Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-11-09, 09:02 PM   #1
Fissile
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Fissile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 533
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Typical Jersey Corruption

I think only the States of Alabama and Mississippi are more corrupt. Anyway, the state has been building a bike path that runs along the Hudson from the George Washington Bridge to the Bayonne Bridge (18.5 miles total length) IT'S BEEN 20 YEARS AND THE BIKE PATH IS STILL NOT COMPLETED. I've been looking forward to riding this thing for years. Even NYC isn't this bad. NYC managed to build a bike path from the George down to the Battery in less then 10 years. I hope all the people responsible get kidnapped by Somali pirates. Bunch of ******-bags.

---------------------------------

Kelly: Hudson River Walkway is far from finished
Sunday, June 22, 2008

Last updated: Thursday October 16, 2008, 1:28 PM

It seemed like such a fine idea: Build a walkway along 18.5 miles of Hudson River waterfront in Bergen and Hudson counties.

A continuous path stretching from the concrete and steel of the George Washington Bridge to the concrete and steel of Bayonne.

If New York City could do it along its Hudson waterfront, why not New Jersey?

But that was 1988, and time has a way of eroding our best intentions.

On what should be its 20th anniversary, New Jersey’s Hudson River Walkway is far from finished.

Why?

Answering that question is hardly simple. But a wide array of government officials point to a fundamental problem:

The state law, calling for the waterfront walkway, never put one government agency or even one developer in charge.

To save tax money, New Jersey left the building of the walkway to scores of waterfront property owners.

“A walkway by committee,” as one critic put it. Or as Scott Brubaker, chief of the state Bureau of Coastal and Land Use Compliance and Enforcement, noted: “That’s probably the single largest reason why certain segments of the walkway have not been built yet.”

Two decades ago, the idea seemed simple enough, even inspired: Each owner or developer would build a section of walkway following common specifications — a 30-foot-wide space that includes 16 feet of walking pathway, bordered by 14 feet of grass or shrubs. Over time, each piece would be linked, akin to hooking together freight cars in a long train.

But some owners delayed building anything — and are now targets of state investigations. Then, some property owners built classy-looking pathways, with landscaped gardens, lighting and brickwork. Others took a cheaper way out and, in some cases, installed paths that are far narrower than the state guidelines.

The result is an uneven waterfront walkway, with nettlesome, trash-strewn gaps — and no firm date on when everything will be completed.

By contrast, New York City took less than a decade to finish its Hudson River walkway, from the George Washington Bridge to the Battery. But New York’s path had one builder — the city.

“Right now, New York is putting us to shame,” said Peggy Wong, a board member of the non-profit Hudson River Conservancy and one of the walkway’s most stalwart proponents. “It’s horrifying what we’re doing here.”

Eleven of the 18.5 miles of walkway are finished, according to the state Department of Environmental Protection. Several stretches are even considered civic gems. In Hoboken, for example, a new harbor promenade, built on the site of run-down docks that were the backdrop to the movie “On the Waterfront,” now lures thousands of residents on summer weekends.

But Hoboken is an exception.

On at least 5.5 miles of the waterfront elsewhere, the DEP became so frustrated with foot-dragging by developers that it redrew its walkway maps and allowed the “path” to run inland, along city streets and sidewalks.

Civic activists have complained. But little has changed.

“The worst-case scenario is that residents will give up and say there is nothing we can do,” said Helen Manogue, president of the waterfront conservancy.

Some of the most nagging problems begin in North Bergen and stretch into Edgewater and its 3-mile sliver of Bergen County waterfront.

With its expansive views of Manhattan, Edgewater has long been a magnet for condominium developers and investors. But amid such potential beauty — and money — are some of the walkway’s most formidable obstacles.

Behind a shopping center near Edgewater’s defunct Binghamton Ferry restaurant, a narrow portion of the walkway dead-ends into a set of trash Dumpsters and a chain-link fence. Beyond the fence sits an oil tank farm.

Farther south, near a Japanese steakhouse, the path dead-ends into another chain-link fence.

From there, the path winds around a golf driving range and enters an uninterrupted stretch popular with joggers and walkers. But after two miles, the path ends — at a toxic waste dump.

Just south of the dump sits the former site of the Unilever research plant. The 23-acre tract, vacant for several years because of litigation, is slated to become Edgewater’s newest development — and the site of the borough’s new municipal center and another section of the waterfront walkway.

But even if that section of walkway is completed, several other parcels of land just to the south have no walkway. In once case, land for the walkway fell into the Hudson.

“It’s ridiculous,” said Jill Kleinman, an Edgewater resident and walkway proponent. “The last thing they seem to think about when they sell properties is whether we will have a walkway.”

On a recent morning, Frank Petrucci, a 26-year-old independent filmmaker, left his Edgewater apartment for a run on the waterfront path.

He selected a northbound route — and actually jogged unencumbered for more than a mile. But then, he ran into a marina and a series of fences.

Petrucci turned around and headed home.

“You can’t beat it,” he said.

But he was commenting of the view of the Hudson River and Manhattan.

Looking at the pathway he had just jogged, Petrucci shook his head and smiled.

“When I run, I give myself a little obstacle course,” he said.

http://www.northjersey.com/environme...tml?c=y&page=1
Fissile is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-09, 12:56 PM   #2
vinfix
Steel80's
 
vinfix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: NJ
Bikes: Bianchi Pista, Zebra fixie, Breezer Venturi, Breezer Lightning Pro
Posts: 535
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
I think the point of the story is that no one was ultimately responsible, which is why it didn't get done, so your rant about pirates is not only harsh but misplaced. I did not see anything in the article suggesting corruption ( as in bribery, back-door deals, no show jobs, the typical NJ stuff) but it did give a pretty good picture of what the environment is. Like most of that part of NJ, the inside of a PortoJohn.

It sounds like the state mandated this path on private property. As a NJ resident myself, I am against the idea that the state can tell you what to do with your property, let alone requiring public access or some standard of what a walkway should be.

Last edited by vinfix; 04-14-09 at 12:59 PM.
vinfix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-09, 02:14 PM   #3
Fissile
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Fissile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 533
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by vinfix View Post
I think the point of the story is that no one was ultimately responsible, which is why it didn't get done, so your rant about pirates is not only harsh but misplaced. I did not see anything in the article suggesting corruption ( as in bribery, back-door deals, no show jobs, the typical NJ stuff) but it did give a pretty good picture of what the environment is. Like most of that part of NJ, the inside of a PortoJohn.

It sounds like the state mandated this path on private property. As a NJ resident myself, I am against the idea that the state can tell you what to do with your property, let alone requiring public access or some standard of what a walkway should be.
Nothing suggesting corruption? Have you ever lived in North Bergen or Edgewater? Both of those towns are as corrupt as the day is long. Dude, what have you been huffing?

The law is clear, you can not block public access to tidal water ways. It may seem draconian to require property owners to build and maintain a publicly accessible pedestrian path adjacent to their property, but you're not talking about mom & pop and a split level. These properties are owned by mega-big-bucks real estate developers. We're talking multi-squillion dollar developments being constructed next to the river. I checked out some of these places, small town houses, with a one car garage, start at over a million. Is it too much to ask these fat-cats to cough up $20K for some damn asphalt?

You can now go back to listening to Rush and Sean.
Fissile is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-09, 07:32 AM   #4
vinfix
Steel80's
 
vinfix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: NJ
Bikes: Bianchi Pista, Zebra fixie, Breezer Venturi, Breezer Lightning Pro
Posts: 535
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
I'll take your word for it that the local government is corrupt, I see no mention of that in the article you cited. It looks to me like the state screwed it up (no surprise there) and developers obviously can't be trusted to "do the right thing" on their own and build you a bike path.

Just because someone disagrees with your opinion doesn't mean they sniff glue or listen to right-wing haters. My radio is set to NPR, thank you.
vinfix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-09, 07:55 AM   #5
redtires
Extra Medium Member
 
redtires's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Louisville, Co
Bikes: Arcalis Andorra 01 custom build, Specialized Stumpy
Posts: 1,824
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
oh...that kind of jersey...lol
__________________
I like bikes.
redtires is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-09, 04:14 PM   #6
Fissile
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Fissile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 533
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by vinfix View Post
I'll take your word for it that the local government is corrupt, I see no mention of that in the article you cited. It looks to me like the state screwed it up (no surprise there) and developers obviously can't be trusted to "do the right thing" on their own and build you a bike path.

Just because someone disagrees with your opinion doesn't mean they sniff glue or listen to right-wing haters. My radio is set to NPR, thank you.
You may not be sniffing glue, or listening to the shills of corporate kleptocracy, but you sure are naive. The state didn't screw anything up, it's just as crooked as the damn developers. A number of developers wanted to block public access to the waterfront, in violation of the law. The state "plan" of requiring developers to build the riverside walkway was nothing but a giveaway of public access rights to real estate fat cats. The "plan" did not specify any penalties, fines or sanctions for nonperformance. In other words, they were told to build the walkway, and if they didn't comply, they were told again in a real mean voice.

BULLSH1T!

Last edited by Fissile; 04-20-09 at 06:10 PM.
Fissile is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-09, 07:53 PM   #7
Fast Cloud
Senior Member
 
Fast Cloud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Bikes:
Posts: 645
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fissile View Post
I think only the States of Alabama and Mississippi are more corrupt.

Oh please...We can't touch Illinois. But I do sympathize with your situation.
Fast Cloud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-09, 11:16 AM   #8
Izengabe
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: NYC
Bikes:
Posts: 67
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Wow, disfuntional governement in NJ! There's a shock.

Although judging by th opening rant I was expecting some reference to Soprano characters soemwhere in the article!
Izengabe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-09, 08:24 PM   #9
hunyak
Senior Junior Member
 
hunyak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NJ
Bikes: Cannondale, Trek
Posts: 68
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Corruption you ask?

Have you ever watched the "Sopranos"?

It's not fiction, it's reality here in the garden state. Paulie gets a big fat envelope and kicks a percentage of it up to Tony...
hunyak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-09, 07:37 AM   #10
pueblonative
Senior Member
 
pueblonative's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Pueblo, CO
Bikes: Roadmaster 26 Men's Mountain Bike
Posts: 249
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I wouldn't take that as corruption so much as incompetency and laziness.
pueblonative is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-09, 07:39 AM   #11
Fissile
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Fissile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 533
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by pueblonative View Post
I wouldn't take that as corruption so much as incompetency and laziness.
Jersey politicians are never incompetent or lazy when it comes to lining their own pockets.

I was really looking forward to this path. A rider would have been able to start on the Jersey side at the George Washington Bridge, ride south to the Bayonne Bridge and into Staten Island, ride to the Staten Island Ferry, take the ferry to the Battery, and ride the Greenway in Manhattan up to the George and back over to Jersey. Total about 40 miles and most of on paths free of kamikaze cabs and tweeked up truckers.

Last edited by Fissile; 04-26-09 at 08:13 AM.
Fissile is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:52 PM.