Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Advocacy & Safety
Reload this Page >

if bikes and car numbers were reversed

Search
Notices
Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

if bikes and car numbers were reversed

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-04-08, 07:40 PM
  #26  
genec
 
genec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079

Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2

Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times in 3,158 Posts
Originally Posted by Helmet Head
I never said "market forces are always the best for society"; that's not what this is about.

But Hayek showed in his tour de force, Road to Serfdom, that the idea you propose is folly. You cannot establish a stable state with the "central government and society constantly putting in energy to keep the pendulum at the unstable resting point". As Hayek shows in his book, and what is totally beyond the scope of a post here, is that once you start putting in energy like that, humans adjust their behavior to take advantage, to which the government must respond by putting in more energy and rules, to which human behavior is against adjusted, and thus requires even more energy and rules, and so on, until finally you have dictatorship and/or the economy collapses, and poverty becomes widespread. Thus, such approaches pave the "road to serfdom".
I'm not absolutely sure as I don't know Hayek... but I believe that the economical situation in China is also proving your point... Overall China is still under government control, but they have allowed individuals to participate in a version of controlled capitalism which has lead to individual wealth.
genec is offline  
Old 01-04-08, 09:20 PM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,018
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
In order for people to switch to cars they would have to be within biking distance of work and shopping. That would require painful changes in zoning laws, or a revolution in 'telecommuting'. It is a fact that most places in the US are zoned for low density housing. Increace the density and people would bike more.

For example I can never understand why massive suburban and rural malls are not surrounded by high rise apartments.
geo8rge is offline  
Old 01-04-08, 09:51 PM
  #28  
Banned.
 
Helmet Head's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 13,075
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by genec
I'm not absolutely sure as I don't know Hayek... but I believe that the economical situation in China is also proving your point... Overall China is still under government control, but they have allowed individuals to participate in a version of controlled capitalism which has lead to individual wealth.
Yes, China is moving the opposite direction on the road to serfdom, away from central governmental control and inevitable serfdom, while we are moving toward it.

The kicker is we move in that direction regardless of whether the Democrats or the neocons are in charge. Ron Paul represents the hope for America. Sorry, this belongs in P&R, but Brian made that political statement...
Helmet Head is offline  
Old 01-04-08, 09:59 PM
  #29  
totally louche
Thread Starter
 
Bekologist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: A land that time forgot
Posts: 18,023

Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 9 Posts
this doesn't belong in P&R if all you punters simply stop introducing political and social theory into what was meant to be a discussion topic regarding flip-flopped road usage and the mechanics of managing vastly fewer cars than bikes.
Bekologist is offline  
Old 01-04-08, 10:18 PM
  #30  
Banned.
 
Helmet Head's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 13,075
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Bekologist
this doesn't belong in P&R if all you punters simply stop introducing political and social theory into what was meant to be a discussion topic regarding flip-flopped road usage and the mechanics of managing vastly fewer cars than bikes.
I didn't mean the whole thread belongs in P&R Bek, just the political diversion.
Helmet Head is offline  
Old 01-05-08, 02:01 AM
  #31  
Rider
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Matanuska-Susitna Borough, AK
Posts: 1,077
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
All sorts of bad premises in there.

Why do vehicles drive at 55-65 MPH? - They are designed to run best at that speed by auto makers.
Why do auto makers design vehicles to run 55 MPH? - Because that is the safe and legal operating speed of a car.
Why is that the safe operating speed of a car? - Because the roads are designed to support travel at a design speed of 55 MPH.
Give an engineer a design speed and he can design a road to be "safe" at any speed, be it 5 mph or 500 mph.
Why are roads designed to be driven on at 55 MPH? - because the speed limit in the U.S.A. is 55 MPH.
Why is the speed limit 55 MPH? - Oh, that's just some arbitrary number they pulled out of their collective saddle-holes that was related to how fast people were zooming away on various roads and things at the time.

If the roads were mostly filled with bicycles, it would be a major safety consideration to adjust the travel speed of trucks, etc. Thus, the speed limit would be changed (it has changed in the past) and auto makers would design their next fleet of cars to run best at that new speed as the sweet spot.
JusticeZero is offline  
Old 01-05-08, 04:21 AM
  #32  
Bike ≠ Car ≠ Ped.
 
BarracksSi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 13,861

Bikes: Some bikes. Hell, they're all the same, ain't they?

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by maddyfish
Speed doesn't kill, speed differential kills.
Sort of, but general idiocy kills even more than simple speed differential. I drove on the autobahn in Germany for the first time a few days ago, and despite the massive speed differential (our van topped out at 155 km/h, yet the fast German sedans & wagons were cruising by at maybe 250), I felt a lot safer out there than I do in the DC area at any speed.
BarracksSi is offline  
Old 01-05-08, 10:48 AM
  #33  
genec
 
genec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079

Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2

Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times in 3,158 Posts
Originally Posted by Helmet Head
Yes, China is moving the opposite direction on the road to serfdom, away from central governmental control and inevitable serfdom, while we are moving toward it.

The kicker is we move in that direction regardless of whether the Democrats or the neocons are in charge. Ron Paul represents the hope for America. Sorry, this belongs in P&R, but Brian made that political statement...
What if the Nash equilibrium were instead applied to the situation of motoring and cycling... of course each "actor" in the game would have to see the benefit of advancing their "opponent" for the greater good.

And naturally it would mean that all involved would have to see beyond their own immediate selfish goals.

I think this is why something like the Autobahn, referenced above, works.
genec is offline  
Old 01-05-08, 12:16 PM
  #34  
Bike ≠ Car ≠ Ped.
 
BarracksSi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 13,861

Bikes: Some bikes. Hell, they're all the same, ain't they?

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by genec
And naturally it would mean that all involved would have to see beyond their own immediate selfish goals.

I think this is why something like the Autobahn, referenced above, works.
It really does.

I was in the far right lane, only doing about 130-140 km/h , closing on a slower truck while two small vans were gradually approaching me to pass on my left. I lifted a bit while the first of the two vans passed, then, in my mirrors, I watched the second van also lift off, giving me space to move over. All three of us passed the truck smoothly.

Here in DC, that second small van would have accelerated to prevent me from passing the truck.

I gotta say, as I was riding a Supershuttle van back from the airport to my house, I was almost scared. It's competitive on the freeway here, and for no real reason, either. It's like everyone either dares each other to see how far beyond the speed limit they'll drive, or stays resolutely at the limit in a similarly arrogant display of self-righteousness.

My short experience on the Autobahn just wasn't like that at all. Everyone drove only as fast as they were comfortable -- and everyone was willing to allow others to drive at their own speeds. They stayed as far to the right as they could, watched their mirrors, and moved to allow passing.

We really can't drive worth a damn around here.
BarracksSi is offline  
Old 01-05-08, 07:32 PM
  #35  
Banned
 
dynodonn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: U.S. of A.
Posts: 7,466
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1268 Post(s)
Liked 78 Times in 67 Posts
Originally Posted by BarracksSi
It really does.

I was in the far right lane, only doing about 130-140 km/h , closing on a slower truck while two small vans were gradually approaching me to pass on my left. I lifted a bit while the first of the two vans passed, then, in my mirrors, I watched the second van also lift off, giving me space to move over. All three of us passed the truck smoothly.

Here in DC, that second small van would have accelerated to prevent me from passing the truck.

I gotta say, as I was riding a Supershuttle van back from the airport to my house, I was almost scared. It's competitive on the freeway here, and for no real reason, either. It's like everyone either dares each other to see how far beyond the speed limit they'll drive, or stays resolutely at the limit in a similarly arrogant display of self-righteousness.

My short experience on the Autobahn just wasn't like that at all. Everyone drove only as fast as they were comfortable -- and everyone was willing to allow others to drive at their own speeds. They stayed as far to the right as they could, watched their mirrors, and moved to allow passing.

We really can't drive worth a damn around here.


One thing about Germany, it is very hard and expensive to get a drivers license, and very easy to lose one, a complete opposite from here in the US. I understand that they have some very stiff fines and rigorous policing, I hear that it is a 500 US dollar fine to even make a rude gesture at another driver.
dynodonn is offline  
Old 01-06-08, 04:23 AM
  #36  
Bike ≠ Car ≠ Ped.
 
BarracksSi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 13,861

Bikes: Some bikes. Hell, they're all the same, ain't they?

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by dynodonn
One thing about Germany, it is very hard and expensive to get a drivers license, and very easy to lose one, a complete opposite from here in the US. I understand that they have some very stiff fines and rigorous policing, I hear that it is a 500 US dollar fine to even make a rude gesture at another driver.
You can even get fined for running out of gas on the Autobahn. There's also a requirement to use winter tires during the winter months, so you'll cars like a Mercedes S-class with steel wheels & winter tires. Your car must also be kept in good repair, which explains why I never saw a claptrap like the Ford Tempo I saw last night with bottomed-out rear suspension and a smashed taillight.

The study guide for the written exam is 30 sheets of 30 questions each. I remember a question that has a picture from the driver's seat showing four kids running out of the street -- three were running to the left, one girl running to the right, and they were leaving a ball behind. The question was, "What should you reckon might happen?" Two of the answers were, "The girl might turn around to join her friends," "Someone might turn to retrieve the ball,"; I can't remember the third answer. Both on the study guide and the actual exam, there can be more than one right answer to a question, and I think you need to get all of them for the question to count as correct (but I'm not sure on that one).
BarracksSi is offline  
Old 01-06-08, 04:09 PM
  #37  
Tortoise Wins by a Hare!
 
AlmostTrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Looney Tunes, IL
Posts: 7,398

Bikes: Wabi Special FG, Raleigh Roper, Nashbar AL-1, Miyata One Hundred, '70 Schwinn Lemonator and More!!

Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1549 Post(s)
Liked 941 Times in 504 Posts
Originally Posted by BarracksSi
You can even get fined for running out of gas on the Autobahn. There's also a requirement to use winter tires during the winter months, so you'll cars like a Mercedes S-class with steel wheels & winter tires. Your car must also be kept in good repair, which explains why I never saw a claptrap like the Ford Tempo I saw last night with bottomed-out rear suspension and a smashed taillight.

The study guide for the written exam is 30 sheets of 30 questions each. I remember a question that has a picture from the driver's seat showing four kids running out of the street -- three were running to the left, one girl running to the right, and they were leaving a ball behind. The question was, "What should you reckon might happen?" Two of the answers were, "The girl might turn around to join her friends," "Someone might turn to retrieve the ball,"; I can't remember the third answer. Both on the study guide and the actual exam, there can be more than one right answer to a question, and I think you need to get all of them for the question to count as correct (but I'm not sure on that one).
Very interesting. I wish it was more like that here in the states.
AlmostTrick is offline  
Old 01-06-08, 04:35 PM
  #38  
genec
 
genec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079

Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2

Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times in 3,158 Posts
Originally Posted by AlmostTrick
Very interesting. I wish it was more like that here in the states.


Amen... and yet so many of our cycling brethren decry Europe as being somehow "less."
genec is offline  
Old 01-06-08, 04:49 PM
  #39  
Bike ≠ Car ≠ Ped.
 
BarracksSi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 13,861

Bikes: Some bikes. Hell, they're all the same, ain't they?

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by AlmostTrick
Very interesting. I wish it was more like that here in the states.
Shoot, I wish I knew as much at 16 about driving as I learned over the subsequent decade. Sometimes I think that I got through those years without any serious accidents purely out of luck.
BarracksSi is offline  
Old 01-06-08, 07:15 PM
  #40  
Tortoise Wins by a Hare!
 
AlmostTrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Looney Tunes, IL
Posts: 7,398

Bikes: Wabi Special FG, Raleigh Roper, Nashbar AL-1, Miyata One Hundred, '70 Schwinn Lemonator and More!!

Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1549 Post(s)
Liked 941 Times in 504 Posts
Originally Posted by genec


Amen... and yet so many of our cycling brethren decry Europe as being somehow "less."
Some of these same "cycling brethren" also think driver training, traffic law enforcement, and drivers themselves, don't need much improvement here. It makes me wonder if they drive and ride on the same roads as me.
AlmostTrick is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.