Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Advocacy & Safety
Reload this Page >

Proprosed Montana Legislation-Stop signs

Search
Notices
Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

Proprosed Montana Legislation-Stop signs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-16-09, 12:39 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
cman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Boise,ID
Posts: 516
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Proprosed Montana Legislation-Stop signs

Montana is looking at passing a law similar to Idaho's in regards to Stop signs. Cyclist could treat stop signs as yields. It will be interesting to see how it goes. This article states some other cities and states are looking at Idaho's law also even cities like Portland,OR. The comments at the bottom are fairly interesting.
cman is offline  
Old 01-16-09, 12:53 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
degnaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Bellevue, WA
Posts: 1,606
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
but it only makes customary . . . behavior legal
If only every law was treated that way - Its infuriating when someone gets a ticket doing something that everybody does, no matter if its stop sign running, red light running, or even speeding (for cars). Stop signs should become yields for both cars and bikes, red light running should be legalized for bikes, and speed limits should be set at the 85th percentile speed.
degnaw is offline  
Old 01-16-09, 03:22 PM
  #3  
feros ferio
 
John E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
Posts: 21,798

Bikes: 1959 Capo Modell Campagnolo; 1960 Capo Sieger (2); 1962 Carlton Franco Suisse; 1970 Peugeot UO-8; 1982 Bianchi Campione d'Italia; 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10;

Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1393 Post(s)
Liked 1,325 Times in 837 Posts
Originally Posted by degnaw
...speed limits should be set at the 85th percentile speed.
They are in California, and people die because of it. Allowing the fastest 1/6 of all motorists to set the enforceable speed limit for everyone is not always the correct policy.
__________________
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
John E is offline  
Old 01-16-09, 03:35 PM
  #4  
Non-Custom Member
 
zeytoun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 1,613

Bikes: 1975-1980 SR road bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
That's an oversimplification of California law.

If you have a legitimate reason for a less than 85th percentile speed limit, you can have one.

You just can't lower the speed limit past the 85th percentile, with no rationale other than "just because", because that would be a speed trap.
zeytoun is offline  
Old 01-16-09, 03:43 PM
  #5  
Freewheelin' Fred
 
dwilbur3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 742

Bikes: Surly Cross Check

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
When I was a kid, people didn't speed so much. Then came the 55mph National Emergency Speed Limit. Everybody got in the habit of going 10-15 mph over the speed limit. Then when they raised them back again everybody still drove 10-15 mph over the speed limit but now it was crazy. I bet if you raised it to 85 mph you'd still have people doing 10-15 mph over the limit.

That's my opinion and it's worth exactly the price of the paper it's printed on.
dwilbur3 is offline  
Old 01-16-09, 04:15 PM
  #6  
genec
 
genec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079

Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2

Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times in 3,158 Posts
Originally Posted by zeytoun
That's an oversimplification of California law.

If you have a legitimate reason for a less than 85th percentile speed limit, you can have one.

You just can't lower the speed limit past the 85th percentile, with no rationale other than "just because", because that would be a speed trap.
How about that the speed being driven is not conducive to the safety of other users of the street.

That was exactly the reasoning that was used on Balboa Ave near my home to lower the speed from 50MPH to 45MPH, to reduce the pedestrian collisions. A new stop light was also added to calm traffic. Each corner also has signs telling motorists that they must yield to pedestrians in the crosswalks.

Just because drivers can drive fast, doesn't mean they should.

The 85% rule is based on drivers comfort levels... but isolation from the environment tends to increase the driver comfort level based on false confidence. Rolled up windows, air conditioning and loud stereos along with road noise damping systems tend to give motorists a false sense of speed and control at the expense to the other users of the road.
genec is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.