Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Advocacy & Safety
Reload this Page >

Idiot on four wheels and, no brains

Search
Notices
Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

Idiot on four wheels and, no brains

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-06-09, 01:35 PM
  #51  
Philologist
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 438

Bikes: Univega Gran Turismo

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by qmsdc15
Drivers do not get bent out of shape over a double parked car which is illegal and stationary, but a bicycle legally riding at 20mph is a huge problem. That is my point.
Really? I find double-parked cars very annoying. Fortunately, they're also very rare; I think it's been several years since I last saw one. (That's not counting delivery trucks that park squarely across the center line while making deliveries, forcing traffic coming from both directions to hug the curb to get around them. Those, unfortunately, are rather common.)

If drivers don't seem to get upset over double-parked cars, I suspect it's because parked cars don't usually have anyone in them for the other drivers to yell at. Also, it's easier to get around a stationary object than a moving object.
Widsith is offline  
Old 08-06-09, 01:38 PM
  #52  
L T X B O M P F A N S R
 
apricissimus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Malden, MA
Posts: 2,334

Bikes: Bianchi Volpe, Bianchi San Jose, Redline 925

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1641 Post(s)
Liked 5 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Widsith
Really? I find double-parked cars very annoying. Fortunately, they're also very rare; I think it's been several years since I last saw one.
Heh, I probably come across 20 or more double parked cars every evening on my commute home. I guess a lot depends on where you are.
apricissimus is offline  
Old 08-06-09, 01:43 PM
  #53  
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Maryland
Posts: 5,155

Bikes: rockhopper, delta V, cannondale H300, Marin Mill Valley

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
I don't mind sharing the lane with illegally parked cars, but even then, drivers will not give me room to get around the parked cars which would mean approximately 0.0000sec lost in their drive time. What's up with that?
qmsdc15 is offline  
Old 08-06-09, 01:45 PM
  #54  
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Maryland
Posts: 5,155

Bikes: rockhopper, delta V, cannondale H300, Marin Mill Valley

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Widsith
Really? I find double-parked cars very annoying...
Your a driver, not a rider. This website is for riders.
qmsdc15 is offline  
Old 08-06-09, 02:00 PM
  #55  
Philologist
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 438

Bikes: Univega Gran Turismo

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Chris516
Ok, I will cross you off my 'list' of, the cyclists that really give a hoot and, put you on my 'list' of cyclists that I shake my head at, just like the cyclists that don't wear helmets.
You can mark me down as one of those who don't wear helmets, either. I started riding in the late '50s/early '60s, never even knew bike helmets existed until sometime in the '80s or '90s, and never got a head injury while riding, nor knew anyone else who did. We did plenty of dumb and dangerous stunts as kids, too, like trying to ride up a near-vertical hillside that tended to send bikes tumbling over backwards if you didn't have enough speed to make it all the way to the top. (We all had to keep trying until we'd made it all the way up at least once.) We also had "contests" where we rode our bikes as fast as possible down the sidewalk, swerved into someone's front yard and leaped off sideways at full speed. The object was to see whose bike would travel the farthest without a rider. (Things like that would destroy most bikes made today in short order, but those old heavy cruisers from the '50s and '60s were built like tanks. Usually all that had to be done was to hold the front wheel between your legs and twist the handlebars back around till they were pointing the right way.) There were plenty of bruises and scrapes and the occasional broken bone, but never any serious injuries, and we wore no protective equipment of any kind (often not even shirts or shoes).

Anyway, riders did just fine without helmets for generations (including all through my childhood, adolescence and early adulthood), and I don't see the need for one now.
Widsith is offline  
Old 08-06-09, 02:02 PM
  #56  
Philologist
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 438

Bikes: Univega Gran Turismo

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by qmsdc15
Your a driver, not a rider. This website is for riders.
I drive a car, so I'm a driver. I also ride a bike, so I'm a rider. There's no contradiction. And this website is for anyone who wants to use it.
Widsith is offline  
Old 08-06-09, 02:11 PM
  #57  
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Maryland
Posts: 5,155

Bikes: rockhopper, delta V, cannondale H300, Marin Mill Valley

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
You drive without a helmet? Don't you know most fatal car crashes involve head injuries? Your childhood memories of riding bikes touched me.
qmsdc15 is offline  
Old 08-06-09, 02:33 PM
  #58  
Philologist
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 438

Bikes: Univega Gran Turismo

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by qmsdc15
You drive without a helmet? Don't you know most fatal car crashes involve head injuries? Your childhood memories of riding bikes touched me.
It's nice that I was able to brighten your day. And no, I don't ride or drive with a helmet. (Though I used to wear a helmet while riding a fire truck, because it's easier to wear it than to carry it while hanging onto the back of the truck.)
Widsith is offline  
Old 08-06-09, 03:14 PM
  #59  
the dream shall never die
 
galyons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Lincoln, Sacramento North Valley, California
Posts: 154

Bikes: Cannondale RT3000 Tandem Cannondale R900 CAAD 8 Campy

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Liked 17 Times in 8 Posts
Originally Posted by apricissimus
What do you do when the only sensible place to ride is in the middle of the lane? (Yes, it happens sometimes.) Do you pull over simply because the car behind you is faster? What if it's difficult or dangerous to do so?
Please reread the post. "if you are slower move safely to the right and let faster traffic pass." Moving safely would preclude putting oneself in danger.

Geary
galyons is offline  
Old 08-06-09, 04:37 PM
  #60  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 635

Bikes: Soma cyclocross with Bionx PL500HS

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I don't know how long he was behind you, but when I take the lane, I try to make sure I won't be blocking anyone for more than 5-10s (varies depending on how much slower I'm going). At the same time, I don't rush it if it seems like I won't hold them up for more than 5s because it gives them more experience sharing the road with bicyclists. If you try to assert your right on the road for too long, not only will you irritate the driver and risk inviting a confrontation, you will have just ruined your peaceful bike ride for the day.
adamtki is offline  
Old 08-06-09, 04:49 PM
  #61  
Que CERA, CERA
 
jefferee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Kitchener, ON
Posts: 873
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by qmsdc15
Sharing the road does not mean sharing the lane. You are endangering yourself and encouraging illegal driving.
If it's wide enough to safely share, why not do so?
jefferee is offline  
Old 08-06-09, 05:21 PM
  #62  
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Maryland
Posts: 5,155

Bikes: rockhopper, delta V, cannondale H300, Marin Mill Valley

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
None of the lanes in DC are wide enough to safely share. If you feel safe sharing the lane with a car, go for it. I've broken my collarbone on a car door opened in my path. I feel safer in the middle of the lane, that's where you will find me. Accommodating cars is not something that enters my mind.
qmsdc15 is offline  
Old 08-06-09, 05:34 PM
  #63  
Que CERA, CERA
 
jefferee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Kitchener, ON
Posts: 873
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Fair enough. Most of the busy roads around here have shareable curb lanes, bike lanes, or a half-decent alternate route.
jefferee is offline  
Old 08-06-09, 05:51 PM
  #64  
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Maryland
Posts: 5,155

Bikes: rockhopper, delta V, cannondale H300, Marin Mill Valley

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Actually, I do try to go as fast as I can in situations where I can't keep up with traffic. I'm not intentionally obstructing. I do try to accommodate traffic to that extent.
qmsdc15 is offline  
Old 08-06-09, 05:57 PM
  #65  
L T X B O M P F A N S R
 
apricissimus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Malden, MA
Posts: 2,334

Bikes: Bianchi Volpe, Bianchi San Jose, Redline 925

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1641 Post(s)
Liked 5 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by galyons
Please reread the post. "if you are slower move safely to the right and let faster traffic pass." Moving safely would preclude putting oneself in danger.

Geary
Which is sometimes not possible.
apricissimus is offline  
Old 08-06-09, 07:27 PM
  #66  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,788
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Context, people.

On a 2-lane blacktop w/ no shoulder, there is NO safe place to move -- except OFF the road, which is ridiculous; we,as cyclists, have the same right to the road as cars in all 50. If it was a WIDE lane, I would have no problem sharing the lane.

The average citizen has NOTHING going on so important that they require us to leave the roadway for them. They need to re-learn the meaning of 'share'.
DX-MAN is offline  
Old 08-06-09, 07:36 PM
  #67  
the dream shall never die
 
galyons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Lincoln, Sacramento North Valley, California
Posts: 154

Bikes: Cannondale RT3000 Tandem Cannondale R900 CAAD 8 Campy

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Liked 17 Times in 8 Posts
Originally Posted by galyons
Please reread the post. "if you are slower move safely to the right and let faster traffic pass." Moving safely would preclude putting oneself in danger.

Geary
Originally Posted by apricissimus
Which is sometimes not possible.
How so? I can't imagine an infinite impediment that would disallow eventually moving to the right to allow faster traffic to pass.

Geary
galyons is offline  
Old 08-06-09, 07:49 PM
  #68  
the dream shall never die
 
galyons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Lincoln, Sacramento North Valley, California
Posts: 154

Bikes: Cannondale RT3000 Tandem Cannondale R900 CAAD 8 Campy

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Liked 17 Times in 8 Posts
Originally Posted by DX-MAN
Context, people.

On a 2-lane blacktop w/ no shoulder, there is NO safe place to move -- except OFF the road, which is ridiculous; we,as cyclists, have the same right to the road as cars in all 50. If it was a WIDE lane, I would have no problem sharing the lane.

The average citizen has NOTHING going on so important that they require us to leave the roadway for them. They need to re-learn the meaning of 'share'.
Really? I am amazed at the inability of some to not see this argument as an absolute. "On a 2-lane blacktop w/ no shoulder, there is NO safe place to move -- except", um, let me think...how 'bout to the right?

Attitudes, such as "They need to re-learn the meaning of 'share' " do not make the roads safer for cyclists. Seems to me some cyclists, and I pray the vast minority, need to learn the actual meaning of sharing and get the seat post out of their.....

YMMV,
Geary
galyons is offline  
Old 08-06-09, 08:00 PM
  #69  
L T X B O M P F A N S R
 
apricissimus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Malden, MA
Posts: 2,334

Bikes: Bianchi Volpe, Bianchi San Jose, Redline 925

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1641 Post(s)
Liked 5 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by galyons
Originally Posted by galyons
Please reread the post. "if you are slower move safely to the right and let faster traffic pass." Moving safely would preclude putting oneself in danger.

Geary

How so? I can't imagine an infinite impediment that would disallow eventually moving to the right to allow faster traffic to pass.

Geary
Here's an example on my daily route to work in the morning.

I have to merge left to get onto an underpass that goes under a busy street. The whole thing is about 500 feet long or so, the lanes are narrow, and there's a big concrete wall on the right (no shoulder). Naturally moving to the right to let traffic pass is not an option. There are two lanes, so the motorist behind me can pass on the left if they want. But if that lane is full of other cars, well tough cookies.

In addition, I have to take the lane early before I even get there or else it's difficult to even get onto it since aggressive drivers are loathe to let me in when I try to merge. I've actually been hit by a car at that location (no injuries though) and ever since then I've been made it a point to be more assertive there, with good success.

Last edited by apricissimus; 08-06-09 at 08:04 PM.
apricissimus is offline  
Old 08-06-09, 08:17 PM
  #70  
the dream shall never die
 
galyons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Lincoln, Sacramento North Valley, California
Posts: 154

Bikes: Cannondale RT3000 Tandem Cannondale R900 CAAD 8 Campy

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Liked 17 Times in 8 Posts
Originally Posted by apricissimus
Here's an example on my daily route to work in the morning.

I have to merge left to get onto an underpass that goes under a busy street. The whole thing is about 500 feet long or so, the lanes are narrow, and there's a big concrete wall on the right (no shoulder). Naturally moving to the right to let traffic pass is not an option. There are two lanes, so the motorist behind me can pass on the left if they want. But if that lane is full of other cars, well tough cookies.

In addition, I have to take the lane early before I even get there or else it's difficult to even get onto it since aggressive drivers are loathe to let me in when I try to merge. I've actually been hit by a car at that location (no injuries though) and ever since then I've been made it a point to be more assertive there, with good success.
Exactly! "The whole thing is about 500 feet long or so". I face similar situations regularly riding in my area.
My strategy is the same as you detail. If you need to go left to follow your route, then you need to do so, and generally, earlier is better.

I have no issue with this. That is vehicular flow.

I do take exception to immature, self-centered cycling behaviors that only serve to make the roads more dangerous for all.

Sorry to hear that you were hit!

Geary
galyons is offline  
Old 08-07-09, 02:16 AM
  #71  
24-Speed Machine
Thread Starter
 
Chris516's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wash. Grove, MD
Posts: 6,058

Bikes: 2003 Specialized Allez 24-Speed Road Bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Kevrob
When a jerk drives a company vehicle in an unsafe manner I have been known to email the company to complain about it. Unless the proprietor was operating the vehicle, a chewing out from his supervisor about liability is more effective than any face-to-face rant I could come up with, even if I could catch the miscreant.
Generally, I would have done that and, have done that it the past. It was his concern for my life, that he exhibited when I talked to him briefly, that made me think otherwise.

Originally Posted by Kevrob
I was descending a two-lane road this morning that I frequently take to avoid the greater and faster traffic on the state highway. I was passed on the curved downhill by some sort of heavy equipment vehicle. I was in the process of taking the lane, as the road's edge — no shoulders — was obstructed by a fallen tree branch. Joe Bigtruck had to cross the double-yellow to get past me, and there was a small sedan approaching in the other direction. You'd think that taking his foot off the gas, braking, and letting the compact get around him before he passed me might make some sense, especially to a professional driver. No, he had to beat me to the 4-way stop on the other side of the next hill.

Unfortunately, I wasn't able to catch the company name. It was "Allied" something or other, but not the moving van folks.

No way I wasn't seen, either. I was wearing an orange and yellow reflective vest, and had a blinking taillight on my seatpost rack.

Kevin
Considering that it was a descent and, not an ascent, I would side with the truck driver.
Chris516 is offline  
Old 08-07-09, 05:35 AM
  #72  
24-Speed Machine
Thread Starter
 
Chris516's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wash. Grove, MD
Posts: 6,058

Bikes: 2003 Specialized Allez 24-Speed Road Bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Widsith
You can mark me down as one of those who don't wear helmets, either. I started riding in the late '50s/early '60s, never even knew bike helmets existed until sometime in the '80s or '90s, and never got a head injury while riding, nor knew anyone else who did. We did plenty of dumb and dangerous stunts as kids, too, like trying to ride up a near-vertical hillside that tended to send bikes tumbling over backwards if you didn't have enough speed to make it all the way to the top. (We all had to keep trying until we'd made it all the way up at least once.) We also had "contests" where we rode our bikes as fast as possible down the sidewalk, swerved into someone's front yard and leaped off sideways at full speed. The object was to see whose bike would travel the farthest without a rider. (Things like that would destroy most bikes made today in short order, but those old heavy cruisers from the '50s and '60s were built like tanks. Usually all that had to be done was to hold the front wheel between your legs and twist the handlebars back around till they were pointing the right way.) There were plenty of bruises and scrapes and the occasional broken bone, but never any serious injuries, and we wore no protective equipment of any kind (often not even shirts or shoes).

Anyway, riders did just fine without helmets for generations (including all through my childhood, adolescence and early adulthood), and I don't see the need for one now.
You are definitely 'cruisin for a bruisin'.

You will also end up in the A&S Memorial list.

Last edited by Chris516; 08-07-09 at 05:51 AM. Reason: Needed to add stuff.
Chris516 is offline  
Old 08-07-09, 07:20 AM
  #73  
Senior Member
 
gcottay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Green Valley AZ
Posts: 3,770

Bikes: Trice Q; Volae Century; TT 3.4

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Leading edge, no. Just the same boring old lunatic fringe.
gcottay is offline  
Old 08-07-09, 01:02 PM
  #74  
Senior Member
 
Digital_Cowboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Tampa/St. Pete, Florida
Posts: 9,352

Bikes: Specialized Hardrock Mountain (Stolen); Giant Seek 2 (Stolen); Diamondback Ascent mid 1980 - 1997

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 62 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by galyons
Please reread the post. "if you are slower move safely to the right and let faster traffic pass." Moving safely would preclude putting oneself in danger.

Geary
It is not always safe to move to the right of the road, what should be done then? On a mountain road with a shear drop it would not be safe to move over to the right. The same for a road with just a shoulder and a significant drop from the road to the shoulder.
Digital_Cowboy is offline  
Old 08-07-09, 01:04 PM
  #75  
Senior Member
 
Digital_Cowboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Tampa/St. Pete, Florida
Posts: 9,352

Bikes: Specialized Hardrock Mountain (Stolen); Giant Seek 2 (Stolen); Diamondback Ascent mid 1980 - 1997

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 62 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by DX-MAN
Context, people.

On a 2-lane blacktop w/ no shoulder, there is NO safe place to move -- except OFF the road, which is ridiculous; we,as cyclists, have the same right to the road as cars in all 50. If it was a WIDE lane, I would have no problem sharing the lane.

The average citizen has NOTHING going on so important that they require us to leave the roadway for them. They need to re-learn the meaning of 'share'.
Exactly, there are plenty of roads out there without a shoulder and the only option would be for the cyclist to totally move off of the road. Granted we all have encounter more then our fair share of drivers who would like nothing better then IF we weren't on "their" roads but we know that we are legally entitled to be there just as they are so why should we have to leave the road so as not to "slow" them down for x seconds?
Digital_Cowboy is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.