Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    156
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Scare Tactic gone too far?

    There was the case last month of the man in Portland who intentionally hit 2 cyclists, there was another case in Salt Lake City where a man intentionally hit a cyclist. Now there's this case where a 43 year old man intentionally hit a black cyclist who was riding on the sidewalk. http://www.whotv.com/global/story.asp?s=7038923

    My question is this: do you think these drivers really wanted to hit the cyclists or do you think they were just trying to scare the cyclist and ended up hitting them by accident? THe reason I ask this is I know for sure some guys pass really close and honk just to scare me, they leave no room for error.

    The thing that gets me about the driver in Portland who hit the 2 cyclists on purpose is that a nun testified for him, she said he was a good and calm driver and had avoided many accidents. Her testimony was on one of the networks sites.

  2. #2
    Sophomoric Member Roody's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Dancing in Lansing
    Posts
    20,494
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It's very difficult to judge intentions; sometimes I'm not even sure why I myself did something. Either way, these drivers should be investigated, and they should be prosecuted if they intentionally or negligently hit the cyclists. Maybe the Portland driver fooled the nun, or maybe he really was gentle when an authority figure like a nun was around, but had no conscience when he was on his own.

    It's kind of scary to think there are people like that out there, isn't it?


    "Think Outside the Cage"

  3. #3
    pj7
    pj7 is offline
    On Sabbatical
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    1,543
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Clarks View Post
    The thing that gets me about the driver in Portland who hit the 2 cyclists on purpose is that a nun testified for him, she said he was a good and calm driver and had avoided many accidents. Her testimony was on one of the networks sites.
    Every inmate serving a sentence for homicide wasn't a murder at one time either.
    I am a sig Virus. Please put me in your sig so that I can continue to replicate.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Leeds UK
    Posts
    1,904
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    In the earlier case, I wonder how the nun knew that he had "avoided many accidents"?

    If it is true that he had, then he could not possibly be a good driver, since the essence of good driving that you very rarely have to avoid an accident.

  5. #5
    Senior Member Keith99's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    5,756
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by atbman View Post
    In the earlier case, I wonder how the nun knew that he had "avoided many accidents"?

    If it is true that he had, then he could not possibly be a good driver, since the essence of good driving that you very rarely have to avoid an accident.
    I think I'd modify what you said just a bit. A good driver rarely avoids an accident in a way that anyone else could notice.

    The avoidance happens by backing off early, not forcing things. A good lawyer might be able to turn her testimony to the drivers harm. He barely avoids a lot of accidents because he helps create the dangerous situation over and over.

  6. #6
    livin' the nightmare syn0n's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    desert
    My Bikes
    '81 Centurion SS coversion, other ****
    Posts
    491
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Scare tactics are always taking things to far. You're not supposed to be intimidating other road users of any kind period.

  7. #7
    Banned. Helmet Head's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    13,075
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Clarks View Post

    My question is this: do you think these drivers really wanted to hit the cyclists or do you think they were just trying to scare the cyclist and ended up hitting them by accident? THe reason I ask this is I know for sure some guys pass really close and honk just to scare me, they leave no room for error.
    I think in most cases the cyclist is simply not noticed largely because he is riding as much "out of the way" as he can, rather than in a way to be conspicuous and grab the attention of drivers.

    The guys who are honking and passing really close are obviously aware of you and are unlikely to hit you.

  8. #8
    Old Fogy
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Murray, Utah
    Posts
    1,224
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I don't know about the others, but the one in Salt Lake City definitely intended to run over the cyclist.

  9. #9
    Al noisebeam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    AZ
    My Bikes
    Cannondale SuperSix, Lemond Poprad. Retired: Jamis Sputnik, Centurion LeMans Fixed, Diamond Back ascent ex
    Posts
    13,941
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Helmet Head View Post
    The guys who are honking and passing really close are obviously aware of you and are unlikely to hit you.
    I think you overestimate how well some people know the boundaries of their vehicles and the space needed by a cyclist following their line.

    Al

  10. #10
    tired donnamb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Portland, OR
    My Bikes
    Breezer Uptown 8, U frame
    Posts
    5,660
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    According to what the police say the motorist told them in Portland, he deliberately hit the first cyclist because he was apparently frustrated that cyclists (in general) don't share the road. The police spokesman implied that the motorist's interpretation of "share the road" was for cyclists to never be in his way when he is driving. The second cyclist was hit because he was in the pathway of the motorist when he tried to flee after hitting the first cyclist.
    "Real wars of words are harder to win. They require thought, insight, precision, articulation, knowledge, and experience. They require the humility to admit when you are wrong. They recognize that the dialectic is not about making us look at you, but about us all looking together for the truth."

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    1,819
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Clarks View Post
    My question is this: do you think these drivers really wanted to hit the cyclists or do you think they were just trying to scare the cyclist and ended up hitting them by accident?
    I'm not sure that it matters. Let's say it was a *** instead of a car. Would the courts go for the statement "Your honor, I didn't mean to actually shoot the guy when I aimed the *** at him and shot him." This "scaring the guy" mindset makes for good television drama, but in real life I think it's dumb, and shows criminal intent. I don't know how the courts have ruled on this, but I'm sure it's come up before. And if it worked, then every defense attorney would be using it today.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •