Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Advocacy & Safety
Reload this Page >

Does anyone ride wearing a regular hat?

Search
Notices
Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

Does anyone ride wearing a regular hat?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-09-08, 08:59 AM
  #51  
Senior Member
 
closetbiker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 9,630
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Liked 18 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by StrangeWill
...Don't be a ******bag because you're wrong.
here's your opportunity to explain the pathology of brain injury and how the 2 designs linked (cone lined and Phillips) differ from the current, conventional design in the role of DAI. Give it a go.

Last edited by closetbiker; 02-09-08 at 09:11 AM.
closetbiker is offline  
Old 02-09-08, 09:05 AM
  #52  
Blasted Weeds
 
Tude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 1,182

Bikes: Trek 1200C, Specialized Rockhopper, Giant Yukon FX, Giant Acapulco

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by closetbiker
with a post like that, I'd think Tude would be wearing that hat all the time

They are fun! - but they don't stay well on the HELMETS. Have done birthday rides but all us idiots with the birthday hats on top of HELMETS - just looked like arses - but hey we had fun
__________________
Tude is offline  
Old 02-09-08, 09:30 AM
  #53  
Blasted Weeds
 
Tude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 1,182

Bikes: Trek 1200C, Specialized Rockhopper, Giant Yukon FX, Giant Acapulco

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by joejack951
Let's say some company comes out with toddler helmets to protect children learning to walk from bumps and scrapes on their heads. Do you strap them on your kids immediately?

And something from reality: There are plenty of helmets designed to protect the head in an automobile crash. Do you wear one all the time, even as a passenger?

If not (to either situation), why not?
Sigh .. I'm rather glad it is not set in stone where a law states a bicyclist must wear a helmet - cause the posts bringing out the un-benefits of wearing a helmet would increase (note, not including the per state age required helmet required for children of a certain age).

There's always someone who will argue about something - cause - HEY - we're a free speech society!

OK - so years ago I, Tude, did not like the aspect of wearing a helmet. Why you ask? I thought I looked like a dork. It looked like I had a mushroom on my head! And it made my hair all funky (especially when sweaty - yuck - helmet head). So I did not wear one. (shoot - I struggled many years before that to find the right motorcycle helmet - ending up with a half-helm). And I never went down hard enough, etc to enact a benefit of a helmet or not. But sometime later as I started to upgrade my bicycle stuff to more serious riding stuffs - I lapsed into helmet territory and never went back. Hell I have helmets that match my bicycles.

I won't even again write about my one friend who, last Spring, took a meander around the block in his baseball cap this past Spring and "woke" up still clipped in and down on the side of the road - with concussion and did not know who he was (he lost a couple hours out of his life and actually rode down to someone - gave them his license and asked how to get back there, since he didn't know where his house actually was).

Nope. I got over the funky helmet look and started thinking some of those brands out there are dam sexy and so I rather enjoy my helmet. Whatever can protect the melon is awesome. And if it looks freakin great, then that's priceless!

And actually at the many functions I do/did for my club for festivals/outdoor expositions/bicycle races - I really didn't get too many people who were totally negative on helmets, personally when I did hear a negative comment about helmets - they really didn't come across as a serious bicyclist. That's a person who rides a bicycle, not a bicyclist.

But I got lots of people and their children at my booths and the visitors reinforced helmets to their children (especially since there were some of us in the booth riding in and out and so had the attire on - can't tell you how many times I go down the street and I hear a mother walking with their small child on a bicycle - and they point to me and say "See?! When you ride a bicycle, you wear a helmet") - plus I also talked to several people who kinda wanted to know, ya know about helmets (meaning - they've never worn one and didn't really know what to expect about a helmet - like size, style, etc). Out in the public - I'm a wealth of info - that stuff turns me on - I just stepped down from the Publicity Director of my club to concentrate more on my stuff (I participate now in a number of charities that include bicycle races and marathons) and for more bicycle advocacy. More people on the road on two wheels makes me very happy

My only regret about resigning from my position is that I had many people come back and update me each year on their bicycle activities - see some of them went from dusty bicycle stuffs in the garage to getting the family involved in bicycling. Sweet stuff. And I searched the internet and contacted many agencies - some from Europe on bicycling activities so I had tons of literature on bicycle do''s and don'ts. And lots of stuff on bicycle safety - which included helmets. I'll miss those return updates, although one woman works with me - she's now leading some shorter rides and has become quite the confident rider. Awesome!

As to the baby blurb and inside car blurb, hell - you can slip in the tub and get a nasty bump on the head ---- there are all sorts of things like this one can bring up to reinforce a "why helmet". But sorry, I'm still sold on being as much protected as I can be while on the road, I mean (as a commuter and mtbr) I have nice lights, fenders, extra this, extra that - am wind and rainproof basically from head to toe ... ride year round and love it (wind and rain can go away though, just drop some more snow for my mtb - simple request) why not plop a helmet on my head and add a few more points to my overall health factor.
__________________

Last edited by Tude; 02-09-08 at 10:05 AM.
Tude is offline  
Old 02-09-08, 09:07 PM
  #54  
Rider
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Matanuska-Susitna Borough, AK
Posts: 1,077
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Right, but all that is NOT on topic. The OP feels that skin cancer is a serious risk, and likely if they do not find a way to mitigate it, then all the bike helmets in the world would do them no good because they will not wear them. Maybe they have a family history of cancer, and have good reason to be worried. I don't know, and it's not my job to know. My part is to answer the question as best I can as to how to prevent SUN EXPOSURE TO THE EARS AND NECK, which helmets do not typically protect against, and which wide brimmed hats do. If you don't let them wear a wide brimmed hat or equivalent, and you do not have a better suggestion to meet the need, then you, as most helmet law fans are, are just trying to get people off of their bikes and into cars.
JusticeZero is offline  
Old 02-10-08, 12:29 PM
  #55  
GNU Cyclist
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: La Belle Province
Posts: 185
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Tude
As to the baby blurb and inside car blurb, hell - you can slip in the tub and get a nasty bump on the head ---- there are all sorts of things like this one can bring up to reinforce a "why helmet". But sorry, I'm still sold on being as much protected as I can be while on the road, I mean (as a commuter and mtbr) I have nice lights, fenders, extra this, extra that - am wind and rainproof basically from head to toe ... ride year round and love it (wind and rain can go away though, just drop some more snow for my mtb - simple request) why not plop a helmet on my head and add a few more points to my overall health factor.
I don't get it. Why don't you wear one in the tub? You could be as safe in the tub as you are on the road. Plus it'd be waterproof so you wouldn't have to wear a shower cap and it would look great and attract lots of comments from other people in the shower.

You could show them how to put bars of soap in the vents and other useful functions that people haven't thought of yet. I understand that since the Dutch government made shower helmets compulsory the number of people taking showers has increased by 54.235% and the amount of water used has also gone down. So it's not just safer, it's also good eco-logic.
WaltPoutine is offline  
Old 02-10-08, 12:34 PM
  #56  
GNU Cyclist
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: La Belle Province
Posts: 185
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
French foreign legion hats

Originally Posted by JusticeZero
Right, but all that is NOT on topic. The OP feels that skin cancer is a serious risk, and likely if they do not find a way to mitigate it, then all the bike helmets in the world would do them no good because they will not wear them. Maybe they have a family history of cancer, and have good reason to be worried. I don't know, and it's not my job to know. My part is to answer the question as best I can as to how to prevent SUN EXPOSURE TO THE EARS AND NECK, which helmets do not typically protect against, and which wide brimmed hats do. If you don't let them wear a wide brimmed hat or equivalent, and you do not have a better suggestion to meet the need, then you, as most helmet law fans are, are just trying to get people off of their bikes and into cars.
Hear, hear. And back on topic: I have occasionally (on long tours when it's not practical to keep stocked up on sunscreen lotion) used hats that seem to be described as "french foreign legion" as seen at this link:
https://www.armynavysales.com/Merchan...egory_Code=CAP The only problem with them (as with all baseball caps) is that the brims tend to be a bit too long and stiff for comfortable descending or riding into a headwind.

WaltPoutine is offline  
Old 02-10-08, 01:30 PM
  #57  
Senior Member
 
joejack951's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 12,100

Bikes: 2016 Hong Fu FM-079-F, 1984 Trek 660, 2005 Iron Horse Warrior Expert, 2009 Pedal Force CX1, 2016 Islabikes Beinn 20 (son's)

Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1242 Post(s)
Liked 94 Times in 65 Posts
Originally Posted by Tude
As to the baby blurb and inside car blurb, hell - you can slip in the tub and get a nasty bump on the head ---- there are all sorts of things like this one can bring up to reinforce a "why helmet". But sorry, I'm still sold on being as much protected as I can be while on the road, I mean (as a commuter and mtbr) I have nice lights, fenders, extra this, extra that - am wind and rainproof basically from head to toe ... ride year round and love it (wind and rain can go away though, just drop some more snow for my mtb - simple request) why not plop a helmet on my head and add a few more points to my overall health factor.
I ride year round and love it too. I do, however, make some decisions that increase my enjoyment of cycling while ever so slightly increasing the chance I might get hurt. For instance, in the summer, I leave a lot of exposed skin, namely my arms and legs. Now aside from the ever so slight chance that it may snow in the summer and I could get frostbite, there's a slightly higher chance that I could fall and scrape a knee or elbow (I know, because it's happened to me before, once about 3 years ago). I prefer not to sweat any more than I already do though so I make a slight safety concession. I'm curious how you dress in the summer though since safety is such a high priority. It's very easy to put on a pair of leather pants and a jacket which would greatly reduce the risk of any road rash (and I'm sure you'd get plenty of compliments from other bikers on your outfit).

Another safety concession I make is not wearing steel toed shoes. At stoplights, one could very easily get their foot run over by a car and you only get one left/right foot. Seems as though it would sense to protect your toes but I'm too much of a weight weenie to care about that.
joejack951 is offline  
Old 02-10-08, 04:26 PM
  #58  
Bike ≠ Car ≠ Ped.
 
BarracksSi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 13,861

Bikes: Some bikes. Hell, they're all the same, ain't they?

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by JusticeZero
... how to prevent SUN EXPOSURE TO THE EARS AND NECK, which helmets do not typically protect against, and which wide brimmed hats do. If you don't let them wear a wide brimmed hat or equivalent, and you do not have a better suggestion to meet the need, then you, as most helmet law fans are, are just trying to get people off of their bikes and into cars.
Sunscreen lotions work, too.
BarracksSi is offline  
Old 02-11-08, 10:02 AM
  #59  
Senior Member
 
closetbiker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 9,630
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Liked 18 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by BarracksSi
Sunscreen lotions work, too.
the OP said,

Originally Posted by Doug5150
...The problem I have often is that I get sunburned on my ears or around my hairline, where I can't apply sunscreen real well. Also around the sweatband, because it rubs off the sunscreen...
Even though someone can apply sunscreen, when you're riding a bike, it always sweats off. The shade a wide brimmed hat provides seems a reasonable precaution if sunburn is your concern.

What people choose to be most concerned with is an interesting phycological issue.
closetbiker is offline  
Old 02-11-08, 01:32 PM
  #60  
Bike ≠ Car ≠ Ped.
 
BarracksSi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 13,861

Bikes: Some bikes. Hell, they're all the same, ain't they?

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by closetbiker
the OP said,
...
Even though someone can apply sunscreen, when you're riding a bike, it always sweats off. The shade a wide brimmed hat provides seems a reasonable precaution if sunburn is your concern.

What people choose to be most concerned with is an interesting phycological issue.
Ah, ok, somehow I missed that..

I haven't had any difficulty putting sunscreen on, over, and behind my ears, though. My hairline isn't a problem -- I just let some get into the short hairs; and, back when I had longer hair (especially the mess of a "mullet" I had around 1990.. ugh ), the hair itself blocked the sun just fine. I've also used DCT for my ears even though it's supposed to be a lip sunblock/treatment.

On the other hand, my head doesn't sweat very much, either -- my back starts sweating before anything else. One of the guys I work with begins sweating from his head first (it'll drip down his cheeks before my face is even moist), so maybe the OP's "sweat pattern" is also different from mine.
BarracksSi is offline  
Old 02-11-08, 03:40 PM
  #61  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 251
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I wear a mossy oak hat.. pretty much all the time, and I have somewhat long hair so my neck doesn't get burned. I don't think I've ever had a sunburn on my neck. If it's anywhere, it's my cheeks and that's rare.
Kyle90 is offline  
Old 02-11-08, 07:53 PM
  #62  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 6,401
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times in 13 Posts
Originally Posted by StrangeWill
They're protected by cages from outside influences, for the most part. When was the last time you saw a race car driver taking a t-bone in which the car actually blows through the roll cage and makes contact with the driver.

It would have more to do with the neck brace and debris along with making contact with parts inside the car itself as opposed to making contact with a physical part of the other vehicle.
You might want to contact the major motorsports organizations with this little tidbit. As hot as it gets in those cars, I'm sure the drivers would be happy to learn that they don't need to wear their helmets.
Six jours is offline  
Old 02-11-08, 08:50 PM
  #63  
Bike ≠ Car ≠ Ped.
 
BarracksSi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 13,861

Bikes: Some bikes. Hell, they're all the same, ain't they?

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Six jours
You might want to contact the major motorsports organizations with this little tidbit. As hot as it gets in those cars, I'm sure the drivers would be happy to learn that they don't need to wear their helmets.
They must wear their helmets, if for no other reason than to protect their heads from the roll cages surrounding them.

It's like this -- any vehicle intended for wheel-to-wheel racing needs a cage to protect it from collapsing due to multiple impacts, especially from other racers. The driver, then, needs protection from the cage -- a strong, well-secured seat, five-point harness, and a helmet to protect his head from getting smashed if it hits the cage. Plus a HANS device, or at least a neck collar, to protect his neck from breaking because of the helmeted head getting whipped around.

Those car-rated helmets need to withstand multiple impacts as well, in case it hits the same cage tube again and again.
BarracksSi is offline  
Old 02-11-08, 08:58 PM
  #64  
Rider
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Matanuska-Susitna Borough, AK
Posts: 1,077
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
But if you only expect to have your head smashed against the frame and/or windows of the car ONCE by a high speed impact, that won't cause any injury at all, and so you don't need to protect your head?

I'm kind've annoyed by this idea that I 'need' a helmet on a bike, but that it's silly to wear a helmet in a car. I have been in two auto crashes, one quite recently. In both, a helmet would have helped me. (Granted, in the second one, it wouldn't have helped all that much, but I wasn't badly injured in it. Had I been going any faster, it would have been VERY important that I have a helmet; as it was, I was 12 mph under the speed limit on a road where average traffic is 8-10 mph above the limit. As it was, my head was briefly crushed against the back of the seat by the roof as it collapsed.
The first crash, though, left me with quite a bit of head injuries, to the point that I am missing days, possibly even weeks, of time leading up to and following it. A helmet probably would have helped; all I had from it was head injuries.

Last edited by JusticeZero; 02-11-08 at 09:15 PM.
JusticeZero is offline  
Old 02-11-08, 09:06 PM
  #65  
Life is Fun
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Asheville, NC
Posts: 21

Bikes: 94 Kona Kilauea (hardtail, nothing stock but the frame and seatpost); 03 Motobecane Le Champion (stock, minus a front wheel upgrade); 05 Haro Shift R5 (all stock)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
For the past 15 years I've always just worn a regular baseball cap backwards. Works great and the bill protects my neck.

Just last year I started wearing a helmet on a semi-regular basis...but he only reason I began wearing one is to shut up all the helmet Natzi's who like to yell at people riding without one (seriously, it got old having people yelling "where's your helmet?" every day during my commute).

Do whatever works for you and keeps you riding (and away from sunburn, etc.).
ccsami4x4 is offline  
Old 02-11-08, 09:07 PM
  #66  
Bike ≠ Car ≠ Ped.
 
BarracksSi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 13,861

Bikes: Some bikes. Hell, they're all the same, ain't they?

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by JusticeZero
But if you only expect to have your head smashed against the frame and/or windows of the car ONCE by a high speed impact, that won't cause any injury at all, and so you don't need to protect your head?
You mean from the inside of the car (race driver), or the outside (cyclist)? *edit - I wrote this post before you added to yours*

When autocrossing (racing one at a time around cones on a huge parking lot against the clock), helmets are required, at least for insurance purposes. There's been debate about whether closed-face helmets cause injury if they hit an airbag, though.

On an open track (HPDEs or time trials, with zero passing or limited passing allowed), helmets are still required, and a roll bar may be recommended (or, in the case of convertibles & open roadsters, required). The only expectation is that the car might roll if it goes off-track, so the factory-built roll protection should be enough.

Wheel-to-wheel racing can be a real mess, of course. That's why the driver compartment is so heavily fortified, and the driver is restrained to keep from getting knocked around inside.
BarracksSi is offline  
Old 02-11-08, 09:24 PM
  #67  
Bike ≠ Car ≠ Ped.
 
BarracksSi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 13,861

Bikes: Some bikes. Hell, they're all the same, ain't they?

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by JusticeZero
I'm kind've annoyed by this idea that I 'need' a helmet on a bike, but that it's silly to wear a helmet in a car. I have been in two auto accidents, one quite recently. In both, a helmet would have helped me. (Granted, in the second one, it wouldn't have helped all that much, but I wasn't badly injured in it. Had I been going any faster, it would have been VERY important that I have a helmet; as it was, I was 12 mph under the speed limit on a road where average traffic is 8-10 mph above the limit.
The first accident, though, left me with quite a bit of head injuries, to the point that I am missing days, possibly even weeks, of time leading up to and following it. A helmet probably would have helped; all I had from it was head injuries.
Yeah, I know -- sometimes I feel like I'd be safer in my car wearing my car helmet. I'm lucky that both of my accidents resulted in no injury whatsoever.

I think it's because nobody expects this kind of stuff to happen all the time on public roads:
https://youtube.com/watch?v=kvNylkt0uvc
(Spec Miata race series crash compilation )
BarracksSi is offline  
Old 02-11-08, 09:25 PM
  #68  
Rider
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Matanuska-Susitna Borough, AK
Posts: 1,077
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Okay, so... I fail to see how this demonstrates that helmets are less needed in cars. Open track, to me, seems like they have more protection other than the helmet than typical autos do, and they still wear helmets. Helmets would have helped me in a car. Should we be pushing for a helmet law for cars?
JusticeZero is offline  
Old 02-11-08, 09:39 PM
  #69  
Bike ≠ Car ≠ Ped.
 
BarracksSi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 13,861

Bikes: Some bikes. Hell, they're all the same, ain't they?

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by JusticeZero
Okay, so... I fail to see how this demonstrates that helmets are less needed in cars. Open track, to me, seems like they have more protection other than the helmet than typical autos do, and they still wear helmets.
Helmets in those cars are there just as much to protect the driver against his own car, though.

Helmets would have helped me in a car.
No argument from me there.

Should we be pushing for a helmet law for cars?
I'm not sure. Car helmet laws are usually on the books already -- except that helmets are deemed illegal. With all the airbags being installed these days covering almost every surface, a helmet wouldn't be necessary (and, as I mentioned earlier, might actually be more dangerous, because a helmet might reach the airbag before it's finished deploying). They block some vision and hearing, too.

If it were legal for me to wear my helmet in the car on the street, I'm still not sure if I would choose to wear it anyway.
BarracksSi is offline  
Old 02-11-08, 09:41 PM
  #70  
Kamek
 
ralph12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 486
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I mighta posted this already, but I find that a knit/watch cap is essential for keeping my ears warm when the weather gets below about 55 degrees or so.
ralph12 is offline  
Old 02-12-08, 02:34 PM
  #71  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 205

Bikes: 2007 ICE Trice T; 2008 Brompton M6L; 2009 Surly LHT; 2010 Surly Cross Check

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Actual answer alert! Please skip if you're enjoying the helmet/no-helmet debate.

I do wear a helmet, but highly recommend the Tilley hats when you need a big brim that damn well stays on your head. Check out the various models at www.tilley.com. Best for riding would be maybe the t-5 models, which have a less-big brim. That is because a bigger one could flop down into your eyes at speed; not a good thing, obviously.

Edit: The airflo actually looks perfect--might even fit under a helmet, and has brim plus a 'retractable' ear-and-neck flap.

Last edited by J B Bell; 02-12-08 at 02:37 PM. Reason: additional information
J B Bell is offline  
Old 02-21-08, 01:15 PM
  #72  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Gaseous Cloud around Uranus
Posts: 3,741
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 38 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times in 7 Posts
I wear one of those funny cycling hats.Don't see the need for a helmet on a bicycle.
Booger1 is offline  
Old 02-21-08, 02:06 PM
  #73  
Senior Member
 
closetbiker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 9,630
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Liked 18 Times in 6 Posts


a smaller cross sectional area at the tip gives a softer "protection" for small deformations; once that deformation is used up, a larger sectional area provides stiffer protection, with the transition being smooth and continuous, or "progressive."

It's common for motor vehicles to have rubber bumpers to limit suspension travel on big bumps (when the suspension "bottoms out.") These are typically tapered, although "parabolic" describes them better than "conical."
closetbiker is offline  
Old 02-21-08, 02:35 PM
  #74  
Senior Member
 
closetbiker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 9,630
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Liked 18 Times in 6 Posts


unlike the tennis ball, a human head is actually attached to a body! Immediately after impact, the human head actually rotates around the point of articulation (where the spine connects with the skull), like a 4.5Kg orange on a stick. In fact, the head’s center of gravity is off-centre, simply compounding the problem.


The effects of a blow to the head on brain function arise from the structural characteristics of the skull and the brain and the direction and size of the forces acting on the head. The brain, a rather soft tissue with the consistency somewhere between egg white and jello, is covered by three membrane layers. The outer-most layer, called the dura mater, is connected to the inside of the skull at various suture points which serve to suspend the brain within the skull. The brain sits atop the brain stem and the spinal cord extends from there, out the base of the skull through a hole called the foramen magnum. Brain injuries arise from three characteristics of this brain-skull anatomy: the rigidity and internal contours of the skull, the incompressibility of brain tissue and the susceptibility of the brain to shearing forces.

The first two characteristics give rise to contusions or hematomas (i.e., bleeding) on the surface of the brain, one of the most common injuries. There are usually two contusion sites in a brain injury. One occurs at the site of the blow to the brain and is called the coup injury. The other arises where the brain bounces off the skull when it has been moved away from the site of the original blow. The contusion here is termed the contre coup injury. Some bleeding may also arise at the suture points when the dura mater is torn away from the inside of the skull.

The third characteristic, susceptibility to shearing forces, plays a role primarily in injuries which involve rapid and forceful movements of the head, such as in motor vehicle accidents. In these situations rotational forces such as might occur in whiplash-type injuries are particularly important. These forces, associated with the rapid acceleration and deceleration of the head, are smallest at the point of rotation of the brain near the lower end of the brain stem and successively increase at increasing distances from this point. The resulting shearing forces cause different levels in the brain to move relative to one another. This movement produces stretching and tearing of axons (diffuse axonal injury) and the insulating myelin sheath, injuries which are the major cause of loss of consciousness in a head trauma. Small blood vessels are also damaged causing bleeding (petechial hemorrhages) deep within the brain.

Tests show that the PHPS concept, developed by Harley Street psychotherapist Dr Ken Phillips, provides 60% more protection from rotational injury than conventional helmets. PHPS is the most significant advance in helmet safety technology since the 1960s and is set to become the industry norm for protection against rotational injury.

Putting its own concept into practice, Phillips Helmets has combined the PHPS technology
with cutting edge design to create the Phillips brand of helmets – a ‘head within a head’.
closetbiker is offline  
Old 02-21-08, 02:54 PM
  #75  
Senior Member
 
Agent Cooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The Black Lodge
Posts: 329

Bikes: '04 Cannondale T800, '00 Raleigh M80

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
Before I started using a helmet on a regular basis I used to tie a bandana over my head. This works pretty well as far as sun protection and it stays on at speed. Keeps bugs out of your hair and it's pretty good for wicking sweat from the brow, which is why I started using one. I still like to wear one under my helmet sometimes.

Drawbacks: I used to try to tie it over my ears on really sunny days to try and protect them, but this never worked well. You can also tie it so that the tail hangs over the back of your neck, but I didn't have much luck with this, either.

Still, the good old fashioned bandana is cheap and and it stays on, so I suppose this is a good choice for somebody who decides to without a helmet but wants some sun and bug insurance.
Agent Cooper is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.