Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    e-Biker
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
    My Bikes
    Gary Fisher, Strong GT-S eBike
    Posts
    951
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Bike path meets right turn lane = bad

    In Mississauga we have the Burnhamthorpe trail. It's a multi-use trail and most cyclist use it. This could apply to truely dedicated cycle paths as well so here goes:

    When a bike path intersects a road which has advanced right turn signals, I find it very dangerous. The Burnhamthorpe at the corner of Mavis in Mississauga is a good example. You ride along the Burnhamthorpe trail heading west and then you stop at the corner of Mavis. Once the Mavis traffic going through has stopped there's an advanced left turn green for Burnhamthorpe. But at the same time there's an advanced green for the right turn lane going from Mavis south onto Burnhamthorpe west.

    So while you wait for the traffic to clear there's always some bozo coming down Mavis in the right turn lane trying to make it before it goes red. By the time he reaches the corner the light is green for straight ahead traffic on Burnhamthorpe as well as the cyclists on the trail. But that same bozo will almost always be perfectly timed to intersect the cyclists crossing the intersection.

    It's always the same problem; some nutcase in the right turn lane trying to make his right turn before the light goes red, and ends up running the red light.

    I already reported one hit and run at that corner where a black Camry hit a cyclist and sped away. And just this morning while I come up upon that intersection heading the other way I notice a police car, a chevy Impala and a cyclist in close proximity in the Petro Canada gas station lot on the corner. I can only assume thee cop was writing up an accident report.

    After refelecting on this I believe that these types of intersections should be banned. If you have a bike path intersecting a street, the right turn lane should be removed from that street.

    Burnhamthorpe and Mavis is a notoriously dangerous intersection because of the volume of traffic, speeds and the poorly planned intersection. I honestly think that removing the right turn lane on the north side, where the bike path crosses, would significantly reduce the number of car vs. bike and car vs. pedestrian accidents.

  2. #2
    i like mud discosaurus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Mighty City by the Mighty Mississippi
    My Bikes
    Trek 7.2 FX WSD, beaters
    Posts
    392
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Zeuser View Post
    If you have a bike path intersecting a street, the right turn lane should be removed from that street.
    Word.

    I was hit in a similar situation, except the driver that hit me was fully stopped, waiting to turn right on a red light. I was passing with the crosswalk signal, riding with another cyclist, at walking speed. The simple solution would be to place a warning sign to drivers that the intersection includes the bike/ped path, and not allowing right turns on red. Not that they would pay attention, anyway...

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Toronto
    My Bikes
    Miyata 600, Marin Larkspur, Marin Muirwoods, GT tequesta, Fuji Ace
    Posts
    970
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    +1

  4. #4
    feros ferio John E's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Location
    www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
    My Bikes
    1959 Capo; 1980 Peugeot PKN-10; 1981 Bianchi; 1988 Schwinn KOM-10;
    Posts
    15,190
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    This is one of the principal reasons some folks so vehemently oppose segregation of bicycle traffic. The price we pay for eliminating the risk of being struck from behind is a huge increase in the odds of being right-hooked at every intersection, including every driveway. The chance of being left-crossed also increases, because motorists typically are watching for oncoming car traffic in the main travel lanes and are therefore not paying any attention at all to the MUP crossing. The only way to get the best of both worlds is with special signal timing and signage or grade separation at intersections, such as along the San Luis Rey river MUP in Oceanside CA.
    "Early to bed, early to rise. Work like hell, and advertise." -- George Stahlman
    Capo [dschaw'-poe]: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger, S/N 42624
    Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
    Bianchi: 1981 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
    Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069

  5. #5
    "Per Ardua ad Surly" nelson249's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Kitchener, Ontario
    My Bikes
    Bianchi Specialissima, Mongoose Hilltopper ATB, Surly Cross-Check, Norco City Glide
    Posts
    1,413
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    There is a similar situation on the Laurel trail in Waterloo at the intersection of Erb and Caroline. The trail north of Erb is on a diagonial to the left so cyclists have to make a left hand turn. There is a bike specific left turn lane BUT drivers coming down Caroline treat their right lane like a merge lane and cut through constantly without stopping on even on their red (This is where Erb becomes a two way street). It is not much fun southbound either. I usually find it safer and easier to take the street coming south.
    1997 Mongoose Hilltopper, 1988 Bianchi Specialissima, 2006 Surly Cross-Check, 2010 Norco City Glide, 1947 CCM Single-speed.

    "Take him to the forge and show him the instruments"
    Bernardo Gui, Inquisitor The Name of the Rose

  6. #6
    hill hater nova's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    norton ohio 5.5 miles from center road tow path trail head
    My Bikes
    cannondale t400 1987 model and a raleigh gran prix from 1973
    Posts
    2,127
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Zeuser View Post

    Burnhamthorpe and Mavis is a notoriously dangerous intersection because of the volume of traffic, speeds and the poorly planned intersection. I honestly think that removing the right turn lane on the north side, where the bike path crosses, would significantly reduce the number of car vs. bike and car vs. pedestrian accidents.

    +.75
    Notice the point in there.

    Ok in such cases the right turn lane does not need to be out right removed as it is very useful for motorists and cyclists alike. How ever it should be only in the last 100 feet of the road at most. If the bike path or mup is with in that zone say closer than 50 to 175 feet (depending on how busy the road is) then it should be re routed to be that far away from where the right turn lane begins.

    Here the few places the ohio erie towpath trail does cross such a road thats basically how it is already. I have yet to see it not like that. Well ok one road is a exception but this is a road nearish a major metro park in a area where every one simply expects cyclists to be (impossible to miss noticing the fact heh)

    Heres the thing about such crossings you can not really place blame on those who laid out the roads them selves. The fault belongs to those who choose the area where the path crosses the road. Who here would care if the crossing was 50 to 150 feet further down the road? Not me simply put a few pedal strokes more is all it would take and for any cyclists 5 or 10 pedal strokes is meaningless.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •