Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-22-08, 09:25 AM   #1
littlewaywelt
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
littlewaywelt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 1,508
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
bike path is un-environmental in DC region

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...=moreheadlines


An eight foot wide bike path (or sections of it), next to a new six lane highway + shoulders & medians, is un-environmental for footprint reasons. Nice logic, Montgomery County.
littlewaywelt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-08, 10:49 AM   #2
genec
genec
 
genec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Posts: 24,707
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 317 Post(s)
Un****ing believable!

I guess dedicating one lane of that six lane freeway to cyclists is just out of the question.
genec is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-08, 04:20 PM   #3
Dchiefransom
Senior Member
 
Dchiefransom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Newark, CA. San Francisco Bay Area
Bikes:
Posts: 6,205
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
It would probably be cheaper to just put the concrete dividers down the entire length of the road and give cyclists one full lane with a yellow line down the middle. The savings could be taken by using the right lane on one side. Not having to build any exit ramps for the cars would pay for it. After reaching the end, the drivers could loop back around to their destinations(just trying to give cars as much consideration as bikes).
__________________
Silver Eagle Pilot
Dchiefransom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-08, 06:08 PM   #4
derath
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Reisterstown, MD
Bikes:
Posts: 3,190
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
What do you expect from the People's Republic of Montgomery county?

Personally IMO they should scrap the entire ICC project, and just build the path instead.

-D
derath is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-08, 06:54 PM   #5
CB HI
Cycle Year Round
 
CB HI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Honolulu, HI
Bikes:
Posts: 11,963
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 197 Post(s)
"That means limiting rainwater runoff from pavement, including asphalt bike paths, that can contaminate streams and other habitat."

You Montgomery County cyclist must use a hell of a lot of chain lube if it is dripping off all over those bike paths.
CB HI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-08, 08:31 PM   #6
Cyclaholic
CRIKEY!!!!!!!
 
Cyclaholic's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Bikes: several
Posts: 4,269
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 71 Post(s)
This just sweeps away any lingering doubt of just how dysfunctional our car-centric transport culture has become. Society's addiction to oil is in no way different to a heroine junkie's addiction.

The Saudi oil sheiks must be laughing so hard they're giving themselves hernias. I would be slowly but surely cranking up the price of oil and milking it for all it's worth if I were them.
__________________
There are 10 types of people in the world - the ones that can count in base 2, the ones that can't count in base 2, and the ones that didn't expect this to be in base 3.
Cyclaholic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-08, 01:52 AM   #7
Allister
Devilmaycare Cycling Fool
 
Allister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Wynnum, Australia
Bikes: 1998 Cannondale F700
Posts: 3,819
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
The problems, county planners say, started in 2004, when Maryland highway officials conducting a fast-tracked environmental study of the connector dropped plans for an off-road bike path. At the time, highway officials were facing a federal review of the connector proposal, which had been stymied for decades because of environmental concerns. Highway officials said they cut the bike trail because they needed to curb costs and reduce the project's environmental "footprint."
Looks like they took all the 'footprint' they could get and used it for car lanes. Bit hard to now justify increasing the footprint again.

Funny how they'll do whatever it takes to get a road through, but grab any excuse to ditch bike space. In this case they not only stuffed it up for bikes from the start, but stuffed it up for the foreseeable future.
Allister is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-08, 05:46 AM   #8
mandovoodoo
Violin guitar mandolin
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Friendsville, TN, USA
Bikes: Wilier Thor, Fuji Professional, LeMond Wayzata
Posts: 1,171
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I suspect the analysis is quite biased and fails to adequately balance the long term impact. Also, mitigation is unlikely to have been considered adequately. While I normally find that outraged folks simply didn't get their way in a reasonable process, I suspect there's something amiss here. Participate in the process, anyone up there with standing, and support any local group mounting a legal challenge.

There's likely a minimal assumption on use levels in the long term by commuters. Could well simply count on use estimates as a recreational facility. And fail to account for positive impacts to the larger environment over the long term.

Only when government and industry really grab hold of cycling and promote it will such things waft through easily. I'm not going to hold my breath on that one!
mandovoodoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-08, 05:59 AM   #9
kk4df
Senior Member
 
kk4df's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Augusta, GA
Bikes: Bottecchia CF frame and fork, Ultegra 6603 crank and FD, DuraAce RD, Easton Vista wheels, Brooks B-17 saddle, Shimano 105 brakes, Michelin Pro2 Race tires
Posts: 639
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
As a transportation planner, Kines said, he believes it would be "shortsighted" not to build a continuous, off-road bike path along the highway. However, he said, parks officials think improving local roads, such as by widening sidewalks to accommodate bikes, would be sufficient.



Since when are bikes supposed to ride on sidewalks. That's against the law in my state and many others. Our car-centric culture amazes me sometimes.
kk4df is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-08, 11:23 AM   #10
randya
Senior Member
 
randya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: in bed with your mom
Bikes: who cares?
Posts: 13,689
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Ah, the Rob Anderson defense!

randya is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-08, 11:26 AM   #11
randya
Senior Member
 
randya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: in bed with your mom
Bikes: who cares?
Posts: 13,689
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
"...parks officials think improving local roads, such as by widening sidewalks to accommodate bikes, would be sufficient."

randya is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-08, 11:46 AM   #12
-=(8)=-
♋ ☮♂ ☭ ☯
 
-=(8)=-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 40205 'ViLLeBiLLie
Bikes: Sngl Spd's, 70's- 80's vintage, D-tube Folder
Posts: 7,903
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
This same bazarre logic used in naming SUV's after the stuff thay have a huge part in
negatively impacting, i.e., Sequoia, Ranier, Sedona, Yukon, etc.....
__________________
-ADVOCACY-☜ Radical VC = Car people on bikes. Just say "NO"
-=(8)=- is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:01 AM.