Cut off in traffic; bad precedent being set
#51
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,531 Times
in
3,157 Posts
I'd agree that a motorist in the right most lane on a roadway could decide to move right at any time, and could also decide to turn right at any intersection, signalized or not. As such, you should ride accordingly. Don't pass moving traffic on the right in the shoulder or a bike lane where motorists generally do not expect traffic. The only way to be 100% sure that someone won't turn right from the right most lane and cut you off is to position yourself in the righthand lane.
100% sure eh.
I was cut off yesterday while in a right only turn lane, while using the center of the lane, while making a legal right turn...
Some hot headed woman in a Toyota cut me off by turning right from the center NO TURN LANE.
This is not the first time this has happened, and not the only location.
She went wide around me, so I wasn't in any real danger... but it just goes to show... There is no 100% sure method of anything when dealing with motorists who chose to do things their way, instead of in accordance of the rules of the road.
(This BTW is why I tend to laugh at John Foresters' insistance that all things are right and good as every one follows the rules... ) Riiiiiighhhht!!
#52
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,531 Times
in
3,157 Posts
I would love to see similar laws here. They put the burden back onto those with the greatest potential for damage.
#53
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: New England (the HUB)
Posts: 121
Bikes: 05 Cannondale R700, 82 Univega CustomMaxima SS conversion
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Future possibilities aside, I am merely speaking about this one event. I am speaking purely and absolutely about this one situation; and I wish to avoid semantic debates and the good ol' 'coulda, woulda, shoulda'.
I am alive (again, thankfully!) and I was not 'more than 50% at fault', as the adjuster said.
#54
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: New England (the HUB)
Posts: 121
Bikes: 05 Cannondale R700, 82 Univega CustomMaxima SS conversion
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
according to you reasoning thus far, I can only deduce the following:
Ride IN traffic = people pass dangerously close... SO...
Ride on SHOULDER = not on roadway, so if you get hit it's your fault
Car jets out infront of you = you should'nt have been there
No Signal? = No sympathy
to ride a bike on the road requires ESP
No ESP? don't ride because you'll never anticipate everything everyone is going to do.
This is all a bit screwy.
I was riding along a road and a car turned without any indication. BUT I SHOULD HAVE KNOWN IT?? Just because it's a fact of life that people are ass-holes does not mean I should just 'accept it'.
<saracam> Everyone might as well hang up their shoes and not ride anymore because cars don't give a f*ck. </sarcasm>
I totally disagree with your position.
#55
I drink your MILKSHAKE
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: St. Petersburg, FL
Posts: 15,061
Bikes: 2003 Specialized Rockhopper FSR Comp, 1999 Specialized Hardrock Comp FS, 1971 Schwinn Varsity
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Legally, it's common knowledge that cars aren't supposed to use the paved shoulder as a travel lane. The Massachusetts law allows cylists to pass on the right but otherwise expects them to drive like cars, so it naturally follows that bikes are not legally allowed to ride on the shoulder. Of course we all would do it, and likely the police would tolerate it and most motorists would appreciate it and we would all be happy, but it's still not legal.
#56
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: New England (the HUB)
Posts: 121
Bikes: 05 Cannondale R700, 82 Univega CustomMaxima SS conversion
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Again, no you weren't
You said yourself that you were to the right of the white line and therefore out of the legal roadway.
Damn hard to prove the "did not check the mirrors" bit even with witnesses
It's unfortunate that the cop didn't take statements from witnesses. We're not against you here, but your own actions led to the loopholes that screwed you.
You said yourself that you were to the right of the white line and therefore out of the legal roadway.
Damn hard to prove the "did not check the mirrors" bit even with witnesses
It's unfortunate that the cop didn't take statements from witnesses. We're not against you here, but your own actions led to the loopholes that screwed you.
According to my local laws, YES I WAS.
I was on the 'roadway' as vehilcles allowed due to congestion... sometimes to the right, sometimes to the left of the line; whatever safety allowed. I did not overtake any cars who were displaying any sort of indicator (directionals, brake lights, etc...) I still do not see how I was being unsafe.
I was wearing screaming yellow in broad day-light... my 'guess' that the driver did not check mirrors is an educated, logical, and reasonable one.
No kidding about the cop/witness thing. After researching through bike advocacy groups I find that it is not uncommon for officers to be less-than interested in cases such as this where injuries are not 'life-threatening'. Even my fiance' (who spoke to the officer while I was in the ER) said he was rushed and dis-interested.
I know you're not 'against' me, but I do think it is a mass (guilt? defence? compensation??) thing since a lot of riders out there are guilty of riding 'improperly' at any givin time. Thankfully accidents are the variable and not the norm; and I admit to the occasional infraction due to impatience, though I strive to be cautious and consciencious, but impatience is simply not the case here. I WAS CUT OFF (sorry for the all caps) and the simple fact is turing without signalling is wrong even without a cyclist/pedestrian/car/etc... who is affected.
Are you merely condemning me because you, yourself are guilty?
My years and miles of safety in an otherwise difficult area (prior to this incident) speak for themselves.
Thank you again for your thoughts.
Last edited by Astroluc; 08-03-07 at 09:37 PM.
#57
Chairman of the Bored
Join Date: May 2004
Location: St. Petersburg, FL
Posts: 5,825
Bikes: 2004 Raleigh Talus, 2001 Motobecane Vent Noir (Custom build for heavy riders)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Honestly talk to a lawyer...see if you can sue the driver for inadequate insurance coverage as required by law, since his insurance was unable to pay for your vehicle.
I did this when some jerk tailended my mustang, and his insurance stonewalled me (they said my estimate was by an "untrustworthy" shop (it was the fracking dealer for chrissakes)....so I sued, he flipped out and sued his insurer...a week later I got a settlement check from the driver. Apparently he got a large settlement from his insurer as well.
Insurance companies are scum (no offense to those who work for them)....they WILL find a way to weasel out of paying for anything, so I will not hesitate to make life as uncomforatable for them as they make mine.
I did this when some jerk tailended my mustang, and his insurance stonewalled me (they said my estimate was by an "untrustworthy" shop (it was the fracking dealer for chrissakes)....so I sued, he flipped out and sued his insurer...a week later I got a settlement check from the driver. Apparently he got a large settlement from his insurer as well.
Insurance companies are scum (no offense to those who work for them)....they WILL find a way to weasel out of paying for anything, so I will not hesitate to make life as uncomforatable for them as they make mine.
#58
For The Fun of It
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Louisissippi Coast
Posts: 5,832
Bikes: Lynskey GR300, Lynskey Backroad, Litespeed T6, Lynskey MT29, Burley Duet
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2123 Post(s)
Liked 1,631 Times
in
818 Posts
Mr. Underbridge is providing wise counsel that you would do well to heed. Irrespective of the law, it is incumbent upon the bicyclist to recognize the inherent danger in his chosen activity. One of those dangers is the very cause of your accident. You said the road the driver was turning right onto was a secondary road. It could have been a driveway and that should have been enough to have sent up a red flag. PEOPLE AREN'T EXPECTING BICYCLES TO BE ON THEIR RIGHT. They just aren't. I'm a bicyclist and I don't check my rearview mirrors for passing bicyclists before I turn right.
What was the car's position in relation to you for the 60/30/15/10/5 seconds before the collision?
Please don't think I am beating up on you. I have had a few accidents on both two and four wheels in my days. After each, I always reflect on what I could have done differently. The situation you described...running at times the same speed as traffic, at times slowly passing to the right and at others slowly being passed, is a dangerous situation. I know you are looking at the matter from a legal standpoint, but from a practical standpoint, Mr. Underbridge is trying to help keep you from having to exercise your legal rights in what is obviously a legal gray area.
I hope you heal well. My bruises are finally fading from a motorcycle accident I had when an oncoming car turned left into my path.
What was the car's position in relation to you for the 60/30/15/10/5 seconds before the collision?
Please don't think I am beating up on you. I have had a few accidents on both two and four wheels in my days. After each, I always reflect on what I could have done differently. The situation you described...running at times the same speed as traffic, at times slowly passing to the right and at others slowly being passed, is a dangerous situation. I know you are looking at the matter from a legal standpoint, but from a practical standpoint, Mr. Underbridge is trying to help keep you from having to exercise your legal rights in what is obviously a legal gray area.
I hope you heal well. My bruises are finally fading from a motorcycle accident I had when an oncoming car turned left into my path.
#59
Senior Member
100% sure eh.
I was cut off yesterday while in a right only turn lane, while using the center of the lane, while making a legal right turn...
Some hot headed woman in a Toyota cut me off by turning right from the center NO TURN LANE.
This is not the first time this has happened, and not the only location.
She went wide around me, so I wasn't in any real danger... but it just goes to show... There is no 100% sure method of anything when dealing with motorists who chose to do things their way, instead of in accordance of the rules of the road.
(This BTW is why I tend to laugh at John Foresters' insistance that all things are right and good as every one follows the rules... ) Riiiiiighhhht!!
BTW, how does someone cut you off but go "wide around" you? Sounds like you are exagerrating again.
#60
Senior Member
there was about 3' of smooth un-interupted pavement to the right while the roadway was clogged with slow moving cars (several on or slightly over the white line) due to traffic congestion.
the vehicle turned suddenly and without warning; I simply had no time to react. I always yield right of way when I see a signal or see a car actually in front of me... I'll always lose vs. a car, that's how I view it.
the vehicle turned suddenly and without warning; I simply had no time to react. I always yield right of way when I see a signal or see a car actually in front of me... I'll always lose vs. a car, that's how I view it.
#61
totally louche
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: A land that time forgot
Posts: 18,023
Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
8 Posts
I suspect bikes are legally allowed to ride on the shoulder in Mass. and there are no shoulders IN intersections, joe. You've actually been searching Mass traffic law to try and blame the bicyclist???? lame-o.
armchair bicycling. give it a rest, boys.
armchair bicycling. give it a rest, boys.
#62
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,735
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1089 Post(s)
Liked 1,187 Times
in
750 Posts
Do I understand this situation correctly?:
Uncontrolled intersection; No "right turn lane" - in other words, normal right (and left) turns would take place from the lane itself, not after moving into a right turn lane.
OP was passing car(s) on the right as he approached this intersection
Car in question turned right as OP was passing traffic on the right and thus a collision happened (bike hitting front passenger side of car).
OP claims that no right turn signal was used - but I don't know if that's a fact.
OP is dead wrong. This is a classic example of exactly what you're NOT supposed to do on a bike - pass people on the right in an intersection in which right turns are made from the normal traffic lane. You can ONLY pass cars on the right if they are going straight, not in a situation where turns are possible.
IF the car wasn't signaling, the driver would be partially responsible, but cyclist is mostly responsible for passing cars on the right. How would it be if the car had run into another car that was passing on the right going through the intersection?
This is the only situation where I've hit a car. It was clearly my fault and I'm just glad I didn't damage myself or the car. (I was at least going slow and was able to stop and swerve and kind of latch on to the car rather than crashing totally).
OP probably should have gotten a ticket.
Uncontrolled intersection; No "right turn lane" - in other words, normal right (and left) turns would take place from the lane itself, not after moving into a right turn lane.
OP was passing car(s) on the right as he approached this intersection
Car in question turned right as OP was passing traffic on the right and thus a collision happened (bike hitting front passenger side of car).
OP claims that no right turn signal was used - but I don't know if that's a fact.
OP is dead wrong. This is a classic example of exactly what you're NOT supposed to do on a bike - pass people on the right in an intersection in which right turns are made from the normal traffic lane. You can ONLY pass cars on the right if they are going straight, not in a situation where turns are possible.
IF the car wasn't signaling, the driver would be partially responsible, but cyclist is mostly responsible for passing cars on the right. How would it be if the car had run into another car that was passing on the right going through the intersection?
This is the only situation where I've hit a car. It was clearly my fault and I'm just glad I didn't damage myself or the car. (I was at least going slow and was able to stop and swerve and kind of latch on to the car rather than crashing totally).
OP probably should have gotten a ticket.
#63
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: New England (the HUB)
Posts: 121
Bikes: 05 Cannondale R700, 82 Univega CustomMaxima SS conversion
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Do I understand this situation correctly?:
Uncontrolled intersection; No "right turn lane" - in other words, normal right (and left) turns would take place from the lane itself, not after moving into a right turn lane.
OP was passing car(s) on the right as he approached this intersection
Car in question turned right as OP was passing traffic on the right and thus a collision happened (bike hitting front passenger side of car).
OP claims that no right turn signal was used - but I don't know if that's a fact.
Uncontrolled intersection; No "right turn lane" - in other words, normal right (and left) turns would take place from the lane itself, not after moving into a right turn lane.
OP was passing car(s) on the right as he approached this intersection
Car in question turned right as OP was passing traffic on the right and thus a collision happened (bike hitting front passenger side of car).
OP claims that no right turn signal was used - but I don't know if that's a fact.
no traffic control related to secondary roadway
I was NOT passing anyone "at the time" (traffic was accelerating)
No signal or brake-lights were present
IF there was a signal; which there was not. I have been in a few situaitions (non bike related) where I was at-fault, and plainly admit it.
This is your opinion... but it is only an opinion; and in this thread it is needlessly incindiary, so I will ignore it outside of this statement.
According to your reasoning I should never pass (or even travel) on the right, ever, if there is so much as a parking lot, driveway, road, path, ally, etc... because any car can suddenly turn with or without signaling? Why is that acceptable? Considering the amount of bicycle traffic I see in urban or urbanized areas that flout this, I hardly see how it is practical. And even if we disregard practicality, it's still LEGAL if the car displays no indicator. Whis is the case in my situation.
Plainly speaking; I am LEGALY in the right.
and just for the record: I do NOT disregard cars just because I 'feel' I am right. I do understand that I am in more danger of harm than anyone in a car regardless of 'right' or 'wrong'. I am a cautious cyclist and not an aggressive rider... that is a very large reason why I am having trouble with this issue.
#64
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: New England (the HUB)
Posts: 121
Bikes: 05 Cannondale R700, 82 Univega CustomMaxima SS conversion
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
<cough>notanintersection</cough>
#65
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: New England (the HUB)
Posts: 121
Bikes: 05 Cannondale R700, 82 Univega CustomMaxima SS conversion
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#66
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: New England (the HUB)
Posts: 121
Bikes: 05 Cannondale R700, 82 Univega CustomMaxima SS conversion
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
very good point and thank you.
#67
Senior Member
It's standard practice for insurance companies to deny payout on claims. They're trying to save money. Sometimes the only way to get them to pay is to challenge them in court. Problem is, if it's a low payout (usually the result of no bodily injuries) most people won't find a lawyer who'll work for nothing or if it goes to small claims where you don't need a lawyer, the insurance company will send someone as a rep that's more than qualified to out maneuver you.
If the sum total of your loss in the collision is $500 or less, take it as a learning experience and be glad you weren't seriously hurt. Figure out why something went wrong on the road and avoid it in the future.
BTW, you mentioned lost wages and medical bills were covered. What's the story there? Missed the morning at work to be checked out at a hospital or clinic? I'd be curious what they paid for that.
If the sum total of your loss in the collision is $500 or less, take it as a learning experience and be glad you weren't seriously hurt. Figure out why something went wrong on the road and avoid it in the future.
BTW, you mentioned lost wages and medical bills were covered. What's the story there? Missed the morning at work to be checked out at a hospital or clinic? I'd be curious what they paid for that.
#68
Senior Member
before I argue about the definition of 'intersection' again perhaps we should find out how MA state law defines 'intersection'... since we (and others here) obviously disagree about it's meaning. Until we can figure that out, I'll leave this alone.
<cough>notanintersection</cough>
<cough>notanintersection</cough>
From: https://www.mass.gov/legis/laws/mgl/90-1.htm
I found this in the laws pertaining to cyclists:
"Section 11B. Every person operating a bicycle upon a way, as defined in section one of chapter ninety, shall have the right to use all public ways in the commonwealth except limited access or express state highways where signs specifically prohibiting bicycles have been posted, and shall be subject to the traffic laws and regulations of the commonwealth and the special regulations contained in this section, except that: (1) the bicycle operator may keep to the right when passing a motor vehicle which is moving in the travel lane of the way <snip>" (link: https://www.mass.gov/legis/laws/mgl/85-11b.htm)
That seems to give you permission to pass a vehicle going straight on the right in the shoulder as a "way" is defined as "any public highway, private way laid out under authority of statute, way dedicated to public use, or way under the control of park commissioners or body having like powers."
But in your case, the vehicle was turning right and as such, not in the "travel lane of the way." There are no laws that I can find requiring a signal to turn right (I can't find any signal laws actually) nor are there any laws requiring the turning driver to move onto the shoulder to make a right turn (I haven't seen that in any state's laws actually).
In conclusion , my point isn't to say "you're wrong." My point is that you'll have tough time convincing any judge in his right mind that you were legally in the right passing a turning vehicle on the right in the shoulder and, way more importantly, for your own safety this is something that you should avoid doing, whether the "intersecting way" is a major road, a minor road, a driveway, or a parking lot entrance. You don't know when someone is going to turn right and you cannot count on everyone to signal their turns, especially when they are in the far right lane.
Last edited by joejack951; 08-05-07 at 07:45 PM.
#69
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 7,279
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
So, a couple of months ago I was cut off in traffic, resulting in some slight injury and damage to my bike... Insurance company now says it is MY FAULT and will not cover damage to the bike (about $500)!...This is a DANGEROUS precedent and a dark day for cycling.
Are there any cyclist advocacy groups whom I can contact about this matter? Thank you.
Are there any cyclist advocacy groups whom I can contact about this matter? Thank you.
Last edited by Blue Order; 08-05-07 at 08:03 PM.
#70
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Reston, VA
Posts: 2,369
Bikes: 2003 Giant OCR2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
no right (or left) turn lane
According to your reasoning I should never pass (or even travel) on the right, ever, if there is so much as a parking lot, driveway, road, path, ally, etc... because any car can suddenly turn with or without signaling? Why is that acceptable? Considering the amount of bicycle traffic I see in urban or urbanized areas that flout this, I hardly see how it is practical. And even if we disregard practicality, it's still LEGAL if the car displays no indicator. Whis is the case in my situation.
According to your reasoning I should never pass (or even travel) on the right, ever, if there is so much as a parking lot, driveway, road, path, ally, etc... because any car can suddenly turn with or without signaling? Why is that acceptable? Considering the amount of bicycle traffic I see in urban or urbanized areas that flout this, I hardly see how it is practical. And even if we disregard practicality, it's still LEGAL if the car displays no indicator. Whis is the case in my situation.
90% of the morons out there don't use their turn signals. Because of this, YOU'RE RIGHT - *NEVER* ride to the right of a line of traffic that isn't moving a lot faster than you, because you won't be able to tell who's going to turn. I've said this ad nauseum, but if they didn't just pass you, they won't remember you're there.
If you are going approximately the same speed as the traffic, then just GET IN IT. It's much safer.
Plainly speaking, you are PRACTICALLY the one who got hit. If being legally right is comforting when you're the one injured, I can't help you.
And if you truly don't see why what you did was a really bad idea - regardless of legality - read this: https://www.bikexprt.com/streetsmarts/usa/
#71
Banned.
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 13,075
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Oh, man, this thread is classic. I just read the whole thing. Astroluc is the quintessential typical cyclist. Fairly experienced. Think he knows how to ride a bike. Thinks he knows how the rules of the road apply to bikes. Think he knows how he should behave. Thinks he did nothing wrong. Resistant to all the good advice other clearly more experienced and knowledgable cyclists are giving him. And yet he was almost hit in one of the most common ways cyclists are hit. Clueless.
For all the hand-wringing about how motorists need to be educated, when the vast majority of cyclists out there are thinking and riding like Astroluc, can motorist education really make much of a difference?
For all the hand-wringing about how motorists need to be educated, when the vast majority of cyclists out there are thinking and riding like Astroluc, can motorist education really make much of a difference?
#72
I drink your MILKSHAKE
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: St. Petersburg, FL
Posts: 15,061
Bikes: 2003 Specialized Rockhopper FSR Comp, 1999 Specialized Hardrock Comp FS, 1971 Schwinn Varsity
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Not by what I've read from the links you've provided. The shoulder is NOT a travel lane and NOT part of the "roadway"
You didn't take the lane. Your own wishy washy riding style (sometimes in, sometimes out) is a main contributer to the problem.
It was still a guess, regardless of how you dress it up
Unfortunately this is symptomatic of societal attitudes towards cyclists
Not at all, but most riders will admit when they've done something wrong, or are at least partially at fault
I'm not denying that, however, the fact that you weren't in the roadway, but instead on the shoulder, damages your case.
Not hardly. If I make a mistake, I own up to it. Of course I also don't pass stopped cars on the right or "filter" up at lights.
Even a blind squirrel gets a few nuts. You need to work on asserting yourself and claiming your place on the roadway rather than sending the mixed message you've been broadcasting for "years and miles"
I was on the 'roadway' as vehicles allowed due to congestion... sometimes to the right, sometimes to the left of the line; whatever safety allowed. I did not overtake any cars who were displaying any sort of indicator (directionals, brake lights, etc...) I still do not see how I was being unsafe.
No kidding about the cop/witness thing. After researching through bike advocacy groups I find that it is not uncommon for officers to be less-than interested in cases such as this where injuries are not 'life-threatening'. Even my fiance' (who spoke to the officer while I was in the ER) said he was rushed and dis-interested.
Thankfully accidents are the variable and not the norm; and I admit to the occasional infraction due to impatience, though I strive to be cautious and conscientious, but impatience is simply not the case here. I WAS CUT OFF (sorry for the all caps) and the simple fact is turning without signaling is wrong even without a cyclist/pedestrian/car/etc... who is affected.
Not hardly. If I make a mistake, I own up to it. Of course I also don't pass stopped cars on the right or "filter" up at lights.
#73
Banned.
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 13,075
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Raiyn is being a little harsh, but absolutely right.
Forester's rule of thumb is something like, "never pass on the right when they can or might turn right".
My basic general rule is to never let my front wheel pass the back bumper when I'm on the right. But that's general, there are exceptions. The point is, I know it's an exception when I do it. Before I do it, I always evaluate the situation (which takes probably less than a second in real time). The first thing I do is consider alternatives. Can I pass on the left? Any reason to not slow down and just get behind this guy in the lane? Passing on the left, even if it means lane-splitting, is always preferable and usually works.
Only when I have good reasons to not utilize these other options will I even consider proceeding on the right. And then the first thing I do is look ahead for "a place where a right turn can be made". That can be anything from a major intersection to an alley or driveway. If such a place exists, then I back off. Once I'm sure the driver is not turning right, then I'm likely to proceed (after reconsidering the preferable alternatives again, of course).
If the driver slows down, then I too will slow down, often also merging left and passing on the left (what might not have been an option a few seconds ago might be now that the driver has slowed and started turning right).
Bottom line: if I ever get right hooked I will consider that to be my fault and nobody elses, that's for sure.
Forester's rule of thumb is something like, "never pass on the right when they can or might turn right".
My basic general rule is to never let my front wheel pass the back bumper when I'm on the right. But that's general, there are exceptions. The point is, I know it's an exception when I do it. Before I do it, I always evaluate the situation (which takes probably less than a second in real time). The first thing I do is consider alternatives. Can I pass on the left? Any reason to not slow down and just get behind this guy in the lane? Passing on the left, even if it means lane-splitting, is always preferable and usually works.
Only when I have good reasons to not utilize these other options will I even consider proceeding on the right. And then the first thing I do is look ahead for "a place where a right turn can be made". That can be anything from a major intersection to an alley or driveway. If such a place exists, then I back off. Once I'm sure the driver is not turning right, then I'm likely to proceed (after reconsidering the preferable alternatives again, of course).
If the driver slows down, then I too will slow down, often also merging left and passing on the left (what might not have been an option a few seconds ago might be now that the driver has slowed and started turning right).
Bottom line: if I ever get right hooked I will consider that to be my fault and nobody elses, that's for sure.
#74
Banned.
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 13,075
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
In response to the previous post, I was sent the following by PM:
Allow me to clarify.
If I ever get right hooked, even if it's by someone in the adjacent lane to my left while I am in the center of the outside lane, I will consider that to be my fault and nobody elses, that's for sure.
you stated Bottom line: if I ever get right hooked I will consider that to be my fault and nobody elses, that's for sure.
I only take "offense" at that, as motorists can and will right hook you from a center or leftish lane... from which you may not have even considered them as being in part of your immediate "defense zone."
Word to the wise.
I only take "offense" at that, as motorists can and will right hook you from a center or leftish lane... from which you may not have even considered them as being in part of your immediate "defense zone."
Word to the wise.
If I ever get right hooked, even if it's by someone in the adjacent lane to my left while I am in the center of the outside lane, I will consider that to be my fault and nobody elses, that's for sure.
#75
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,531 Times
in
3,157 Posts
In response to the previous post, I was sent the following by PM:
Allow me to clarify.
If I ever get right hooked, even if it's by someone in the adjacent lane to my left while I am in the center of the outside lane, I will consider that to be my fault and nobody elses, that's for sure.
Allow me to clarify.
If I ever get right hooked, even if it's by someone in the adjacent lane to my left while I am in the center of the outside lane, I will consider that to be my fault and nobody elses, that's for sure.