Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    __________ seeker333's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    2,669
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Shocking news: driving while texting super risky

    Especially for the meat pylons.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/28/te...28texting.html

    July 28, 2009
    In Study, Texting Lifts Crash Risk by Large Margin
    By MATT RICHTEL

    The first study of drivers texting inside their vehicles shows that the risk sharply exceeds previous estimates based on laboratory research — and far surpasses the dangers of other driving distractions.

    The new study, which entailed outfitting the cabs of long-haul trucks with video cameras over 18 months, found that when the drivers texted, their collision risk was 23 times greater than when not texting.

    The Virginia Tech Transportation Institute, which compiled the research and plans to release its findings on Tuesday, also measured the time drivers took their eyes from the road to send or receive texts.

    In the moments before a crash or near crash, drivers typically spent nearly five seconds looking at their devices — enough time at typical highway speeds to cover more than the length of a football field.

    Even though trucks take longer to stop and are less maneuverable than cars, the findings generally applied to all drivers, who tend to exhibit the same behaviors as the more than 100 truckers studied, the researchers said. Truckers, they said, do not appear to text more or less than typical car drivers, but they said the study did not compare use patterns that way.

    Compared with other sources of driver distraction, “texting is in its own universe of risk,” said Rich Hanowski, who oversaw the study at the institute.

    Mr. Hanowski said the texting analysis was financed by $300,000 from the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, which has the mission of improving safety in trucks and buses. More broadly, the research yielding the results represent a significant logistical undertaking.

    The overall cost was $6 million to equip the trucks with video cameras and track them for three million miles as they hauled furniture, frozen foods and other goods across the country.

    The final analysis of the data is undergoing peer review before formal publication.

    Tom Dingus, director of the Virginia Tech institute, one of the world’s largest vehicle safety research organizations, said the study’s message was clear.

    “You should never do this,” he said of texting while driving. “It should be illegal.”

    Thirty-six states do not ban texting while driving; 14 do, including Alaska, California, Louisiana and New Jersey. New York legislators have sent a bill to Gov. David A. Paterson. But legislators in some states have rejected such rules, and elected officials say they need more data to determine whether to ban the activity.

    One difficulty in measuring crashes caused by texting drivers — and by drivers talking on phones — is that many police agencies do not collect this data or have not compiled long-term studies. Texting also is a relatively new phenomenon.

    The issue has drawn attention after several recent highly publicized crashes caused by texting drivers, including an episode in May involving a trolley car driver in Boston who crashed while texting his girlfriend.

    Over all, texting has soared. In December, phone users in the United States sent 110 billion messages, a tenfold increase in just three years, according to the cellular phone industry’s trade group, CTIA.

    The results of the Virginia Tech study are buttressed by new laboratory research from the University of Utah. In a study over the last 18 months, college students using a sophisticated driving simulator showed an eight times greater crash risk when texting than when not texting.

    That study, which is undergoing peer review and has been submitted for publication in The Journal for Human Factors, also found that drivers took their eyes off the road for around five seconds when texting.

    David Strayer, a professor who co-wrote the University of Utah report, offered two explanations for the simulator’s showing lower risks than the Virginia study. Trucks are tougher to maneuver and stop, he noted, and the college students in his study might be somewhat better at multitasking.

    But the differences in the studies are not the point, Mr. Strayer said. “You’re off the charts in both cases,” he added. “It’s crazy to be doing it.”

    At Virginia Tech, researchers said they focused on texting among truckers simply because the trucking study was relatively new and thus better reflected the explosive growth of texting. But another new study from the organization is focusing on texting among so-called light-vehicle drivers, specifically teenagers.

    Preliminary results from that study show risk levels for texters roughly comparable to those of the truck drivers. The formal results of the light-vehicle study should be available later this year. By comparison, several field and laboratory studies show that drivers talking on cellphones are four times more likely to cause a crash than other drivers. And a previous Virginia institute study videotaping car drivers found that they were three times more likely to crash or come close to a crash when dialing a phone and 1.3 times more likely when talking on it.

    Researchers focused on distracted driving disagree about whether to place greater value on the results of such a so-called naturalistic study or laboratory studies, which allow the scientists to recreate conditions and measure individual drivers against themselves.

    But, in the case of texting, laboratory and real-world researchers say the results are significant — from both scientific methodologies, texting represents a much greater risk to drivers than other distractions.

    A new poll shows that many drivers know the risks of texting while driving — and do it anyway. The AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety plans on Tuesday to publish polling data that show that 87 percent of people consider drivers texting or e-mailing to pose a “very serious” safety threat (roughly equal to the 90 percent who consider drunken drivers a threat).

    Of the 2,501 drivers surveyed this spring, 95 percent said that texting was unacceptable behavior. Yet 21 percent of drivers said they had recently texted or e-mailed while driving.

    About half of drivers 16 to 24 said they had texted while driving, compared with 22 percent of drivers 35 to 44.

    “It’s convenient,” said Robert Smith, 22, a recent college graduate in Windham, Me. He says he regularly texts and drives even though he recognizes that it is a serious risk. He would rather text, he said, than take time on a phone call.

    “I put the phone on top of the steering wheel and text with both thumbs,” he said, adding that he often has exchanges of 10 messages or more. Sometimes, “I’ll look up and realize there’s a car sitting there and swerve around it.”

    Mr. Smith, who was not part of the AAA survey, said he was surprised by the findings in the new research about texting.

    “I’m pretty sure that someday it’s going to come back to bite me,” he said of his behavior.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Leeds UK
    Posts
    1,893
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    More studies are needed
    We're waiting for more information
    We don't believe that the dangers have been properly assessed
    And anyway, I drive better when I've had a few

  3. #3
    Al noisebeam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    AZ
    My Bikes
    Cannondale SuperSix, Lemond Poprad. Retired: Jamis Sputnik, Centurion LeMans Fixed, Diamond Back ascent ex
    Posts
    13,907
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

  4. #4
    feros ferio John E's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Location
    www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
    My Bikes
    1959 Capo; 1980 Peugeot PKN-10; 1981 Bianchi; 1988 Schwinn KOM-10;
    Posts
    14,784
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Vehicular manslaughter while texting should be punished as second-degree murder.
    "Early to bed, early to rise. Work like hell, and advertise." -- George Stahlman
    Capo [dschaw'-poe]: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger, S/N 42624
    Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
    Bianchi: 1981 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
    Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069

  5. #5
    Ovdabak, OR DArthurBrown's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Oregon
    My Bikes
    2008 Mercier Corvus Steel, 2007 Trek 4300, ~1980 Takara Deluxe 12, 1985 Trek 620 (modernized)
    Posts
    494
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Just yesterday a fellow cyclist got hit by a texter-driver about 50 yards in front of me. His head came down like a hammer against her windshield. His helmet dented and shattered. His bike was scrap. His wrist was broken (we think), and he had a nasty gash on his leg.

    The texter, a 17-year old girl, at first denied she was texting, but I and another driver saw that she was.

    Two morals here: Texter-drivers are idiots, and bike helmets save lives.

  6. #6
    High Roller
    Guest
    As someone on another thread pointed out, follow the money. Until we get off our butts and pass draconian election campaign funding reforms, we can expect this insanity to continue. Meanwhile, automakers continue to incorporate more electronic distractions into future automobile designs, funded with our bail-out tax dollars.

  7. #7
    Senior Member frymaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    where the mild things roam
    Posts
    1,092
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by High Roller View Post
    ...pass draconian election campaign funding reforms
    really? campaign finance reform? i think this safety issue can much better be accomplished by a far more simple and immediate way:

    caltrops.
    "Let's try and keep the constructive answers in the commuting forum." --SheistyMike

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •