Interesting situation on my ride this morning, was I correct?
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 42
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Interesting situation on my ride this morning, was I correct?
I was on the last section of my commute here in San Diego. This section of the ride is in a business park with a very wide two lane road coming up to a side street on the right. This side street is also wide, with no road markings of any kind. None of these streets have any sidewalk or bike lane. As I came up to make my right turn there were four pedestrians crossing the side street about half way across heading in my direction.
I did notice a car coming up behind me. I signaled my right turn and slowed a bit to give the peds a bit more time to cross, expecting I would swing a little wide to avoid them. The car made a right in front of me swinging wide. I gave a loud "HEY!" to indicate my disapproval with the maneuver he just pulled.
The guy pulled over, rolled down his window so we could discuss the matter. There was no yelling, just a discussion of the rules. Having ridden in Boston for many years, his opinion was that if I was at the far right of the road, I was essentially in the "bike lane" and should of held my line into the turn. Of course that would have required that I hit the peds or stop. He agreed that the turn he made was dangerous and that he would look up the laws to be sure.
I thanked him for having the discussion and went on my way.
Except for screaming at him is the first place, was I correct in this situation?
I did notice a car coming up behind me. I signaled my right turn and slowed a bit to give the peds a bit more time to cross, expecting I would swing a little wide to avoid them. The car made a right in front of me swinging wide. I gave a loud "HEY!" to indicate my disapproval with the maneuver he just pulled.
The guy pulled over, rolled down his window so we could discuss the matter. There was no yelling, just a discussion of the rules. Having ridden in Boston for many years, his opinion was that if I was at the far right of the road, I was essentially in the "bike lane" and should of held my line into the turn. Of course that would have required that I hit the peds or stop. He agreed that the turn he made was dangerous and that he would look up the laws to be sure.
I thanked him for having the discussion and went on my way.
Except for screaming at him is the first place, was I correct in this situation?
#3
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
I was on the last section of my commute here in San Diego. This section of the ride is in a business park with a very wide two lane road coming up to a side street on the right. This side street is also wide, with no road markings of any kind. None of these streets have any sidewalk or bike lane. As I came up to make my right turn there were four pedestrians crossing the side street about half way across heading in my direction.
I did notice a car coming up behind me. I signaled my right turn and slowed a bit to give the peds a bit more time to cross, expecting I would swing a little wide to avoid them. The car made a right in front of me swinging wide. I gave a loud "HEY!" to indicate my disapproval with the maneuver he just pulled.
The guy pulled over, rolled down his window so we could discuss the matter. There was no yelling, just a discussion of the rules. Having ridden in Boston for many years, his opinion was that if I was at the far right of the road, I was essentially in the "bike lane" and should of held my line into the turn. Of course that would have required that I hit the peds or stop. He agreed that the turn he made was dangerous and that he would look up the laws to be sure.
I thanked him for having the discussion and went on my way.
Except for screaming at him is the first place, was I correct in this situation?
I did notice a car coming up behind me. I signaled my right turn and slowed a bit to give the peds a bit more time to cross, expecting I would swing a little wide to avoid them. The car made a right in front of me swinging wide. I gave a loud "HEY!" to indicate my disapproval with the maneuver he just pulled.
The guy pulled over, rolled down his window so we could discuss the matter. There was no yelling, just a discussion of the rules. Having ridden in Boston for many years, his opinion was that if I was at the far right of the road, I was essentially in the "bike lane" and should of held my line into the turn. Of course that would have required that I hit the peds or stop. He agreed that the turn he made was dangerous and that he would look up the laws to be sure.
I thanked him for having the discussion and went on my way.
Except for screaming at him is the first place, was I correct in this situation?
Where did this take place... just out of curiosity.
#4
Arizona Dessert
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: AZ
Posts: 15,030
Bikes: Cannondale SuperSix, Lemond Poprad. Retired: Jamis Sputnik, Centurion LeMans Fixed, Diamond Back ascent ex
Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5345 Post(s)
Liked 2,169 Times
in
1,288 Posts
I would have stopped and waited for the peds to cross.
This is also why I don't (with some exceptions) make right turns from the far right of the lane, but instead closer to the center. Otherwise you can get right hooked (or left crossed) while making a right turn.
But you handled it fine.
Al
This is also why I don't (with some exceptions) make right turns from the far right of the lane, but instead closer to the center. Otherwise you can get right hooked (or left crossed) while making a right turn.
But you handled it fine.
Al
#6
feros ferio
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
Posts: 21,798
Bikes: 1959 Capo Modell Campagnolo; 1960 Capo Sieger (2); 1962 Carlton Franco Suisse; 1970 Peugeot UO-8; 1982 Bianchi Campione d'Italia; 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10;
Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1393 Post(s)
Liked 1,325 Times
in
837 Posts
You did fine.
__________________
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
#7
feros ferio
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
Posts: 21,798
Bikes: 1959 Capo Modell Campagnolo; 1960 Capo Sieger (2); 1962 Carlton Franco Suisse; 1970 Peugeot UO-8; 1982 Bianchi Campione d'Italia; 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10;
Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1393 Post(s)
Liked 1,325 Times
in
837 Posts
We are nearly neighbors, separated by an airport -- I work in the Carlsbad Airport Centre business park, which is immediately southwest of McClellan/Palomar.
__________________
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
#8
Crankenstein
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Spokane
Posts: 4,037
Bikes: Novara Randonee (TankerBelle)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
I was on the last section of my commute here in San Diego. This section of the ride is in a business park with a very wide two lane road coming up to a side street on the right. This side street is also wide, with no road markings of any kind. None of these streets have any sidewalk or bike lane. As I came up to make my right turn there were four pedestrians crossing the side street about half way across heading in my direction.
I did notice a car coming up behind me. I signaled my right turn and slowed a bit to give the peds a bit more time to cross, expecting I would swing a little wide to avoid them. The car made a right in front of me swinging wide. I gave a loud "HEY!" to indicate my disapproval with the maneuver he just pulled.
The guy pulled over, rolled down his window so we could discuss the matter. There was no yelling, just a discussion of the rules. Having ridden in Boston for many years, his opinion was that if I was at the far right of the road, I was essentially in the "bike lane" and should of held my line into the turn. Of course that would have required that I hit the peds or stop. He agreed that the turn he made was dangerous and that he would look up the laws to be sure.
I thanked him for having the discussion and went on my way.
Except for screaming at him is the first place, was I correct in this situation?
I did notice a car coming up behind me. I signaled my right turn and slowed a bit to give the peds a bit more time to cross, expecting I would swing a little wide to avoid them. The car made a right in front of me swinging wide. I gave a loud "HEY!" to indicate my disapproval with the maneuver he just pulled.
The guy pulled over, rolled down his window so we could discuss the matter. There was no yelling, just a discussion of the rules. Having ridden in Boston for many years, his opinion was that if I was at the far right of the road, I was essentially in the "bike lane" and should of held my line into the turn. Of course that would have required that I hit the peds or stop. He agreed that the turn he made was dangerous and that he would look up the laws to be sure.
I thanked him for having the discussion and went on my way.
Except for screaming at him is the first place, was I correct in this situation?
I'd say you were both slightly 'wrong' in that you SHOULD have stopped to wait for the peds to clear the intersection.
I'd have to agree with the bit about holding your line, though... don't go from far right to the middle of the lane WHILE making a turn... nobody can predict that. Either start and finish your turn from the right, or take the lane before the turn and hold it through the turn, THEN decide whether you should be positioned to the right or in the center of the lane.
Stay safe out there.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Leeds UK
Posts: 2,085
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 38 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
3 Posts
So he was turning right and overtaking someone else who was turning right while pedestrians were crossing the entrance to the road being turned into. This means that he was, apparently unaware of the pedestrians already crossing which might cause you to swing a little wide.
It would seem that he was not allowing a cyclist sufficient room to manouevre, by not allowing a reasonable space for right of way (I assume that cyclists are allowed some lateral space [3' ?] according to state law?). It would also seem that he assumed that you knew he was going to turn right at the same time that you were - again, is he allowed to do that in state law? To my mind, it would be an unreasonable demand to make of someone you are overtaking. In the UK, it is for the overtaking driver/rider to make sure that the road ahead of their direction of travel is clear.
On the basis of your description, the only minor criticism which any of us might make is that you might be a litle more aware of the possiblity of an overtaking car also turning right by engine sound/gear changing, etc. In his case it would seem that he was legally in the wrong, but you were, perhaps, slightly situationally less alert than might have been possible.
It would seem that he was not allowing a cyclist sufficient room to manouevre, by not allowing a reasonable space for right of way (I assume that cyclists are allowed some lateral space [3' ?] according to state law?). It would also seem that he assumed that you knew he was going to turn right at the same time that you were - again, is he allowed to do that in state law? To my mind, it would be an unreasonable demand to make of someone you are overtaking. In the UK, it is for the overtaking driver/rider to make sure that the road ahead of their direction of travel is clear.
On the basis of your description, the only minor criticism which any of us might make is that you might be a litle more aware of the possiblity of an overtaking car also turning right by engine sound/gear changing, etc. In his case it would seem that he was legally in the wrong, but you were, perhaps, slightly situationally less alert than might have been possible.
#10
♋ ☮♂ ☭ ☯
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 40205 'ViLLeBiLLie
Posts: 7,902
Bikes: Sngl Spd's, 70's- 80's vintage, D-tube Folder
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Agreed.
Or, slowed to a crawl. I wouldnt have swung wide.
On our part, we need to convey predictability just
as we expect it in return.
Great job of being containing what could have been a
volatile confrontation, though
__________________
☞-ADVOCACY-☜ Radical VC = Car people on bikes. Just say "NO"
☞-ADVOCACY-☜ Radical VC = Car people on bikes. Just say "NO"
#11
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 42
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Let me clarify the "holding my line" bit a little. I did not pull into the middle of the lane before making my turn. I just went a little past the corner of the intersection. I was still not past the center of the side road before I turned.
#12
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 42
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
So he was turning right and overtaking someone else who was turning right while pedestrians were crossing the entrance to the road being turned into. This means that he was, apparently unaware of the pedestrians already crossing which might cause you to swing a little wide.
#13
Fattest Thin Man
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Directly above the center of the earth
Posts: 2,648
Bikes: Miyata 610, Vinco V, Rocky Mountain Element
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
1 Post
Fixed.
In all my years and miles of riding, I've never, ever had anyone from the seat of a car discuss anything even remotely rationally.
I think you did fine. I probably wouldn't have yelled, but obviously, that's not a big deal.
Az
In all my years and miles of riding, I've never, ever had anyone from the seat of a car discuss anything even remotely rationally.
I think you did fine. I probably wouldn't have yelled, but obviously, that's not a big deal.
Az
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ky. and FL.
Posts: 3,944
Bikes: KHS steel SS
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Nobody, you, the driver, the peds, go hurt, so you can't have done much wrong.
I would have done the same thing, signaled, waited, that you did. Likely I'd have been far enough out in the lane that if the car wanted to pass he'd have had to drive into oncoming traffic to do it. But you didn't get hit, so I'd call that good. SOmetimes cars will try to pass you at totally inappropriate times, and that's just the way it is.
I would have done the same thing, signaled, waited, that you did. Likely I'd have been far enough out in the lane that if the car wanted to pass he'd have had to drive into oncoming traffic to do it. But you didn't get hit, so I'd call that good. SOmetimes cars will try to pass you at totally inappropriate times, and that's just the way it is.
#15
Senior Member
#16
Conservative Hippie
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Wakulla Co. FL
Posts: 4,271
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
To parrot some of what has already been said:
On a bike I probably would have placed myself in the middle of the lane before reaching the intersection. Whether I did that or not I would have held my line through the turn, even if it meant slowing or stopping for the peds.
In a car I would have either passed before the turn or waited until after the turn. I would not have tried to pass in a turn. A wide lane does not equate to a bike lane, and even if it did he had no business attempting to pass in a turn.
On a bike I probably would have placed myself in the middle of the lane before reaching the intersection. Whether I did that or not I would have held my line through the turn, even if it meant slowing or stopping for the peds.
In a car I would have either passed before the turn or waited until after the turn. I would not have tried to pass in a turn. A wide lane does not equate to a bike lane, and even if it did he had no business attempting to pass in a turn.
#17
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
Helmet Head can even confirm such a case where he has seen me discuss a car/bike situation with a motorist.
#18
Striving for Fredness
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: West Michigan
Posts: 1,190
Bikes: Old Giant Rincon
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
IMHO, if you were planning on going wide and essentially taking the lane you should have done so before the turn to indicate to the driver that that was your intention, but no harm no foul. At least the guy was nice/rational enough to stop and discuss it without screaming.
#19
Senior Member
This would interesting to find out. I think sharing the lane is only for moving straight ahead. I believe two road users sharing one lane during a turn is a no-no.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,272
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4257 Post(s)
Liked 1,356 Times
in
942 Posts
I signaled my right turn and slowed a bit to give the peds a bit more time to cross, expecting I would swing a little wide to avoid them. The car made a right in front of me swinging wide. I gave a loud "HEY!" to indicate my disapproval with the maneuver he just pulled.
In my opinion, what you did was (fairly) reasonable and what he did was unreasonable.
#21
Senior Member
Since there was not two marked lanes going in the same direction, it sounds like the driver should read Section 22100 of the California Vehicle Code, Subsection (a) in particular.
#22
-=Barry=-
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Baltimore, MD +/- ~100 miles
Posts: 4,077
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
FWIW MD law (not sure if CA has anything similar):
Basically the driver of the vehicle has to be in the same position as a cyclists when making a turn.
(a) Right turns.- If the driver of a vehicle intends to turn right at any intersection, he shall approach the intersection and make the right turn as close as practicable to the right-hand curb or edge of the roadway.
#23
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
Motorists don't read laws... they just do what they feel they need to do to satisfy their immediate needs.
Of course most cyclists don't read the laws either.
Usually lawyers are the law readers.
#25
Cycle Year Round