Biker Rage?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Posts: 189
Bikes: Breezer Finesse
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#3
For The Fun of It
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Louisissippi Coast
Posts: 5,851
Bikes: Lynskey GR300, Lynskey Backroad, Litespeed T6, Lynskey MT29, Burley Duet
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2134 Post(s)
Liked 1,644 Times
in
826 Posts
I know a lot of motorists who could use a good beating. I just hope it was deserved in this case.
#4
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,392
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,690 Times
in
2,513 Posts
He posted in the comments. Too bad none of the cyclists did. I'm positive there was some reason the cyclists did this, and it was probably ugly.
#5
Cycle Year Round
The cyclist were wrong for what they did, but I suspect the motorist did more than just cut off the cyclist.
What are the cops like in Eugene? Do they take cyclist complaints seriously or do they blow them off? Could this act of escalation result, in part, from a repeated lack of police action in solving violance against cyclist.
What are the cops like in Eugene? Do they take cyclist complaints seriously or do they blow them off? Could this act of escalation result, in part, from a repeated lack of police action in solving violance against cyclist.
Last edited by CB HI; 11-08-08 at 03:03 AM.
#6
Bike ≠ Car ≠ Ped.
Troublemaking punks on bikes, that's what anyone's gonna see. Hardly anything to do with typical bike commuters.
#7
Dogs like me.
Time to go back and read the comments. A witness just posted 30 minutes ago, saying that she saw the driver of the SUV swipe one of the cyclists, try to run down the others, and drove away.
I don't feel sorry at all for the chump.
I don't feel sorry at all for the chump.
#8
CRIKEY!!!!!!!
Join Date: May 2005
Location: all the way down under
Posts: 4,276
Bikes: several
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1589 Post(s)
Liked 687 Times
in
365 Posts
Considering the eyewitness account the headline should be changed to "Road raging SUV driver commits a hit and run on cyclist but gets a taste of his own medicine"
__________________
"Surely one can love his own country without becoming hopelessly lost in an all-consuming flame of narrow-minded nationalism" - Fred Birchmore
"Surely one can love his own country without becoming hopelessly lost in an all-consuming flame of narrow-minded nationalism" - Fred Birchmore
#10
Perineal Pressurized
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: In Ebritated
Posts: 6,555
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Four punks on BMX bikes. Whoop
__________________
This is Africa, 1943. War spits out its violence overhead and the sandy graveyard swallows it up. Her name is King Nine, B-25, medium bomber, Twelfth Air Force. On a hot, still morning she took off from Tunisia to bomb the southern tip of Italy. An errant piece of flak tore a hole in a wing tank and, like a wounded bird, this is where she landed, not to return on this day, or any other day.
This is Africa, 1943. War spits out its violence overhead and the sandy graveyard swallows it up. Her name is King Nine, B-25, medium bomber, Twelfth Air Force. On a hot, still morning she took off from Tunisia to bomb the southern tip of Italy. An errant piece of flak tore a hole in a wing tank and, like a wounded bird, this is where she landed, not to return on this day, or any other day.
#11
CRIKEY!!!!!!!
Join Date: May 2005
Location: all the way down under
Posts: 4,276
Bikes: several
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1589 Post(s)
Liked 687 Times
in
365 Posts
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAAAAAAA.....
I had to check if I was in the jokes & humor forum when I read that.
__________________
"Surely one can love his own country without becoming hopelessly lost in an all-consuming flame of narrow-minded nationalism" - Fred Birchmore
"Surely one can love his own country without becoming hopelessly lost in an all-consuming flame of narrow-minded nationalism" - Fred Birchmore
#12
Dogs like me.
And why does the type of bicycle they were riding matter? I mean, is someone in your world automatically more credible if they are riding, say, a Schwinn World Tour? What can you tell about the trustworthiness of an individual riding a rehabbed 1967 Raleigh with chrome forks?
Crikey, I can only imagine if these four "punks" were riding RANS crank forwards. Your head would probably explode.
#13
Selfish bitter clinger.
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Red Stick
Posts: 187
Bikes: Surly 1x1 commuter, Specialized Epic, Litespeed Ultimate, Nishiki Sport, Trek zx6000, Fisher Sugar team issue, Surly Big Dummy, 1984 Trek 400, Trek 820, kabuki road bike.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Maybe we could let the police do their jobs. It could be a little street justice or punks going to far. We'll see if the police do a fair investigation.
#14
Violin guitar mandolin
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Friendsville, TN, USA
Posts: 1,171
Bikes: Wilier Thor, Fuji Professional, LeMond Wayzata
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Such a waste of energy. If all these folks had been properly armed with handguns they'd have been able to settle the matter more efficiently.
So. What duty does Home Depot owe a customer when that customer is attacked on their property? I believe in general terms that a business customer is an invitee and that the property owner owes an invitee a higher duty (e.g., to warn of hazards) than a mere social visitor. But this situation lies sort of outside the usual. I don't believe there's a duty to rescue a stranger from attack on public property, but how about a business invitee on private property?
This is, if I recall correctly, premises liability. Based on the conflicting information, I can't see how either the motorist or the BMXers would benefit from a suit against each other. But by the time the motorist went into HD, the initial altercation was over. All that happened on HD property was the BMXer on motorist attack. I would think that HD owes a business invitee the duty of calling 911 promptly in an emergency. take a heart attack victim in the checkout aisle. When he falls, let him lie until another customer calls 911 or call 911 immediately? I would think that not calling 911 would attract a negligence suit based on a general duty to aid those in trouble at least to the extent of calling 911. It's only a short extension to take that general duty - which I suspect we all think must exist in supermarkets and HD - and extend it to immediately outside the building in an area frequented by employees, as was the situation here.
Will be fun to see what happens.
So. What duty does Home Depot owe a customer when that customer is attacked on their property? I believe in general terms that a business customer is an invitee and that the property owner owes an invitee a higher duty (e.g., to warn of hazards) than a mere social visitor. But this situation lies sort of outside the usual. I don't believe there's a duty to rescue a stranger from attack on public property, but how about a business invitee on private property?
This is, if I recall correctly, premises liability. Based on the conflicting information, I can't see how either the motorist or the BMXers would benefit from a suit against each other. But by the time the motorist went into HD, the initial altercation was over. All that happened on HD property was the BMXer on motorist attack. I would think that HD owes a business invitee the duty of calling 911 promptly in an emergency. take a heart attack victim in the checkout aisle. When he falls, let him lie until another customer calls 911 or call 911 immediately? I would think that not calling 911 would attract a negligence suit based on a general duty to aid those in trouble at least to the extent of calling 911. It's only a short extension to take that general duty - which I suspect we all think must exist in supermarkets and HD - and extend it to immediately outside the building in an area frequented by employees, as was the situation here.
Will be fun to see what happens.
#15
Perineal Pressurized
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: In Ebritated
Posts: 6,555
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
The BMX riders are guilty of assault and damaging property though, regardless of the perceived slight.
__________________
This is Africa, 1943. War spits out its violence overhead and the sandy graveyard swallows it up. Her name is King Nine, B-25, medium bomber, Twelfth Air Force. On a hot, still morning she took off from Tunisia to bomb the southern tip of Italy. An errant piece of flak tore a hole in a wing tank and, like a wounded bird, this is where she landed, not to return on this day, or any other day.
This is Africa, 1943. War spits out its violence overhead and the sandy graveyard swallows it up. Her name is King Nine, B-25, medium bomber, Twelfth Air Force. On a hot, still morning she took off from Tunisia to bomb the southern tip of Italy. An errant piece of flak tore a hole in a wing tank and, like a wounded bird, this is where she landed, not to return on this day, or any other day.
#16
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
How does the SUV driver get singular credibility?
#17
Guest
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
[QUOTE=mandovoodoo;7813430]Such a waste of energy. If all these folks had been properly armed with handguns they'd have been able to settle the matter more efficiently.
So. What duty does Home Depot owe a customer when that customer is attacked on their property? I believe in general terms that a business customer is an invitee and that the property owner owes an invitee a higher duty (e.g., to warn of hazards) than a mere social visitor. But this situation lies sort of outside the usual. I don't believe there's a duty to rescue a stranger from attack on public property, but how about a business invitee on private property?
This is, if I recall correctly, premises liability. Based on the conflicting information, I can't see how either the motorist or the BMXers would benefit from a suit against each other. But by the time the motorist went into HD, the initial altercation was over. All that happened on HD property was the BMXer on motorist attack. I would think that HD owes a business invitee the duty of calling 911 promptly in an emergency. take a heart attack victim in the checkout aisle. When he falls, let him lie until another customer calls 911 or call 911 immediately? I would think that not calling 911 would attract a negligence suit based on a general duty to aid those in trouble at least to the extent of calling 911. It's only a short extension to take that general duty - which I suspect we all think must exist in supermarkets and HD - and extend it to immediately outside the building in an area frequented by employees, as was the situation here.
So far, this post appears to be the most reasonable and less emotional. All we know here, is what we see on the video. All the rest is alleged, third hand information. The bicyclist clearly followed the mostist onto private property and clearly assaulted him. The Home Depot employees clearly had the responsabililty to call 911. They have a legal responsability to invitees/customers on thier property.
Nuff said.
So. What duty does Home Depot owe a customer when that customer is attacked on their property? I believe in general terms that a business customer is an invitee and that the property owner owes an invitee a higher duty (e.g., to warn of hazards) than a mere social visitor. But this situation lies sort of outside the usual. I don't believe there's a duty to rescue a stranger from attack on public property, but how about a business invitee on private property?
This is, if I recall correctly, premises liability. Based on the conflicting information, I can't see how either the motorist or the BMXers would benefit from a suit against each other. But by the time the motorist went into HD, the initial altercation was over. All that happened on HD property was the BMXer on motorist attack. I would think that HD owes a business invitee the duty of calling 911 promptly in an emergency. take a heart attack victim in the checkout aisle. When he falls, let him lie until another customer calls 911 or call 911 immediately? I would think that not calling 911 would attract a negligence suit based on a general duty to aid those in trouble at least to the extent of calling 911. It's only a short extension to take that general duty - which I suspect we all think must exist in supermarkets and HD - and extend it to immediately outside the building in an area frequented by employees, as was the situation here.
So far, this post appears to be the most reasonable and less emotional. All we know here, is what we see on the video. All the rest is alleged, third hand information. The bicyclist clearly followed the mostist onto private property and clearly assaulted him. The Home Depot employees clearly had the responsabililty to call 911. They have a legal responsability to invitees/customers on thier property.
Nuff said.
#18
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,392
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,690 Times
in
2,513 Posts
clearly, tracking someone down and beating them up is not a solution that we should promote. OTOH, it is often impossible to get satisfaction using more reasonable approaches. Actually, with 4 of them, they might have had some traction with the cops. It would be interesting to know what this guy did. I'm not impressed with the idea that he just honked at them or something else that is obnoxious but harmless.