Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 14 of 14
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Montreal
    My Bikes
    Peugeot Hybrid, Minelli Hybrid
    Posts
    6,521
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    New Idea for Rearview

    http://www.bikeradar.com/commuting/n...our-head-13801

    The price would be beyond my budget, but this is an interesting concept. If I had it I would have to wear bifocal lenses. I wonder if there would be problems with waterproofing the USB ports.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    6,033
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It's a good concept but the battery dies after 4 hours. That's just not good enough. If they can get the battery to last at least 8 hours, I'll look at it. However, I don't like the fact you have to lower your head or eyes to look at the cars behind.

    The Take A Look mirror is still the standard.

  3. #3
    Senior Member roadiespinner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Reno Nv
    My Bikes
    Della Santa, Bike Friday Air Glide, 1974 Schwinn Paramount, Cannondale t2000 Touring, Cannondale r500 Road Silk, LeMond Buenos Aires, Trek 7000 mtn bike, Sears and Roebuck[ made by Puch. I have had up to 36 bikes at one time. I am a sick person.
    Posts
    145
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    + 1 on the Take A Look mirror. Don't leave home without it.

  4. #4
    Senior Member roadiespinner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Reno Nv
    My Bikes
    Della Santa, Bike Friday Air Glide, 1974 Schwinn Paramount, Cannondale t2000 Touring, Cannondale r500 Road Silk, LeMond Buenos Aires, Trek 7000 mtn bike, Sears and Roebuck[ made by Puch. I have had up to 36 bikes at one time. I am a sick person.
    Posts
    145
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    +1 on the Take A Look mirror. Don't leave home without it.

  5. #5
    53 miles per burrito urban_assault's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Ft Worth, TX
    My Bikes
    Land Shark, Trek 1000, Iron Horse Rogue
    Posts
    1,485
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Dahon.Steve View Post
    It's a good concept but the battery dies after 4 hours. That's just not good enough. If they can get the battery to last at least 8 hours, I'll look at it. However, I don't like the fact you have to lower your head or eyes to look at the cars behind.

    The Take A Look mirror is still the standard.
    Dang, you go on some long rides.

  6. #6
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    9
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Great idea... thanks for posting the link

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    6,033
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by urban_assault View Post
    Dang, you go on some long rides.
    LOL... Good one.

    During the summer, I can be out all day long. I was wondering how the device works at night? Does it have a back light because if that's the case, I'm certain the batteries won't last very long.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Ottawa
    My Bikes
    Stevens Strada 600
    Posts
    155
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Looks like a solution looking for a problem. There's any number of good mirrors that solve the problem and don't need electricity.

  9. #9
    Devilmaycare Cycling Fool Allister's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Wynnum, Australia
    My Bikes
    1998 Cannondale F700
    Posts
    3,819
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by aubinmg View Post
    Looks like a solution looking for a problem. There's any number of good mirrors that solve the problem and don't need electricity.
    Indeed, or you can just turn your head.

    "The makers say it could help reduce the number of cyclists’ deaths caused by lack of rear vison – 13 per cent of all fatal riding incidents according to some studies"

    I call BS on that one. I stopped reading after that.

    If it had a record feature, it might at least have a bit of usefulness.
    If we learn from our mistakes, I must be a goddamn genius.

  10. #10
    Senior Member littlewaywelt's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    1,509
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by AndrewP View Post
    http://www.bikeradar.com/commuting/n...our-head-13801

    The price would be beyond my budget, but this is an interesting concept. If I had it I would have to wear bifocal lenses. I wonder if there would be problems with waterproofing the USB ports.
    I'm not sure I get why this has any advantage over a mirror unless it has a directv hookup.
    One Less Car
    Conservation begins with you.

  11. #11
    Former Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    dropmachine.com
    Posts
    4,062
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Allister View Post
    "The makers say it could help reduce the number of cyclists’ deaths caused by lack of rear vison – 13 per cent of all fatal riding incidents according to some studies"
    They seem to be confusing "lack of rear vision" with "getting hit from behind".

    Although there is the contingent on this board that think if they check (stare into?) their mirrors often enough, they can magically "bail right" and make them one in the same. But that's a another topic.

    If it had a video recorder and was actually waterproof I'd think about it.

  12. #12
    Devilmaycare Cycling Fool Allister's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Wynnum, Australia
    My Bikes
    1998 Cannondale F700
    Posts
    3,819
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by ghettocruiser View Post
    They seem to be confusing "lack of rear vision" with "getting hit from behind".

    Although there is the contingent on this board that think if they check (stare into?) their mirrors often enough, they can magically "bail right" and make them one in the same. But that's a another topic.
    Even if that were the case, 13% seems inordinately high for such a collision type that is often stated as being the rarest kind.

    Call me a cynic, but "some studies", without actually mentioning which studies, just reads to me as 'we made this up on the spot to help flog our overpriced, unecessary product.'
    If we learn from our mistakes, I must be a goddamn genius.

  13. #13
    Senior Member Rob_E's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    My Bikes
    Surly Longhaul Trucker, Dahon Boardwalk, Raleigh 20
    Posts
    1,472
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Seems like this is more than a high-tech rearview mirror. I admit that if that's all it was, it would probably be overkill, but it sounds like with different add-ons it can do other things like function as a GPS and heart rate monitor. It might be handy. Although I think Garmin has a unit out that does all that (except the rearview mirror).

  14. #14
    Former Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    dropmachine.com
    Posts
    4,062
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Allister View Post
    Even if that were the case, 13% seems inordinately high for such a collision type that is often stated as being the rarest kind.
    I've never been of the opinion that it is rare (relatively speaking), and real studies (actual ones I've read, Google "Toronto Bicycle study") and at least five recent Toronto-area fatalities have reinforced that view.

    This is why I feel compelled to raise the issue repeatedly when the VC take-the-lane crowd bases a safety strategy on the premise these accidents almost never happen. And I say this as a guy who often takes the lane and rarely uses a mirror.

    What this has to do with a display on a speedometer is, of course, exactly nothing.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •