Proprosed Montana Legislation-Stop signs
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Boise,ID
Posts: 516
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Proprosed Montana Legislation-Stop signs
Montana is looking at passing a law similar to Idaho's in regards to Stop signs. Cyclist could treat stop signs as yields. It will be interesting to see how it goes. This article states some other cities and states are looking at Idaho's law also even cities like Portland,OR. The comments at the bottom are fairly interesting.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Bellevue, WA
Posts: 1,606
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
but it only makes customary . . . behavior legal
#3
feros ferio
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
Posts: 21,798
Bikes: 1959 Capo Modell Campagnolo; 1960 Capo Sieger (2); 1962 Carlton Franco Suisse; 1970 Peugeot UO-8; 1982 Bianchi Campione d'Italia; 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10;
Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1393 Post(s)
Liked 1,325 Times
in
837 Posts
They are in California, and people die because of it. Allowing the fastest 1/6 of all motorists to set the enforceable speed limit for everyone is not always the correct policy.
__________________
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
#4
Non-Custom Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 1,613
Bikes: 1975-1980 SR road bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
That's an oversimplification of California law.
If you have a legitimate reason for a less than 85th percentile speed limit, you can have one.
You just can't lower the speed limit past the 85th percentile, with no rationale other than "just because", because that would be a speed trap.
If you have a legitimate reason for a less than 85th percentile speed limit, you can have one.
You just can't lower the speed limit past the 85th percentile, with no rationale other than "just because", because that would be a speed trap.
#5
Freewheelin' Fred
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 742
Bikes: Surly Cross Check
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
When I was a kid, people didn't speed so much. Then came the 55mph National Emergency Speed Limit. Everybody got in the habit of going 10-15 mph over the speed limit. Then when they raised them back again everybody still drove 10-15 mph over the speed limit but now it was crazy. I bet if you raised it to 85 mph you'd still have people doing 10-15 mph over the limit.
That's my opinion and it's worth exactly the price of the paper it's printed on.
That's my opinion and it's worth exactly the price of the paper it's printed on.
#6
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
That's an oversimplification of California law.
If you have a legitimate reason for a less than 85th percentile speed limit, you can have one.
You just can't lower the speed limit past the 85th percentile, with no rationale other than "just because", because that would be a speed trap.
If you have a legitimate reason for a less than 85th percentile speed limit, you can have one.
You just can't lower the speed limit past the 85th percentile, with no rationale other than "just because", because that would be a speed trap.
That was exactly the reasoning that was used on Balboa Ave near my home to lower the speed from 50MPH to 45MPH, to reduce the pedestrian collisions. A new stop light was also added to calm traffic. Each corner also has signs telling motorists that they must yield to pedestrians in the crosswalks.
Just because drivers can drive fast, doesn't mean they should.
The 85% rule is based on drivers comfort levels... but isolation from the environment tends to increase the driver comfort level based on false confidence. Rolled up windows, air conditioning and loud stereos along with road noise damping systems tend to give motorists a false sense of speed and control at the expense to the other users of the road.