Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-06-09, 11:51 AM   #1
randya
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
randya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: in bed with your mom
Bikes: who cares?
Posts: 13,689
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Portland Bike Master Plan Public Review Draft Now Available On-Line

http://www.portlandonline.com/transp...44597&a=265909
randya is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-09, 12:18 PM   #2
irwin7638
Senior Member
 
irwin7638's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Kalamazoo, Mi.
Bikes: Byron,Sam, The Hunq and that Old Guy
Posts: 2,892
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
Thanks for bringing this up! It will help tremendously with a project here in West Michigan.

Marc
irwin7638 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-09, 03:27 PM   #3
randya
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
randya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: in bed with your mom
Bikes: who cares?
Posts: 13,689
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
You should know that I have reservations about the plan, particularly the reliance on separated bike lanes ('cycle tracks') in an urban grid, because of the high number of intersections and thus motorist turning maneuvers cyclists using such facilities will be exposed to. I'm a much bigger proponent of the use of sharrows, which Portland for some inexplicable reason has decided to reject as a widespread solution. So before you advocate for the Portland-style approach, I suggest you read 'What Happened in Europe', pages 133-138 of Robert Hurst's 'The Cyclist's Manifesto'.
randya is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-09, 06:07 PM   #4
irwin7638
Senior Member
 
irwin7638's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Kalamazoo, Mi.
Bikes: Byron,Sam, The Hunq and that Old Guy
Posts: 2,892
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
OH, Portland's issues are their issues. I wasn't looking at any recommendations or conclusions, what I liked was the "best practices" survey which provides such a concise description of solutions put in practice.
irwin7638 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-09, 10:53 PM   #5
Bekologist
totally louche
 
Bekologist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: A land that time forgot
Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes
Posts: 18,025
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
that's a very comprehensive document, and there was nothing anti-bicyclist in it.

screw the criticism, portland and its cycle tracks either will work or they won't. portland has so much positive going for biking, there's nothing a little UN-vehicularity can do to quell the tide of lawful roadway bicycling in greater Portland.

in 2030, criticism of portlands' far reaching goals in 2010 will seem so trivial.
Bekologist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-09, 10:07 AM   #6
randya
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
randya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: in bed with your mom
Bikes: who cares?
Posts: 13,689
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
among other things, Portland will never be able to fund full implementation of this plan; and they will rarely, if ever, remove proven 'failed facilities'

Portland cyclists are already doing fine without most of this stuff, since the number of cyclists in Portland has begun to approach 'critical mass' in the last three years with very few additions to the bikeway network

IMO, The best thing the city could do is to keep installing more bike parking corrals throughout the city, something that they are continuing to do


Last edited by randya; 10-11-09 at 10:15 AM.
randya is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-09, 10:23 AM   #7
Bekologist
totally louche
 
Bekologist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: A land that time forgot
Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes
Posts: 18,025
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
i thought the city also needs to improve road conditions favorable to biking to the southwest neighborhoods, out of Alberta Arts neighborhood, and into the suburbs; also east to troutdale and gresham as well as improving road conditions overall to favor bicycling by the enhusiastic but concerned segment of portlands residents.

maybe its just me but theres still a lot of auto sprawl around portland that needs remediation somewhat although it is less the city propers' jurisdiction, riding out towards Beaverton or Gresham there's a lot of pavement and traffic conditions that're not always super bike friendly.

Last edited by Bekologist; 10-11-09 at 10:29 AM.
Bekologist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-09, 10:35 AM   #8
randya
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
randya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: in bed with your mom
Bikes: who cares?
Posts: 13,689
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
sharrows are the simple, inexpensive solution; but, for some inexplicable reason, Rob Burchfield, PDOT's chief engineer, has rejected them
randya is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-09, 11:12 AM   #9
Bekologist
totally louche
 
Bekologist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: A land that time forgot
Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes
Posts: 18,025
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
there's numerous benefits to bonifide preferred class lanes over shared lane space but not at all times. portland surely hasn't rejected shared roadways.


Bike boulevards and many cross town routes on low traffic streets are still bike/car shared lane space if road widths are too narrow for bikelane plus travel lane.
Bekologist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-09, 11:47 AM   #10
randya
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
randya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: in bed with your mom
Bikes: who cares?
Posts: 13,689
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bekologist View Post
portland surely hasn't rejected shared roadways.
unfortunately, it appears that they have, at least on any street classified higher than a neighborhood street. Bike boulevards on neighborhood streets are about as far as PDOT appears willing to go as far as shared roadways.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bekologist View Post
Bike boulevards and many cross town routes on low traffic streets are still bike/car shared lane space if road widths are too narrow for bikelane plus travel lane.
If you know the streets in Portland and look at the plan map, you will see that many narrow inner city low-level collector and arterial streets that would be perfect for sharrows are not classified as such. My brief and very incomplete list, from the parts of town I'm most familiar with:

SE Stark
E 28th
SE 11th
SE 12th
SE Hawthorne
SE Division
NW Everett
NW Glisan
SW Park Blocks
NW Park Blocks

The fact of the matter is, all of these streets should have had sharrows applied two or three years ago, and yet, barely a single sharrow is in place anywhere in the city (a short 'test section' with questionable sharrow placement too far to the right on SW 19th has been there for the last four of five years, with no follow-up).
randya is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:19 AM.