Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-26-09, 01:15 AM   #1
wheel
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
wheel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Crystal MN
Bikes:
Posts: 2,147
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Taking the lane on a narrow 4 lane road. (video)

Here is why I take the lane on this 4 lane road. . I purposely rode to the right. You can clearly see as I move left so do the cars. It isn't a 100 percent but it is much better than the start.
McKellips Rd east bound
http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&sour...,0.022638&z=16

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4mu1HeRczNQ

Last edited by wheel; 03-26-09 at 01:20 AM.
wheel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-09, 06:35 AM   #2
atbman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Leeds UK
Bikes:
Posts: 1,976
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by wheel View Post
Here is why I take the lane on this 4 lane road. . I purposely rode to the right. You can clearly see as I move left so do the cars. It isn't a 100 percent but it is much better than the start.
McKellips Rd east bound
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4mu1HeRczNQ
Congrats. Perfect example of why one should take the lane. This really ought to be in the post on "as far right as practicable crap" thread
atbman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-09, 06:52 AM   #3
crhilton
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska
Bikes: '07 Trek 1500, '08 Surly Cross Check, '09 Masi Speciale Sprint custom build
Posts: 4,568
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
At some point you get far enough left that drivers know they have to use the other lane to get around you and so they just move over into the other lane. It's a good example of using lane position to communicate with drivers about how they need to pass you.

I didn't really think anybody but the cargo van buzzed you though. Looked like you were getting 2-3 feet from most drivers and they weren't going that fast. Could be an optical illusion though.
crhilton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-09, 12:21 PM   #4
wheel
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
wheel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Crystal MN
Bikes:
Posts: 2,147
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by crhilton View Post
At some point you get far enough left that drivers know they have to use the other lane to get around you and so they just move over into the other lane. It's a good example of using lane position to communicate with drivers about how they need to pass you.

I didn't really think anybody but the cargo van buzzed you though. Looked like you were getting 2-3 feet from most drivers and they weren't going that fast. Could be an optical illusion though.
I need to verify width measurement. In our state this is illegal. You can't share a lane with a bicycle which doesn't have enough width IE 13 feet or wider. I will edit this the issue is not buzzing it is lane sharing. You have 11 inches to the right via camera angle. If you use the left of my handle bars. Thank You.

Last edited by wheel; 03-26-09 at 12:42 PM.
wheel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-09, 12:28 PM   #5
noisebeam
Al
 
noisebeam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: AZ
Bikes: Cannondale SuperSix, Lemond Poprad. Retired: Jamis Sputnik, Centurion LeMans Fixed, Diamond Back ascent ex
Posts: 14,109
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 71 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by wheel View Post
I need to verify with measurement. In our state this is illegal. You can't share a lane with a bicycle which doesn't have enough width IE 13 feet or wider. I will edit this. Thank You.
No matter the lane width you can still use part of the lane a cyclist is in to pass a cyclist as long as one gives at least 3' of clearance.

Al
noisebeam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-09, 12:45 PM   #6
wheel
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
wheel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Crystal MN
Bikes:
Posts: 2,147
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by noisebeam View Post
No matter the lane width you can still use part of the lane a cyclist is in to pass a cyclist as long as one gives at least 3' of clearance.

Al
More editting.
wheel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-09, 12:46 PM   #7
Bekologist
totally louche
 
Bekologist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: A land that time forgot
Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes
Posts: 18,025
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
did you filter at the next light?
Bekologist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-09, 01:16 PM   #8
wheel
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
wheel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Crystal MN
Bikes:
Posts: 2,147
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bekologist View Post
did you filter at the next light?


I never filter if I take a lane previously. I don't want to have them pass me again. Unless a rare gridlock which I will use a better sharable street, wait, or use a different route.

FYI I missed the green light and was the first one at the stop light.

Last edited by wheel; 03-26-09 at 01:28 PM.
wheel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-09, 01:25 PM   #9
noisebeam
Al
 
noisebeam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: AZ
Bikes: Cannondale SuperSix, Lemond Poprad. Retired: Jamis Sputnik, Centurion LeMans Fixed, Diamond Back ascent ex
Posts: 14,109
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 71 Post(s)
I ride thru there sometimes. Gotta love the river crossing.
noisebeam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-09, 02:01 PM   #10
wheel
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
wheel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Crystal MN
Bikes:
Posts: 2,147
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Ok I will stick with that I will post more video as I ride,



A shareable lane with a bicycle and a truck is defined as a having a width of more than 13 feet. In this video there is a narrow lane ( less than 13 feet) present.
This is what you can expect from motorists because there are no laws which require a person to move over to the other lane to overtake a cyclist. They only need to provide three feet of clearance.
It is ambiguous for me to try to define what is three feet as all they pass me. Clearly some don't and some are questionable. Some motorists simply move over to the other lane and allow the maximum clearance. What constitutes as a "safe three feet overtaking" is left up to someone who won't get hurt.
By law the two lane positions are correct, The first position to the right resulted in at least one close pass with a cargo van.
The second lane position to the left, yields better results in my opinion. The person who is subject to death and injury.
This is a good example of why a cyclist may choose to use the law and move to the left to communicate to the motorists that this is a narrow lane and a motorist will need to use a portion of the left lane to overtake the cyclist as the video shows, and provide better visibility for the motorists.
The camera angle is offset by 11 inches to the right from the starting point of the left handle bars

Quote:
Originally Posted by noisebeam View Post
I ride thru there sometimes. Gotta love the river crossing.
Yea nothing like riding on a river bed, and much better than Alma School. I get to do this twice a week it just opened back up.
wheel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-09, 02:04 PM   #11
noisebeam
Al
 
noisebeam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: AZ
Bikes: Cannondale SuperSix, Lemond Poprad. Retired: Jamis Sputnik, Centurion LeMans Fixed, Diamond Back ascent ex
Posts: 14,109
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 71 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by wheel View Post

A shareable lane with a bicycle and a truck is defined as a having a width of more than 13 feet. In this video there is a narrow lane ( less than 13 feet) present.
Is it, where? A sharable lane (to me) is one that I choose to share. Under a range of circumstances (speeds, traffic, road surface, road edge design, type of vehicle passing, etc.) it may be less than 13' or more than 13'

Al
noisebeam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-09, 02:16 PM   #12
wheel
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
wheel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Crystal MN
Bikes:
Posts: 2,147
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by noisebeam View Post
Is it, where? A sharable lane (to me) is one that I choose to share. Under a range of circumstances (speeds, traffic, road surface, road edge design, type of vehicle passing, etc.) it may be less than 13' or more than 13'

Al
edited thank you.
"In this video there is a narrow lane present which the motorists needs to use a portion of the left lane to overtake a cyclist with three feet of clearance."

Last edited by wheel; 03-26-09 at 02:42 PM.
wheel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-09, 04:35 PM   #13
Bekologist
totally louche
 
Bekologist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: A land that time forgot
Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes
Posts: 18,025
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
i'd think 'as far right as practicable' protects all lane positions along that road. heck, it would for me.

I'm with noisebeam, if the lanes not safe enough to try and share, I'm going to control the lane until it becomes impossible for me to control. you'll know you've bitten off more road than you can control when the cars start passing you on YOUR right.

Last edited by Bekologist; 03-26-09 at 04:40 PM.
Bekologist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-09, 04:37 PM   #14
Bekologist
totally louche
 
Bekologist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: A land that time forgot
Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes
Posts: 18,025
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by wheel View Post

FYI I missed the green light and was the first one at the stop light.
I've gotten honked at twice this week on the commute being first one at the stoplight and controlling the lane after the light (at 20mph plus off the christmas tree....)
Bekologist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-09, 04:58 PM   #15
GrotonPaul
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Massachusetts
Bikes: Serotta Fierte Steel
Posts: 97
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Ok, help me out here. It's hard to judge, but in the beginning of the video you appear to be at least 2 if not 3 feet off the fog line. About 20 seconds in you can see your front tire. On a road like this I like to sit about 6 inches from the fog line, I generally get at least 3 feet of clearance from cars. When I take a lane, there is no doubt as I sit over the half way point of the lane. To me 3 feet off the fog line is too far over on a busy street but not far enough to claim the lane.
GrotonPaul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-09, 05:57 PM   #16
ROJA
Pepperoni Power
 
ROJA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Oaklandish
Bikes:
Posts: 1,666
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
It all depends on the circumstances. I have had drivers buzz me closer while taking the lane (two lanes each direction) than while riding all the way to the right.
ROJA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-09, 08:11 PM   #17
wheel
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
wheel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Crystal MN
Bikes:
Posts: 2,147
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by GrotonPaul View Post
Ok, help me out here. It's hard to judge, but in the beginning of the video you appear to be at least 2 if not 3 feet off the fog line. About 20 seconds in you can see your front tire. On a road like this I like to sit about 6 inches from the fog line, I generally get at least 3 feet of clearance from cars. When I take a lane, there is no doubt as I sit over the half way point of the lane. To me 3 feet off the fog line is too far over on a busy street but not far enough to claim the lane.
those are the left handle bars.
I have the camera center position. I am riding a lot closer to the fog line more like less than a foot as I see all the traffic coming I then inch my way left. I don't think I ever got more than 32 inches to the left.
wheel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-09, 07:07 AM   #18
nvincent
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NY
Bikes: Trek 800 MTB, Ross Shark
Posts: 154
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
It looked to me like they were passing at a reasonable distance. But at those speeds, cars passing by can still be rattling and unnerving to a cyclist. I don't know if I would feel safer taking the lane, though. Motorists don't always expect to see cyclists on the road. Some speeding motorists might not notice you until it's too late.
nvincent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-09, 08:59 AM   #19
ChipSeal
www.chipsea.blogspot.com
 
ChipSeal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: South of Dallas, Texas
Bikes: Giant OCR C0 road
Posts: 1,026
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by nvincent View Post
... Some speeding motorists might not notice you until it's too late.
To be seen at a distance, and securing the motorist's attention, is precisely why taking the lane makes this situation safer.

A distracted or speeding motorist will unconsciously dismiss a shoulder or fog line cyclist as a hazard because he is "out of the way". But when the cyclist is in the middle of the lane (In the way) the motorist's subconscious throws a red flag and draws full attention to "the hazard".

A centered in the lane cyclist is instantaneously understood to be a slow moving obstruction that must be contended with- either slowing to his speed or altering the path of the car. A large object in their lane is never overlooked.

Take peek at this video and notice the behavior of the overtaking vehicles. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0B18P...e=channel_page

On high speed roads, being in the way is safer than being out of the way.
ChipSeal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-09, 09:39 AM   #20
I-Like-To-Bike
Been Around Awhile
 
I-Like-To-Bike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Posts: 23,692
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChipSeal View Post
To be seen at a distance, and securing the motorist's attention, is precisely why taking the lane makes this situation safer.

A distracted or speeding motorist will unconsciously dismiss a shoulder or fog line cyclist as a hazard because he is "out of the way". But when the cyclist is in the middle of the lane (In the way) the motorist's subconscious throws a red flag and draws full attention to "the hazard".

A centered in the lane cyclist is instantaneously understood to be a slow moving obstruction that must be contended with- either slowing to his speed or altering the path of the car. A large object in their lane is never overlooked.

On high speed roads, being in the way is safer than being out of the way.
Do you have an advanced degree in pop psychology or did you just make up your findings all by yourself?

Are you seriously claiming that a cyclist centered in the lane on any high speed highway is at less risk of a catastrophic event than a cyclist riding on a paved parallel shoulder of the same road?

Does this incredible premise (presumably based on your assumptions stated above) apply at all hours, all weather conditions, and at any volume of traffic? If not, what conditions have to be met for your claim to be "true"?
I-Like-To-Bike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-09, 09:42 AM   #21
10 Wheels
Galveston County Texas
 
10 Wheels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: In The Wind
Bikes: 2010 Expedition, 03 GTO
Posts: 29,639
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 215 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike View Post
Do you have an advanced degree in pop psychology or did you just make up your findings all by yourself? Are you claiming that a cyclist centered in the lane on any high speed highway is at less risk of a catastrophic event than a cyclist riding on a paved parallel shoulder of the same road? Does this incredible premise (presumably based on your assumptions stated above) apply at all hours, all weather conditions, and at any volume of traffic? If not, what conditions have to be met for your claim to be "true"?
Why don't you try it and report back.
Thanks
__________________
[SIZE=1][B]What I like about Texas[/B]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PGukLuXzH1E

Set F1re To The Ra1n ( NY Night Rain Ride)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W7jfcWEkSrI
10 Wheels is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-09, 09:47 AM   #22
Bekologist
totally louche
 
Bekologist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: A land that time forgot
Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes
Posts: 18,025
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChipSeal View Post

On high speed roads, being in the way is safer than being out of the way.
that's suuch a fallacious generalization.... I'm going to have to call "Bulshevit"
Bekologist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-09, 02:39 PM   #23
Bioflamingo
Bike Collector
 
Bioflamingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Kansas
Bikes: 91 Diamond Back Apex, 77 Raleigh Grand Prix
Posts: 323
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I live several miles outside of town, and the road to town has NO shoulder. In fact, once you cross the white line it's a 4 inch drop straight down. I try not to ride my bike on it because it is so dangerous. However, I see other cyclists go down it frequently.

When they ride on the white line, cars barely move over. If one of them even barely brushed the cyclist they would go over the edge and rolling into the ditch. The road is narrow, and sometimes you'll have two drivers passing each other at the same point where the cyclist is. Usually this results in much honking and screaming that can be heard from several cars back.

When they ride in the lane, cars will go completely into the other lane to pass them. If there is a car coming from the other direction, they will stop and let them pass, then go around the cyclist. I have yet to hear or see anyone honk in this situation.

The speed limit is 45 mph, but the lack of law enforcement on this stretch of road means cars frequently top 65 mph. When I do ride down this road, I make sure I'm dead center in the lane, just like a regular vehicle.

It really pushes the law though. Technically, you're supposed to ride as far to the right as possible. However, when a car passes a cyclist, stalled car, pedestrian, etc, they are supposed to go completely into the other lane to do so. They never do this unless you take up the whole lane yourself. So I use the defense that I'm breaking the law to ensure that other people follow it, plus I'm attempting to spare myself unnecessary pain and injuries.
Bioflamingo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-09, 05:31 PM   #24
njkayaker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 9,503
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 78 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChipSeal View Post
On high speed roads, being in the way is safer than being out of the way.
This is why I just stop in the middle of the highway lane when I need to change a flat, have a picnic, etc!

Anyway, given that the "shoulder" looks like some gnarly dirt riding, I don't see that what the guy did in the video as anything unreasonable.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bioflamingo View Post
Technically, you're supposed to ride as far to the right as possible.
It's not "as far to the right as possible". It's "as far to the right as practicable". The law allows you to take the conditions into account. (You'd think that bicyclists would understand this (whether or not they agree with FRAP)).

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bioflamingo View Post
However, when a car passes a cyclist, stalled car, pedestrian, etc, they are supposed to go completely into the other lane to do so.
Do you have a reference for this (regarding Kansas law)?

Last edited by njkayaker; 03-28-09 at 05:37 PM.
njkayaker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-09, 05:46 PM   #25
ChipSeal
www.chipsea.blogspot.com
 
ChipSeal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: South of Dallas, Texas
Bikes: Giant OCR C0 road
Posts: 1,026
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bioflamingo View Post
It really pushes the law though. Technically, you're supposed to ride as far to the right as possible. However, when a car passes a cyclist, stalled car, pedestrian, etc, they are supposed to go completely into the other lane to do so. They never do this unless you take up the whole lane yourself. So I use the defense that I'm breaking the law to ensure that other people follow it, plus I'm attempting to spare myself unnecessary pain and injuries.
Actually, Kansas conforms to most far to the right laws in that is says "practicable" not possible. Secondly, one of the listed exceptions is "narrow width lanes". Kansas law grants you the right to take the lane in the very circumstances you describe.


Quote:
8-1590. Riding on bicycles or mopeds; riding on roadways and bicycle paths.
(Bicyclists must ride to the right)

(a) Every person operating a bicycle or a moped upon a roadway at less than the normal speed of traffic at the time and place and under the conditions then existing shall ride as near to the right side of the roadway as practicable, except under any of the following situations when:

(1) Overtaking and passing another bicycle or vehicle proceeding in the same direction;

(2) preparing for a left turn at an intersection or into a private road or driveway; or

(3) reasonably necessary to avoid conditions including, but not limited to, fixed or moving objects, parked or moving bicycles, bicycles, pedestrians, animals, surface hazards or narrow width lanes that make it unsafe to continue along the right-hand edge of the roadway.
ChipSeal is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:47 PM.