Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-12-08, 12:29 PM   #1
Elkhound
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Charleston, WV
Bikes: Trek Mountaineer modified with a NuVinci; Montegue Paratrooper folding mountain bike; Greenspeed recumbent; Surly Big Dummy with Stokemonkey
Posts: 1,768
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Small increase in cyclists means large decrease in accidents.

I have read this as a truism, but was there ever a study to show this, and if so is it available online?
Elkhound is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-08, 11:31 AM   #2
Giro
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: USA
Bikes:
Posts: 501
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
The only research paper on the Internet that I am aware of is "Safety in numbers in Australia: more walkers and bicyclists, safer walking and bicycling" in Health Promotion Journal of Australia 2005;16:47-51 which is available in full text as a PDF document HERE. This is one of the studies cited regarding mandatory helmet laws. If mandatory helmet use reduces the numbers of cyclists, the net effect on safety for people who continue to bicycle can be no improvement or even less safety.

Studies of this nature tend to be observational because a controlled experimental trial is difficult to do. I would think that if there were good numbers on number of bicyclists and motor vehicles on the road by day of week or month or season, that might be another way of looking for an effect.

Edit: Another link for the same paper LINK. Graphs in the paper in higher resolution LINK.

Last edited by Giro; 04-13-08 at 01:38 PM.
Giro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-08, 12:08 AM   #3
RobertHurst
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Denver
Bikes:
Posts: 1,621
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Giro View Post
The only research paper on the Internet that I am aware of is "Safety in numbers in Australia: more walkers and bicyclists, safer walking and bicycling" in Health Promotion Journal of Australia 2005;16:47-51 which is available in full text as a PDF document HERE. This is one of the studies cited regarding mandatory helmet laws. If mandatory helmet use reduces the numbers of cyclists, the net effect on safety for people who continue to bicycle can be no improvement or even less safety.

Studies of this nature tend to be observational because a controlled experimental trial is difficult to do. I would think that if there were good numbers on number of bicyclists and motor vehicles on the road by day of week or month or season, that might be another way of looking for an effect.

Edit: Another link for the same paper LINK. Graphs in the paper in higher resolution LINK.
Giro, thanks for posting that. I had forgotten to put it on the research page, probably because it has a near-identical title to this paper by Jacobsen -- Safety in Numbers: More Walkers and Bicyclists, Safer Walking and Bicycling (abstract) -- from 2003, which I believe is a different animal from the Robinson paper, although I've only looked at the abstract.

Robert
RobertHurst is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:10 PM.