders more visibility to motorist & shorten the length of the group for motorists to pass.

Given that the motorist must change lanes to pass, would you rather he have to pass eight riders in a single file or the same eight in a 2 X 4 double line?
Da Tinker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-07, 08:30 AM   #5
bac
Senior Member
 
bac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Pennsylvania
Bikes: Too many to list!
Posts: 7,481
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Here's the rub. If we cyclists don't even know, how in the world is the driver going to know the law? The only answer is, of course, in driver education. I'm not holding my breath for that one.

... Brad
bac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-07, 02:50 PM   #6
joejack951
Senior Member
 
joejack951's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Wilmington, DE
Bikes: 1984 Trek 660, 2003 Specialized Hardrock, 2004 LOOK KG386i (RIP), 2005 Iron Horse Warrior Expert, 2009 Pedal Force CX1, 2014 Islabikes CNOC 14 (son's)
Posts: 10,082
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 118 Post(s)
Why even bother worrying about the laws? If riding two abreast isn't impeding anyone from passing (any more than a single cyclist would) who cares? I enjoy riding two abreast as it's the only way to be able to carry on a conversation with someone while cycling without having to shout. My dad is hard of hearing and can't understand a word I say unless I'm riding right next to him. Motorists who complain about cyclists riding two abreast don't seem to recognize the irony in doing so: if their cars weren't so wide (to accomodate side by side seating) they could easily pass a cyclist (and sometimes two side by side cyclists) without having to leave the lane.
joejack951 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-07, 06:57 PM   #7
rando
Senior Member
 
rando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tempe, AZ
Bikes:
Posts: 2,967
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
my inner 12 year old still chuckles at the word "abreast".
__________________
"Think of bicycles as rideable art that can just about save the world". ~Grant Petersen

Cyclists fare best when they recognize that there are times when acting vehicularly is not the best practice, and are flexible enough to do what is necessary as the situation warrants.--Me
rando is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-07, 08:37 PM   #8
sbhikes
Dominatrikes
 
sbhikes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Still in Santa Barbara
Bikes: Catrike Pocket, Lightning Thunderbold recumbent, Trek 3000 MTB.
Posts: 4,920
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I like riding abreast because I can't hear when people talk to me otherwise and they can't hear me either. But it seems hard to get people to ride side-by-side.
sbhikes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-07, 08:50 PM   #9
AndrewP
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Montreal
Bikes: Peugeot Hybrid, Minelli Hybrid
Posts: 6,521
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Riding side by side is easier if you have a mirror so you are constantly aware of the traffic situation behind you.
AndrewP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-07, 09:56 PM   #10
Tapeworm21
Senior Member
 
Tapeworm21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Berkeley
Bikes: 2010 Tarmac SL, 2013 Fairdale Weekender, 2013 Fairdale Coaster, 1995 Specialized M2 Pro, 1972 Schwinn Heavy Duty, 2014 Surley Long Haul Trucker
Posts: 2,265
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Why would you even ride side by side? Is the topic of your chit chat really that important? You're literally playing in traffic by riding side by side.
Tapeworm21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-07, 05:50 AM   #11
Da Tinker
Can't ride enough!
 
Da Tinker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: south Louisiana
Bikes: IFab Crown Jewel, Giant Defy, Hardtail MTB, Fuji finest, Bianchi FG conversion
Posts: 1,235
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tapeworm21
You're literally playing in traffic by riding side by side.

Hold on! Bikes are traffic!
Da Tinker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-07, 07:59 AM   #12
cuda2k
Unique Vintage Steel
 
cuda2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Allen, TX
Bikes: Kirk Frameworks JKS-C, Serotta Nova, Gazelle AB-Frame, Fuji Team Issue, Schwinn Crosscut, All-City Space Horse
Posts: 11,486
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Multiple lanes in one direction = no real reason not to ride 2 abreast to fill the lane.

One lane in each direction = single file to ease passing of traffic and reduce risk of being hit.

^ ^ ^ that's my opinion. There has been a recent report of one of the small suburbs around here harassning rec cyclist groups on weekend rides for how many across they were riding.
cuda2k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-07, 08:39 AM   #13
joejack951
Senior Member
 
joejack951's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Wilmington, DE
Bikes: 1984 Trek 660, 2003 Specialized Hardrock, 2004 LOOK KG386i (RIP), 2005 Iron Horse Warrior Expert, 2009 Pedal Force CX1, 2014 Islabikes CNOC 14 (son's)
Posts: 10,082
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 118 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tapeworm21
Why would you even ride side by side? Is the topic of your chit chat really that important? You're literally playing in traffic by riding side by side.
It's about as important as it is to have your passenger next to you in a car to chat with them. At least on bikes, you have the option to go single file when it can help with passing.
joejack951 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-07, 07:46 PM   #14
JohnBrooking
Commuter
 
JohnBrooking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Southern Maine
Bikes: 2006 Giant Cypress EX (7-speed internal hub)
Posts: 2,567
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Add me to the opinion of not really caring about the law. I see no problem if you are not impeding traffic, and are aware enough of what's coming up behind you to change when necessary. But when there is faster-moving traffic behind you and room for it to pass, purposefully continuing to hold it up is rude. It's about common courtesy and cooperation on the road.
JohnBrooking is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-07, 10:10 PM   #15
ChipSeal
www.chipsea.blogspot.com
 
ChipSeal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: South of Dallas, Texas
Bikes: Giant OCR C0 road
Posts: 1,026
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Texas: two abreast is OK by law.
ChipSeal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-07, 11:07 PM   #16
rajman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Toronto
Bikes: Miyata 600, Marin Larkspur, Marin Muirwoods, GT tequesta, Fuji Ace
Posts: 970
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Wait a second here - are you trying to say that passing a slow cyclist/rollerblader/golfcart/electric wheelchair/horse is illegal in a bunch of states? Is that enforceable?
rajman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-07, 04:24 AM   #17
LandLuger
bicyclist
 
LandLuger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 383
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
What is ironic is that when I ride two abreast with my father, I get far more angry honks/shouts from the motorists, yet in single file we take the lane by riding the right tiretrack. Somehow the latter doesn't upset the stupid cagers even though they have to move to the opposing lane to pass in either case. BTW, my state law specifically states that bicyclists can ride two abreast.
LandLuger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-07, 05:46 AM   #18
joejack951
Senior Member
 
joejack951's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Wilmington, DE
Bikes: 1984 Trek 660, 2003 Specialized Hardrock, 2004 LOOK KG386i (RIP), 2005 Iron Horse Warrior Expert, 2009 Pedal Force CX1, 2014 Islabikes CNOC 14 (son's)
Posts: 10,082
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 118 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by rajman
Wait a second here - are you trying to say that passing a slow cyclist/rollerblader/golfcart/electric wheelchair/horse is illegal in a bunch of states? Is that enforceable?
It's illegal in no passing zones, just like it's illegal to pass motor vehicles in no passing zones. No passing zones include any road with a solid yellow line down the middle on the side closest to the one you are operating on. I've never seen it enforced (I've been passed by motorists crossing a solid yellow line with a cop behind them and the cop then proceeded to pass me too).

There are laws in most states that require slow moving vehicles on a two lane road (one lane each way, this law does not apply when there is a passing lane)to pull over when there's space if they are impeding traffic (no safe and legal way to be passed). The laws I've seen state that being followed by 5 or more vehicles while going less than the normal speed of traffic is impeding traffic.

While cycling, I prefer to be passed even in no passing zones if my speed is slow enough that the limited sightlines do not pose a hazard. Most people pass reasonably and it allows me to keep moving instead of having to pull over periodically to let backed up traffic pass. On rare occasion, I will pull over (turn onto a cross street, a driveway, or a narrow shoulder) if someone's been stuck behind me for a significant period of time. In practice, it's impossible to tell how many vehicles are behind you so it becomes a judgement call for the cyclist for when to pull over.
joejack951 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-07, 05:49 AM   #19
joejack951
Senior Member
 
joejack951's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Wilmington, DE
Bikes: 1984 Trek 660, 2003 Specialized Hardrock, 2004 LOOK KG386i (RIP), 2005 Iron Horse Warrior Expert, 2009 Pedal Force CX1, 2014 Islabikes CNOC 14 (son's)
Posts: 10,082
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 118 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by LandLuger
What is ironic is that when I ride two abreast with my father, I get far more angry honks/shouts from the motorists, yet in single file we take the lane by riding the right tiretrack. Somehow the latter doesn't upset the stupid cagers even though they have to move to the opposing lane to pass in either case. BTW, my state law specifically states that bicyclists can ride two abreast.
Some motorists do seem to get offended by cyclists riding two abreast. It doesn't help that most cyclists think it's illegal too, and most cyclists think it's their duty to always get out of the way of faster traffic (with that mindset, you'd never even consider riding two abreast except for offroad trails or very wide shoulders).
joejack951 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-07, 06:11 AM   #20
reich17
 
reich17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 414
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Ohio Revised Code

4511.55. Bicycle to be ridden near right side of roadway; riding bicycles or motorcycles abreast.

A) Every person operating a bicycle upon a roadway shall ride as near to the right side of the roadway as practicable obeying all traffic rules applicable to vehicles and exercising due care when passing a standing vehicle or one proceeding in the same direction.

(B) Persons riding bicycles or motorcycles upon a roadway shall ride not more than two abreast in a single lane, except on paths or parts of roadways set aside for the exclusive use of bicycles or motorcycles.

(C) This section does not require a person operating a bicycle to ride at the edge of the roadway when it is unreasonable or unsafe to do so. Conditions that may require riding away from the edge of the roadway include when necessary to avoid fixed or moving objects, parked or moving vehicles, surface hazards, or if it otherwise is unsafe or impracticable to do so, including if the lane is too narrow for the bicycle and an overtaking vehicle to travel safely side by side within the lane.
reich17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-07, 06:35 AM   #21
MiRider
Experienced Lurker
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Michigan
Bikes:
Posts: 58
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
It's legal here in Michigan, but not always a safe choice.

Michigan Compiled Laws 257.660b
Two or more individuals operating bicycles upon a highway or street shall not ride more than 2 abreast except upon a path or portion of the highway or street set aside for the use of bicycles.

http://www.legislature.mi.gov/(S(jpd...e=mcl-257-660b

Last edited by MiRider; 04-04-07 at 06:51 AM.
MiRider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-07, 09:33 AM   #22
joejack951
Senior Member
 
joejack951's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Wilmington, DE
Bikes: 1984 Trek 660, 2003 Specialized Hardrock, 2004 LOOK KG386i (RIP), 2005 Iron Horse Warrior Expert, 2009 Pedal Force CX1, 2014 Islabikes CNOC 14 (son's)
Posts: 10,082
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 118 Post(s)
FWIW, I'm 99.999% positive that it is not legal to ride three (or more) abreast in a single lane on a roadway in any state.
joejack951 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-07, 09:40 AM   #23
noisebeam
Al
 
noisebeam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: AZ
Bikes: Cannondale SuperSix, Lemond Poprad. Retired: Jamis Sputnik, Centurion LeMans Fixed, Diamond Back ascent ex
Posts: 14,109
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 71 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by joejack951
FWIW, I'm 99.999% positive that it is not legal to ride three (or more) abreast in a single lane on a roadway in any state.
According to:

http://www.bicycledriving.com/trafficlaw.htm

Eight states do not have a law limiting number of cyclists abreast.

Al
noisebeam is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-07, 09:42 AM   #24
joejack951
Senior Member
 
joejack951's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Wilmington, DE
Bikes: 1984 Trek 660, 2003 Specialized Hardrock, 2004 LOOK KG386i (RIP), 2005 Iron Horse Warrior Expert, 2009 Pedal Force CX1, 2014 Islabikes CNOC 14 (son's)
Posts: 10,082
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 118 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by noisebeam
According to:

http://www.bicycledriving.com/trafficlaw.htm

Eight states do not have a law limiting number of cyclists abreast.

Al
I was hoping they'd list the states. Guess I need to do more searching. Thanks for pointing that out though.
joejack951 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-07, 11:37 AM   #25
ghettocruiser
Former Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: dropmachine.com
Bikes:
Posts: 4,062
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by joejack951
Motorists who complain about cyclists riding two abreast don't seem to recognize the irony in doing so: if their cars weren't so wide (to accomodate side by side seating) they could easily pass a cyclist...

Never thought of that angle. Good call.
ghettocruiser is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:18 PM.