Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Angle Parking

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Chico, Cali
    Posts
    389
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Angle Parking

    There's been a proposal around here to change the downtown parking scheme from parallel parking to angle parking, and it's gained some traction in the city council. Currently the downtown area is built around a pair of three-lane one-way streets with parallel parking on both sides. The proposed scheme would remove a lane, making these two-lane one-way streets with angle parking on the right (and parallel on the left). It is also supposed to help create around a five-foot buffer on both sides between traffic and parking.

    This seems like a really bad idea for cyclists... especially the ones uncomfortable with taking lanes who'll probably try to ride down the buffer and be even more invisible to motorists who blindly back into traffic.

    Anybody got any advice for shooting this sort of scheme down?

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Toronto
    My Bikes
    Miyata 600, Marin Larkspur, Marin Muirwoods, GT tequesta, Fuji Ace
    Posts
    970
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Not sure, but I have previously been subject to angle parking on a major street. It's a big nightmare, b/c you can't have absolute faith that the reverse lights work on each vehicle - so you never really know when someone is going to back into you. At least with parallel parking the vehicles with legal tinting on the windows generally let you know if there is someone in the car.

    Good luck

  3. #3
    Ride that pony. fourteenbucks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Central Illinois
    My Bikes
    Schwinn Skyliner
    Posts
    161
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The best thing you can do is talk to your city council. I went to mine tonight and argued the construction of new bike lanes in useless parts of town. At least it gets them thinking about the topic from someone who uses the roads for a different purpose.
    Schwinn Skyliner - you'd be surprised what I can do with a $200 bike.
    Blogs are useless. Write a real journal.

  4. #4
    Mr. Maximan1 maximan1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Anaheim and Fullerton (SoCal)
    My Bikes
    Puch Superleicht, Nishiki moutain project, Trek 2300 carbon composite
    Posts
    1,301
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    There is angle parking by my high school, and 2 weeks ago a motorcycle cop got injured by some ****** backing out without looking. They blocked off the whole street and made a huge deal of it.

    Bad idea.

  5. #5
    Bike ≠ Car ≠ Ped. BarracksSi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Washington, DC
    My Bikes
    Some bikes. Hell, they're all the same, ain't they?
    Posts
    13,857
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    We have angled parking in several places here, including on the street where I work, but the angle is so that drivers have to back into their spots.

    The act of parking holds up traffic more than parallel parking, because driving backwards at an angle really exposes how little driving skill someone might have. But, it seems like they can see a lot better when it's time to leave their spot -- the side mirror is useless, so they turn to look out the window where there isn't even a B-pillar to get in the way.

  6. #6
    Genius FlatMaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Auburn, AL
    My Bikes
    Specilized Sirrus
    Posts
    324
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    In the downtown Auburn area, we have angle parking like that. I thought it would be a problem whereas angled drivers backing out couldn't see cyclists. Their view would be blocked by other parked cars. I've found that this street is busy enough that that trafic moves slowly enough that no body backs out unless there is plenty of room. Perhaps going from 3 to two lanes one way will slow the traffic enough to be amenable to cyclists.
    Ride or Die

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Montreal
    My Bikes
    Peugeot Hybrid, Minelli Hybrid
    Posts
    6,521
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by BarracksSi View Post
    We have angled parking in several places here, including on the street where I work, but the angle is so that drivers have to back into their spots.

    The act of parking holds up traffic more than parallel parking, because driving backwards at an angle really exposes how little driving skill someone might have. But, it seems like they can see a lot better when it's time to leave their spot -- the side mirror is useless, so they turn to look out the window where there isn't even a B-pillar to get in the way.
    This is the way it should be, for safety reasons when leaving the parking space. Diagonal parking also remove the possibility of dooring cyclists. I dont think it will hold up traffic because it is normal to back into parallel parking spaces.

  8. #8
    -=Barry=- The Human Car's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Baltimore, MD +/- ~100 miles
    Posts
    4,077
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by BarracksSi View Post
    We have angled parking in several places here, including on the street where I work, but the angle is so that drivers have to back into their spots.

    The act of parking holds up traffic more than parallel parking, because driving backwards at an angle really exposes how little driving skill someone might have. But, it seems like they can see a lot better when it's time to leave their spot -- the side mirror is useless, so they turn to look out the window where there isn't even a B-pillar to get in the way.
    FWIW Back-in parking is supposed to be bike friendly and I guess it is better then front-in parking but still I would rather see corner parking lots (with landscaped screening) then streets lined with cars.
    Cycling Advocate
    http://BaltimoreSpokes.org
    . . . o
    . . /L
    =()>()

  9. #9
    Bike ≠ Car ≠ Ped. BarracksSi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Washington, DC
    My Bikes
    Some bikes. Hell, they're all the same, ain't they?
    Posts
    13,857
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by AndrewP View Post
    This is the way it should be, for safety reasons when leaving the parking space. Diagonal parking also remove the possibility of dooring cyclists. I dont think it will hold up traffic because it is normal to back into parallel parking spaces.
    On the block by my workplace, people block both lanes of traffic (one each direction) while backing into a spot. It's doesn't last long, but it's pretty dependable.

    Quote Originally Posted by The Human Car View Post
    FWIW Back-in parking is supposed to be bike friendly and I guess it is better then front-in parking but still I would rather see corner parking lots (with landscaped screening) then streets lined with cars.
    Personally, I'd rather see business and homes taking up those lots, and fewer cars overall. It helps my area that public transit is really good -- limited parking kinda encourages people to take the cab and subway instead.

  10. #10
    Banned.
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Sioux City, Iowa
    My Bikes
    Vision R40 Recumbent
    Posts
    825
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Saving Hawaii View Post
    There's been a proposal around here to change the downtown parking scheme from parallel parking to angle parking, and it's gained some traction in the city council. Currently the downtown area is built around a pair of three-lane one-way streets with parallel parking on both sides. The proposed scheme would remove a lane, making these two-lane one-way streets with angle parking on the right (and parallel on the left). It is also supposed to help create around a five-foot buffer on both sides between traffic and parking.

    This seems like a really bad idea for cyclists... especially the ones uncomfortable with taking lanes who'll probably try to ride down the buffer and be even more invisible to motorists who blindly back into traffic.

    Anybody got any advice for shooting this sort of scheme down?
    Which city? Honolulu?

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Chico, Cali
    Posts
    389
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Square & Compas View Post
    Which city? Honolulu?
    Of course not. Just small town California. (the moniker is an inside joke)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •