Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-30-09, 03:25 PM   #1
randya
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
randya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: in bed with your mom
Bikes: who cares?
Posts: 13,689
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Portland Changes Mind on Location of Cycle Track

So the Fire Bureau nixed the previous location. Note that in the new location right turns are not possible - it abuts a limited-access university campus on the west or right side - so there are no real hooking hazards (except from University personnel). This may in fact be one of the few locations in Portland where a facility like this does make sense.

Let's just hope the city doesn't extrapolate the results to other locations with much, much higher 'hooking' risks.

I still think this is largely a political move to appease a certain dutch-o-phile constituency Adams made promises to during the election cycle.


http://bikeportland.org/2009/04/30/a...o-sw-broadway/




Last edited by randya; 04-30-09 at 03:31 PM.
randya is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-09, 04:00 PM   #2
noisebeam
Al
 
noisebeam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: AZ
Bikes: Cannondale SuperSix, Lemond Poprad. Retired: Jamis Sputnik, Centurion LeMans Fixed, Diamond Back ascent ex
Posts: 14,112
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 388 Post(s)
So it's OK for university personnel, the confused, lost or those drivers looking (perhaps unsuccessfully) for a short cut to potentially right hook cyclists? Thinking there is no right hook hazard when there is still one, even if less, is possibly more risky than being alert to the possibility when the likelihood is higher.

Are there also left turns along this stretch? If so will cyclists be allowed to use the primary travel lanes instead (or not because bike lane use is mandatory?)

Is 3' sufficient shy zone?

Who has the right of way, pedestrians traveling to/from vehicles crossing path to/from sidewalk or cyclists? Are there effectively unmarked crosswalks between each car door and the sidewalk?

Last edited by noisebeam; 04-30-09 at 04:07 PM.
noisebeam is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-09, 04:37 PM   #3
randya
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
randya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: in bed with your mom
Bikes: who cares?
Posts: 13,689
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
^^all good points. Personally, I think pedestrians in the cycle track ROW are going to be a big problem, they will probably congregate in it waiting for the light to change to cross the street, and use it as an extension of the sidewalk. And I beleive use of the primary travel lanes for left turns will be a questionable legal maneuver, since Oregon has a mandatory side path law, ORS 814.420.
randya is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-09, 04:45 PM   #4
Blue Order
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 7,282
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by randya View Post
And I beleive use of the primary travel lanes for left turns will be a questionable legal maneuver, since Oregon has a mandatory side path law, ORS 814.420.
Not applicable for a left-turning cyclist.
Blue Order is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-09, 04:53 PM   #5
noisebeam
Al
 
noisebeam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: AZ
Bikes: Cannondale SuperSix, Lemond Poprad. Retired: Jamis Sputnik, Centurion LeMans Fixed, Diamond Back ascent ex
Posts: 14,112
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 388 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue Order View Post
Not applicable for a left-turning cyclist.
How soon can one become a left turning cyclist?

If there are only limited and difficult (as it can't be merge, but a sharp left) opportunities to move from the cycle track to the primary travel lanes, would it be acceptable to use the primary travel lanes for this entire stretch even if the left turn is toward the end of it?

Or another way of saying this is can one pass a possible left turn while using the primary travel lanes and not be considered a non-left turning cyclist?
noisebeam is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-09, 05:16 PM   #6
Blue Order
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 7,282
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by noisebeam View Post
How soon can one become a left turning cyclist?

If there are only limited and difficult (as it can't be merge, but a sharp left) opportunities to move from the cycle track to the primary travel lanes, would it be acceptable to use the primary travel lanes for this entire stretch even if the left turn is toward the end of it?

Or another way of saying this is can one pass a possible left turn while using the primary travel lanes and not be considered a non-left turning cyclist?
The standard is always going to be the "reasonable person" standard. The question then is "what would a reasonable person do in the same circumstance?"

The statute says you can leave the bike lane to "prepare" for a left turn. What distance would be necessary for the "reasonable person" to "prepare" to make that left turn? If there are only limited opportunities to leave the cycle track, then a reasonable person would need (at least) the distance from where one can first leave the cycletrack to where one can turn.

Of course, there's nothing in the law that says you can't turn left by first crossing the intersection and then repositioning yourself to cross again, in the direction you want to go.
Blue Order is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-09, 05:50 PM   #7
randya
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
randya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: in bed with your mom
Bikes: who cares?
Posts: 13,689
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue Order View Post
Not applicable for a left-turning cyclist.
leaving a cycle track to make a left turn is a whole lot different than leaving a bike lane to make a left turn; it's kind of hard to get from the cycle track to the left turn lane with all those parked cars in the way, eh?
randya is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-09, 05:54 PM   #8
Blue Order
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 7,282
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by randya View Post
leaving a cycle track to make a left turn is a whole lot different than leaving a bike lane to make a left turn; it's kind of hard to get from the cycle track to the left turn lane with all those parked cars in the way, eh?
Perhaps, but there's nothing "legally qquestionable" about making a left turn from outside of the bike lane.

I'm not really too worried about it. Turning left would only require crossing the intersection, then turning left.
Blue Order is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-09, 05:55 PM   #9
randya
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
randya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: in bed with your mom
Bikes: who cares?
Posts: 13,689
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I don't see why they just don't remove all of the parking on the west side of the street, then there would be a 15' wide bike lane with clear access to the adjacent travel lanes to make left turning maneuvers. 7' + 3' buffer is not a whole lot of space for cyclists, similar objections regarding how narrow the proposed cycle track is were raised w/r/t the earlier NW Park blocks proposal.
randya is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-09, 05:56 PM   #10
randya
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
randya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: in bed with your mom
Bikes: who cares?
Posts: 13,689
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue Order View Post
Perhaps, but there's nothing "legally qquestionable" about making a left turn from outside of the bike lane.

I'm not really too worried about it. Turning left would only require crossing the intersection, then turning left.
you're not really making any sense at all here, maybe a picture would help?
randya is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-09, 06:00 PM   #11
Blue Order
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 7,282
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by randya View Post
I don't see why they just don't remove all of the parking on the west side of the street, then there would be a 15' wide bike lane with clear access to the adjacent travel lanes to make left turning maneuvers. 7' + 3' buffer is not a whole lot of space for cyclists, similar objections regarding how narrow the proposed cycle track is were raised w/r/t the earlier NW Park blocks proposal.
I agree, too much of our road space is dedicated to storing automobiles. If they were off the streets, there'd be a lot of space freed up for other modes of travel.

Doesn't mean I have the same objection to parking bikes on the public way, mind.
Blue Order is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-09, 06:04 PM   #12
Blue Order
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 7,282
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by randya View Post
you're not really making any sense at all here, maybe a picture would help?
I can't draw, doubly so with tech.

What I mean is instead of getting in the left lane to turn left, just proceeding straight across the intersection, stopping on the other side, then reorienting yourself so you're facing in the direction you wanted to turn, and proceeding straight across the intersection. What do they call that, the "Copenhagen left" or something like that? Anyway, if a cycletrack made a traditional left turn more difficult, I'd just do the above.
Blue Order is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-09, 06:05 PM   #13
randya
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
randya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: in bed with your mom
Bikes: who cares?
Posts: 13,689
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
that's a two step left turn. TriMet is recommending it for bikes on the new bus mall. It can be done, but I would not exactly call it 'bike friendly'.

but I suppose since the motorists can't do it, we're either one up on them or 'special'


Last edited by randya; 04-30-09 at 10:23 PM.
randya is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-09, 08:37 PM   #14
dirtyhippy
<~>
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: MSP
Bikes:
Posts: 147
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I would be concerned with the cleanliness of this line. It seems to me that it could easily get cluttered and become unfit for riding, especially if cars do not regularly travel down it.
dirtyhippy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-09, 09:05 AM   #15
noisebeam
Al
 
noisebeam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: AZ
Bikes: Cannondale SuperSix, Lemond Poprad. Retired: Jamis Sputnik, Centurion LeMans Fixed, Diamond Back ascent ex
Posts: 14,112
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 388 Post(s)
What or how will the light be triggered the light if a two step is done?

Who decides what of the choices is reasonable?

If one can't take the safe and practical choice and down the entire stretch in the primary travel lanes with confidence that it is considered reasonable by all law enforcement then the only reasonable choice would be to avoid this cycle tracked street.
noisebeam is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-09, 10:04 AM   #16
Blue Order
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 7,282
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by dirtyhippy View Post
I would be concerned with the cleanliness
Since when has a dirty hippy been concerned with cleanliness?

Blue Order is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-09, 12:17 PM   #17
chriswnw
biking and fighting!
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Portland, OR
Bikes:
Posts: 247
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
I am glad they are no longer planning to destroy Park and 9th with this thing, although I don't expect the results of the new plan will be much better. I guess we can view it as a "pilot project" that will display the virtues or faults of the cycle track concept in a North American setting. I of course predict that it will be far more problematic than advantageous. Hopefully people will pay attention to the results.

We already know that bike boulevards *do* work here, and wish we would stick with that solution rather than engaging in this Euro-fetishism. Park and 9th, which isn't commonly used as a thoroughfare for cars anyway, would actually work really well as a north-south bike boulevard -- improve the crossings (especially around Burnside), remove the parking, and put in a few barriers to prevent it from being used as a through street for automobiles. People who don't like biking in even the relatively slow traffic of downtown could lock up on the bike boulevard and walk the rest of the way to their destination.
chriswnw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-09, 02:31 PM   #18
RobertHurst
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Denver
Bikes:
Posts: 1,621
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
With the three-foot 'shy zone' still in place, bicyclists on the inside edge of the track will still be surprised by occasional car doors thrown open by passengers who reasonably expect not to door anyone when throwing open their doors. Still seems like a serious liability no-no for the city.
RobertHurst is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-09, 03:09 PM   #19
noisebeam
Al
 
noisebeam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: AZ
Bikes: Cannondale SuperSix, Lemond Poprad. Retired: Jamis Sputnik, Centurion LeMans Fixed, Diamond Back ascent ex
Posts: 14,112
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 388 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobertHurst View Post
With the three-foot 'shy zone' still in place, bicyclists on the inside edge of the track will still be surprised by occasional car doors thrown open by passengers who reasonably expect not to door anyone when throwing open their doors. Still seems like a serious liability no-no for the city.
That's what I thought as well, note also the elevation view (in Randya's OP) shows two cyclists side by side on the cycle track - and considering that cyclists may keep wheels within white lines, but have their body/bike hang over the left white line. There is also no physical barrier preventing some vehicles to be parked right up against or even slightly over the left side line of the shy zone.

The narrow space that is the shy zone is very limited for pedestrians when loading/unloading vehicles - especially those with disabilities, with baby strollers, etc.

Al
noisebeam is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:37 PM.