Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Senior Member pueblonative's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Pueblo, CO
    My Bikes
    Roadmaster 26 Men's Mountain Bike
    Posts
    249
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Explain this safety article

    http://www.consumeraffairs.com/news0..._injuries.html

    All right. The article clearly states that head injuries are not the most common injury and that injuries to upper and lower extremities are. The article wants to mention helmet safety for children. Okay, I'm cool with that. But how much more space would it take to mention other safety tips for the other extremities? Or even post a link to something like http://www.bicyclesafe.com/ ? Go ahead and mention the helmets but do a little bit more homework than recopying a press release off of some researcher if you don't mind.
    A judge is a law student who marks his own examination papers.
    H.L Mencken
    Pueblonative biking

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    2,054
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It would be very easy to do as you suggest, but you have to keep in mind, that is Not their agenda.
    The article is trying to push mandatory helmet laws, not promote safter riding technique or even promote cycling at all.

  3. #3
    Devilmaycare Cycling Fool Allister's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Wynnum, Australia
    My Bikes
    1998 Cannondale F700
    Posts
    3,819
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The article seems to be arguing that only boys under 14 need helmets.
    If we learn from our mistakes, I must be a goddamn genius.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Aus
    Posts
    632
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Yay, isn't it great reading an article written by someone who understands statistics.
    /sarcasm

    But yes I'm in agreeance with xenologer, it would be better to promote safer riding in general which would concievably reduce all types of injuries. Of course it's hard with children though.
    I want to live.

  5. #5
    Senior Member pueblonative's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Pueblo, CO
    My Bikes
    Roadmaster 26 Men's Mountain Bike
    Posts
    249
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by xenologer View Post
    It would be very easy to do as you suggest, but you have to keep in mind, that is Not their agenda.
    The article is trying to push mandatory helmet laws, not promote safter riding technique or even promote cycling at all.
    If it's trying to do that then it's trying rather clumsily. If I wanted to promote people putting locks in their doors, for instance, I would not start out by saying that the majority of break-ins occur when the burglars go through the window.
    A judge is a law student who marks his own examination papers.
    H.L Mencken
    Pueblonative biking

  6. #6
    Dogs like me. Ajenkins's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    361
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Allister View Post
    The article seems to be arguing that only boys under 14 need helmets.
    Agreed. And if my memory serves me, boys of that age group should also be wearing parachutes and flame-proof suits, for roughly the same reason.

    Fact of the matter is, we pretty much survived our late childhood and adolescence, and have memories of friends who did not. It's an inherently dangerous time, and some recent studies have emerged that show that, in removing those dangers, we are actually delaying maturation to adulthood.

    Thanks, Allister, for allowing me to use your comment as a soapbox to stand on. I'm sure you feel free to return the favor sometime.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •